期刊论文详细信息
BMC Medical Education
The status of evolutionary medicine education in North American medical schools
Mark D Schwartz1  Matthew W Beyrouty1  Katelyn J Bennett1  Nicole K Skursky1  Terry M Wolpaw2  Randolph M Nesse5  C Athena Aktipis5  Anila Asghar4  Brandon H Hidaka3 
[1] New York University School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave, New York 10016, NY, USA;Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey 17033, PA, USA;University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 W Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City 66160, KS, USA;McGill University, 3700 McTavish Street, Room 244, Montréal H3A 1Y2, Québec, Canada;Arizona State University, 411 North Central Avenue, Phoenix 85004, AZ, USA
关键词: Survey;    Curriculum dean;    Medical school curriculum;    Medical education;    Evolutionary medicine;    Evolutionary biology;   
Others  :  1138391
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-015-0322-5
 received in 2014-11-26, accepted in 2015-02-20,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Medical and public health scientists are using evolution to devise new strategies to solve major health problems. But based on a 2003 survey, medical curricula may not adequately prepare physicians to evaluate and extend these advances. This study assessed the change in coverage of evolution in North American medical schools since 2003 and identified opportunities for enriching medical education.

Methods

In 2013, curriculum deans for all North American medical schools were invited to rate curricular coverage and perceived importance of 12 core principles, the extent of anticipated controversy from adding evolution, and the usefulness of 13 teaching resources. Differences between schools were assessed by Pearson’s chi-square test, Student’s t-test, and Spearman’s correlation. Open-ended questions sought insight into perceived barriers and benefits.

Results

Despite repeated follow-up, 60 schools (39%) responded to the survey. There was no evidence of sample bias. The three evolutionary principles rated most important were antibiotic resistance, environmental mismatch, and somatic selection in cancer. While importance and coverage of principles were correlated (r = 0.76, P < 0.01), coverage (at least moderate) lagged behind importance (at least moderate) by an average of 21% (SD = 6%). Compared to 2003, a range of evolutionary principles were covered by 4 to 74% more schools. Nearly half (48%) of responders anticipated igniting controversy at their medical school if they added evolution to their curriculum. The teaching resources ranked most useful were model test questions and answers, case studies, and model curricula for existing courses/rotations. Limited resources (faculty expertise) were cited as the major barrier to adding more evolution, but benefits included a deeper understanding and improved patient care.

