期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of minimal guided and unguided internet-based mobile supported stress-management in employees with occupational stress: a three-armed randomised controlled trial
Matthias Berking1  Pim Cuijpers4  Elena Heber3  Heleen Riper4  Anna-Carlotta Zarski3  Filip Smit2  Dirk Lehr3  David Daniel Ebert1 
[1] Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University Nuremberg-Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany;Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute of Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;Innovation Incubator, Division Health Trainings online, Leuphana University, Rotenbleicher Weg 67, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany;GGZ inGeest, Regional Mental Health Service Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
关键词: Cost-effectiveness;    Randomised controlled trial;    Internet-based;    Stress management;    Occupational health;    Unguided self-help;    Guided self-help;   
Others  :  1128770
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-807
 received in 2014-07-12, accepted in 2014-07-17,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Internet- and mobile based stress-management interventions (iSMI) may be an effective means to address the negative consequences of occupational stress. However, available results from randomised controlled trials are conflicting. Moreover, it is yet not clear whether guided or unguided self-help iSMI provide better value for money. Internet-based mental health interventions without guidance are often much less effective than interventions including at least some guidance from a professional. However, direct comparisons in randomised controlled trials are scarce and, to the best of our knowledge, the comparative (cost)-effectiveness of guided vs. unguided iSMI has not yet been studied. Hence, this study investigates the acceptability and (cost-) effectiveness of minimal guided and unguided iSMI in employees with heightened levels of perceived stress.

Methods

A three-armed randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to compare a minimal guided and unguided iSMI with a waiting list control condition (WLC). Both active conditions are based on the same iSMI, i.e. GET.ON Stress, and differ only with regard to the guidance format. Employees with heightened levels of perceived stress (PSS ≥ 22) will be randomised to one of three conditions. Primary outcome will be comparative changes in perceived stress (PSS). Secondary outcomes include changes in self-reported depression, work-engagement, presenteeism and absenteeism. Moreover, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted from a societal perspective, including both direct medical costs and costs related to productivity losses. In addition, a cost-benefit analysis will be conducted from the employer’s perspective. Incremental net-benefit regression analyses will address the question if there are any baseline factors (i.e. subgroups of employees) associated with particularly favorable cost-effectiveness when the experimental intervention is offered. Assessments take place at baseline, 7 weeks post-treatment and 6 months after randomisation.

Discussion

Online-based (guided) self-help interventions could be an acceptable, effective and economically sustainable approach to offer evidence-based intervention alternatives to reduce the negative consequences associated with work-related stress. This study evaluates the (cost-) effectiveness of two versions of an iSMI, minimal guided and unguided iSMI. Thus, the present study will further enhance the evidence-base for iSMI and provide valuable information about the optimal balance between outcome and economic costs.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trial Registration (DRKS): DRKS00005687.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Ebert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150225065519451.pdf 480KB PDF download
Figure 1. 76KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Hammen C: Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005, 1:293-319. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938
  • [2]Richardson S, Shaffer JA, Falzon L, Krupka D, Davidson KW, Edmondson D: Meta-analysis of perceived stress and its association with incident coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2012, 110(12):1711-1716. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.004
  • [3]Steptoe A, Kivimäki M: Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012, 9(6):360-370. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2012.45
  • [4]Kalia M: Assessing the economic impact of stress–the modern day hidden epidemic. Metabolism 2002, 51(6 Suppl 1):49-53. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12040542 webcite
  • [5]Richardson KM, Rothstein HR: Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol 2008, 13(1):69-93. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69
  • [6]Van der Klink JJ, Blonk RW, Schene AH, van Dijk FJ: The benefits of interventions for work-related stress. Am J Public Health 2001, 91(2):270-276. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1446543&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract webcite
  • [7]Bhui KS, Dinos S, Stansfeld SA, White PD: A synthesis of the evidence for managing stress at work: a review of the reviews reporting on anxiety, depression, and absenteeism. J Environ Public Health 2012, 2012:515874. doi:10.1155/2012/515874
