The emergence of maternal health as a political priority in Madhya Pradesh, India: a qualitative study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Miguel San Sebastian³  Anna-Karin Hurtig⁴  Isabel Goicolea¹  Prakash Ramchandra Deo²  Tej Ram Jat⁴ 

[1] Umeå Centre for Gender Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, SE 90187, Sweden;United Nations Population Fund, UN Office, 41-42, Polytechnic Colony, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462013, India;Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, SE 90187, Sweden;Swedish Research School for Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, SE 90187, Sweden

关键词: India;    Madhya Pradesh;    Political priority;    Maternal mortality;    Maternal health;   

Others  :  1137870
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-13-181

 received in 2012-09-12, accepted in 2013-09-23,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Politics plays a critical role in agenda setting in health affairs; therefore, understanding the priorities of the political agenda in health is very important. The political priority for safe motherhood has been investigated at the national level in different countries. The objective of this study was to explore why and how maternal health became a political priority at sub-national level in the state of Madhya Pradesh in India.

Methods

This study followed a qualitative design. Data were collected by carrying out interviews and review of documents. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with twenty respondents from four stakeholder groups: government officials, development partners, civil society and academics. Data analysis was performed using thematic analysis. The analysis was guided by Kingdon’s multiple streams model.

Results

The emergence of maternal health as a political priority in Madhya Pradesh was the result of convergence in the developments in different streams: the development of problem definition, policy generation and political change. The factors which influenced this process were: emerging evidence of the high magnitude of maternal mortality, civil society’s positioning of maternal mortality as a human rights violation, increasing media coverage, supportive policy environment and launch of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), the availability of effective policy solutions, India’s aspiration of global leadership, international influence, maternal mortality becoming a hot debate topic and political transition at the national and state levels. Most of these factors first became important at national level which then cascaded to the state level. Currently, there is a supportive policy environment in the state for maternal health backed by greater political will and increased resources. However, malnutrition and population stabilization are the competing priorities which may push maternal health off the agenda.

Conclusions

The influence of the events and factors evolving from international and national levels significantly contributed to the development of maternal health as a priority in Madhya Pradesh. This led to several opportunities in terms of policies, guidelines and programmes for improving maternal health. These efforts were successful to some extent in improving maternal health in the state but several implementation challenges still require special attention.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Jat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]World Health Organisation: UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank: Health and Millennium Development Goals. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005.
• [2]World Health Organisation: UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank: Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2010.
• [3]Registrar General of India: Sample Registration System-Bulletin on Maternal Mortality in India 2007–2009. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General of India; 2011.
• [4]Vora KS, Mavalankar DV, Ramani KV, Upadhyaya M, Sharma B, Iyengar S, Gupta V, Iyengar K: Maternal health situation in India: a case study. J Health Popul Nutr 2009, 27:184-201.
• [5]Catford J: Creating political will: moving from the science to the art of health promotion. Health Promot Int 2006, 21:1-4.
• [6]World Health Organisation: The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2005.
• [7]Kingdon JW: Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd edition. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc; 2003.
• [8]Shiffman J, Smith S: Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet 2007, 370:1370-1379.
• [9]Shiffman J: Generating political priority for safe motherhood. Afr J Reprod Health 2004, 8:6-10.
• [10]Shiffman J: Generating political priority for maternal mortality reduction in 5 developing countries. Am J Public Health 2007, 97:796-803.
• [11]Shiffman J, Stanton C, Salazar AP: The emergence of political priority for safe motherhood in Honduras. Health Policy Plan 2004, 19:380-390.
• [12]Shiffman J, Ved RR: The state of political priority for safe motherhood in India. BJOG 2007, 114:785-790.
• [13]Shiffman J, Okonofua FE: The state of political priority for safe motherhood in Nigeria. BJOG 2007, 114:127-133.
• [14]Department of Public Health & Family Welfare- Government of Madhya Pradesh: National Rural Health Mission-State Project Implementation Plan. Bhopal: Department of Public Health & Family Welfare, Government of Madhya Pradesh; 2007.
• [15]Government of Madhya Pradesh: The Chief Minister's 100 Days Priority Programmes. Bhopal: Government of Madhya Pradesh; 2008.
• [16]Government of Madhya Pradesh: State Population Policy, 2000. Bhopal: Government of Madhya Pradesh; 2000.
• [17]Government of Madhya Pradesh: Sankalp (Resolution) 2010. Bhopal: Government of Madhya Pradesh; 2010.
• [18]Daniels K, Lewin S, The Practihc Policy Group: Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa. Health Res Policy Syst 2008, 6:1-13. BioMed Central Full Text
• [19]Klugman B: Mainstreaming gender equality in health policy. Agenda 1999, 15(sup1):48-70.
• [20]Ogden J, Walt G, Lush L: The politics of 'branding' in policy transfer: the case of DOTS for tuberculosis control. Soc Sci Med 2003, 57:179-188.
• [21]Schmidt M, Joosen I, Kunst AE, Klazinga NS, Stronks K: Generating political priority to tackle health disparities: a case study in the Dutch City of The Hague. Am J Public Health 2010, 100:S210-S215.
• [22]Registrar General of India: Census of India, 2011- Provisional population totals, Madhya Pradesh. Bhopal: Directorate of Census Operations, Madhya Pradesh; 2011.
• [23]International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS): District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS 3) 2007–08 India. Madhya Pradesh. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); 2010.
• [24]Registrar General of India: Maternal mortality in India: 1997–2003: trends, causes and risk factors. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General of India; 2006.
• [25]Registrar General of India: Annual health survey bulletine 2010–11, Madhya Pradesh. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India; 2011.
• [26]Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage Publications; 2004.
• [27]Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006, 3:77-101.
• [28]ICT Services and System Development and Division of Epidemiology and Global Health: OpenCode 3.6. Umeå: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine. Sweden: Umeå University; 2009.
• [29]Shiffman J: Generating political will for safe motherhood in Indonesia. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56(6):1197-1207.
• [30]Stone D: Learning lessons and transfering policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics 1999, 19:51-59.
• [31]Garner P, Kale R, Dickson R, Dans T, Salinas R: Getting research findings into practice: Implementing research findings in developing countries. Br Med J 1998, 317:531-535.
• [32]Government of India: Reproductive and Child Health Programme. New Delhi: Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India; 2005.
• [33]Dahlgren L, Emmelin M, Winkvist A: Qualitative methodology for international public health. Umeå: Umeå International School of Public Health, Epidemiology and Public Health Sciences, Umeå University; 2004.
• [34]Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.