Impact of a fixed price system on the supply of institutional long-term care: a comparative study of Japanese and German metropolitan areas

BMC Health Services Research

Kazuo Kawahara¹  Keiko Yoshida¹ 

[1] Department of Health Policy Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan

关键词: Metropolitan areas;    Fixed price system;    Equitable supply;    Excess demand;    Institutional care facility;    Long-term care;   

Others  :  1134201
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-48

 received in 2013-07-16, accepted in 2014-01-30,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The need for institutional long-term care is increasing as the population ages and the pool of informal care givers declines. Care services are often limited when funding is controlled publicly. Fees for Japanese institutional care are publicly fixed and supply is short, particularly in expensive metropolitan areas. Those insured by universal long-term care insurance (LTCI) are faced with geographically inequitable access. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of a fixed price system on the supply of institutional care in terms of equity.

Methods

The data were derived from official statistics sources in both Japan and Germany, and a self-administered questionnaire was used in Japan in 2011. Cross-sectional multiple regression analyses were used to examine factors affecting bed supply of institutional/residential care in fixed price and free prices systems in Tokyo (Japan), and an individually-bargained price system in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany). Variables relating to costs and needs were used to test hypotheses of cost-dependency and need-orientation of bed supply in each price system. Analyses were conducted using data both before and after the introduction of LTCI, and the results of each system were qualitatively compared.

