Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review

BMC Public Health

Kerin O′Dea²  Hassan Vally¹  Peter Morris³  Helen Eyles⁴  Julie Brimblecombe³  Andrew P Black² 

[1]School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

[2]Sansom Institute for Health Research, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

[3]Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia

[4]National Institute for Health Innovation, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

关键词: Nutritional status;    Dietary intake;    Health outcomes;    Disadvantaged families;    Food subsidy;   

Others  :  1162709
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-1099

 received in 2012-07-09, accepted in 2012-12-12,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Less healthy diets are common in high income countries, although proportionally higher in those of low socio-economic status. Food subsidy programs are one strategy to promote healthy nutrition and to reduce socio-economic inequalities in health. This review summarises the evidence for the health and nutritional impacts of food subsidy programs among disadvantaged families from high income countries.

Methods

Relevant studies reporting dietary intake or health outcomes were identified through systematic searching of electronic databases. Cochrane Public Health Group guidelines informed study selection and interpretation. A narrative synthesis was undertaken due to the limited number of studies and heterogeneity of study design and outcomes.

Results

Fourteen studies were included, with most reporting on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children in the USA. Food subsidy program participants, mostly pregnant or postnatal women, were shown to have 10–20% increased intake of targeted foods or nutrients. Evidence for the effectiveness of these programs for men or children was lacking. The main health outcome observed was a small but clinically relevant increase in mean birthweight (23–29g) in the two higher quality WIC studies.

