Co-interviewing across gender and culture: expanding qualitative research methods in Melanesia

BMC Public Health

David J MacLaren¹  Tracie A Mafile’o⁴  Rachael Tommbe³  Matupit Darius²  Unia K Api²  Michelle L Redman-MacLaren¹ 

[1] College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, McGregor Rd, Smithfield, Cairns, Australia;School of Theology, Pacific Adventist University, Port Moresby, National Capital District, Papua New Guinea;School of Health Science, Pacific Adventist University, Port Moresby, National Capital District, Papua New Guinea;Deputy Vice Chancellor, Pacific Adventist University, Port Moresby, National Capital District, Papua New Guinea

关键词: Melanesia;    Papua New Guinea;    Power;    Gender;    Culture;    Public health research;    Qualitative research;    Co-interviewing;   

Others  :  1127975
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-922

 received in 2014-03-31, accepted in 2014-08-29,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The social and cultural positions of both researchers and research participants influence qualitative methods and study findings. In Papua New Guinea (PNG), as in other contexts, gender is a key organising characteristic and needs to be central to the design and conduct of research. The colonial history between researcher and participant is also critical to understanding potential power differences. This is particularly relevant to public health research, much of which has emerged from a positivist paradigm. This paper describes our critical reflection of flexible researcher responses enacted during qualitative research in PNG.

Methods

Led by a senior male HIV researcher from PNG, a male from a PNG university and a female from an Australian university conducted qualitative interviews about faith-based responses to HIV in PNG. The two researchers planned to conduct one-on-one interviews matching gender of participants and interviewer. However, while conducting the study, four participants explicitly requested to be interviewed by both researchers. This experience led us to critically consider socially and culturally situated ways of understanding semi-structured interviewing for public health research in Melanesia.

Results

New understandings about public health research include: (i) a challenge to the convention that the researcher holds more power than the research participant, (ii) the importance of audience in Melanesia, (iii) cultural safety can be provided when two people co-interview and (iv) the effect an esteemed leader heading the research may have on people’s willingness to participate. Researchers who occupy insider-outsider roles in PNG may provide participants new possibilities to communicate key ideas.

