Development of oral health policy in Nigeria: an analysis of the role of context, actors and policy process

BMC Oral Health

Obinna Onwujekwe⁴  Benjamin Uzochukwu³  Nkoli Ezumah⁵  Giuliano Russo⁶  Bassey Ebenso²  Nkoli Uguru¹  Enyi Etiaba⁴ 

[1] Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute for Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Department of Sociology/Anthropology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), The Nova University of Lisbon, Campus de Campolide, Lisbon, 1099-085, Portugal

关键词: Oral health;    Actors;    Context;    Process;    Oral health policy;   

Others  :  1183523
DOI  :  10.1186/s12903-015-0040-8

 received in 2014-12-17, accepted in 2015-04-23,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

In Nigeria, there is a high burden of oral health diseases, poor coordination of health services and human resources for delivery of oral health services. Previous attempts to develop an Oral Health Policy (OHP) to decrease the oral disease burden failed. However, a policy was eventually developed in November 2012. This paper explores the role of contextual factors, actors and the policy process in the development of the OHP and possible reasons why the current approved OHP succeeded.

Methods

The study was undertaken across Nigeria; information gathered through document reviews and in-depth interviews with five groups of purposively selected respondents. Analysis of the policy development process was guided by the policy triangle framework, examining context, policy process and actors involved in the policy development.

Results

The foremost enabling factor was the yearning among policy actors for a policy, having had four failed attempts. Other factors were the presence of a democratically elected government, a framework for health sector reform instituted by the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH). The approved OHP went through all stages required for policy development unlike the previous attempts. Three groups of actors played crucial roles in the process, namely academics/researchers, development partners and policy makers. They either had decision making powers or influenced policy through funding or technical ability to generate credible research evidence, all sharing a common interest in developing the OHP. Although evidence was used to inform the development of the policy, the complex interactions between the context and actors facilitated its approval.