Conclusions

Limited high quality evidence of the impacts of food subsidy programs on the health and nutrition of adults and children in high income countries was identified. The improved intake of targeted nutrients and foods, such as fruit and vegetables, could potentially reduce the rate of non-communicable diseases in adults, if the changes in diet are sustained. Associated improvements in perinatal outcomes were limited and most evident in women who smoked during pregnancy. Thus, food subsidy programs for pregnant women and children should aim to focus on improving nutritional status in the longer term. Further prospective studies and economic analyses are needed to confirm the health benefits and justify the investment in food subsidy programs.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Black et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL: Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006, 367(9524):1747-1757.
• [2]Symonds ME, Ramsay MM: Maternal-fetal nutrition during pregnancy and lactation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
• [3]Baker EA, Schootman M, Barnidge ECK: The role of race and poverty in access to foods that enable individuals to adhere to dietary guidelines. Prev Chronic Dis 2006, 3:A76.
• [4]Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C, Newman B: Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutr 2002, 5(5):663-669.
• [5]Drewnowski A, Darmon N: Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis. J Nutr 2005, 135(4):900-904.
• [6]Rangan AM, Schindeler S, Hector DJ, Gill TP, Webb KL: Consumption of ′extra′ foods by australian adults: types, quantities and contribution to energy and nutrient intakes. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009, 63(7):865-871.
• [7]Rayner M, Scarborough P: The burden of food related ill health in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005, 59(12):1054-1057.
• [8]Kant AK: Consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods by adult americans: nutritional and health implications. The third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988–1994. Am J Clin Nutr 2000, 72(4):929-936.
• [9]Khaw K-T, Wareham N, Bingham S, Welch A, Luben R, Day N: Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in Men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med 2008, 5(1):e12.
• [10]Chun OK, Floegel A, Chung S-J, Chung CE, Song WO, Koo SI: Estimation of antioxidant intakes from diet and supplements in U.S. Adults.[erratum appears in J nutr. 2010 May;140(5):1062]. J Nutr 2010, 140(2):317-324.
• [11]Gray L, Leyland AH: A multilevel analysis of diet and socio-economic status in scotland: investigating the 'Glasgow effect'. Public Health Nutr 2009, 12(9):1351-1358.
• [12]Drewnowski A, Darmon N: The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost. Am J Clin Nutr 2005, 82(1 Suppl):265S-273S.
• [13]Darmon N, Drewnowski A: Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr 2008, 87(5):1107-1117.
• [14]Green LW, Kreuter MW: Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach. 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
• [15]United States Department of Agriculture: Food and nutrition service. How the WIC helps. US Department of Agriculture; 2004. 20/6/2007]; Available from: http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/aboutwic/howwichelps.htm webcite
• [16]Oliveira V, Racine E, Olmsted J, Ghelfi L: The WIC program: Background, Trends and Issues. Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report, Number 27. Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2002.
• [17]Fox MK, Hamilton W, Lin B: Effects of Food Assistance and Nutrition Programs on Nutrition and Health: Volume 3, Literature Review. Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report No. 19–3. Washington: U.S: Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2004.
• [18]Hoynes HW, Page ME, Stevens AH: Is a WIC start a better start? evaluating WIC's impact on infant health using program introduction. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Inc, NBER Working Paper; 2009.
• [19]Joyce T, Racine A, Yunzal-Butler C: Reassessing the WIC effect: evidence from the pregnancy nutrition surveillance system. J Policy Anal Manage 2008, 27(2):277-303.
• [20]Ludwig J, Miller M: Interpreting the WIC debate. J Policy Anal Manage 2005, 24(4):691-701.
• [21]National Health Service: About healthy start. London: National Health Service; 2005. [22/4/2008]; Available from: http://www.healthystart.nhs.uk/en/fe/page.asp?n1=1&n2=8&n3=29 webcite
• [22]Kim CI, Lee Y, Kim BH, Lee HS, Jang YA: Development of supplemental nutrition care program for women, infants and children in korea: NutriPlus(+). Nutr Res Pract 2009, 3(3):171-179.
• [23]Hill F: Food mail: the canadian alternative to food stamps. Int J Circumpolar Health 1998, 57(1):177-181.
• [24]D'Souza L, Renfrew M, McCormick F, Dyson L, Wright K, Henderson J, et al.: Food-support programmes for low-income and socially disadvantaged childbearing women in developed countries - systematic review of the evidence. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
