期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Nurse awareness of clinical research: a survey in a Japanese University Hospital
Kikue Kida1  Rumi Katashima2  Toshiko Miyamoto2  Michiko Yoshimaru2  Shigemi Takai2  Hiroaki Yanagawa2 
[1]Division of Nursing, Tokushima University Hospital, Kuramoto-cho 2, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
[2]Clinical Trial Center for Developmental Therapeutics, Tokushima University Hospital, Kuramoto-cho 2, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
关键词: Contribution;    Awareness;    Clinical research;    Research ethics;    Nurses;   
Others  :  865377
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2288-14-85
 received in 2013-08-05, accepted in 2014-06-25,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Clinical research plays an important role in establishing new treatments and improving the quality of medical practice. Since the introduction of the concept of clinical research coordinators (CRC) in Japan, investigators and CRC work as a clinical research team that coordinates with other professionals in clinical trials leading to drug approval (registration trials). Although clinical nurses collaborate with clinical research teams, extended clinical research teams that include clinical nurses may contribute to the ethical and scientific pursuit of clinical research.

Methods

As knowledge of clinical research is essential for establishing an extended clinical research team, we used questionnaires to survey the knowledge of clinical nurses at Tokushima University Hospital. Five-point and two-point scales were used. Questions as for various experiences were also included and the relationship between awareness and experiences were analyzed.

Results

Among the 597 nurses at Tokushima University Hospital, 453 (75.9%) responded to the questionnaires. In Japan, registration trials are regulated by pharmaceutical affairs laws, whereas other types of investigator-initiated research (clinical research) are conducted based on ethical guidelines outlined by the ministries of Japan. Approximately 90% of respondents were aware of registration trials and clinical research, but less than 40% of the nurses were aware of their difference. In clinical research terminology, most respondents were aware of informed consent and related issues, but ≤50% were aware of other things, such as the Declaration of Helsinki, ethical guidelines, Good Clinical Practice, institutional review boards, and ethics committees. We found no specific tendency in the relationship between awareness and past experiences, such as nursing patients who were participating in registration trials and/or clinical research or taking a part in research involving patients as a nursing student or a nurse.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that clinical nurses have only limited knowledge on clinical research and the importance to have chances to make nurses aware of clinical research-related issues is suggested to establish an extended research team. Because of the study limitations, further study is warranted to determine the role of clinical nurses in establishing a suitable infrastructure for ethical pursuit of clinical research.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Yanagawa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140726062251891.pdf 305KB PDF download
50KB Image download
【 图 表 】

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Björkström ME, Hamrin EK: Swedish nurses’ attitudes towards research and development within nursing. J Adv Nurs 2001, 34:706-714.
  • [2]Moreno-Casbas T, Fuentelsaz-Gallego C, Gil de Miguel A, Gonzalez-Marıa E, Clarke SP: Spanish nurses’ attitudes towards research and perceived barriers and facilitators of research utilisation: a comparative survey of nurses with and without experience as principal investigators. J Clin Nurs 2011, 20:1936-1947.
  • [3]Timmins F, McCabe C, McSherry R: Research awareness: managerial challenges for nurses in the Republic of Ireland. J Nurs Manage 2012, 20:224-235.
  • [4]Wocial LD, Bledsoe P, Helft PR, Everett LQ: Nurse ethicist: innovative resource for nurses. J Prof Nurs 2010, 26:287-292.
  • [5]Cusveller B: Nurses serving on clinical ethics committees: a qualitative exploration of a competency profile. Nurs Ethics 2012, 19:431-442.
  • [6]Yanagawa H, Nishiya M, Miyamoto T, Shikishima M, Imura M, Nakanishi R, Ariuchi N, Akaishi A, Takai S, Abe S, Kisyuku M, Kageyama C, Sato C, Yamagami M, Urakawa N, Sone S, Irahara M: Clinical trials for drug approval: a pilot study of the view of doctors at Tokushima University Hospital. J Med Invest 2006, 53:292-296.
  • [7]Rahman S, Majumder MAA, Shaban SF, Rahman N, Ahmed M, Abdulrahman KB, D’Souza UJA: Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches. Adv Med Edu Pract 2011, 2:85-93.
  • [8]Ebihara A, Takahashi K, Ikemoto F, Yamamoto K: Clinical pharmacology and clinical trials in Japan. J Mol Med 1996, 74:479-486.
  • [9]Yanagawa H, Kishuku M, Akaike M, Azuma H, Irahara M: View of physicians on and barriers to patient enrollment in a multicenter clinical trial: experience in a Japanese rural area. Int Arch Med 2010, 3:7.
  • [10]Baer AR, Zon R, Devine S, Lyss AP: The clinical research team. J Oncol Pract 2011, 7:188-192.
  • [11]MacLean S, Désy P, Juarez A, Perhats C, Gacki-Smith J: Research education needs of pediatric emergency nurses. J Emerg Nurs 2006, 32:17-22.
  • [12]Yanagawa H, Irahara M, Houchi H, Kakehi Y, Moritoyo T, Nomoto M, Miyamura M, Shuin T, Shikoku Collaborative Group for Promotion of Clinical Trials: View and present status of personnel involved in clinical trials: a survey of participants from the First Symposium of the Shikoku Collaborative Group for Promotion of Clinical Trials. J Med Invest 2011, 58:81-85.
  • [13]Eastwood GM, Roberts B, Williams G, Rickard CM: A worldwide investigation of critical care research coordinators’ self-reported role and professional development priorities: the winner survey. J Clin Nurs 2013, 22:838-847.
  • [14]Matsumoto K, Nagamura F, Ogami Y, Yamashita N, Kamibeppu K: Difficulties of nursing staff involved in phase 1 oncology trials in Japan. Cancer Nurs 2011, 34:369-375.
  • [15]Oberle K, Allen M: Ethical considerations for nurses in clinical trials. Nurs Ethics 2006, 13:180-186.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:25次 浏览次数:27次