Claims, liabilities, injures and compensation payments of medical malpractice litigation cases in China from 1998 to 2011

BMC Health Services Research

Lihua Fan²  Zhong Zhang²  Quansheng Sun²  Lei Gao²  Xinyan Liu²  Xiaowen Zhao³  Li Li²  Tao Sun²  Xiangcheng Wu¹  Heng Li² 

[1] School of Applied Foreign Language, Heilongjiang University, Xuefu Road, Harbin, China;Department of Health Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Xuefu Road, Harbin, China;Department of Health economic, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Xuefu Road, Harbin, China

关键词: Medical litigation;    Medical malpractice;    Compensation;    Claims;   

Others  :  1126431
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-390

 received in 2013-11-04, accepted in 2014-09-11,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Although China experienced great improvement in their health system, disputes between patients and doctors have increasingly intensified, reaching an unprecedented level. Retrospective analysis of medical malpractice litigation can discover the characteristics and fundamental cause of these disagreements.

Methods

We analyzed medical malpractice litigation data from 1998 to 2011 for characteristics of claims via a litigation database within a nationwide database of cases (1086 cases) in China, including claims, liabilities, injures, and compensation payments.

Results

Among the cases analyzed, 76 percent of claims received compensation in civil judgment (640 out of 841), while 93 percent were fault liability in paid judgment (597 out of 640). The average time span between the occurrence of the injury dispute and closure of claims was 3 years. Twenty-two percent of claims (183 of 841) were caused by injury, poisoning, and other external causes. Seventy-nine percent of claims (472 of 597) were contributed to by errors in medical technology. The median damage compensation payment for death was significantly lower than for serious injuries (P < 0.001; death, $13270 [IQR, $7617–$23181]; serious injury, $23721 [IQR, $10367–$57058]). Finally, there was no statistically significant difference in the median mental compensation between minor injury, serious injury, and death (P = 0.836).