Results

Total supply of institutional care in Tokyo under fixed pricing was found to be cost-dependent regarding capital costs and scale economies, and negatively related to need. These relationships have however weakened in recent years, possibly caused by political interventions under LTCI. Supply of residential care in Tokyo under free pricing was need-oriented and cost-dependent only regarding scale economies. Supply in North Rhine-Westphalia under individually bargained pricing was cost-independent and not negatively related to need.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that publicly funded fixed prices have a negative impact on geographically equitable supply of institutional care. The contrasting results of the non-fixed-price systems for Japanese residential care and German institutional care provide further theoretical supports for this and indicate possible solutions against inequitable supply.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Yoshida and Kawahara; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Society at a Glance 2011: OECD social indicators. 2011. http://www.oecd.org/social/societyataglance.htm webcite
• [2]Japan Statistics Bureau: Statistical Handbook of Japan. 2011. http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/index.htm webcite
• [3]Campbell JC: Sustaining long-term care insurance in Japan and beyond. In Reforming Health Social Security Proceeding of an International Seminar. Tokyo. Washington: The World Bank East Asia and Pacific Region Human Development Sector Unit; 2005:84-98. [Working Paper Series, No. 2005-4]
• [4]Norton E: Long-term care. In Handbook of Health Economics, Volume 1. Edited by Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V; 2000:955-993.
• [5]Japan Institute of Workers’ Evolution: Kaigo wo okonau roudousha no ryouritsushien nikakawaru chousakenkyū houkokusho (Survey Report for Supporting Workers in Balancing Work and Long-term Care). 2011. (in Japanese) http://www.jiwe.or.jp/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=LxeEikaeQRE%3D&tabid=134 webcite
• [6]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Sizing up the challenge ahead: future demographic trends and long-term care costs. Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care 2011. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/help-wanted/sizing-up-the-challenge-ahead_9789264097759-7-en webcite
• [7]Nakazawa K: Tokyoken niokeru kaigoshisetsu no kensetsu to bunpu ni kansuru jisshou bunseki (Empirical analysis on establishment and distribution of institutional elderly care facilities in Greater Tokyo). In Kaigo sābisu no jisshō kenkyū: seido henka to seisaku taiō (Empirical Studies: Institutional Changes and Political Measure). Edited by Nakazawa K. Tokyo: Mitsubishi Economic Research Institute; 2010:75-93. in Japanese
• [8]Miyazawa H: Uneven nursing care service opportunity and the behavior of service providers under the long-term care insurance system: a statistical analysis in the Kanto District. Geogr Rev Jpn 2003, 76(2):59-80. (in Japanese)
• [9]Tokyo Metropolitan Government: Tokyo-to koureishahokenfukushikeikaku Heisei 24-26(Health Care and Welfare Planning for the Elderly of Tokyo Metropolitan Government for 2012 to 2014). (in Japanese) http://www.fukushihoken.metro.tokyo.jp/kourei/shisaku/koureisyakeikaku/05keikaku2426/05keikakuhtml/index.html webcite
• [10]Inoue Y: Perspectives on housing for the elderly from the aspect of community-based integrated care system. J Nat Institute Publ Health 2012, 6(2):119-124. (in Japanese)
• [11]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Aging, Housing and Urban Development. Paris: OECD Publications; 2003.
• [12]Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Tokubetsuyougoroujinhōmu niokeru nyūshomoushikomi no jittai nikansuru chousakenkyū: shakaihokenshingikai kaigohokenbukai dai 78kai Shiryou (Survey on the Actual Situation of Applications for Admission to Special Nursing Homes for the Elderly: Documents for the 78th Social Insurance Council’s Subcommittee of Long-term Care Insurance). 2011. in Japanese
• [13]Blank RH, Burau V: Comparative Health Policy. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
• [14]Mankiw NG: Principles of Economics. 4th edition. Mason: Thomson/South-Western; 2007.
• [15]Wonderling D, Gruen R, Black N: Introduction to Health Economics. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2010.
• [16]Scanlon WJ: A theory of the nursing home market. Inquiry 1980, 17(1):25-41.
• [17]Nyman JA: Analysis of nursing home use and bed supply: Wisconsin, 1983. Health Serv Res 1989, 24(4):511-537.
• [18]Swan JH, Kitchener M, Harrington C: Medicaid nursing facility rates, capacity, and utilization: a structural analysis. Soc Work Publ Health 2009, 24:380-400.
• [19]Congressional Budget Office: A CBO Study: Rural Hospitals and Medicare’s Prospective Payment System. 1991. http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/76xx/doc7653/91-cbo-037.pdf webcite
• [20]Lillie-Blanton M, Felt S, Redmon P, Renn S, Machlin S, Wennar E: Rural and urban hospital closures, 1985-1988: operating and environmental characteristics that affect risk. Inquiry 1992, 29(3):332-344.
• [21]Li P, Schneider JE, Ward MM: Converting to critical access status: how does it affect rural hospitals’ financial performance? Inquiry 2009, 46:46-57.
• [22]Yin RK: Case Study Research: design and methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 2006.
• [23]Roth G, Rothgang H: The effects of the long-term care insurance act on nursing home rates. Z Gesundh Wiss (J Publ Health) 1999, 7(4):306-334. (in German)
• [24]Rothgang H: Long-term care in Germany. In Reforming Health Social Security Proceeding of an International Seminar: June 2005. Tokyo. Washington: The World Bank East Asia and Pacific Region Human Development Sector Unit; 2005:84-98. [Working Paper Series, No. 2005-4]
• [25]Nomura Research Institute: Chiikishakai oyobi keizai niokeru tokuteishisetu no yakuwari oyobi kouken nikansuru chousakenkyū houkokusho: keizaisangyoushou itakuchousa (Report of the Survey on Roles of Designated Facilities for Residential Care in Community and Economy, and their Contributions: a Survey Commissioned by Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry). Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. 2011. (in Japanese) http://www.meti.go.jp/meti_lib/report/2011fy/E001554.pdf webcite