Conclusions

The OHP development succeeded through a complex inter-relationship of context, process and actors, clearly illustrating that none of these factors could have, in isolation, catalyzed the policy development. Availability of evidence is necessary but not sufficient for developing policies in this area. Wider socio-political contexts in which actors develop policy can facilitate and/or constrain actors’ roles and interests as well as policy process. These must be taken into consideration at stages of policy development in order to produce policies that will strengthen the health system, especially in low and middle-income countries, where policy processes and influences can be often less than transparent.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Etiaba et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]European Platform. Better oral health-National oral health policies 2012 [February 10,2014]. Available from: http://www.oralhealthplatform.eu/.
• [2]World Health Organization. Writing Oral Health Policy: A manual for Oral Health Managers in the WHO African Region. Congo, Brazaville 2005.
• [3]Walt G, Shiffman J, Schneider H, Murray SF, Brugha R, Gilson L. ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy Plan. 2008; 23:308-17.
• [4]Lee K, Lush L, Walt G, Cleland J. Family planning policies and programmes in eight low-income countries: a comparative policy analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47:949-59.
• [5]Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan. 1994; 9(4):353-70.
• [6]Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. Making health policy. Open University Press, London; 2005.
• [7]ODI. Bridging Research and Policy in International Development. An analytical and practical framework. Briefing paper. October 2004. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2004 [cited 2014 14 March]. Available from: http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/198.pdf.
• [8]Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur R. Evidence-based health policy: context and utilisation. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 58(1):207-17.
• [9]Green A, Gerein N, Mirzoev T, Bird P, Pearson S, Anh LV et al.. Health policy processes in maternal health: a comparison of Vietnam. India China Health Policy. 2011; 100(2-3):167-73.
• [10]Writing oral health policy:a manual for oral health managers in the WHO African region. WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville; 2005.
• [11]Ministry of Health K, Rwanda,, FDI World Dental Federation F-V, France,. ORAL HEALTH POLICY IN RWANDA-Report of the 1st National Stakeholder Workshop 17-18 February, Kigali, Rwanda, Brazzaville, Cogo: 2005.
• [12]Kaimenyi JT. Oral health in kenya. Int Dent J. 2004; 54(6 (Suppl 1)):378-82.
• [13]Ministry of Health Uganda, World Health organization. National Oral Health Policy. In: Uganda MoH, editor. 2007.
• [14]Prinja S. Role of Ideas and Ideologies in Evidence-Based Health Policy. Iranian J Public Health. 2010; 39(1):64-9.
• [15]National Strategic Health Development Plan 2010-2015. Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria; 2010.
• [16]Olomola A. An analysis of the research-policy nexus in Nigeria.g links between economic research and policymaking. African World Press, New Jersey & IDRC, Canada; 2007.
• [17]Hanshom D. Economic policy research as an input to good governance in Africa. NEPRU Working Paper No. 91. (NEPRU) NEPRU. UNESCO, Windhoek, Namibia; 2003.
• [18]DFID Research Strategy: 2008–2013. DFID, London; 2008.
• [19]Olomola A. An analysis of the research-policy nexus in Nigeria. The Policy paradox in Africa – Strengthening links between economic research and policymaking (Chapter 8). ) African World Press & International Development Research Centre, Trenton New Jersey & Ottawa , Canada; 2007.
• [20]Akpata ES. Oral health in Nigeria. Int Dent J. 2004; 54:361-6.
• [21]Adegbembo AO, El-Nadeef MA. National study of periodontal status and treatment need among Nigerians. Int Dent J. 1995; 45:197-203.
• [22]Adeleke OA, Danfillo IS, Chukwu GA, Gyang MA, Jalo PH, Steve JP. Inequalities in oral healthcare in Nigeria. IADR -87th General Session and Exhibition, Miami, Florida; 2009.
• [23]Ndiaye CF. Oral health in the African region: progress and perspectives of the regional strategy. African J Oral Health. 2005; 2(1&2):2-9.
• [24]Adeniyi AA, Sofola OO, Kalliecharan RV. An appraisal of the oral health care system in Nigeria. Int Dent J. 2012; 62:292-300.
• [25]Federal Ministry of Health. In: Division D, editor. The Nigeria National Oral Health Policy. 2012.
• [26]Gilson L, Raphaely N. The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994–2007. Health Policy Plan. 2008; 23(5):294-307.
• [27]Petridou E. Theories of the policy process: contemporary scholarship and future directions. Policy studies journal, 42, S12-S32. Policy Studies J. 2014; 42:12-32.
• [28]Omar M, Green A, Bird P, Mirzoev T, Flisher A, Kigozi F et al.. Mental health policy process: a comparative study of Ghana, South Africa Uganda and Zambia. Int J Mental Health Syst. 2010; 4:24.
• [29]Meessen B, Hercot D, Noirhomme M, Ridde V, Tibouti A, Tashobya CK, et al. Removing user fees in the health sector: a review of policy processes in six sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy Plan. 2011;26 suppl 2:ii16–29.
• [30]Omar M, Green A, Bird P, Mirzoev T, Flisher A, Kigozi F et al.. Mental health policy process: a comparative study of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2010; 4(1):1-10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]CIA. The Wrold Factbook Washington, D.C.: Central Intelligence Agency; 2014 [cited 2015 20 February]. Available from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ni.html.
• [32]Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11(1):100. BioMed Central Full Text
• [33]Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: CA; 2009.
• [34]Fisher I, Ziviani J. Explanatory case studies: Implications and applications for clinical research. Aust Occup Ther J. 2004; 51:185-91.
• [35]Obinna C. Whither Nigeria’s oral health policy? The National Vanguard. 2013.
• [36]Collins C, Green A, Hunter D. Health sector reform and the interpretation of policy context. Health Policy. 1999; 47:69-83.
• [37]Araújo JLC, Maciel FR. Developing an operational framework for health policy analysis. Rev bras saúde matern infant. Recife. 2001; 1(3):203-21.
• [38]Reich MR. The politics of agenda setting in international health:child health versus adult health in developing countries. J Int Dev. 1995; 7:489-502.
• [39]Foltz AM. The policy process. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva; 1996.
• [40]Green A, Gerein N, Mirzoev T, Bird P, Pearson S, Anh LV et al.. Health policy processes in maternal health: a comparison of Vietnam, India and China. Health Policy. Health Policy. 2011; 100:167-73.
• [41]Tantivess S, Walt G. The role of state and non-state actors in the policy process: the contribution of policy networks to the scale-up of anti-retroviral therapy in Thailand. Health Policy Plan. 2008; 23:328-38.
• [42]Seddoh A, Akoh SA. Policy initiation and political levers in health policy: lessons from Ghana’s health insurance. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12 Suppl1:S10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [43]Stover J, Johnston A. The Art of policy formulation: experiences from Africa in developing national HIV/AIDS policies. The Futures group International, Washington DC; 1999.
• [44]World Health Organization. There are no rules for sample size in qualitative research. 2004. Available from: apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js6169e/7.6.html.
• [45]Mason M. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews [63 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum. Qualitative Social Research. 2010;11(3):Art. 8. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387.