Functional constraints on tooth morphology in carnivorous mammals

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Alistair R Evans¹  Peter D Smits¹ 

[1] Department of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, AUS

关键词: Integration;    Ecomorphology;    Dasyuromorphia;    Carnivora;    Three-dimensional reconstruction;   

Others  :  1140573
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2148-12-146

 received in 2012-04-24, accepted in 2012-07-27,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

The range of potential morphologies resulting from evolution is limited by complex interacting processes, ranging from development to function. Quantifying these interactions is important for understanding adaptation and convergent evolution. Using three-dimensional reconstructions of carnivoran and dasyuromorph tooth rows, we compared statistical models of the relationship between tooth row shape and the opposing tooth row, a static feature, as well as measures of mandibular motion during chewing (occlusion), which are kinetic features. This is a new approach to quantifying functional integration because we use measures of movement and displacement, such as the amount the mandible translates laterally during occlusion, as opposed to conventional morphological measures, such as mandible length and geometric landmarks. By sampling two distantly related groups of ecologically similar mammals, we study carnivorous mammals in general rather than a specific group of mammals.

Results

Statistical model comparisons demonstrate that the best performing models always include some measure of mandibular motion, indicating that functional and statistical models of tooth shape as purely a function of the opposing tooth row are too simple and that increased model complexity provides a better understanding of tooth form. The predictors of the best performing models always included the opposing tooth row shape and a relative linear measure of mandibular motion.

Conclusions

Our results provide quantitative support of long-standing hypotheses of tooth row shape as being influenced by mandibular motion in addition to the opposing tooth row. Additionally, this study illustrates the utility and necessity of including kinetic features in analyses of morphological integration.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Smits and Evans.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1 .

Figure 2 .