  • [8]American Psychological Association: Stress in America™: Missing the Health Care Connection. [https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2012/full-report.pdf webcite]
  • [9]Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L, van Rooy MJ: Recruiting participants for interventions to prevent the onset of depressive disorders: possible ways to increase participation rates. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:181. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-181
  • [10]Buntrock C, Ebert DD, Lehr D, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Smit F, Berking M: Evaluating the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of web-based indicated prevention of major depression: design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2014, 14(1):25. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-25
  • [11]Andersson G, Titov N: Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry 2014, 13(1):4-11. doi:10.1002/wps.20083
  • [12]Ruwaard J, Lange A, Bouwman M, Broeksteeg J, Schrieken B: E-mailed standardized cognitive behavioural treatment of work-related stress: a randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther 2007, 36(3):179-192. doi:10.1080/16506070701381863
  • [13]Ebert DD, Lehr D, Boß L, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Andersson G, Thiart H, Heber E, Berking M: Efficacy of an Internet-based problem-solving training for teachers: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health
  • [14]Hedman E, Ljótsson B, Lindefors N: Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2012, 12(6):745-764. doi:10.1586/erp.12.67
  • [15]Richards D, Richardson T: Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2012, 32(4):329-342. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004
  • [16]Johansson R, Andersson G: Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Rev Neurother 2012, 12(7):861-869. quiz 870. doi:10.1586/ern.12.63
  • [17]Cuijpers P, Marks IM, van Straten A, Cavanagh K, Gega L, Andersson G: Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther 2009, 38(2):66-82. doi:10.1080/16506070802694776
  • [18]Mayo-Wilson E, Montgomery P: Media-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy and behavioural therapy (self-help) for anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 9:CD005330. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005330.pub4
  • [19]Cheng SK, Dizon J: Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychother Psychosom 2012, 81(4):206-216. doi:10.1159/000335379
  • [20]Zetterqvist K, Maanmies J, Ström L, Andersson G: Randomized controlled trial of internet-based stress management. Cogn Behav Ther 2003, 32(3):151-160. doi:10.1080/16506070302316
  • [21]Cook RF, Billings DW, Hersch RK, Back AS, Hendrickson A: A field test of a web-based workplace health promotion program to improve dietary practices, reduce stress, and increase physical activity: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2007, 9(2):e17. doi:10.2196/jmir.9.2.e17
  • [22]Shimazu A, Kawakami N, Irimajiri H, Sakamoto M, Amano S: Effects of web-based psychoeducation on self-efficacy, problem solving behavior, stress responses and job satisfaction among workers: a controlled clinical trial. J Occup Health 2005, 47(5):405-413. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16230834 webcite
  • [23]Geraedts AS, Kleiboer AM, Wiezer NM, van Mechelen W, Cuijpers P: Web-based guided self-help for employees with depressive symptoms (Happy@Work): design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:61. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-61
  • [24]Thiart H, Lehr D, Ebert DD, Sieland B, Berking M, Riper H: Log in and breathe out: efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an online sleep training for teachers affected by work-related strain–study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013, 14:169. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-169
  • [25]Heber E, Ebert DD, Lehr D, Nobis S, Berking M, Riper H: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based and mobile stress-management intervention for employees: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:655. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-655
  • [26]Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R: A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983, 24(4):385-396. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6668417 webcite
  • [27]Beck AT, Steer A, Brown GK: BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory Manual. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996. 2nd edition. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
  • [28]Lesage F-X, Berjot S, Deschamps F: Psychometric properties of the French versions of the perceived stress scale. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2012, 25(2):178-184. doi:10.2478/S13382-012-0024-8
  • [29]Mohr DC, Cuijpers P, Lehman K: Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res 2011, 13(1):e30. doi:10.2196/jmir.1602
  • [30]Titov N, Dear BF, Johnston L, Lorian C, Zou J, Wootton B, Spence J, McEvoy PM, Rapee RM: Improving adherence and clinical outcomes in self-guided internet treatment for anxiety and depression: randomised controlled trial. Andersson G, ed. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(7):e62873.
