期刊论文详细信息
BMC Gastroenterology
Inter-relationships between the economic and emotional consequences of colorectal cancer for patients and their families: a qualitative study
Linda Sharp2  Anthony Staines3  Kanika Kapur4  Patricia Fitzpatrick1  Aileen Timmons2  Claire Finn5  Liza Costello2  Alan Ó Céilleachair6 
[1] School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland;School of Nursing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland;School of Economics and Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland;National Economic and Social Council, Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland;National Cancer Registry, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, Ireland
关键词: Employment;    Social support;    Caregivers;    Patients;    cost analysis;    Costs &;    Colorectal cancer;   
Others  :  1113055
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-230X-12-62
 received in 2011-06-24, accepted in 2012-06-07,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

While the evidence-base concerning the economic impact of cancer for patients and their families/carers has grown in recent years, there is little known about how emotional responses to cancer influence this economic impact. We investigated the economic costs of cancer in the context of patients’ emotions and how these both shaped the patient and family burden.

Methods

Health professionals from six hospitals invited patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (ICD10 C18-C20) within the previous year to take part in the study. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with patients and, where available, a family member. Interviews covered medical and non-medical costs incurred as a result of cancer and the impact of these on the lives of the patient and their family. Interviews were audio-recorded. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and these data were analysed qualitatively using thematic content analysis.

Results

Twenty-two patients with colorectal cancer (17 colon and 5 rectal; 14 women and 8 men) were interviewed; 6 were accompanied by a family member. Important cancer-related financial outlays included: travel and parking associated with hospital appointments; costs of procedures; increased household bills; and new clothing. Cancer impacted on employed individuals’ ability to work and depressed their income. The opportunity cost of informal care for carers/family members, especially immediately post-diagnosis, was a strong theme. All patients spoke of the emotional burden of colorectal cancer and described how this burden could lead to further costs for themselves and their families by limiting work and hindering their ability to efficiently manage their expenses. Some patients also spoke of how economic and emotional burdens could interact with each other. Support from employers, family/carers and the state/health services and patients’ own attitudes influenced this inter-relationship.