Conclusion

The social reasons for the conflict and high payment were catastrophic out-of-pocket health-care expense in addition to the high expectations for treatment in China. There were no distinguishing features between China and other countries with respect to time of suits, facilities, and specialties in these claims. The compensation for damages in different medical injuries was unfair in China.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Liebman BL: Malpractice mobs: medical dispute resolution in China. Columbia Law Rev 2013, 113(1):181-264.
• [2]The WQ: China’s Medical Mayhem. Wilson Quarterly 2013, 37(3):144-146.
• [3]The L: Chinese doctors are under threat. Lancet 2010, 376:657-657.
• [4]Chen X: Defensive medicine or economically motivated corruption? A confucian reflection on physician care in china today. J Med Philos 2007, 32(6):635-648.
• [5]The L: Ending violence against doctors in China. Lancet 2012, 379(9828):1764.
• [6]Harris DM, Wu CC: Medical Malpractice in the People’s Republic of China: The 2002 Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents. J Law Med Ethics 2005, 33(3):456-477.
• [7]Chang L: In China, Courts Find New Muscle as They Take On Medical Cases. (Cover story). Wall Street J Eastern Edition 2002, 239(4):A1.
• [8]Feldman EA: Why Patients Sue Doctors: The Japanese Experience. J Law Med Ethics 2009, 37(4):792-799.
• [9]Wheat K: Is There a Medical Malpractice Crisis in The UK? J Law Med Ethics 2005, 33(3):444-455.
• [10]Francesco T: Medical Malpractice: The Experience in Italy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(2):434-442.
• [11]Bal B: An Introduction to Medical Malpractice in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(2):339-347.
• [12]Wang D, Yang Y: Retrospective Analysis on 315 Cases of Medical Dispute In a General Hospital. Sun Yatsen University Forum 2007, 27(11):32-36.
• [13]The L: Violence against doctors: Why China? Why now? What next? The Lancet 2014, 383(9922):1013.
• [14]Neil V: Juries and Medical Malpractice Claims: Empirical Facts versus Myths. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(2):367-375.
• [15]Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Yoon C, Puopolo AL, Brennan TA: Claims, Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation. New Engl J Med 2006, 354:2024-2033.
• [16]Weeks WB, Foster T, Wallace AE, Stalhandske E: Tort Claims Analysis in the Veterans Health Administration for Quality Improvement. J Law Med Ethics 2001, 29(3/4):335.
• [17]Zhu Z, Jiang B: To Discuss The Necessity of Establishing a Medical Identification System of Medical Disputes- Report of 62 Cases of Medical Dispute Lawsuit Case Analysis. Jiangsu Health Management 2007, 18(97):78-80.
• [18]Yu B, Chen C, Jin X, Sun J, Xu H: Disposal of 278 Medical Dispute Cases. Hosp Admin J Chin Chin PLA 2012, 19(10):966-967.
• [19]Lu H, Wang H: Reasons of 73 medical dispute cases. J Chinese PLA Postgrad Med Sch 2010, 31(8):819-820.
• [20]Su Y, Hu Y, Yang J, Yan Z, Liu M: A Retrospective Analysis on 356 Cases of Forensic Identification for Medical Dispute. West China Med J 2009, 24(2):288-291.
• [21]Guo N: The study on medical damage compensation disputes in part of Primary People’s Court of Urumqi in 2008 to 2010. Xin Jiang Medical University, Social Medicine and Health Service Management 2012.
• [22]Zhang Y: Medical Injury and Medical Negligence in Obstetrical and Gyneeological Malpractice Cases. Peking Union Medical College, Department of epidemiology and statistics 2008.
• [23]Xu H: Related to Prenatal Ultrasonic Diagnosis of 120 Cases of Medical Dispute Cases Analysed and Preventive Measures. Chin J Med Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) 2011, 8(4):683-689.
• [24]Shaw GY, Pierce E: Malpractice Litigation Involving Iatrogenic Surgical Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Closed-Claims Review With Recommendations for Prevention and Management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009, 118(1):6-12.
• [25]Iv N, Eikens MP, Hamersma AM, Bruijne MC: Application of Root Cause Analysis on Malpractice Claim Files Related to Diagnostic Failures. Qual Saf Health Care 2010, 19(e21):1-5.
• [26]Tehrani ASS, Lee H, Mathews SC, Shore A, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, Newman-Toker DE: 25-Year Summary of US Malpractice Claims for Diagnostic Errors 1986–2010: An Analysis From the National Practitioner Data Bank. BMJ Qual Saf 2013, 22:672-680.
• [27]Carroll AE, Buddenbaum JL: Malpractice Claims Involving Pediatricians: Epidemiology and Etiology. Pediatrics 2007, 120(1):10-17.
• [28]Cranshaw J, Gupta KJ, Cook TM: Litigation related to drug errors in anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995–2007. Anaesthesia 2009, 64(12):1317-1323.
• [29]Oliver D, Killick S, Even T, Willmott M: Do falls and falls-injuries in hospital indicate negligent care – and how big is the risk? A retrospective analysis of the NHS Litigation Authority Database of clinical negligence claims, resulting from falls in hospitals in England 1995 to 2006. Qual Saf Health Care 2008, 17(6):431-436.
• [30]Uesugi N, Yamanaka M, Suzuki T, Hirahara F: Analysis of birth-related medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan: Review and discussion towards implementation of a no-fault compensation system. (J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010, 36(4):717-725.
• [31]Yang CM, Tsai SH, Chiu WT: How risky is caring for emergency patients at risk of malpractice litigation: a population based epidemiological study of Taiwan’s experiences. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9:168. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Jena AB, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A: Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty. N Engl J Med 2011, 365:629-636.
• [33]Najaf-Zadeh A, Dubos F, Pruvost I, Bons-Letouzey C, Amalberti R, Martinot A: Epidemiology and aetiology of paediatric malpractice claims in France. Arch Dis Child 2011, 96(2):127-130.
• [34]Zheng L, Jin K, Yan X, Chen Y, Dong L, Jin H, Tang J: 111 Case of The Investigation and Analysis of Medical Disputes. Chin J Hosp Admin 2006, 22(4):250-252.
• [35]Li W: Analysis of 69 Cases of Medical Disputes and Protection. J Qiqihar Med Coll 2011, 32(1):94-95.
• [36]Kong F, Bai R, Cui Z, Wang X, Pan L, Fan Y, Liu C, Zhang Z: Identificationg Results of 254 Cases of Medical Disputes. Chinese Hospital Management 2011, 31(2):17-18.
• [37]Teo D: 7th International Association of Biological Standardization (IABS) Symposium on Advances in Transfusion Safety. Biologicals 2012, 40:169-169.
• [38]Wu CY, Lai HJ, Chen RC: Medical malpractice experience of Taiwan: 2005 versus 1991. Intern Med J 2009, 39(4):237-242.
• [39]Wan L, Zhu J, Yang S: Study oR 151 Cases of Judicial ldentificalion of Medical Dispute. Med Philos 2010, 31(10):64-65.
• [40]Xi C, Yang L: Medical liability laws in China: The tale of two regimes. Tort L Rev 2011, 19:65-75.
• [41]Kelly CN, Mello MM: Are Medical Malpractice Damages Caps Constitutional? An Overview of State Litigation. J Law Med Ethics 2005, 33(3):513-534.