Recruitment and retention of participants in a pragmatic randomized intervention trial at three community health clinics: Results and lessons learned

BMC Public Health

Graham A Colditz¹  Bernard Rosner²  Sandy Askew⁴  Gary G Bennett⁴  Karen M Emmons³  Russell E Glasgow⁵  Erica T Warner⁶ 

[1] Department of Surgery, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA;Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA, USA;Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, USA;Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Box 90086, Durham, NC, USA;Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Executive Plaza North, Rockville, MD, USA;Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 181 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, USA

关键词: Retention;    Recruitment;    Pragmatic trial;    Hypertension;    Obesity;    Weight-loss;    Health disparities;   

Others  :  1162487
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-192

 received in 2012-09-12, accepted in 2013-02-19,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Obesity and hypertension and their associated health complications disproportionately affect communities of color and people of lower socioeconomic status. Recruitment and retention of these populations in research trials, and retention in weight loss trials has been an ongoing challenge.

Methods

Be Fit, Be Well was a pragmatic randomized weight loss and hypertension management trial of patients attending one of three community health centers in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants were asked to complete follow-up assessments every 6-months for two years. We describe challenges encountered and strategies implemented to recruit and retain trial participants over the 24-month intervention. We also identify baseline participant characteristics associated with retention status. Retention strategies included financial incentives, contact between assessment visits, building relationships with health center primary care providers (PCPs) and staff, and putting participant convenience first.

Results

Active refusal rates were low with 130 of 2,631 patients refusing participation (4.9%). Of 474 eligible persons completing telephone screening, 365 (77.0%) completed their baseline visit and were randomized into the study. The study population was predominantly non-Hispanic Black (71.2%), female (68.5%) and reported annual household income of less than $35,000 (70.1%). Recruitment strategies included use of passive approval of potential participants by PCPs, use of part-time staff, and outsourcing calls to a call center. A total of 314 (86.0%) people completed the 24-month visit. Retention levels varied across study visits and intervention condition. Most participants completed three or more visits (69.6%), with 205 (56.2%) completing all four. At 24-months, lower retention was observed for males and the intervention condition. Retention strategies included building strong relationships with clinic staff, flexibility in overcoming participant barriers through use of taxi vouchers, night and weekend appointments, and keeping participants engaged via newsletters and social gatherings.

Conclusion

We were able to retain 86.0% of participants at 24-months. Recruitment and retention of high percentages of racial/ethnic minorities and lower income samples is possible with planning, coordination with a trusted community setting and staff (e.g. community health centers and RAs), adaptability and building strong relationships.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00661817