Conclusions

The economic impact of colorectal cancer on patients and their families is complex. This study suggests that the economic costs and the emotional impact of cancer are often related and can exacerbate each other, but that various factors can meditate this inter-relationship.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Ó Céilleachair et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150204012045653.pdf 421KB PDF download
Figure 2. 44KB Image download
Figure 1. 44KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]American Cancer Society: Global Cancer Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta; 2007.
  • [2]Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, Gatta G, Micheli A, Mangone L, Kunkler I, EUROCARE-4 Working Group: Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol 2007, 8(9):784-796.
  • [3]Comber H, Walsh P: Patterns Of Care And Survival Of Cancer Patients In Ireland 1994 To 2004. National Cancer Registry, Cork; 2008.
  • [4]Verdecchia A, Santaquilani M, Sant M: Survival for cancer patients in Europe. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2009, 45(3):315-324.
  • [5]American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta; 2007.
  • [6]Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML: Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011, 103(2):117-128.
  • [7]Bending MW, Trueman P, Lowson KV, Pilgrim H, Tappenden P, Chilcott J, Tappenden J, Aalto P: Estimating the direct costs of bowel cancer services provided by the National Health Service in England. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010, 26(4):362-369.
  • [8]Mcafee DA, West J, Scholefield JH, Whynes DK: Hospital costs of colorectal cancer care. Clin Med Oncol 2009, 20(3):27-37.
  • [9]Yabroff KR, Warren JL, Schrag D, Mariotto A, Meekins A, Topor M, Brown ML: Comparison of approaches for estimating incidence costs of care for colorectal cancer patients. Med Care 2009, 47(7 Suppl 1):S56-S63.
  • [10]Clerc L, Jooste V, Lejeune C, Schmitt B, Arveux P, Quantin C, Faivre J, Bouvier AM: Cost of care of colorectal cancers according to health care patterns and stage at diagnosis in France. Eur J Health Econ 2008, 9(4):361-367.
  • [11]Paramore L, Thomas S, Knopf KB, Cragin LS, Fraeman KH: Estimating costs of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2006, 6(1):52-58.
  • [12]Yabroff KR, Warren JL, Knopf K, Davis WW, Brown ML: Estimating patient time costs associated with colorectal cancer care. Med Care 2005, 43(7):640-648.
  • [13]Longo CJ, Deber R, Fitch M, Williams AP, D'Souza D: An examination of cancer patients' monthly 'out-of-pocket' costs in Ontaria, Canada. Eur J Cancer Care 2007, 16(6):500-507.
  • [14]Sanchez KM, Richardson JL, Mason HR: The return to work experiences of colorectal cancer survivors. AAOHN J 2004, 52(12):500-510.
  • [15]Longo CJ, Bereza BG: A comparative analysis of monthly out-of-pocket costs for patients with breast cancer as compared with other common cancers in Ontario, Canada. Curr Oncol 2011, 18(1):e1-e8.
  • [16]Longo CJ, Fitch M, Deber RB, Williams AP: Financial and family burden associated with cancer treatment in Ontario, Canada. Support Care Cancer 2006, 14(11):1077-1085.
  • [17]Syse A, Tretli S, Kravdal O: The impact of cancer on spouses' labor earnings: a population-based study. Cancer 2009, 115(18 Suppl):4350-4361.
  • [18]Yabroff KR, Kim Y: Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors. Cancer 2009, 115(18 Suppl):4362-4373.
  • [19]Worster B, Holmes S: A phenomenological study of the postoperative experiences of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2009, 13(5):315-322.
  • [20]Julkunen J, Gustavsson-Lilius M, Hietanen P: Anger expression, partner support, and quality of life in cancer patients. J Psychosom Res 2009, 66(3):235-244.
  • [21]Cotrim H, Pereira G: Impact of colorectal cancer on patient and family: implications for care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2008, 12(3):217-226.
  • [22]Eurostat: Eurostat regional yearbook 2010. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg; 2010.
  • [23]The National Cancer Forum: A Strategy for Cancer Control In Ireland. Department of Health & Children, Dublin; 2006.
  • [24]Central Statistics Office: Health Status & Health Service Utilisation. The Stationery Office, Cork; 2008.
  • [25]Sharp L, Timmons A: The Financial Impact of a Cancer Diagnosis. National Cancer Registry, Cork; 2010.
  • [26]Creswell JW, Maietta RC: Qualitative Research. In Handbook of social research. Edited by Miller DC, Salkind NJ. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California; 2008.
  • [27]Smith JA, Osborn M: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods. Edited by Smith JA. Sage, London; 2008.
  • [28]Van Houtven CH, Ramsey SD, Hornbrook MC, Atienza AA, van Ryn M: Economic burden for informal caregivers of lung and colorectal cancer patients. Oncologist 2010, 15(8):883-893.
  • [29]Yabroff KR, Davis WW, Lamont EB, Fahey A, Topor M, Brown ML, Warren JL: Patient time costs associated with cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007, 99(1):14-23.
  • [30]Markman M, Luce R: Impact of the cost of cancer treatment: an internet-based survey. J Oncol Pract 2010, 6(2):69-73.
  • [31]Bradley S, Sherwood PR, Donovan HS, Hamilton R, Rosenzweig M, Hricik A, Newberry A, Bender C: I could lose everything: understanding the cost of a brain tumor. J Neurooncol 2007, 85(3):329-338.
  • [32]Faggiano F, Partanen T, Kogevinas M, Bofetta P: Socioeconomic differences in cancer incidence and mortality. Social Inequalities and Cancer. No. 138 edition 1997, 65-176.
  • [33]Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ, Greene SM, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, Kirlin B, Clauser SB: The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts. Qual Saf Health Care 2010, 19(6):484-489.
  • [34]Moffatt S, Noble E, Exley C: "Done more for me in a fortnight than anybody done in all me life." How welfare rights advice can help people with cancer. BMC Health Serv Res 2010., 3(10)
  • [35]Sharp L, Carsin AE, Timmons A: Associations between cancer-related financial stress and strain and psychological wellbeing among individuals living with cancer. Psychooncologyin press
  • [36]Sharp L, Timmons A: Social welfare and legal constraints associated with work among breast and prostate cancer survivors: Experiences from Ireland. J Cancer Survivin press
  • [37]Hofstatter EW: Understanding patient perspectives on communication about the cost of cancer care: a review of the literature. J Oncol Pract 2010, 6(4):188-192.
  • [38]McFarlane J, Riggins J, Smith TJ: SPIKE$: a six-step protocol for delivering bad news about the cost of medical care. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26(25):4200-4204.
  • [39]Illingworth N, Forbat L, Hubbard G, Kearney N: The importance of relationships in the experience of cancer: a re-working of the policy ideal of the whole-systems approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2010, 14(1):23-28.
  • [40]Reher DS: Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Popul Dev Rev 1998, 24(2):203-234.
  • [41]Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A, Summerton N: Lung cancer patients' perceptions of access to financial benefits: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2004, 54(505):589-594.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:22次 浏览次数:6次