BMC Oral Health | |
Clinical directors’ views of centralisation and commissioning of cleft services in the UK | |
Andrea Waylen3  Andrew Ness2  Jonathan Sandy1  Julia K Scott4  Aidan Searle3  | |
[1] School of Oral and Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin St, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK;Bristol Nutrition Biomedical Research Unit, UHBristol Education Centre, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK;School of Oral and Dental Science, Lifecourse Epidemiology and Population Oral Health, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK;Department of Orthodontics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK | |
关键词: Clinical directors; Commissioning; Centralisation; Specialist services; | |
Others : 1118152 DOI : 10.1186/1472-6831-15-12 |
|
received in 2014-09-25, accepted in 2015-01-15, 发布年份 2015 | |
![]() |
【 摘 要 】
Background
To determine the views of Clinical Directors working in the United Kingdom (U.K.) Cleft Service with regard to centralisation, commissioning and impact on cleft service provision.
Methods
In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 Clinical Directors representing regional cleft services. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, a coding frame was developed by two researchers and transcripts were coded using a thematic, ‘interpretive’ approach.
Results
Clinical Directors perceived the commissioning of cleft services in the U.K. to be dependent upon historical agreements and individual negotiation despite service centralisation. Furthermore, Clinical Directors perceived unfairness in the commissioning and funding of cleft services and reported inconsistencies in funding models and service costs that have implications for delivering an equitable cleft service with an effective Multidisciplinary Team.
Conclusions
National Health Service (NHS) commissioning bodies can learn lessons from the centralisation of cleft care. Clinical Directors’ accounts of their relationships with specialist commissioning bodies and their perspectives of funding cleft services may serve to increase parity and improve the commissioning of cleft services in the U.K.
【 授权许可】
2015 Searle et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150206021125205.pdf | 198KB | ![]() |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Coupland MA, Coupland AI: Seasonality, incidence, and sex distribution of the cleft lip and palate births in Trent region, 1973–1982. Cleft Palate J 1988, 25(1):33-37.
- [2]CSAG: Cleft lip/and or palate. London: HMSO; 1998. [Report of CSAG committee]
- [3]Frey B, Argent A: Safe paediatric intensive care. Part.2: workplace organisation, critical incident monitoring and guidelines. Intens Care Med 2004, 30:1292-7.
- [4]Scott JK, Leary SD, Ness AR, Sandy J, Persson M, Kilpatrick N, et al.: Centralization of services for children born with Orofacial clefts in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional survey. Cleft Palate Cran J 2014, 51(5):102-10.
- [5]Department of Health: Health Act 1999. London: HMSO; 1999.
- [6]Department of Health: Specialised services national definition set 3rd edition. Cleft lip and palate services (all ages) no.15. 2010.
- [7]Carter Review Report: Review of commissioning arrangements for specialised services. An independent review requested by the Department of Health, London. 2006. http://www.yhscg.nhs.uk/Governance/Review%20Document%20May%202006.pdf webcite
- [8]Commissioning for specialised services 2010. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Managingyourorganisation/Commissioning/Commissioningspecialisedservices/index.htm webcite. Accessed 5 September 2013
- [9]Personal communication via email National Research Ethics Committee to Waylen, A. 5th February 2010
- [10]Snape D, Spencer L: The foundations of qualitative research. In Qualitative Research Practice; A Guide for Social Scientists and Researchers. Edited by Ritchie J, Lewis J. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2003.
- [11]NVivo qualitative data analysis software, QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 9, 2010
- [12]Ritchie J, Lewis J: Qualitative Research Practice; A Guide for Social Scientists and Researchers. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2003.
- [13]Hart O: Incomplete contracts and public ownership; remarks and an application to a public-private ownership. Econ J 2003, 113:69-76.
- [14]Fitzsimons KJ, Mukarram S, Copley LJ, Deacon SA, van der Meulen JH: Centralisation of services for children with cleft lip and palate: a study of hospital episode statistics. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:148. BioMed Central Full Text
- [15]Davies K, Davies P: Tensions in commissioning: services for children’s speech, language and communication needs in one English region. J Health Serv Res Pol 2012, 17(suppl 2):37-44.
- [16]Personal communication. Email communication between Searle, A. and Alberry, L. regarding draft of CLP Dashboard. 6 September, 2013
- [17]The cleft collective: Closing the gap in cleft research. https://www.cleftcollective.org.uk webcite
- [18]Department of Health: The future of specialised services outlined in report. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/the-future-of-specialised-services-outlined-in-report webcite –the future of specialised commissioning
- [19]Clinical reference groups for specialised services - a guide for clinicians: NHS commissioning board, Jan 2013. http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/crg-guide.pdf webcite