• [25]World Health Organisation: Fruit and vegetables for health. Geneva: World Health Organisation and Food and Agriculture Organisation; 2005.
• [26]Higgins JPT, Green S (Eds): In Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [Updated march 2011]. the cochrane collaboration. 2011. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org webcite
• [27]Armstrong R, Waters E, Jackson N, Oliver S, Popay J, Shepherd J, et al.: Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Version 2. Australia: Melbourne University; 2007.
• [28]The World Bank: Country and lending groups. Washington: World Bank; 2012. [24/03/2012]; Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups#High_income webcite
• [29]Outback Stores: Outback stores. Background. Darwin: Outback Stores; 2012. [9/10/2012]; Available from: http://www.outbackstores.com.au/background.html webcite
• [30]Ni Mhurchu C, Blakely T, Jiang Y, Eyles HC, Rodgers A: Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2010, 91(3):736-747.
• [31]Nnoaham KE, Sacks G, Rayner M, Mytton O, Gray A: Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies. Int J Epidemiol 2009, 38(5):1324-1333.
• [32]Herman DR, Harrison GG, Afifi AA, Jenks E: Effect of a targeted subsidy on intake of fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. Am J Public Health 2008, 98(1):98-105.
• [33]Kristjansson B, Petticrew M, MacDonald B, Krasevec J, Janzen L, Greenhalgh T, Wells GA, MacGowan J, Farmer AP, Shea B, Mayhew A, Tugwell P, Welch V: School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged students. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2007., (1) Art. No.: CD004676
• [34]Burns C, Kristjansson B, Harris G, Armstrong R, Cummins S, Black A, et al.: Community level interventions to improve food security in developed countries. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev [serial on the Internet] 2010., (12) Available from: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD008913/frame.html webcite
• [35]Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group: The data collection checklist. Ottawa: University of Ottawa; 2002.
• [36]Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al.: The newcastle-ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Health Research Institute; 2010. [23/09/2011]; Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp webcite
• [37]Burr ML, Trembeth J, Jones KB, Geen J, Lynch LA, Roberts ZES: The effects of dietary advice and vouchers on the intake of fruit and fruit juice by pregnant women in a deprived area: a controlled trial. Public Health Nutr 2007, 10(6):559-565.
• [38]Caan B, Horgen DM, Margen S, King JC, Jewell NP: Benefits associated with WIC supplemental feeding during the interpregnancy interval. Am J Clin Nutr 1987, 45(1):29-41.
• [39]Gunnell D, Smith GD, Ness AR, Frankel S: The effects of dietary supplementation on growth and adult mortality: a re-analysis and follow-up of a pre-war study. Public Health 2000, 114(2):109-116.
• [40]Herman DR, Harrison GG, Jenks E: Choices made by Low-income women provided with an economic supplement for fresh fruit and vegetable purchase. J Am Diet Assoc 2006, 106(5):740-744.
• [41]Kennedy BM, Champagne CM, Ryan DH, Newton R, Conish BK, Harsha DW, et al.: The "rolling store:" an economical and environmental approach to the prevention of weight gain in african american women. Ethn Dis 2009, 19(1):7-12.
• [42]Metcoff J, Costiloe P, Crosby WM: Effect of food supplementation (WIC) during pregnancy on birth weight. Am J Clin Nutr 1985, 41(5):933-947.
• [43]Pehrsson PR, Moser-Veillon PB, Sims LS, Suitor CW, Russek-Cohen E: Postpartum iron status in nonlactating participants and nonparticipants in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. Am J Clin Nutr 2001, 73(1):86-92.
• [44]Rush D, Alvir JM, Kenny DA, Johnson SS, Horvitz DG: The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children. III. Historical study of pregnancy outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 1988, 48(2 Suppl):412-428.
• [45]Rush D, Horvitz DG, Seaver WB, Leighton J, Sloan NL, Johnson SS, et al.: The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children. IV. Study methodology and sample characteristics in the longitudinal study of pregnant women, the study of children, and the food expenditures study. Am J Clin Nutr 1988, 48(2):429-438.
• [46]Rush D, Kurzon MR, Seaver WB, Shanklin DS: VII. Study of food expenditures. Am J Clin Nutr 1988, 48(2):512-519.
• [47]Rush D, Sloan NL, Leighton J, Alvir JM, Horvitz DG, Seaver WB, et al.: The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children V. Longitudinal study of pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr 1988, 48(2 Suppl):439-483.
• [48]Bailey LB, O'Farrell-Ray B, Mahan CS, Dimperio D: Vitamin B6, iron and folacin status of pregnant women. Nutr Res 1983, 3(6):783-793.
• [49]Currie J, Moretti E: Did the introduction of food stamps affect birth outcomes in california? In Making americans healthier: social and economic policy as health policy. Edited by Schoeni R, House J, Kaplan G, Pollack H. New York: Russell Sage Press; 2008.
