How to measure renal artery stenosis - a retrospective comparison of morphological measurement approaches in relation to hemodynamic significance

BMC Medical Imaging

Örjan Smedby³  Chunliang Wang³  Göran Granerus²  Anders Persson¹  Per Eriksson⁴  Karl Jägervall¹  Malin Andersson¹ 

[1] Department of Radiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;Department of Clinical Physiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden;School of Technology and Health (STH), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden;Department of Nephrology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

关键词: Cross-sectional area;    Vessel diameter;    Fuzzy connectedness segmentation;    Renography;    Magnetic resonance angiography;    Computed tomography angiography;    Renal artery stenosis;   

Others  :  1233403
DOI  :  10.1186/s12880-015-0086-8

 received in 2014-05-26, accepted in 2015-09-23,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Although it is well known that renal artery stenosis may cause renovascular hypertension, it is unclear how the degree of stenosis should best be measured in morphological images. The aim of this study was to determine which morphological measures from Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) are best in predicting whether a renal artery stenosis is hemodynamically significant or not.

Methods

Forty-seven patients with hypertension and a clinical suspicion of renovascular hypertension were examined with CTA, MRA, captopril-enhanced renography (CER) and captopril test (Ctest). CTA and MRA images of the renal arteries were analyzed by two readers using interactive vessel segmentation software. The measures included minimum diameter, minimum area, diameter reduction and area reduction. In addition, two radiologists visually judged the diameter reduction without automated segmentation. The results were then compared using limits of agreement and intra-class correlation, and correlated with the results from CER combined with Ctest (which were used as standard of reference) using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

Results

A total of 68 kidneys had all three investigations (CTA, MRA and CER + Ctest), where 11 kidneys (16.2 %) got a positive result on the CER + Ctest. The greatest area under ROC curve (AUROC) was found for the area reduction on MRA, with a value of 0.91 (95 % confidence interval 0.82–0.99), excluding accessory renal arteries. As comparison, the AUROC for the radiologists’ visual assessments on CTA and MRA were 0.90 (0.82–0.98) and 0.91 (0.83–0.99) respectively. None of the differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions

