Impact of gender and professional education on attitudes towards financial incentives for organ donation: results of a survey among 755 students of medicine and economics in Germany

BMC Medical Ethics

Silke Schicktanz¹  Fabian Schmidt¹  Sabine Wöhlke¹  Julia Inthorn¹ 

[1] Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073 Göttingen, Germany

关键词: Gender;    Students;    Survey;    Financial incentives;    Organ donation;   

Others  :  863115
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6939-15-56

 received in 2014-02-11, accepted in 2014-06-30,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

There is an ongoing expert debate with regard to financial incentives in order to increase organ supply. However, there is a lacuna of empirical studies on whether citizens would actually support financial incentives for organ donation.

Methods

Between October 2008 and February 2009 a quantitative survey was conducted among German students of medicine and economics to gain insights into their point of view regarding living and deceased organ donation and different forms of commercialization (n = 755).

Results

The average (passive) willingness to donate is 63.5% among medical students and 50.0% among students of economics (p = 0.001), while only 24.1% of the respondents were actually holding an organ donor card. 11.3% of students of economics had signed a donor card, however, the number is significantly higher among students of medicine (31.9%, p < 0.001). Women held donor cards significantly more often (28.6%) than men (19.4%, p = 0.004). The majority of students were against direct payments as incentives for deceased and living donations. Nevertheless, 37.5% of the respondents support the idea that the funeral expenses of deceased organ donors should be covered. Women voted significantly less often for the coverage of expenses than men (women 31.6%, men 44.0%, p = 0.003). The number of those in favor of allowing to sell one’s organs for money (living organ donation) was highest among students of economics (p = 0.034).