• [50]United States Department of Agriculture: Food and nutrition service. WIC food packages. Alexandria: United States Department of Agriculture; 2010. [7/04/2012]; Available from: http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/benefitsandservices/foodpkg.HTM webcite
• [51]The Nordic Cochrane Centre: Review manager (RevMan) [computer program]. version 5.0. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
• [52]Lucas P, McIntosh K, Petticrew M, Roberts Helen M, Shiell A: Financial benefits for child health and well-being in low income or socially disadvantaged families in developed world countries. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev [serial on the Internet] 2008., (2) Available from: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD006358/frame.html webcite
• [53]Sterne JA, Davey Smith G: Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? BMJ 2001, 27(7280):226-231.
• [54]Gibson R: Principles of nutritional assessment. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
• [55]Baldrick FR, Woodside JV, Elborn JS, Young IS, McKinley MC: Biomarkers of fruit and vegetable intake in human intervention studies: a systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2011, 51(9):795-815.
• [56]Eyles H, Jiang Y, Ni Mhurchu C: Use of household supermarket sales data to estimate nutrient intakes: a comparison with repeat 24-hour dietary recalls. J Am Diet Assoc 2010, 110(1):106-110.
• [57]Rose D, Habicht JP, Devaney B: Household participation in the food stamp and WIC programs increases the nutrient intakes of preschool children. J Nutr 1998, 128(3):548-555.
• [58]Siega-Riz AM, Kranz S, Blanchette D, Haines PS, Guilkey DK, Popkin BM: The effect of participation in the WIC program on preschoolers' diets. J Pediatr 2004, 144(2):229-234.
• [59]Hall L, Collins CE, Morgan PJ, Burrows TL, Lubans DR, Callister R: Children's Intake of fruit and selected energy-dense nutrient-poor foods is associated with fathers' intake. J Am Diet Assoc 2011, 111(7):1039-1044.
• [60]Ford ES, Mokdad AH: Fruit and vegetable consumption and diabetes mellitus incidence among U.S. Adults. Prev Med 2001, 32(1):33-39.
• [61]Hung H-C, Joshipura KJ, Jiang R, Hu FB, Hunter D, Smith-Warner SA, et al.: Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96(21):1577-1584.
• [62]Crowe FL, Roddam AW, Key TJ, Appleby PN, Overvad K, Jakobsen MU, et al.: Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality from ischaemic heart disease: results from the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)-heart study. Eur Heart J 2011, 32(10):1235-1243.
• [63]Joshipura KJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, et al.: The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134(12):1106-1114.
• [64]Rush D, Leighton J, Sloan NL, Alvir JM, Horvitz DG, Seaver WB, et al.: The national WIC evaluation: evaluation of the special supplemental food program for women, infants, and children. VI. Study of infants and children. Am J Clin Nutr 1988, 48(2 Suppl):484-511.
• [65]Brug J, Kremers SP, Lenthe F, Ball K, Crawford D: Environmental determinants of healthy eating: in need of theory and evidence. Proc Nutr Soc 2008, 67(3):307-316.
• [66]Thornton LE, Crawford DA, Ball K: Neighbourhood-socioeconomic variation in women's diet: the role of nutrition environments. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010, 64(12):1423-1432.
• [67]Eyles HC, Mhurchu CN: Does tailoring make a difference? a systematic review of the long-term effectiveness of tailored nutrition education for adults. Nutr Rev 2009, 67(8):464-480.
• [68]Newby PK, Tucker KL: Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr Rev 2004, 62(5):177-203.
• [69]Smithers LG, Golley RK, Brazionis L, Lynch JW: Characterizing whole diets of young children from developed countries and the association between diet and health: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2011, 69(8):449-467.
• [70]U.S. General Accounting Office: Early intervention: federal investments like WIC can produce savings. GAO/HRD-92-18. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1992.
• [71]Devaney B, Bilheimer L, Schore J: Medicaid costs and birth outcomes: the effects of prenatal WIC participation and the use of prenatal care. J Policy Anal Manage 1992, 11(4):573-592.
• [72]Ford FA, Mouratidou T, Wademan SE, Fraser RB, Ford FA, Mouratidou T, et al.: Effect of the introduction of 'Healthy Start' on dietary behaviour during and after pregnancy: early results from the 'before and after' sheffield study. Br J Nutr 2009, 101(12):1828-1836.
• [73]Mouratidou T, Ford FA, Wademan SE, Fraser RB, Mouratidou T, Ford FA, et al.: Are the benefits of the 'Healthy Start' food support scheme sustained at three months postpartum? results from the sheffield 'before and after' study. Matern Child Nutr 2010, 6(4):347-357.
• [74]Capacci S, Mazzocchi M, Shankar B, Brambila Macias J, Verbeke W, Pérez-Cueto FJA, et al.: Policies to promote healthy eating in europe: a structured review of policies and their effectiveness. Nutr Rev 2012, 70(3):188-200.
• [75]Bitler MP, Currie J: The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New york city: what does it mean? J Policy Anal Manage 2005, 24(4):687-690.