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Warner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S: Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med 1999, 14(9):537-546.
• [2]Gadegbeku CA, Stillman PK, Huffman MD, Jackson JS, Kusek JW, Jamerson KA: Factors associated with enrollment of African Americans into a clinical trial: results from the African American study of kidney disease and hypertension. Contemp Clin Trials 2008, 29(6):837-842.
• [3]Herring P, Montgomery S, Yancey AK, Williams D, Fraser G: Understanding the challenges in recruiting blacks to a longitudinal cohort study: the Adventist health study. Ethn Dis 2004, 14(3):423-430.
• [4]Wynia MK, Gamble VN: Mistrust among minorities and the trustworthiness of medicine. PLoS Med 2006, 3(5):e244. author reply e245
• [5]Ezeugwu CO, Laird A, Mullins CD, Saluja DS, Winston RA: Lessons learned from community-based minority health care serving system participation in an NIH clinical trial. J Natl Med Assoc 2011, 103(9–10):839-844.
• [6]Robinson JM, Trochim WM: An examination of community members’, researchers’ and health professionals’ perceptions of barriers to minority participation in medical research: an application of concept mapping. Ethn Health 2007, 12(5):521-539.
• [7]Sadler GR, Gonzalez J, Mumman M, Cullen L, Lahousse SF, Malcarne V, Conde V, Riley N: Adapting a program to inform African American and Hispanic American women about cancer clinical trials. J Cancer Educ 2010, 25(2):142-145.
• [8]El-Khorazaty MN, Johnson AA, Kiely M, El-Mohandes AA, Subramanian S, Laryea HA, Murray KB, Thornberry JS, Joseph JG: Recruitment and retention of low-income minority women in a behavioral intervention to reduce smoking, depression, and intimate partner violence during pregnancy. BMC Publ Health 2007, 7:233. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Powell JH, Fleming Y: Making medicines for America: the case for clinical trial diversity. J Natl Med Assoc 2000, 92(11):507.
• [10]Kumanyika SK, Espeland MA, Bahnson JL, Bottom JB, Charleston JB, Folmar S, Wilson AC, Whelton PK, TONE Cooperative Research Group: Ethnic comparison of weight loss in the trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the elderly. Obes Res 2002, 10(2):96-106.
• [11]West DS, Elaine Prewitt T, Bursac Z, Felix HC: Weight loss of black, white, and Hispanic men and women in the diabetes prevention program. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008, 16(6):1413-1420.
• [12]Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR: Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 2010, 303(3):235-241.
• [13]Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, Marks JS: Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003, 289(1):76-79.
• [14]Ryan DH, Johnson WD, Myers VH, Prather TL, McGlone MM, Rood J, Brantley PJ, Bray GA, Gupta AK, Broussard AP: Nonsurgical weight loss for extreme obesity in primary care settings: results of the Louisiana obese subjects study. Arch Intern Med 2010, 170(2):146.
• [15]Stevens VJ, Obarzanek E, Cook NR, Lee IM, Appel LJ, Smith West D, Milas NC, Mattfeldt-Beman M, Belden L, Bragg C: Long-term weight loss and changes in blood pressure: results of the trials of hypertension prevention, phase II. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134(1):1.
• [16]Douketis J, Macie C, Thabane L, Williamson D: Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice. Int J Obes 2005, 29(10):1153-1167.
• [17]Ware JH: Interpreting incomplete data in studies of diet and weight loss. N Engl J Med 2003, 348(21):2136-2137.
• [18]Akl EA, Briel M, You JJ, Sun X, Johnston BC: Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review. BMJ 2012, 344:e2809.
• [19]Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, Bennett GG, Jerome GJ, Yeh HC, Sarwer DB, Appel L, Colditz G, Wadden TA, Wells B: Applying the PRECIS criteria to describe three effectiveness trials of weight loss in obese patients with comorbid conditions. Health Serv Res 2011, 47(3pt):1051-1067.
• [20]Yeh HC, Clark JM, Emmons KE, Moore RH, Bennett GG, Warner ET, Sarwer DB, Jerome GJ, Miller ER, Volger S, Louis TA, Wells B, Wadden TA, Colditz GA, Appel LJ: Independent but coordinated trials: insights from the practice-based opportunities for weight reduction trials collaborative research group. Clin Trials 2010, 7(4):322-332.
• [21]Bennett GG, Warner ET, Glasgow RE, Askew S, Goldman J, Ritzwoller DP, Emmons KM, Rosner BA, Colditz GA, for the Be Fit, Be Well Study Investigators: Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice. Arch Intern Med 2012, 172(7):565-574.
• [22]Greaney ML, Quintiliani LM, Warner ET, King DK, Emmons KE, Colditz GA, Glasgow RE, Bennett GG: Weight management among patients at community health centers: the “Be Fit, Be Well” study. Obesity and Weight Management 2009, 5(5):222.
• [23]Foster CE, Brennan G, Matthews A, McAdam C, Fitzsimons C, Mutrie N: Recruiting participants to walking intervention studies: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2011, 8:137-5868-8-137.
• [24]Hunt JR, White E: Retaining and tracking cohort study members. Epidemiol Rev 1998, 20(1):57.
• [25]Guyll M, Spoth R, Redmond C: The effects of incentives and research requirements on participation rates for a community-based preventive intervention research study. J Prim Prev 2003, 24(1):25-41.
• [26]Booker CL, Harding S, Benzeval M: A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies. BMC Publ Health 2011, 11:249. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Davis LL, Broome ME, Cox RP: Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002, 34(1):47-53.
• [28]McCracken M, Jiles R, Blanck HM: Peer reviewed: health behaviors of the young adult US population: behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2003. Prev Chronic Dis 2007, 4(2):A25.
• [29]LeBlanc E, O’Connor E, Whitlock EP, Patnode C, Kapka T: Screening for and Management of Obesity and Overweight in Adults. 2011, 127-145. Evidence Report No. 89; AHRQ Publication No. 11-05159-EF-1:134
• [30]Matthews A, Brennan G, Kelly P, McAdam C, Mutrie N, Foster C: “Don’t wait for them to come to you, you go to them”. A qualitative study of recruitment approaches in community based walking programmes in the UK. BMC Publ Health 2012, 12:635-2458-12-635.
• [31]Nicholson LM, Schwirian PM, Klein EG, Skybo T, Murray-Johnson L, Eneli I, Boettner B, French GM, Groner JA: Recruitment and retention strategies in longitudinal clinical studies with low-income populations. Contemp Clin Trials 2011, 32(3):353-362.
• [32]Cotter RB, Burke JD, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Loeber R: Contacting participants for follow-up: how much effort is required to retain participants in longitudinal studies? Eval Program Plann 2005, 28(1):15-21.
• [33]Kleschinsky JH, Bosworth LB, Nelson SE, Walsh EK, Shaffer HJ: Persistence pays off: follow-up methods for difficult-to-track longitudinal samples. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2009, 70(5):751.
• [34]Pollack CE, Kurd SK, Livshits A, Weiner M, Lynch J: A case–control study of home foreclosure, health conditions, and health care utilization. J Urban Health 2011, 88(3):469-478.
• [35]Couch KA, Fairlie R: Last hired, first fired? Black-white unemployment and the business cycle. Demography 2010, 47(1):227-247.
• [36]Chang MW, Brown R, Nitzke S: Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers. BMC Publ Health 2009, 9(1):424. BioMed Central Full Text