  • [31]Fry JP, Neff RA: Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2009, 11(2):e16. doi:10.2196/jmir.1138
  • [32]Tyler TR: Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annu Rev Psychol 2006, 57:375-400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
  • [33]Tyler TR: The psychology of legitimacy: a relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 1997, 1(4):323-345. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4
  • [34]Michalsen A, Jeitler M, Brunnhuber S, Luedtke R, Büssing A, Musial F, Dobos G, Kessler C: Iyengar yoga for distressed women: a 3-armed randomized controlled trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012, 2012:408727. doi: 10.1155/2012/408727
  • [35]Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D: Who’s stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 20091. J Appl Soc Psychol 2012, 42(6):1320-1334. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00900.x
  • [36]Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977, 1(3):385-401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
  • [37]Hautzinger M, Bailer M: Allgemeine Depressions Skala. Manual. Göttingen: Beltz Test GmbH; 1993. Available at: http://www.psycontent.com/content/3x081j2m2732r345/ webcite
  • [38]Lehr D, Hillert A, Schmitz E, Cut-off-werten EE Von: Screening depressiver Störungen mittels Allgemeiner Depressions- Skala ( ADS-K ) und State-Trait Depressions Scales ( STDS-T ). 2008, 1-10. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.54.1
  • [39]Lehr D, Hillert A, Schmitz E, Sosnowsky N: Assessing depressive disorders using the Center for Epidemiologic Studie. Diagnostica 2008, 2:61-70. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.54.2.61
  • [40]Schaufeli W, Leiter MP, Maslach C, Jackson SE: Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey (MI-GS). In Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. Edited by Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
  • [41]Neubach B, Schmidt K: Gütekriterien einer deutschen Fassung des Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-D). Eine Replikationsstudie bei Altenpflegekräften. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und …. 2000. Available at: http://www.psycontent.com/index/98276L18337760W3.html webcite
  • [42]Schaufeli W, Bakker A: Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test Manual. Utrecht: The Netherlands Departmant of Psychology, Utrecht University; 2003.
  • [43]Schaufeli W, Salanova M: The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness …. 2002. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1015630930326 webcite
  • [44]Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34(3):220-233. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8628042 webcite
  • [45]Balestroni G, Bertolotti G: [EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2012, 78(3):155-159. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23614330 webcite
  • [46]Bouwmans C, De Jong K, Timman R, Zijlstra-Vlasveld M, Van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Tan SS, Hakkaart-van Roijen L: Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Serv Res 2013, 13:217. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-217
  • [47]Attkisson CC, Zwick R: The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982, 5(3):233-237. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10259963 webcite
  • [48]Schmidt J, Lamprecht F, Wittmann WW: Satisfaction with inpatient management. Development of a questionnaire and initial validity studies. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1989, 39(7):248-255.
  • [49]Jacobson NS, Truax P: Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991, 59(1):12-19. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2002127 webcite
  • [50]Rozental A, Andersson G, Boettcher J, Ebert DD, Cuijpers P, Knaevelsrud C, Ljótsson B, Kaldo V, Titov N, Carlbring P: Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions. Internet Interv 2014, 1(1):12-19. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2014.02.001
  • [51]Ebert DD, Lehr D, Baumeister H, Boß L, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Reins JA, Buntrock C, Berking M: GET.ON Mood Enhancer: efficacy of Internet-based guided self-help compared to psychoeducation for depression: an investigator-blinded randomised controlled trial. Trials 2014, 15(1):39.
