Explaining the disability paradox: a cross-sectional analysis of the Swiss general population

BMC Public Health

Jerome Bickenbach²  Gerold Stucki²  Jan D Reinhardt²  Bernd Fellinghauer¹ 

[1] Seminar für Statistik, ETH Zurich, Rämistr. 101, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland;Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne and SPF, Frohburgstr. 3, 4466 Lucerne, Switzerland

关键词: Participation restriction;    Activity limitation;    Graphical models;    ICF;    Impairment;    Perceived health;    Human functioning;    Disability;   

Others  :  1163289
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-12-655

 received in 2012-01-16, accepted in 2012-07-03,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Disability can be broken down into difficulties in different components of functioning such as impairments and limitations in activities and participation (A&P). Previous studies have produced the seemingly surprising result that persons with severe impairments tend to report high quality of life (QoL) including perceived health regardless of their condition; the so-called “disability paradox”. We aim to study the role of contextual factors (i.e. the personal and environmental situation) in explaining the disability paradox.

Methods

The Swiss Health Survey provides information on the perceived health of 18,760 participants from the general population. We construct a conditional independence graph applying random forests and stability selection in order to represent the structure of impairment, A&P limitation, contextual factors, and perceived health.

Results

We find that impairment and A&P limitations are not directly related but only via a cluster of contextual factors. Similarly, impairment and perceived health are not directly related. On the other hand, perceived health is directly connected with A&P limitations. We hypothesize that contextual factors have a moderating and/or mediating effect on the relationship of impairment, A&P limitations, and perceived health.

Conclusion

The disability paradox seems to dissolve when contextual factors are put into consideration. Contextual factors may be responsible for some persons with impairments developing A&P limitations and others not. In turn, persons with impairments may only then perceive bad health when they experience A&P limitation. Political interventions at the level of the environment may reduce the number of persons who perceive bad health.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Fellinghauer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]WHO and The World Bank: World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011.
• [2]Ameratunga S, Hijar M, Norton R: Road-traffic injuries: confronting disparities to address a global-health problem. Lancet 2006, 367(9521):1533-1540.
• [3]Peden M, Hyder A: Road traffic injuries are a global public health problem. BMJ 2002, 324(7346):1153.
• [4]Reinhardt JD, Li J, Gosney J, Rathore FA, Haig AJ, Marx M, DeLisa JA: International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine’s Sub-Committee on Rehabilitation Disaster Relief. Disability and health-related rehabilitation in international disaster relief. Glob Health Action 2011, 4:7191.
• [5]Dans A, Ng N, Varghese C, Tai ES, Firestone R, Bonita R: The rise of chronic non-communicable diseases in southeast Asia: time for action. Lancet 2011, 377(9766):680-690.
• [6]WHO: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO Press; 2001.
• [7]Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Üstün B: Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48(9):1173-1187.
• [8]United Nations General Assembly: Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Resolution 61/106. 2006. Available from [www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/conventioninfo.htm webcite]
• [9]Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ: The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med 1999, 48:977-988.
• [10]Watson N: Well, I Know this is Going to Sound very Strange to you, but I don’t See myself as a Disabled Person: Identity and Disability. Disability & Soc 2002, 17:509-527.
• [11]Australian Bureau of Statistics: National Health Survey: Summary of Results, 2007-2008. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2009.
• [12]Lewin K: Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1936.
• [13]Fayed N, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE: Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: a systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disabil Rehabil 2011, 33(21-22):1941-1951.
• [14]Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Üstün B, Stucki G: ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005, 37(4):212-208.
• [15]Fellinghauer B, Bühlmann P, Ryffel M, von Rhein M, Reinhardt JD: Stable Graphical Model Estimation with Random Forests for Discrete, Continuous, and Mixed Variables. Preprint (available from arXiv.org hosted by Cornell University: 1109.0152v1) 2011.
• [16]Storni M: Enquêtes, sources: Enquête suisse sur la santé. Office Fédéral de la Statistique, Neuchâtel. Espace de l’Europe 10, 2010 Neuchâtel. [http://www.bfs.admin.ch] 2011. [Available from http://www.bfs.admin.ch webcite]
• [17]Graf E: Rapport de méthodes. Enquête suisse sur la santé 2007. Plan d’échantillonnage, pondérations et analyses pondérées des données. Neuchâtel: Office Fédéral de la Statistique,; 2010.
• [18]Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C: Classification and Regression Trees. California: Wadsworth, Inc.; 1984.
• [19]Amit Y, Geman D: Shape Quantization and Recognition with Randomized Trees. Neural Comput 1997, 9:1545-1588.
• [20]Efron B: Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Ann Stat 1979, 7:1-26.
• [21]Breiman L: Random Forests. Mach Learn 2001, 45:5-32.
• [22]Meinshausen N, Bühlmann P: Stability selection (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc B 2010, 72(4):417-473.
• [23]Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
• [24]Nagi S: Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In Sociology and Rehabilitation. Edited by Sussman M. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1965:100-113.
• [25]Gadalla TM, Fuller-Thomson E: Examining the lag time between state-level income inequality and individual disabilities: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health 2008, 98(12):2187-2190.
• [26]Wahrendorf M, Siegrist J: Working conditions in mid-life and participation in voluntary work after labour market exit. In The Individual and the Welfare State – Life Histories in Europe. Edited by Schröder M, Hank K, Börsch-Supan A. Berlin: Springer; 2011:179-188.
• [27]Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL: Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 88(4):529-539.
• [28]Amundson R: Quality of Life, Disability, and Hedonic Psychology. J Theor Soc Behav 2010, 40(4):374-392.
• [29]Colombo D, Maathuis MH, Kalisch M, Richardson TS: Learning high-dimensional directed acyclic graphs with latent and selection variables. Ann Stat 2012, 40:294-321.
• [30]Geyh S, Müller R, Peter C, Bickenbach JE, Post M, Stucki G, Cieza A: Capturing the psychologic-personal perspective in spinal cord injury. Amer J Physical Med 2011, 90(11 Suppl 2):S79-96.
• [31]Reinhardt JD, Miller J, Stucki G, Sykes C, Gray DB: Measuring impact of environmental factors on human functioning and disability: a review of various scientific approaches. Disabil Rehabil 2011, 33(23-24):2151-65.
• [32]Stucki G, Reinhardt JD, Grimby G: Organizing human functioning and rehabilitation research into distinct scientific fields. Part II: Conceptual descriptions and domains for research. J Rehabil Med 2007, 39(4):299-307.
• [33]OECD: Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers. OECD Publishing; 2010.
• [34]Stucki G, Bickenbach JE, Post M: Developing epidemiologic studies of people’s lived experience: the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study as a case in point. Amer J Physical Med 2011, 90(11 Supppl 2):S1-4.