Laboratorial training of examiners for using a visual caries detection system in epidemiological surveys

BMC Oral Health

Fausto M Mendes¹  Mariana M Braga¹  Ana E Haddad¹  Renata S Guedes¹  Thiago M Ardenghi²  Juan S Lara¹  Bruna LP Moro¹  Chaiana Piovesan¹ 

[1] Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 2227, São Paulo, SP 05508-000, Brazil;Department of Stomatology, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

关键词: Calibration;    Examiners;    Epidemiologic surveys;    Dental caries;    Diagnosis;    ICDAS;   

Others  :  1125886
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6831-13-49

 received in 2013-06-13, accepted in 2013-09-24,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

In epidemiological surveys, a good reliability among the examiners regarding the caries detection method is essential. However, training and calibrating those examiners is an arduous task because it involves several patients who are examined many times. To facilitate this step, we aimed to propose a laboratory methodology to simulate the examinations performed to detect caries lesions using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) in epidemiological surveys.

Methods

A benchmark examiner conducted all training sessions. A total of 67 exfoliated primary teeth, varying from sound to extensive cavitated, were set in seven arch models to simulate complete mouths in primary dentition. Sixteen examiners (graduate students) evaluated all surfaces of the teeth under illumination using buccal mirrors and ball-ended probe in two occasions, using only coronal primary caries scores of the ICDAS. As reference standard, two different examiners assessed the proximal surfaces by direct visual inspection, classifying them in sound, with non-cavitated or with cavitated lesions. After, teeth were sectioned in the bucco-lingual direction, and the examiners assessed the sections in stereomicroscope, classifying the occlusal and smooth surfaces according to lesion depth. Inter-examiner reproducibility was evaluated using weighted kappa. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated at two thresholds: all lesions and advanced lesions (cavitated lesions in proximal surfaces and lesions reaching the dentine in occlusal and smooth surfaces).

Results

Regarding the reproducibility, the mean (range) of kappa values was 0.781 (0.529–0.927) for occlusal surfaces, 0.568 (0.191–0.881) for smooth surfaces, and 0.844 (0.698–0.971) for proximal surfaces. Considering all lesions, sensitivity and specificity mean values were respectively 0.724 and 0.844 for occlusal, 0.635 and 0.943 for smooth and 0.658 and 0.927 for proximal surfaces. For detecting advanced lesions, sensitivities and specificities were 0.563 and 0.920 for occlusal, 0.670 and 0.985 for smooth, and 0.838 and 0.985 for proximal surfaces.

Conclusion

The methodology purposed for training and calibration of several examiners designated for epidemiological surveys of dental caries in preschool children using the ICDAS is feasible, permitting the assessment of reliability and accuracy of the examiners previously to the survey´s development.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Piovesan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Agustsdottir H, Gudmundsdottir H, Eggertsson H, Jonsson SH, Gudlaugsson JO, Saemundsson SR, Eliasson ST, Arnadottir IB, Holbrook WP: Caries prevalence of permanent teeth: a national survey of children in Iceland using ICDAS. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010, 38(4):299-309.
• [2]Amorim RG, Figueiredo MJ, Leal SC, Mulder J, Frencken JE: Caries experience in a child population in a deprived area of Brazil, using ICDAS II. Clin Oral Investig 2012, 16(2):513-520.
• [3]Assaf AV, de Castro MM, Zanin L, Tengan C, Pereira AC: Effect of different diagnostic thresholds on dental caries calibration - a 12 month evaluation. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2006, 34(3):213-219.
• [4]Braga MM, Oliveira LB, Bonini GA, Bonecker M, Mendes FM: Feasibility of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) in epidemiological surveys and comparability with standard World Health Organization criteria. Caries Res 2009, 43(4):245-249.
• [5]Gonzalez MC, Ruiz JA, Fajardo MC, Gomez AD, Moreno CS, Ochoa MJ, Rojas LM: Comparison of the def index with Nyvad's caries diagnostic criteria in 3- and 4-year-old Colombian children. Pediatr Dent 2003, 25(2):132-136.
• [6]Pitts N: "ICDAS"–an international system for caries detection and assessment being developed to facilitate caries epidemiology, research and appropriate clinical management. Commun Dent Health 2004, 21(3):193-198.
• [7]Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB: The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007, 35(3):170-178.
• [8]Braga MM, Morais CC, Nakama RC, Leamari VM, Siqueira WL, Mendes FM: In vitro performance of methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009, 108(4):e35-41.
• [9]Braga MM, Mendes FM, Martignon S, Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR: In vitro comparison of Nyvad's system and ICDAS-II with Lesion Activity Assessment for evaluation of severity and activity of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Caries Res 2009, 43(5):405-412.
• [10]Braga MM, Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Imparato JC, Ricketts DN, Mendes FM: Clinical performance of two visual scoring systems in detecting and assessing activity status of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Caries Res 2010, 44(3):300-308.
• [11]Agbaje JO, Mutsvari T, Lesaffre E, Declerck D: Measurement, analysis and interpretation of examiner reliability in caries experience surveys: some methodological thoughts. Clin Oral Investig 2012, 16(1):117-127.
• [12]Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ: A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent 2002, 62(4):201-213.
• [13]Piovesan C, Ardenghi TM, Guedes RS, Ekstrand KR, Braga MM, Mendes FM: Activity assessment has little impact on caries parameters reduction in epidemiological surveys with preschool children. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2013, 41(3):204-211.
• [14]Fyffe HE, Deery C, Nugent ZJ, Nuttall NM, Pitts NB: In vitro validity of the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000, 28(1):52-58.
• [15]Downer MC: Concurrent validity of an epidemiological diagnostic system for caries with the histological appearance of extracted teeth as validating criterion. Caries Res 1975, 9(3):231-246.
• [16]Cleaton-Jones P, Hargreaves JA, Fatti LP, Chandler HD, Grossman ES: Dental caries diagnosis calibration for clinical field surveys. Caries Res 1989, 23(3):195-199.
• [17]Fyffe HE, Deery C, Nugent ZJ, Nuttall NM, Pitts NB: Effect of diagnostic threshold on the validity and reliability of epidemiological caries diagnosis using the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000, 28(1):42-51.
• [18]Reis A, Mendes FM, Angnes V, Angnes G, Grande RHM, Loguercio AD: Performance of methods of occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions. J Dent 2006, 34(2):89-96.
• [19]Novaes TF, Matos R, Gimenez T, Braga MM, Benedetto MS, Mendes FM: Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars - an in vitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2012, 22(6):459-466.
• [20]Matos R, Novaes TF, Braga MM, Siqueira WL, Duarte DA, Mendes FM: Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Caries Res 2011, 45(3):294-302.
• [21]Novaes TF, Matos R, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP, Mendes FM: Performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and conventional methods in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth–in vivo study. Caries Res 2009, 43(1):36-42.
• [22]Neuhaus KW, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Stich H, Lussi A: Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig 2011, 15(5):635-641.
• [23]Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A: Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 2008, 42(4):297-304.
• [24]Shoaib L, Deery C, Ricketts DN, Nugent ZJ: Validity and reproducibility of ICDAS II in primary teeth. Caries Res 2009, 43(6):442-448.
• [25]Lesaffre E, Mwalili SM, Declerck D: Analysis of caries experience taking inter-observer bias and variability into account. J Dent Res 2004, 83(12):951-955.