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Arnold SJ: Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 1992, 85:85-107.
• [2]Wainwright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD, Gosline JM: Mechanical design in organisms. Princeton University Press, Princeton; 1976.
• [3]Wainwright SA: Form and function in organisms. American Zoologist 1988, 28:671-680.
• [4]Wainwright P: Ecomorphology: experimental functional anatomy for ecological problems. American Zoologist 1991, 31:680.
• [5]Schmitz L, Wainwright PC: Nocturnality constrains morphological and functional diversity in the eyes of reef fishes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:338.
• [6]Voigt CC, Schneeberger K, Voigt-Heucke SL, Lewanzik D: Rain increases the energy cost of bat flight. Biology Letters 2011, 7:793-795.
• [7]Hassan MA, Westermann GEG, Hewitt RA, Dokainish MA: Finite-element analysis of simulated ammonoid septa (extinct Cephalopoda): septal and sutural complexities do not reduce strength. Paleobiology 2002, 28:113-126.
• [8]Vermeij G: Characters in context: molluscan shells and the forces that mold them. Paleobiology 2002, 28:41-54.
• [9]Herrel A, De Smet A, Aguirre L: Morphological and mechanical determinants of bite force in bats: do muscles matter? Journal of Experimental Biology 2008, 211:86-91.
• [10]Wroe S, Huber D, Lowry M, McHenry C, Moreno K, Clausen P, Ferrara TL, Cunningham E, Dean MN, Summers AO: Three-dimensional computer analysis of white shark jaw mechanics: how hard can a great white bite? Journal of Zoology 2008, 276:336-342.
• [11]Dumont E, Herrel A, Medellín R, Vargas J: Built to bite: cranial design and function in the wrinkle-faced bat. Journal of Zoology 2009, 279:329-337.
• [12]Olson EC, Miller RL: Morphological Integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 1958.
• [13]Pigliucci M, Preston K: Phenotypic Integration. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2004.
• [14]Chernoff B, Magwene PM: Afterword. In Morphological Integration. Edited by Olson EC, Miller RL. University of Chicago Press, Chicago; 1999:319-348.
• [15]Goswami A, Polly PD: Methods for studying morphological integration and modulatiry. In Quantative Methods in Paleobiology. The Paleontological Society Papers, Volume 16. Edited by Alroy J, Hunt G.  ,  ; 2010:213-243.
• [16]Klingenberg CP: Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics 2008, 39:115-132.
• [17]Savriama Y, Klingenberg CP: Beyond bilateral symmetry: geometric morphometric methods for any type of symmetry. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:280.
• [18]Goswami A: Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution. Am Nat 2006, 168:270.
• [19]Zelditch ML, Wood AR, Swiderski DL: Building developmental integration into functional systems: function-induced integration of mandibular shape. Evolutionary Biology 2008, 36:71-87.
• [20]Gerber S, Hopkins MJ: Mosaic heterochrony and evolutionary modularity: the trilobite genus Zacanthopsis as a case study. Evolution 2011, 65:3241-3252.
• [21]Webster M, Zelditch ML: Evolutionary lability of integration in cambrian ptychoparioid trilobites. Evolutionary Biology 2011, 38:144-162.
• [22]Webster M, Zelditch ML: Modularity of a Cambrian ptychoparioid trilobite cranidium. Evolution and Development 2011, 13:96-109.
• [23]Spears IR, Crompton RH: The mechanical significance of the occlusal geometry of great ape molars in food breakdown. Journal of Human Evolution 1996, 31:517-535.
• [24]Evans A, Wilson G, Fortelius M, Jernvall J: High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents. Nature 2007, 445:78-81.
• [25]Ryder JA: On the mechanical genesis of tooth-forms. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 1878, 30:45-80.
• [26]Simpson GG: Paleobiology of Jurassic mammals. Paleobiologica 1933, 5:127-158.
• [27]Boyer D, Evans A, Jernvall J: Evidence of dietary differentiation among late Paleocene–early Eocene plesiadapids (Mammalia, primates). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2010, 142:194-210.
• [28]Skinner M, Evans A, Smith T, Jernvall J, Tafforeau P, Kupczik K, Olejniczak A, Rosas A, Radovčić J, Thackeray J: Brief communication: Contributions of enamel‒dentine junction shape and enamel deposition to primate molar crown complexity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2010, 142:157-163.
• [29]Santana SE, Strait S, Dumont ER: The better to eat you with: functional correlates of tooth structure in bats. Functional Ecology 2011, 25:839-847.
• [30]Wilson GP, Evans AR, Corfe IJ, Smits PD, Fortelius M, Jernvall J: Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs. Nature 2012, 483:457-460.
• [31]Evans A, Fortelius M: Three-dimensional reconstruction of tooth relationships during carnivoran chewing. Palaeontologia Electronica 2008, 11:10A-11p.
• [32]Herring S: Functional morphology of mammalian mastication. American Zoologist 1993, 33:289-299.
• [33]Pinheiro JC, Bates D: Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York; 2000.
• [34]Venables WN, Ripley BD: Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th edition. Springer, New York; 2002.
• [35]Akaike H: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974, 19:716-723.
• [36]Sugiura N: Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 1978, 7:13-26.
• [37]Burnham D, Anderson KP: Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical-information theoretic approach. 2nd edition. Springer, New York; 2002.
• [38]R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.R-project.org/ webcite
• [39]Barton K: MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.7.11. 2012. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn webcite
• [40]Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D: R Development Core Team: nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effect Models. 3rd edition. Springer, New York; 2011.
• [41]Wroe S, Milne N: Convergence and remarkably consistent constraint in the evolution of carnivore skull shape. Evolution 2007, 61:1251-1260.
• [42]Goswami A, Milne N, Wroe S: Biting through constraints: cranial morphology, disparity and convergence across living and fossil carnivorous mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011, 278:1831-1839.
• [43]Jones ME: Convergence in ecomophology and guild structure among marsupial and placental carnivores. In Predators with pouches. Edited by Jones ME, Dickman CR, Archer M. CSIRO, Australia; 2003:285-296.
• [44]Werdelin L: Comparison of skull shape in marsupial and placental carnivores. Australian Journal of Zoology 1986, 34:109-117.
• [45]Werdelin L: Jaw geometry and molar morphology in marsupial carnivores: analysis of a constraint and its macroevolutionary consequences. Paleobiology 1987, 13:342-350.
• [46]Buckland ST, Burnham KP, Augustin NH: Model selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 1997, 53:603-618.
• [47]Homberger DG: Models and tests in functional morphology: the significance of description and integration. American Zoologist 1988, 28:217-229.
• [48]Gregory W: On the structure and relations of Notharctus, an American Eocene primate. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History, New Series 1920, 3:49-243.
• [49]Butler P: Molarization of the premolars in the Perissodactyla. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1952, 121:819-843.
• [50]Mills J: A comparison of lateral jaw movements in some mammals from wear facets on the teeth. Archives of Oral Biology 1967, 12:654-661.
• [51]Crompton A, Hiiemae K: Molar occlusion and mandibular movements during occlusion in the American opossum, Didelphis marsupialis L. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 1970, 49:21-47.
• [52]Greaves W: The inference of jaw motion from tooth wear facets. Journal of Paleontology 1973, 47:1000-1001.
• [53]Gordon K: Microfracture patterns of abrasive wear striations on teeth indicate directionality. American journal of physical anthropology 1984, 63:315-322.
• [54]Brainerd EL, Baier DB, Gatesy SM, Hedrick TL, Metzger KA, Gilbert SL, Crisco JJ: X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 2010, 313:262-279.