Conclusion

North American medical schools have increased the evolution content in their curricula over the past decade. However, coverage is not commensurate with importance. At a few medical schools, anticipated controversy impedes teaching more evolution. Efforts to improve evolution education in medical schools should be directed toward boosting faculty expertise and crafting resources that can be easily integrated into existing curricula.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Hidaka et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150320020823230.pdf 874KB PDF download
Figure 3. 29KB Image download
Figure 2. 29KB Image download
Figure 1. 36KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Nesse RM, Bergstrom CT, Ellison PT, Flier JS, Gluckman P, Govindaraju DR, et al.: Making evolutionary biology a basic science for medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107(suppl 1):1800-7.
  • [2]Stearns SC: Evolutionary medicine: its scope, interest and potential. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2012, 279(1746):4305-21.
  • [3]Varki A: Nothing in medicine makes sense, except in the light of evolution. J Mol Med 2012, 90(5):481-94.
  • [4]Greaves M, Maley CC: Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 2012, 481(7381):306-13.
  • [5]Aktipis CA, Boddy AM, Gatenby RA, Brown JS, Maley CC. Life history trade-offs in cancer evolution. Nature Rev Cancer. 2013.
  • [6]Gatenby RA, Silva AS, Gillies RJ, Frieden BR: Adaptive Therapy. Cancer Res 2009, 69(11):4894-903.
  • [7]Rook GA: Hygiene hypothesis and autoimmune diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2012, 42(1):5-15.
  • [8]Croft AM, Bager P, Kumar S: Helminth therapy (worms) for allergic rhinitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, 4:CD009238.
  • [9]Garg SK, Croft AM, Bager P: Helminth therapy (worms) for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014, 1:CD009400.
  • [10]Rosche B, Wernecke K-D, Ohlraun S, Dörr J-M, Paul F: Trichuris suis ova in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome (TRIOMS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013, 14(1):112. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [11]Davey P, Brown E, Charani E, Fenelon L, Gould IM, Holmes A, et al.: Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 4:CD003543.
  • [12]Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H: An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007, 5(12):939-51.
  • [13]McGowan JE Jr: Resistance in nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria: multidrug resistance to the maximum. Am J Med 2006, 119(6):S29-36.
  • [14]Cordain L, Eaton SB, Sebastian A, Mann N, Lindeberg S, Watkins BA, et al.: Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century. Am J Clin Nutr 2005, 81(2):341-54.
  • [15]Turner BL, Thompson AL: Beyond the Paleolithic prescription: incorporating diversity and flexibility in the study of human diet evolution. Nutr Rev 2013, 71(8):501-10.
  • [16]Shaw J, Sicree R, Zimmet P: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010, 87(1):4-14.
  • [17]Jönsson T, Granfeldt Y, Ahrén B, Branell U-C, Pålsson G, Hansson A, et al.: Beneficial effects of a Paleolithic diet on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2009, 8(35):1-14.
  • [18]Eaton SB, Strassman BI, Nesse RM, Neel JV, Ewald PW, Williams GC, et al.: Evolutionary health promotion. Prev Med 2002, 34(2):109-18.
  • [19]Nesse RM, Stearns SC: The great opportunity: evolutionary applications to medicine and public health. Evol Appl 2008, 1(1):28-48.
  • [20]Alcock J, Schwartz MD: A clinical perspective in evolutionary medicine: what we wish we had learned in medical school. Evol: Educ Outreach 2011, 4(4):574-9.
  • [21]Harris EE, Malyango AA: Evolutionary explanations in medical and health profession courses: are you answering your students’. BMC Med Educ 2005, 5(1):16. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [22]Nesse RM: Ten questions for evolutionary studies of disease vulnerability. Evol Appl 2011, 4(2):264-77.
  • [23]Allison AC: Protection afforded by sickle-cell trait against subtertian malarial infection. Br Med J 1954, 1(4857):290.
  • [24]Burr M, Butland B, King S, Vaughan-Williams E: Changes in asthma prevalence: two surveys 15 years apart. Arch Dis Child 1989, 64(10):1452-6.
  • [25]Bateson P, Barker D, Clutton-Brock T, Deb D, D’Udine B, Foley RA, et al.: Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature 2004, 430(6998):419-21.
  • [26]Stearns S, Ackermann M, Doebeli M, Kaiser M: Experimental evolution of aging, growth, and reproduction in fruitflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000, 97(7):3309-13.
  • [27]Stearns SC: Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 1989, 3(3):259-68.
  • [28]Downie J. Evolution in health and disease: the role of evolutionary biology in the medical curriculum. BioSci Educ. 2004;4. doi:10.3108/beej.2004.04000004
  • [29]Nesse RM, Schiffman JD: Evolutionary biology in the medical school curriculum. Bioscience 2003, 53(6):585-7.
  • [30]Short R: Darwin, have I failed you? Lancet 1994, 343(8896):528-9.
  • [31]Antolin MF, Jenkins KP, Bergstrom CT, Crespi BJ, De S, Hancock A, et al.: Evolution and medicine in undergraduate education: a prescription for all biology students. Evolution 2012, 66(6):1991-2006.
  • [32]Committee A-H: Scientific foundations for future physicians. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC; 2009.
  • [33]Pew Research Center, December 2013, “Public’s Views on Human Evolution”.
  • [34]Berkman MB, Pacheco JS, Plutzer E: Evolution and creationism in America’s classrooms: a national portrait. PLoS Biol 2008, 6(5):e124.
  • [35]Rudolph JL, Stewart J: Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education. J Res Sci Teach 1998, 35(10):1069-89.
  • [36]Skoog G, Bilica K: The emphasis given to evolution in state science standards: A lever for change in evolution education? Sci Educ 2002, 86(4):445-62.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:31次 浏览次数:5次