Conclusion

Despite a generally positive view on organ donation the respondents refuse to consent to commercialization, but are in favor of removing disincentives or are in favor of indirect models of reward.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Inthorn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA): Aufklärung zur Organ - und Gewebespende in Deutschland: Neue Wege in der Gesundheitskommunikation [Throwing light on organ- and tissue donation in Germany: New directions in health communication]. Köln: BZgA; 2012. [http://www.bzga.de/pdf.php?id=da9ed258791c342e40c77a64bdc13c11 webcite] [accessed 3.7.2014]
• [2]Berndt C: Organspende-Skandal. Alles über die Fehltritte in der Transplantationsmedizin. [Organ donation scandal. All about missteps in transplantation medicine]. In Süddeutsche Zeitung. München; 2014. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/thema/Organspende-Skandal webcite] [accessed 1.5.2014]3
• [3]Bundesärztekammer: Kurz-Statement der Vorsitzenden der Prüfungskommission, Anne-Gret Rinder (Vors.Richterin am Kammergericht i.R) [Brief statement by Anne-Gret Rinder, chairwoman of the examination board]. 2013. [http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/page.asp?his=0.6.3285.11639.11640.11647 webcite] [accessed 1.5.2014]
• [4]Leider S, Roth AE: Kidneys for sale: who disapproves, and why? Am J Transplant 2010, 10(5):1221-1227.
• [5]Douglas S: The argument for property rights in body parts: scarcity of resources. J Med Ethics 2014, 40(1):23-27.
• [6]Greasley K: A legal market in organ: the problem of exploitation. J Med Ethics 2014, 40(1):51-57.
• [7]World Health Organisation: WHO guiding principles on human cell, tissue and organ transplantation. Sixty-Third World Health Assembly. Cell Tissue Bank 2010, 11:413-419.
• [8]Nuffield Council of Bioethics: Human bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research. A guide to the Report, 2011. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/Donation_full_report.pdf webcite
• [9]Kranenburg L, Weimar W: Incentives for living kidney donation: what does the public think? Transplantation 2008, 86(4):500-501.
• [10]Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G, Cross NB, Batabyal P, Craig JC: The experiences of commercial kidney donors: thematic synthesis of qualitative research. Transpl Int 2012, 25:1138-1149.
• [11]Saunders B: Altruism or solidarity? The motives for organ donation and two proposals. Bioethics 2012, 26(7):376-381.
• [12]Voo TC, Holm S: Organs as inheritable property? J Med Ethics 2014, 40(1):57-62.
• [13]Taylor JS: Organs: tradable, but not necessarily inheritable. J Med Ethics 2014, 40(1):62-63.
• [14]Breyer F, Van den Daele W, Engelhard M, Gubernatis G, Kliemt H, Kopetzki C, Schlitt HJ, Taupitz J: Organmangel: Ist der Tod auf der Warteliste unvermeidbar?. Berlin: Springer; 2006.
• [15]Ahlert M, Gubernatis G, Klein R: Common Sense in Organ Allocation. Analyse & Kritik: Zeitschrift für Sozialtheorie 2001, 23:221-244.
• [16]Young RA: Transition to Adulthood: Action, Projects, and Counseling. New York: Springer; 2011.
• [17]Schicktanz S, Rieger JW, Lüttenberg B: Geschlechterunterschiede bei der Lebendnierentransplantation: Ein Vergleich bei globalen, mitteleuropäischen und deutschen Daten und deren ethische Relevanz [Gender differences in living donor kidney transplantation: a comparison with global, Central European and German data and their ethical relevance.]. Transplantationsmedizin 2006, 18:83-90.
• [18]Schweda M, Schicktanz S, Wöhlke S: Understanding public skepticism toward organ donation and its commercialization: The important role of reciprocity. Transplant Proc 2009, 41(6):2509-2511.
• [19]Figueroa CA, Mesfum ET, Acton NT, Kunst AE: Medical students’ knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation: Results of a Dutch survey. Transplant Proc 2013, 45(6):2093-2097.
• [20]Stadlbauer V, Steiner P, Schweiger M, Sereinigg M, Tscheliessnigg K-H, Freidl W, Stiegler P: Knowledge and attitude of ICU nurses, students and patients towards the Austrian organ donation law. BMC Med Ethics 2013., 14(32) [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/14/32 webcite] [accessed 3.7.2014]
• [21]Boulware LE, Troll MU, Wang NY, Powe NR: Public attitudes toward incentives for organ donation: A national study of different racial/ethnic and income groups. Am J Transplant 2006, 6(11):2774-2785.
• [22]Bryce CL, Siminoff LA, Ubel PA, Nathan H, Caplan A, Arnold RM: Do incentives matter? Providing benefits to families of organ donors. Am J Transplant 2005, 5(12):2999-3008.
• [23]Neuberger J, Farber L, Corrado M, O’Dell C: Living liver donation: A survey of the attitudes of the public in Great Britain. Transplantation 2003, 76(8):1260-1264.
• [24]Schweda M, Schicktanz S: The “spare parts person”? Conceptions of the human body and their implications for public attitudes towards organ donation and organ sale. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2009, 4(4):1-10.
• [25]Rey JW, Grass V, Galle PR, Werbner C, Hoffman A, Kiesslich R, Hemmer GP: Education in organ donation among students in Germany - results of an intervention study. Ann Transplant 2013, 18:23-30.
• [26]Radunz S, Juntermanns B, Heuer M, Frühauf NR, Paul A, Kaiser GM: The effect of education on the attitude of medical students towards organ donation. Ann Transplant 2012, 17(1):140-144.
• [27]Banas B, Bleyer B, Eckert M, Gruber H, Pfirstinger J, Schaller O, Dietl B: Level of information of students at the University of Regensburg concerning organ donation and transplantation-Informed or not informed consent in organ donation? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2013, 138(15):775-780.
• [28]Ahlert M: Public and private choices in organ donation. Homo Oeconomicus 2007, 24(2):269-293.
• [29]Decker O, Lehmann A, Fangmann J, Brosig B, Winter M: Phases of organ integration and conflict in a transplant recipient: a longitudinal study using a diary. Am J Psychoanal 2008, 68(3):237-256.
• [30]Decker O, Winter M, Brähler E, Beutel M: Between commodification and altruism: gender imbalance and attitudes towards organ donation. A representative survey of the German community. J Gend Stud 2008, 17(3):251-255.
• [31]Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation: Organ Donation and Transplantation in Germany. Frankfurt am Main; 2012. [http://www.dso.de/uploads/tx_dsodl/DSO_JB_D_2012_e.pdf webcite] [accessed 3.7.2014]
• [32]Kranenburg LW, Schram A, Zuidema W, Weimar W, Hilhorst M, Hessing E, Passchier J, Busschbach JJV: Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008, 23(3):1039-1042.
• [33]Mazaris EM, Crane JS, Warrens AN, Smith G, Tekkis P, Papalois VE: Attitudes toward live donor kidney transplantation and its commercialization. Clin Transpl 2011, 25(3):E312-E319.
• [34]Eurotransplant. Annual Report. 2012. https://www.eurotransplant.org/cms/mediaobject.php?file=AR2012.pdf webcite
• [35]van Buren MC, Massey EK, Maasdam L, Zuidema WC, Hilhorst MT, Ijzermans JN, Weimar W: For love or money? Attitudes toward financial incentives among actual living kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2010, 10(11):2488-2492.
• [36]Haddow G: “Because you’re worth it?” The taking and selling of transplantable organs. J Med Ethics 2006, 32(6):324-328.
• [37]Achille M, Vaillancourt I, Beaulieu-Pelletier G: Living Kidney Donors: Are Women Motivated by Love and Men by Logic? In Organ Transplantation: Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects Towards a Common European Policy. Edited by Weimar W, Bos MA, Bussbach JJ. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers; 2008:321-326.
• [38]Biller-Andorno N: Gender imbalance in living organ donation. Med Health Care Philos 2002, 5(2):199-204.
• [39]Sándor J, Besirevic V, Demény E, Florena GT, Codreanu N, Ambagtsheer F, Weimar W (Eds): In EULOD - Living Organ Donation in Europe: Improving the Effectivness of the Organ Trade Prohibition in Europe. 2012.
• [40]Decker O, Beutel M, Winter M, Brähler E: Sex Sells? Geschlechtsunterschiede und Anreizmodelle - Die Einstellung der Deutschen zur Organspende [Sex Sells? Sex differences and incentive models - German attitudes toward organ donation]. Transplantationsmedizin 2008, 20:53-58.
• [41]Lavee J, Ashkenazi T, Steinberg D: A new law for allocation of donor organs in Israel. Lancet 2010, 375(9720):1131-1133.
• [42]Hoeyer K, Schicktanz S, Deleuran I: Public attitudes to financial incentive models for organs: a literature review suggests that it is time to shift the focus from ‘financial incentives’ to ‘reciprocity’. Transpl Int 2013, 26(4):350-357.