• [26]German Federal Parliament: Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung: Zweiter Bericht über die Entwicklung der Pflegeversicherung (Briefing by the Federal Government: Second Report on the Development of Long-term care Insurance). 2001. [Drucksache (Printed matter), 14/5590] (in German) http://www.bmg.bund.de/fileadmin/dateien/Publikationen/Pflege/Berichte/Zweiter_Bericht_ueber_die_Entwicklung_der_Pflegeversicherung.pdf webcite
• [27]German Federal Statistical Office: Pflegestatistik 2009: Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung Deutschlandergebnisse (Statistics on Long-Term Care 2009: Long-term Care within the Framework of Social Long-term Care Insurance in Germany). Wiesbaden; 2011. in German
• [28]Ikegami N, Yamaguchi K, Yamada Y: The long term care insurance law in Japan: impact on institutional care facilities. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 2003, 18:217-221.
• [29]Yamamoto K: Gyouseikaramita koureishafukushi (Social Welfare for the Elderly from Administrative Perspective). 2nd edition. Tokyo: Houritsu Bunka Sha; 2003. in Japanese
• [30]German Federal Ministry for Health: Abschlussbericht zur Studie “Wirkungen des Pflege-Weiterentwicklungsgesetzes“ (Final Study Report „Impact of Law for Further Development of Long-term Care Insurance “). Berlin; 2011. (in German) https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/dateien/Publikationen/Pflege/Berichte/Abschlussbericht_zur_Studie_Wirkungen_des_Pflege-Weiterentwicklungsgesetzes.pdf webcite
• [31]Dräther H, Jacobs K, Rothgang H: Fokus Pflegeversicherung: Nach der Reform ist vor der Reform (Focus on Long Term Care Insurance: After the Reform is Before the Reform). Berlin: KomPart-Verlagsgesellschaft; 2009. in German
• [32]Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Overview of the Revision of the Long-term Care Insurance System: Amendment of the Long-term Care Insurance and Long-term Care Fee. 2007. http://www.ilcjapan.org/linksE/doc/Overview_of_the_Revision_of_LTCI.pdf webcite
• [33]Wasem J, Rothgang H, Greß S: Vergütungsfindung auf dem stationären Pflegemarkt in Nordrhein-Westfalen: Bestandsaufnahme und Alternativen (Determination of remunerations in institutional care market in North-Rhine Westphalia: current situation and alternatives). University Duisburg-Essen, Faculty for Economics and Business Administration; 2005. [Working Paper Campus Essen 144](in German) http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23148 webcite
• [34]Suzuki W: Hieirihoumonkaigogyousha ha yūri ka (Are not-for-profit operators advantaged?). Q Soc Secur Res 2002, 38(1):74-88. (in Japanese)
• [35]Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Kaigokyūfuhijittaichousanogaikyou (Overview of the Fact-finding Survey on Benefits of Long-term Care Insurance). 2010. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kaigo/kyufu/10/kekka1.html webcite
• [36]German Federal Ministry of Health: Bericht der Bundesregierung über die Entwicklung der Pflegeversicherung und den Stand der Pflegerischen Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Report on Development of Long-Term Care Insurance and Situation of Care Services in Federal Republic of Germany). Bonn; 2011. in German
• [37]Williams A: Health economics: the cheerful face of the dismal science. In Being Reasonable about the Economics of Health. Edited by Culyer AJ, Maynard A. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 1997:45-53.
• [38]Feldstein PJ: Health Care Economics. 7th edition. Delmar Cengage Learning: Clifton Park NY; 2012.
• [39]Andersen R, Newman JF: Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Q 2005, 83(4):1-28.
• [40]Statistics of Tokyo: Statistics of Tokyo. http://www.toukei.metro.tokyo.jp/ webcite
• [41]E-Stat: Portal Site of Official Statistics of Japan. http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/eStatTopPortal.do webcite
• [42]German Federal Statistical Office: German Federal Statistical Office. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Startseite.html webcite
• [43]Information und Technik Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW State Statistical Office) http://www.it.nrw.de/statistik/ webcite
• [44]World Health Organization: Monitoring the Building Blocks of Health Systems: a Handbook of Indicators and their Measurement Strategies. 2010. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/systems/WHO_MBHSS_2010_full_web.pdf webcite
• [45]Tokyo Bureau of Finance: Tokyoto kijunchikakaku (Prices of Standard Residential Areas in Tokyo). (in Japanese). http://www.zaimu.metro.tokyo.jp/kijyunti/index.html webcite
• [46]Hello work internet service https://www.hellowork.go.jp webcite
• [47]McKay NL: An econometric analysis of cost and scale economics in the nursing homes industry. J Hum Resour 1988, 23(1):57-75.
• [48]Christensen EW: Scale and scope economies in nursing homes: a quantile regression approach. Health Econ 2004, 13:363-377.
• [49]German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development: Listen der Mietenstufen der Gemeinden 2002/ 2009 (List of rent levels of the municipalities). in German
• [50]Statistik Service West der Arbeitsagentur (Labor Employment Office for NRW): Arbeitsmarktstatisitk: Arbeitslose und gemeldete sozialversicherungspflichtige Arbeitsstellen – Fachkraft Altenpflege (Labor Market Statistics: Unemployed and Registered Jobs Subject to Social Insurance Contribution). Düsseldorf; 2011.
• [51]Luppa M, Luck T, Weyerer S, König HH, Brähler E, Riedel-Heller SG: Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2010, 39:31-38.
• [52]Gaugler JE, Duval S, Anderson KA, Kane RL: Predicting nursing home admission in the U.S.: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2007, 7:13.
• [53]Verbeek M: A Guide to Modern Econometrics. 4th edition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication; 2012.
• [54]Tokuteishisetujigyousharenrakukyougikai (Association of Operators of Facilities Designated to Provide Residential Care Services): Tokuteishisetsujigyou nikansuru kiseikaikaku no youbou (Requirements for Regulatory Reform for Residential Care Facilities). Tokyo; 2009. in Japanese
• [55]Nyman JA: Prospective and ‘cost-plus’ Medicaid reimbursement, excess Medicaid demand, and the quality of nursing home care. J Health Econ 1985, 4:237-259.
• [56]Grabowski DC, Angelelli JJ: The relationship of Medicaid payment rates, bed constraint policies, and risk-adjusted pressure ulcers. Health Serv Res 2004, 39:793-812.