期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Ethics
Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali
Ogobara K. Doumbo2  Michael Parker1  Dominic Kwiatkowski3  Mahamadou A. Thera2  Salimata Konate2  Alassane Niare2  Susan Bull1  Karim Traore2 
[1] The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK;Malaria Research and Training Center, DEAP/FMPOS, UMI3189, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, Bamako, BP 1805, Mali;Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
关键词: Qualitative research;    Malaria;    Mali;    Genomic research;    Children;    Bioethics;    Research ethics;    Consent;   
Others  :  1218616
DOI  :  10.1186/s12910-015-0035-7
 received in 2014-10-22, accepted in 2015-05-29,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Obtaining informed consent for participation in genomic research in low-income settings presents specific ethical issues requiring attention. These include the challenges that arise when providing information about unfamiliar and technical research methods, the implications of complicated infrastructure and data sharing requirements, and the potential consequences of future research with samples and data. This study investigated researchers’ and participants’ parents’ experiences of a consent process and understandings of a genome-wide association study of malaria involving children aged five and under in Mali. It aimed to inform best practices in recruiting participants into genomic research.

Methods

A qualitative rapid ethical assessment was undertaken. Fifty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with the parents of research participants. An additional nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior research scientists, research assistants and with a member of an ethics committee. A focus group with five parents of research participants and direct observations of four consent processes were also conducted. French and translated English transcripts were descriptively and thematically coded using OpenCode software.

Results

Participants’ parents in the MalariaGEN study had differing understandings of the causes of malaria, the rationale for collecting blood samples, the purposes of the study and the kinds of information the study would generate. Genomic aspects of the research, including the gene/environment interaction underlying susceptibility or resistance to severe malaria, proved particularly challenging to explain and understand.