  • [52]Li J, Loerbroks A, Jarczok MN, Schöllgen I, Bosch JA, Mauss D, Siegrist J, Fischer JE: Psychometric properties and differential explanation of a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work: a study of industrial workers in Germany. Am J Ind Med 2012, 55(9):808-815. doi:10.1002/ajim.22018
  • [53]Berking M, Znoj H: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-27). Zeitschrift für Psychiatr Psychol und …. 2008. Available at: http://www.psycontent.com/index/K300NR32641827R4.pdf webcite
  • [54]Ebert D, Christ O, Berking M: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur emotionsspezifischen Selbsteinschätzung emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-ES). Diagnostica 2013. Available at: http://www.psycontent.com/index/F224M028N22W4175.pdf webcite
  • [55]Rammstedt B, John OP: Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. J Res Pers 2007, 41(1):203-212. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
  • [56]Forstmeier S, Rüddel H: Measuring volitional competences: Psychometric properties of a short form of the volitional components questionnaire (VCQ) in a clinical sample. TOPSYJ 2008, 1:66-77.
  • [57]Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M: Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Edited by Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M. Windsor, UK: nferNelson; 1995:35-37.
  • [58]Schwarzer R, Diehl M, Schmitz GS: Self-Regulation Scale. 1999. [http://www.fu-berlin.de/gesund/skalen webcite]
  • [59]Bertrams A, Dickhäuser O: Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität. Diagnostica 2009, 55(1):2-10. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.55.1.2
  • [60]Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL: High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers 2004, 72(2):271-324. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15016066 webcite
  • [61]Schulz H, Lang K, Nübling R, Koch U: Psychometrische Überprüfung einer Kurzform des Fragebogens zur Psychotherapiemotivation - FPTM-23. Diagnostica 2003, 49(2):83-93. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.49.2.83
  • [62]Schulz H, Nübling R, Rüddel H: Entwicklung einer Kurzform eines Fragebogens zur Psychotherapiemotivation. Verhaltenstherapie 1995, 5:89-95.
  • [63]Schwarzer R, Sniehotta FF, Lippke S, Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schüz B, Wegner M, Ziegelmann JP: On the assessment and analysis of variables in the health action process approach: Conducting an investigation. 2013. Free university of berlin. Available at: http://www.fu-berlin.de/gesund/hapa_web.pdf webcite
  • [64]Papacharissi Z, Rubin AM: Predictors of Internet Use. J Broadcast Electron 2000, 44(2):175-196.
  • [65]Campbell-Sills L, Stein MB: Psychometric analysis and refinement of the connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J Trauma Stress 2007, 20(6):1019-28.
  • [66]Lerner DJ, Amick BC III, Rogers WH, Malspeis S, Bungay K: The work limitations questionnaire: a self-administered instrument for assessing on-the-job work disability. Med Care 2001, 39:72-85.
  • [67]Kigozi J, Lewis M, Jowett S, Barton P, Coast J: Construct validity and responsiveness of the single-item presenteeism question in patients with lower back pain for the measurement of presenteeism. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014, 39(5):409-416. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000162
  • [68]Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L: The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health – a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010, 36(5):404-412. doi:10.5271/sjweh.2917
  • [69]Schafer JL, Graham JW: Missing data : our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 2002, 7(2):147-177. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147
  • [70]Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988. Available at: http://books.google.de/books/about/Statistical_Power_Analysis_for_the_Behav.html?hl=de&id=Tl0N2lRAO9oC&pgis=1 webcite
  • [71]Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T: Academia and clinic the revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134(8):663-694.
  • [72]Fenwick E, Byford S: A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br J Psychiatry 2005, 187:106-108.
  • [73]Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E, CHEERS Task Force: Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ 2013, 346(mar25_1):f1049. doi:10.1136/bmj.f1049
  • [74]Hoch J: All dressed up and know where to go: An example of how to use net benefit regression to do a cost-effectiveness analysis with person-level data (The “A” in CEA). 2008, 175-183.
  • [75]Hoch JS, Briggs AH, Willan AR: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ 2002, 11(5):415-430. doi: 10.1002/hec.678
  • [76]Semmer NK, Grebner S, Elfering A: Beyond Self-Report: Using Observational, Physiological, and Situation-Based Measures in Research On Occupational Stress. In Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being.Vol 3. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being. Bingley: Emerald (MCB UP); 2003:205-263. doi:10.1016/S1479-3555(03)03006-3
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:13次 浏览次数:15次