No significant differences were found between the morphological measures in their ability to predict hemodynamically significant stenosis, but a tendency of MRA having higher AUROC than CTA. There was no significant difference between measurements made by the radiologists and measurements made with fuzzy connectedness segmentation. Further studies are required to definitely identify the optimal measurement approach.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Andersson et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Chrysochou C, Kalra PA. Epidemiology and natural history of atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2009; 52:184-95.
• [2]Wheatley K, Ives N, Gray R, Kalra PA, Moss JG, Baigent C, Carr S, Chalmers N, Eadington D, Hamilton G et al.. Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1953-62.
• [3]Bergqvist D, Björck M, Lundgren F, Troeng T. Invasive treatment for renovascular disease. A twenty year experience from a population based registry. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2008; 49:559-63.
• [4]Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, Jamerson K, Henrich W, Reid DM et al.. Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:13-22.
• [5]Bosmans JL, De Broe ME. Renovascular hypertension: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. JBR-BTR. 2004; 87:32-5.
• [6]Eriksson P, Mohammed AA, De Geer J, Kihlberg J, Persson A, Granerus G, Nyström F, Smedby Ö. Non-invasive investigations of potential renal artery stenosis in renal insufficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25:3607-14.
• [7]Eklöf H, Ahlström H, Boström A, Bergqvist D, Andrén B, Karacagil S, Nyman R. Renal artery stenosis evaluated with 3D-Gd-magnetic resonance angiography using transstenotic pressure gradient as the standard of reference. A multireader study. Acta Radiol. 2005; 46:802-9.
• [8]Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barrett BJ, Paul MD, Genge M, Withers J, Farid N, McManamon PJ. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both. A prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320:143-9.
• [9]Reiss MD, Bookstein JJ, Bleifer KH. Radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. 4. Arteriographic complications. JAMA. 1972; 221:375-8.
• [10]Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, Berger PB, Ting HH, Best PJ, Singh M, Bell MR, Barsness GW, Mathew V et al.. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2002; 105:2259-64.
• [11]De Bruyne B, Manoharan G, Pijls NH, Verhamme K, Madaric J, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Heyndrickx GR. Assessment of renal artery stenosis severity by pressure gradient measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:1851-5.
• [12]Colyer WR, Cooper CJ, Burket MW, Thomas WJ. Utility of a 0.014" pressure-sensing guidewire to assess renal artery translesional systolic pressure gradients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003; 59:372-7.
• [13]Glockner JF, Vrtiska TJ. Renal MR and CT angiography: current concepts. Abdom Imaging. 2007; 32:407-20.
• [14]Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, Maki JH, Leiner T, Beek FJ, Korst MB, Flobbe K, de Haan MW et al.. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141:674-82.
• [15]Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalaki E, Koukoulis G, Fezoulidis IV, Stefanidis I. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography. Ren Fail. 2007; 29:295-302.
• [16]Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer C, Jandeleit K, Olbricht C. Leistungsfähigkeit der CT-Angiographie beim Nachweis von Nierenarterienstenosen [Accuracy of CT angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis]. Röfo. 1994; 161:519-25.
• [17]Thornton MJ, Thornton F, O’Callaghan J, Varghese JC, O’Brien E, Walshe J, Lee MJ. Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173:1279-83.
• [18]Rankin SC, Saunders AJ, Cook GJ, Scoble JE. Renovascular disease. Clin Radiol. 2000; 55:1-12.
• [19]Taylor A, Nally J, Aurell M, Blaufox D, Dondi M, Dubovsky E, Fine E, Fommei E, Geyskes G, Granerus G et al.. Consensus report on ACE inhibitor renography for detecting renovascular hypertension. Radionuclides in Nephrourology Group. Consensus Group on ACEI Renography. J Nucl Med. 1996; 37:1876-82.
• [20]Dondi M, Fanti S, De Fabritiis A, Zuccala A, Gaggi R, Mirelli M, Stella A, Marengo M, Losinno F, Monetti N. Prognostic value of captopril renal scintigraphy in renovascular hypertension. J Nucl Med. 1992; 33:2040-4.
• [21]Mittal BR, Kumar P, Arora P, Kher V, Singhal MK, Maini A, Das BK. Role of captopril renography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996; 28:209-13.
• [22]Salehi N, Firouzi A, Gholoobi A, Shakerian F, Sanati HR, Ahmadabadi MN, Moradi M. Relationship between distribution of coronary artery lesions and renal artery stenosis in patients undergoing simultaneous coronary and renal angiography. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2011; 5:35-40.
• [23]Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, Michaely HJ, Waggershauser T, Ittrich C, Dietrich O, Reiser MF. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology. 2005; 235:687-98.
• [24]Textor SC, Novick AC, Tarazi RC, Klimas V, Vidt DG, Pohl M. Critical perfusion pressure for renal function in patients with bilateral atherosclerotic renal vascular disease. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102:308-14.
• [25]Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 2004; 17:205-16.
• [26]Wang C, Frimmel H, Persson A, Smedby Ö. An interactive software module for visualizing coronary arteries in CT angiography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2008; 3:11-8.
• [27]Wang C, Smedby Ö. Coronary artery segmentation and skeletonization based on competing fuzzy connectedness tree. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007; 10:311-8.
• [28]Ibáñez L, Schroeder W, Ng L. Segmentation. In: ITK software guide. 2nd ed., updated for ITK v2.4. Insight Software Consortium, Clifton Park; 2005: p.503-604.
• [29]Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 327:307-10.
• [30]Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86:420-8.
• [31]Zhang JM, Luo T, Huo Y, Wan M, Chua T, Tan RS, Kassab GS, Tan SY, Zhong L. Area stenosis associated with non-invasive fractional flow reserve obtained from coronary CT images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013; 2013:3865-8.
• [32]Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:445-53.
• [33]Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Kallinowski F, Just A. Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000; 11:2190-8.
• [34]Talenfeld AD, Schwope RB, Alper HJ, Cohen EI, Lookstein RA. MDCT angiography of the renal arteries in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: implications for renal artery stenting with distal protection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188:1652-8.
• [35]Bourgoignie J, Kurz S, Catanzaro FJ, Serirat P, Perry HM. Renal venous renin in hypertension. Am J Med. 1970; 48:332-42.
• [36]Pedersen EB. New tools in diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Kidney Int. 2000; 57:2657-77.
• [37]Soulez G, Oliva VL, Turpin S, Lambert R, Nicolet V, Therasse E. Imaging of renovascular hypertension: respective values of renal scintigraphy, renal Doppler US, and MR angiography. Radiographics. 2000; 20:1355-68.
• [38]McLean AG, Hilson AJ, Scoble JE, Maher ER, Thakrar DS, Moorhead JF, Sweny P. Screening for renovascular disease with captopril-enhanced renography. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1992; 7:211-5.