Rationale and study protocol of the EASY Minds (Encouraging Activity to Stimulate Young Minds) program: cluster randomized controlled trial of a primary school-based physical activity integration program for mathematics

BMC Public Health

Philip J Morgan¹  Kathryn Holmes¹  David R Lubans¹  Nicholas Riley¹ 

[1] School of Education, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia

关键词: Randomised controlled trial;    Accelerometry;    On task behaviour;    Mathematics;    Primary school;    Physical activity;   

Others  :  1128735
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-816

 received in 2014-07-23, accepted in 2014-07-24,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Novel strategies are required to increase school-based physical activity levels of children. Integrating physical activity in mathematics lessons may lead to improvements in students’ physical activity levels as well as enjoyment, engagement and learning. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a curriculum-based physical activity integration program known as EASY Minds (Encouraging Activity to Stimulate Young Minds) on children’s daily school time physical activity levels. Secondary aims include exploring the impact of EASY Minds on their engagement and ‘on task’ behaviour in mathematics.

Methods/Design

Grade 5/6 classes from eight public schools in New South Wales, Australia will be randomly allocated to intervention (n = 4) or control (n = 4) groups. Teachers from the intervention group will receive one day of professional development, a resource pack and asked to adapt their lessons to embed movement-based learning in their daily mathematics program in at least three lessons per week over a six week period. Intervention support will be provided via a weekly email and three lesson observations. The primary outcomes will be children’s physical activity levels (accelerometry) across both the school day and during mathematics lessons (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time). Children’s ‘on-task’ behaviour, enjoyment of mathematics and mathematics attainment will be assessed as secondary outcomes. A detailed process evaluation will be undertaken.

Discussion

EASY Minds is an innovative intervention that has the potential to improve key physical and academic outcomes for primary school aged children and help guide policy and practice regarding the teaching of mathematics.