Conclusions

Our recent experience has taught us public health research methods that are gender sensitive and culturally situated are pivotal to successful research in Melanesia. Qualitative research requires adaptability and reflexivity. Public health research methods must continue to expand to reflect the diverse worldviews of research participants. Researchers need to remain open to new possibilities for learning.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Redman-MacLaren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]MacLaren D, Tommbe R, Mafile’o T, TM Manineng C, Fregonese F, Redman-MacLaren M, Wood M, Browne K, Muller R, Kaldor J, McBride WJ: Foreskin cutting beliefs and practices and the acceptability of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea. BMC Public Health 2013, 13(1):818. BioMed Central Full Text
• [2]Tommbe R, MacLaren DJ, Redman-MacLaren ML, Mafile'o T, Asugeni L, McBride WJ: Researching male circumcision for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea: a process that incorporates science, faith and culture. Health Res Policy Systems 2013, 11(1):1-8. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]MacLaren ML: Students, sex and Solomon Islands: Realities of Participation in Action Research. Brisbane, Australia: Action Learning & Action Research Association National Conference; 2006:24-25.
• [4]Timothy-Harrington R: Knowledge of HIV and HIV Prevention in Community Members Around Atoifi. Honiara, Solomon Islands: Inaugural Solomon Islands National Nurses’ Research Symposium; 2012.
• [5]Simeon L, Mafile'o T, Api UK, Gane B, Thomas B: Successful Models of Youth Leadership: A Study of Papua New Guinea Youth. Port Moresby: Pacific Adventist University With Pacific Leadership Program, AusAID 2010.
• [6]Smith LT: Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. 2nd edition. London: Zed Books; 2012.
• [7]Ackerly B, True J: Back to the future: Feminist theory, activism, and doing feminist research in an age of globalization. Women’s Stud Int Forum 2010, 33(5):464-472.
• [8]Thibodeaua S, North Peiganb F: Loss of trust among first nation people: implications when implementing child protection treatment initiatives. First Peoples Child Family Review 2007, 3(4):50-58.
• [9]Definition of ‘Power’ in English http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/power webcite
• [10]Strathern M: Dealing With Inequality: Analysing Gender Relations in Melanesia and Beyond: Essays by Members of the 1983/1984 Anthropological Research Group at the Research School of Pacific Studies, the Australian National University. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 1987.
• [11]National AIDS Council Secretariat of Papua New Guinea: National Gender Policy and Plan on HIV and AIDS 2006–2010. Papua New Guinea: Port Moresby: National AIDS Council Secretariat; 2006.
• [12]Lewis IR: At risk: the relationship between experiences of child sexual abuse and Women’s HIV status in Papua New guinea. J Child Sex Abus 2012, 21(3):273-294.
• [13]Kelep-Malpo K: Matrilineality and its implications for traditional and contemporary Papua New Guinea cultures. Catalyst 2007, 37:1.
• [14]Hinton R, Earnest J: Stressors, coping, and social support among women in Papua New Guinea. Qual Health Res 2010, 20(2):224-238.
• [15]Redman-Maclaren ML, Mills J, Tommbe R, Maclaren DJ, Speare R, McBride WJ: Women and HIV in a moderate prevalence setting: an integrative review. BMC Public Health 2013, 13(1):552. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Mertens DM: Transformative Research and Evaluation. New York: The Guilford Press; 2009.
• [17]Mertens D, Cram F, Chilisa B: Indigenous Pathways into Social Research. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press Inc; 2013.
• [18]Kovach M: Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2009.
• [19]Api UK, Redman-MacLaren ML, Darius M, Tommbe R, MacLaren DJ: A Faith Based Organisation Response to HIV: Perspectives from ADRA. Lae, Papua New Guinea: Meeting of the Sexual Health Society of Papua New Guinea, PNG Medical Symposium; 2013:5-6.
• [20]Louis MR, Bartunek JM: Insider/outsider research teams: collaboration across diverse perspectives. J Manag Inq 1992, 1(2):101-110.
• [21]Ritchie J, Zwi AB, Blignault I, Bunde-Birouste A, Silove D: Insider-outsider positions in health-development research: reflections for practice. Dev Pract 2009, 19(1):106-112.
• [22]Hampshire K, Iqbal N, Blell M, Simpson B: The interview as narrative ethnography: seeking and shaping connections in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2012, 1-17.
• [23]Burnard P: Some problems in using ethnographic methods in nursing research: commentary and examples from a Thai nursing study. Divers Health Soc Care 2004, 1(1):45-51.
• [24]Starhawk (pseud. M Simons): Truth or Dare: Encounters with Power, Authority, and Mystery. San Fransisco: Harper and Row; 1987.
• [25]Stringer E: Action Research. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2014.
• [26]Dick B, Stringer E, Huxham C: Theory in action research. Action Res 2009, 7(1):5-12.
• [27]Vähäsantanen K, Saarinen J: The power dance in the research interview: manifesting power and powerlessness. Qual Res 2013, 13(5):493-510.
• [28]Ndimande BS: Decolonizing research in postapartheid South Africa. Qual Inq 2012, 18(3):215-226.
• [29]Goddard M: Substantial Justice: An Anthropology of Village Courts in Papua New Guinea. New York: Berghahn Books; 2009.
• [30]Narokobi B: The Melanesian Way. Port Moresby: Port Moresby Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies; 1983.
• [31]Czymoniewicz-Klippel MT, Brijnath B, Crockett B: Ethics and the promotion of inclusiveness within qualitative research: case examples from Asia and the Pacific. Qual Inq 2010, 16(5):332-341.
• [32]Nabobo-Baba U: Knowing and Learning: An Indigenous Fijian Approach. Suva, Fiji: APS Publications; 2006.
• [33]Mafile’o T, Kaise Api U: Understanding youth resilience in Papua New Guinea through life story. Qual Soc Work 2009, 8(4):469-488.
• [34]Massey PD, Wakageni J, Kekeubata E, Maena’adi J, Laete’esafi J, Waneagea J, Fangaria G, Jimuru C, Houaimane M, Talana J, MacLaren D, Speare R: TB questions, East Kwaio answers: community-based participatory research in a remote area of Solomon Islands. Rural Remote Health 2012, 12:2139.
• [35]Redman-MacLaren M, MacLaren D, Harrington H, Asugeni R, Timothy-Harrington R, Kekeubata E, Speare R: Mutual research capacity strengthening: a qualitative study of two-way partnerships in public health research. Int J Equity Health 2012, 11(1):79. BioMed Central Full Text
• [36]Redman-MacLaren M, MacLaren D, Solomon J, Muse A, Asugeni R, Harrington H, Kekuabata E, Speare R, Clough A: Research workshop to research work: initial steps in establishing health research systems on Malaita, Solomon Islands. Health Res Policy Systems 2010, 8(1):33. BioMed Central Full Text
• [37]Clarke AE: Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2005.
• [38]D’Cruz H, Gillingham P, Melendez S: Reflexivity, its meanings and relevance for social work: a critical review of the literature. Brit J Soc Work 2007, 37(1):73-90.
• [39]Denzin NK, Lincoln YS: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011.