Conclusions

This study identifies a number of areas to be addressed in the design of consent processes for genomic research, some of which require careful ethical analysis. These include determining how much information should be provided about differing aspects of the research and how best to promote understandings of genomic research. We conclude that it is important to build capacity in the design and conduct of effective and appropriate consent processes for genomic research in low and middle-income settings. Additionally, consideration should be given to the role of review committees and community consultation activities in protecting the interests of participants in genomic research.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Traore et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150712021236341.pdf 446KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. 3rd ed. CIOMS, Geneva; 2002.
  • [2]World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki. In. Edited by Assembly WM, 8th edn: Geneva: World Medical Association; 2013.
  • [3]Edwards SJ, Lilford RJ, Thornton J, Hewison J. Informed consent for clinical trials: in search of the “best” method. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47(11):1825-1840.
  • [4]Flory J, Emanuel E. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004; 292(13):1593-1601.
  • [5]Mandava A, Pace C, Campbell B, Emanuel E, Grady C. The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries. J Med Ethics. 2012; 38(6):356-365.
  • [6]Shelton AK, Fish AF, Cobb JP, Bachman JA, Jenkins RL, Battistich V et al.. Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care. Am J Crit Care. 2009; 18(5):418-426.
  • [7]Molyneux CS, Wassenaar DR, Peshu N, Marsh K. ‘Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)…!’: community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61(2):443-454.
  • [8]Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013; 8(4):1-18.
  • [9]Tindana PO, Kass N, Akweongo P. The Informed Consent Process in a Rural African Setting: A Case Study of the Kassena-Nankana District of Northern Ghana. IRB. 2006; 28:1-6.
  • [10]Marshall PA, Adebamowo CA, Adeyemo AA, Ogundiran TO, Vekich M, Strenski T et al.. Voluntary participation and informed consent to international genetic research. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(11):1989-1995.
  • [11]Parker M, Bull SJ, de Vries J, Agbenyega T, Doumbo OK, Kwiatkowski DP. Ethical data release in genome-wide association studies in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(11): Article ID e1000143
  • [12]Tekola F, Bull SJ, Farsides B, Newport MJ, Adeyemo A, Rotimi CN et al.. Tailoring consent to context: designing an appropriate consent process for a biomedical study in a low income setting. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009; 3(7): Article ID e482
  • [13]Tindana P, Bull S, Amenga-Etego L, de Vries J, Aborigo R, Koram K et al.. Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience. BMC Med Ethics. 2012; 13(1):15. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]Appiah-Poku J, Newton S, Kass N. Participants’ perceptions of research benefits in an African genetic epidemiology study. Dev World Bioeth. 2011; 11(3):128-135.
  • [15]Marsh VM, Kamuya DM, Mlamba AM, Williams TN, Molyneux SS. Experiences with community engagement and informed consent in a genetic cohort study of severe childhood diseases in Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2010; 11:13. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [16]Marshall PA, Adebamowo CA, Adeyemo AA, Ogundiran TO, Strenski T, Zhou J et al.. Voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent in a genetic epidemiological study of breast cancer in Nigeria. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:38. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [17]Richards MP, Ponder M, Pharoah P, Everest S, Mackay J. Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer. J Med Ethics. 2003; 29(2):93-96.
  • [18]Tekola F, Bull S, Farsides B, Newport MJ, Adeyemo A, Rotimi CN et al.. Impact of social stigma on the process of obtaining informed consent for genetic research on podoconiosis: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics. 2009; 10:13. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [19]Khan A, Capps BJ, Sum MY, Kuswanto CN, Sim K. Informed consent for human genetic and genomic studies: a systematic review. Clin Genet. 2014; 86(3):199-206.
  • [20]Lindegger G, Milford C, Slack C, Quayle M, Xaba X, Vardas E. Beyond the checklist: assessing understanding for HIV vaccine trial participation in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006; 43(5):560-566.
  • [21]A global network for investigating the genomic epidemiology of malaria. Nature. 2008; 456(7223):732-737.
  • [22]Chokshi DA, Thera MA, Parker M, Diakite M, Makani J, Kwiatkowski DP et al.. Valid consent for genomic epidemiology in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(4): Article ID e95
  • [23]de Vries J, Bull SJ, Doumbo O, Ibrahim M, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Kwiatkowski D et al.. Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2011; 12:5. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [24]Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. SAGE Publications Ltd, London; 2007.
  • [25]Ezzy D. Qualitative Analysis Practice and Innovation. Allen & Unwin, NSW, Australia; 2002.
  • [26]Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001; 1(3):385-405.
  • [27]Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-115.
  • [28]Denizen NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California; 2011.
  • [29]Diallo DA, Doumbo OK, Plowe CV, Wellems TE, Emanuel EJ, Hurst SA. Community permission for medical research in developing countries. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(2):255-259.
  • [30]Nyika A, Chilengi R, Ishengoma D, Mtenga S, Thera MA, Sissoko MS et al.. Engaging diverse communities participating in clinical trials: case examples from across Africa. Malar J. 2010; 9:86. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [31]The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London; 2002.
  • [32]Bull S, Farsides B, Tekola Ayele F. Tailoring information provision and consent processes to research contexts: the value of rapid assessments. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012; 7(1):37-52.
  • [33]Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987; 17(2):20-24.
  • [34]Molyneux C, Peshu N, Marsh K. Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan coast. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59(12):2547-2559.
  • [35]Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors. IRB. 2004; 26(2):1-8.
  • [36]Jenkins N, Lawton J, Douglas M, Walker S, Finnie R, Porteous M et al.. How do index patients participating in genetic screening programmes for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) interpret their DNA results? A UK-based qualitative interview study. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 90(3):372-377.
  • [37]Fairhead J, Leach M, Small M. Where techno-science meets poverty: Medical research and the economy of blood in The Gambia, West Africa. Social Science And Medicine. 2006; 63(4):1109-1120.
  • [38]Geissler PW, Kelly A, Imoukhuede B, Pool R. ‘He is now like a brother, I can even give him some blood’–relational ethics and material exchanges in a malaria vaccine ‘trial community’ in The Gambia. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(5):696-707.
  • [39]Geissler W. ‘Kachinja are coming!’: encounters around medical research work in a Kenyan village. Africa. 2005; 75:173-202.
  • [40]Marsh VM, Kamuya DK, Parker MJ, Molyneux CS. Working with Concepts: The Role of Community in International Collaborative Biomedical Research. Public Health Ethics. 2011; 4(1):26-39.
  • [41]Bryman A. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, New York; 2001.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:29次