Trial registration no

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12613000637741 13/05/2013.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Riley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskill W, Ekelund U: Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls and prospects. Lancet 2012, 380:247-257.
• [2]Strong WB, Malina WB, Blimkie RM, Daniels CJ, Dishman RK, Gutin B: Evidence based physical Activity for school-aged youth. J Pediatr 2005, 146:732-737.
• [3]Brewer JD, Leubbers PE, Shane SD: Increasing student Physical Activity during the School Day. Strategies 2009, Jan/Feb 2009:20-23.
• [4]Morgan PJ, Hansen V: Physical education in primary schools: classroom teachers’ perceptions of benefits and outcomes. Health Educ J 2008, 67(3):196-207.
• [5]Donnelly JE, Lambourne K: Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic achievement. Prev Med 2011, 52:S36-S42.
• [6]Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW: Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behaviour. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2010, 38:105-113.
• [7]Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ, Gorely T: Relationships between mediause, body fatnessand physical activity in children and youth: a meta-analysis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004, 28:1238-1246.
• [8]Eukland U, Brage S, Froberg K: TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children:the european youth heart study. PLoS Med 2006, 2:2449-2456.
• [9]Biddle SJ, Asare M: Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: a review of reviews. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:886-895.
• [10]Nettlefold L, McKay HA, Naylor PJ, Bredin SD, Warburton ED: The relationship between objectively measured physical activity, sedentary time and vascular health in children. Am J Hypertens 2012, 25(8):914-919.
• [11]Biddle SJ, O'Connell S, Braithwaite RE: Sedentary behaviour interventions in young people: a meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2011, 45:937-942.
• [12]Oliver M, Schofield G, McEvoy E: An Integrated Curriculum approach to increasing Habitual Physical Activity in Children: A feasibility Study. J Sch Health 2006, 76(2):74-79.
• [13]Morgan PJ, Hansen V: Classroom teachers’ perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Res Q Exerc Sport 2008, 79(4):506-516.
• [14]Morgan PJ, Hansen V: The relationship between PE biographies and PE teaching practices of classroom teachers. Sport Education and Society 2008, 13(4):373-391.
• [15]Katz L, O'Connell M, Yeh MC, Nawaz H, Njike V, Anderson LM, Cory S, Dietz W: Public Health Strategies for preventing and controlling overweight and obesity in school and worksite settings. In Recommendations and Reports. Edited by MMWR. Atlanta: National Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2005:1-12.
• [16]Eather N, Morgan PJ, Lubans DR: Improving the fitness and physical activity levels of primary school children: Results of the Fit-4-Fun group randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2013, 56(1):12-19.
• [17]Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Weaver K, Callister R, Dewar D, Costigan SA, Finn TL, Smith J, Upton L, Plotnikoff RC: Rationale and study protocol for the supporting children's outcomes using rewards, exercise and skills (SCORES) group randomized controlled trial.: A physical activity and fundamental skills intervention for primary schools in low-income communities. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:427-438. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Webster C: Relationships between personal biography and changes in preservice classroom teachers’ physical activity promotion, competance and attitude. Res Online 2011, 30(4):320-339.
• [19]Coe DP, Pivamik JM, Wormack CJ, Reeves MJ, Malna RM: Effects of physical education and activity levels on academic achievement in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006, 38(8):1515.
• [20]Tomporowski PD, Davis CL, Miller PH, Naglieri JA: Exercise and children’s intelligence, cognition, and academic achievement. Educ Psychol Review 2007, 2008(20):111-131.
• [21]Stevens TA, J SS, R LM: The Importance of physical activity and physical education in the prediction of academic achievement. J Sports Behav 2008, 31(4):368-388.
• [22]Rentner DS, Scott C, Kober N: From the capital to the classroom:Year 4 of no child left behind. Washington D.C: Ceter for education policy; 2006.
• [23]Brain Boost:Sport and Physical activity enhance children's Learning. [http://www.dsr.wa.gov.au/brain-boost-sport-and-physical-activity-enhance-childrens-learning webcite]
• [24]Hinde McLeod J, Reynolds R: Quality teaching for quality learning. Melbourne: Social Science Press; 2007.
• [25]Riley N, Morgan PJ, Lubans DR: Preliminary findings of the E.A.S.Y. Minds feasibility Study: A curriculum based physical activity intervention program in the primmary school. In J Sci Med Sport. Sydney; 2012.
• [26]Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman GD: Consort statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J 2004, 328:702-708.
• [27]Donner A, Klar N: Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomisation Trials in Health Research. London: Hodder headline group; 2000.
• [28]Board of Studies NSW: Mathematics K-10 Syllabus. Sydney: Board of Studies NSW; 2012.
• [29]Grieser M, Vu M, Bedimo-Rung A, Neumark-Sztainer D, Moody J, Young D, Moe S: Physical Activity Attitudes, Preferences, and Practices in African American, Hispanic, and Caucasian Girls. Health Educ Behav 2006, 33(1):40-51.
• [30]Trost SG: Measurement of physical activity in children and adolescents. Am J Lifestyle Med 2007, 1(4):299-314.
• [31]Freedson PS, Prober D, Janz KF: Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37(11):s523-s530.
• [32]Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, Pfeiffer KA: Comparison of accelerometer cut-points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011, 43(7):1360-1368.
• [33]Evenson KR, Terry JW: Assessment of differing definitions of accelerometer nonwear time. Res Q Exerc Sport 2012, 80(2):355-362.
• [34]Shapiro ES, Cole CL: Behaviour change in the classroom: self management interventions. New York: Guildford press; 1994.
• [35]Alberto P, Troutman A: Applies Behaviour Analysis for Teachers. 6th edition. Boston: Pearson Education; 2003.
• [36]Volpe RJ, DiPerna JC, Hintze JM, Shapiro ES: Observing students in classroom settings: A review of seven coding schemes. Sch Psychol Rev 2005, 34(4):454-474.
• [37]Fennema E, Sherman JA: Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitude scales: instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. J Res Math Educ 1976, 7:236-324.
• [38]Melancon JG, Thompson B, Becnel S: Measurement integrity of scores from the Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: the attitudes of public school teachers. Educ Psychol Meas 1994, 54(1):187-192.
• [39]Lindsey J, Stephanou A, Urbach D, Sadler D: Progressive achievement tests in mathematics. Melbourne: ACER Press; 2005.
• [40]Barsch J: Barsch Learning style Inventory. Novato: Academic Therapy Publications; 1991.
• [41]Slack N, Norwich B: Evaluating the reliability and validity of a learning styles inventory : A classroom based study. Educ Res 2007, 49(1):51-63.
• [42]McGrath H, Noble T: Eight ways at once. Sydney: Pearson Longman; 2005.
• [43]Mallinkrodt CH, Watkin JG, Molenberhs G, Carrol RJ: Choice of the primary analysis in longitudianal clinical trials. Pharm Sat 2004, 3(3):161-169.
• [44]White IR, Carpenter J, Horton NJ: Including all individuals is not enough: lessons for intention to treat analysis. Clin Trials 2012, 9(4):396-407.
• [45]Cothran DJ, Kulinna PH, Garn AC: Classroom teachers and physical activity integration. Teach and Teach Educ 2010, 26:1381-1338.
• [46]Avalos B: Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher Education over ten years. Teach Teach Educ 2011, 27:10-20.
• [47]Gibson CA, Smith BK, DuBose KD: Physical activity Across the Curriculum (PAAC) year one process evaluation results. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008., 5(36)
• [48]Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J: Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. Br Med J 2006, 332:413-415.
• [49]Greenwood CR, Horton BT, Ytlley CA: Academic engagement:current perspectives in research and practice. Sch Psychol Rev 2002, 31(3):328-349.
• [50]Singaravely S: Mathematics attitude scale: construction, validity and reliability. Int Educ E J 2013, II(III):150-156.
• [51]Attard C: “If i had to pick ant subject, it wouldn't be maths”: foundations for engagement with mathematics in the middle years. Math Educ Res Group 2013, 25:569-587.
• [52]Bellanca J, Brandt R: 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution tree press; 2010.
• [53]Brown M, Brown P, Bibby T: “I would rather die”: reasons given by 16 year olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Res Math Educ 2007, 10(1):3-18.
• [54]Adelson JA, McCoach DB: Development and sychometric proporties of the Math and Me survey: Measuring third graders attitude toward mathematics. Meas Eval Couns Dev 2011, 44(225):225-247.
• [55]Thomson S, De Bortolii L, Nicholas M, Hilman K, Buckley S: Pisa in brief: Highlights from the full Australian Report. Challenges for Australian Education: Results from PISA 2009. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research; 2010.
• [56]Martin AJ, Anderson J, Bopbis J, Way J: Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. J Educ Psychol 2012, 104(1):1-18.
• [57]Pierce R, Stacey K, Barkatas A: A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Comput Educ 2007, 48:285-300.
• [58]Erwin H, Fedewa A, Beighle A, Ahn S: A quantitative review of physical activity, health and learning outcomes associated with classroom-based physical activity interventions. J Appl Sch Psychol 2012, 28(1):14-36.
• [59]Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, Bowles HR: Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012, 44(1S):S68-S76.