Scheduled telephone visits in the veterans health administration patient-centered medical home

BMC Health Services Research

Benjamin J Powers¹  Susanne Danus²  Natalie Ammarell²  Karen Steinhauser³  Heather A King²  Nina R Sperber³ 

[1] St. Luke’s Health System, 190 E Bannock St, Boise, ID 83712, USA;Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham VAMC, Legacy Tower (NC Mutual Building) Suite 600, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA;Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, 411 West Chapel Hill Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA

关键词: Primary care;    Telemedicine;    Health services research;   

Others  :  1133027
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-145

 received in 2013-10-30, accepted in 2014-03-18,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patient-centered medical home model, Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT), includes telephone visits to improve care access and efficiency. Scheduled telephone visits can replace in-person care for some focused issues, and more information is needed to understand how this mode can best work for primary care. We conducted a study at the beginning of PACT implementation to elicit stakeholder views on this mode of healthcare delivery, including potential facilitators and barriers.

Methods

We conducted focus groups with primary care patients (n = 3 groups), providers (n = 2 groups) and staff (n = 2 groups). Questions were informed by Donabedian’s framework to evaluate and improve healthcare quality. Content analysis and theme matrix techniques were used to explore themes. Content was assigned a positive or negative valuation to indicate whether it was a facilitator or barrier. PACT principles were used as an organizing framework to present stakeholder responses within the context of the VHA patient-centered medical home program.

Results

Scheduled telephone visits could potentially improve care quality and efficiency, but stakeholders were cautious. Themes were identified relating to the following PACT principles: comprehensiveness, patient-centeredness, and continuity of care. In sum, scheduled telephone visits were viewed as potentially beneficial for routine care not requiring physical examination, and patients and providers suggested using them to evaluate need for in-person care; however, visits would need to be individualized, with patients able to discontinue if not satisfied. Patients and staff asserted that providers would need to be kept in the loop for continuity of care. Additionally, providers and staff emphasized needing protected time for these calls.

Conclusion

These findings inform development of scheduled telephone visits as part of patient-centered medical homes by providing evidence about areas that may be leveraged to most effectively implement this mode of care. Presenting this service as enhanced care, with ability to triage need for in-person clinic visits and consequently provide more frequent contact, may most adequately meet different stakeholder expectations. In this way, scheduled telephone visits may serve as both a substitute for in-person care for certain situations and a supplement to in-person interaction.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Sperber et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Stange KC, Nutting PA, Miller WL, Jaén CR, Crabtree BF, Flocke SA, Gill JM: Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med 2010, 25(6):601-612.
• [2]Weingarten MA: Telephone consultations with patients: a brief study and review of the literature. J R Coll Gen Pract 1982, 32(245):766-770.
• [3]Staresinic AG, Sorkness CA, Goodman BM, Pigarelli DW: Comparison of outcomes using 2 delivery models of anticoagulation care. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166(9):997.
• [4]Adler-Milstein J, Kvedar J, Bates DW: Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014, 33(2):207-215.
• [5]Bishop TF, Press MJ, Mendelsohn JL, Casalino LP: Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013, 32(8):1361-1367.
• [6]Telehealth services [http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/telehealthsrvcsfctsht.pdf webcite]
• [7]Klein S: The veterans health administration: implementing patient-centered medical homes in the Nation’s largest integrated delivery system. Commonwealth Fund publication 2011, 1537:16.
• [8]Rosland A-M, Nelson K, Sun H, Dolan ED, Maynard C, Bryson C, Stark R, Shear JM, Kerr E, Fihn SD: The patient-centered medical home in the veterans health administration. American Journal of Managed Care 2013, 19(7):e263.
• [9]True G, Butler A, Lamparska B, Lempa M, Shea J, Asch D, Werner R: Open access in the patient-centered medical home: lessons from the veterans health administration. J Gen Intern Med 2013, 28(4):539-545.
• [10]Beaver K, Tysver-Robinson D, Campbell M, Twomey M, Williamson S, Hindley A, Susnerwala S, Dunn G, Luker K: Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ: British Medical Journal 2009, 338.
• [11]Waterman AD, Banet G, Milligan PE, Frazier A, Verzino E, Walton B, Gage BF: Patient and physician satisfaction with a telephone‒based anticoagulation service. J Gen Intern Med 2001, 16(7):460-463.
• [12]Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P, Welch HG: Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association 1992, 267(13):1788-1793.
• [13]LaVela SL, Schectman G, Gering J, Locatelli SM, Gawron A, Weaver FM: Understanding health care communication preferences of veteran primary care users. Patient Educ Couns 2012., 88(3)
• [14]McKinstry B, Watson P, Pinnock H, Heaney D, Sheikh A: Telephone consulting in primary care: a triangulated qualitative study of patients and providers. Br J Gen Pract 2009, 59(563):e209-e218.
• [15]Hewitt H, Gafaranga J, McKinstry B: Comparison of face-to-face and telephone consultations in primary care: qualitative analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2010, 60(574):e201-e212.
• [16]Car J, Sheikh A: Telephone consultations. BMJ: British Medical Journal 2003, 326(7396):966.
• [17]Tuerk PW, Fortney J, Bosworth HB, Wakefield B, Ruggiero KJ, Acierno R, Frueh BC: Toward the development of national telehealth services: the role of veterans health administration and future directions for research. Telemedicine and e-Health 2010, 16(1):115-117.
• [18]Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82(4):581-629.
• [19]Donabedian A: Methods for deriving criteria for assessing the quality of medical care. Med Care Rev 1980, 37(7):653.
• [20]Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005, 15(9):1277-1288.
• [21]Miles MB, Huberman AM: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc; 1994.
• [22]Charmaz K: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.; 2006.
• [23]Muhr T: User’s Manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0. 2nd edition. Berlin: Scientific Software Development; 2004.
• [24]Ghorob A, Bodenheimer T: Sharing the care to improve access to primary care. N Engl J Med 2012, 366(21):1955-1957.
• [25]Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart E, Jaén C: Transforming physician practices to patient-centered medical homes: lessons from the national demonstration project. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011, 30(3):439-445.
• [26]McKinstry B, Watson P, Pinnock H, Heaney D, Sheikh A: Confidentiality and the telephone in family practice: a qualitative study of the views of patients, clinicians and administrative staff. Fam Pract 2009, 26(5):344-350.