期刊论文详细信息
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Visualization of Miscanthus × giganteus cell wall deconstruction subjected to dilute acid pretreatment for enhanced enzymatic digestibility
Zhe Ji1  Xun Zhang1  Zhe Ling1  Xia Zhou1  Shri Ramaswamy2  Feng Xu1 
[1] Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Wooden Material Science and Application, Beijing Forestry University, Tsinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China
[2] Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, Kaufert Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul 55108, MN, USA
关键词: Components distribution;    Cell wall anatomy;    Enzymatic hydrolysis;    Dilute acid pretreatment;    giganteus;    × ;    Miscanthus ;   
Others  :  1225812
DOI  :  10.1186/s13068-015-0282-3
 received in 2015-03-25, accepted in 2015-07-01,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The natural recalcitrance of lignocellulosic plant cell walls resulting from complex arrangement and distribution of heterogeneous components impedes deconstruction of such cell walls. Dilute acid pretreatment (DAP) is an attractive method to overcome the recalcitrant barriers for rendering enzymatic conversion of polysaccharides. In this study, the internodes of Miscanthus × giganteus, a model bioenergy crop, were subjected to DAP to yield a range of samples with altered cell wall structure and chemistry. The consequent morphological and compositional changes and their possible impact on saccharification efficiency were comprehensively investigated. The use of a series of microscopic and microspectroscopic techniques including fluorescence microscopy (FM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and confocal Raman microscopy (CRM)) enabled correlative cell wall structural and chemical information to be obtained.

Results

DAP of M. × giganteus resulted in solubilization of arabinoxylan and cross-linking hydroxycinnamic acids in a temperature-dependent manner. The optimized pretreatment (1% H 2 SO 4 , 170°C for 30 min) resulted in significant enhancement in the saccharification efficiency (51.20%) of treated samples in 72 h, which amounted to 4.4-fold increase in sugar yield over untreated samples (11.80%). The remarkable improvement could be correlated to a sequence of changes occurring in plant cell walls due to their pretreatment-induced deconstruction, namely, loss in the matrix between neighboring cell walls, selective removal of hemicelluloses, redistribution of phenolic polymers and increased exposure of cellulose. The consequently occurred changes in inner cell wall structure including damaging, increase of porosity and loss of mechanical resistance were also found to enhance enzyme access to cellulose and further sugar yield.

Conclusions

DAP is a highly effective process for improving bioconversion of cellulose to glucose by breaking down the rigidity and resistance of cell walls. The combination of the most relevant microscopic and microanalytical techniques employed in this work provided information crucial for evaluating the influence of anatomical and compositional changes on enhanced enzymatic digestibility.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Ji et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150922025356785.pdf 3035KB PDF download
Figure9. 268KB Image download
Figure8. 252KB Image download
Figure7. 249KB Image download
Figure6. 22KB Image download
Figure5. 18KB Image download
Figure4. 57KB Image download
Figure3. 19KB Image download
Figure2. 153KB Image download
Figure1. 31KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure1.

Figure2.

Figure3.

Figure4.

Figure5.

Figure6.

Figure7.

Figure8.

Figure9.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, et al.: Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007, 315:804-807.
  • [2]Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, et al.: The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 2006, 311:484-489.
  • [3]Papa G, Rodriguez S, George A, Schievano A, Orzi V, Sale K, et al.: Comparison of different pretreatments for the production of bioethanol and biomethane from corn stover and switchgrass. Bioresour Technol 2015, 183:101-110.
  • [4]Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United States Department of Energy. 2005. http://www.osti.gov/bridge. Accessed Apr 2005
  • [5]Hodgson EM, Lister SJ, Bridgwater AV, Clifton-Brown J, Donnison IS: Genotypic and environmentally derived variation in the cell wall composition of Miscanthus in relation to its use as a biomass feedstock. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:652-660.
  • [6]Kączkowski J: Structure, function and metabolism of plant cell wall. Acta Physiol Plant 2003, 25:287-305.
  • [7]Kapoor M, Raj T, Vijayaraj M, Chopra A, Gupta RP, Tuli DK, et al.: Structural features of dilute acid, steam exploded, and alkali pretreated mustard stalk and their impact on enzymatic hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 2015, 124:265-273.
  • [8]Berlin A, Balakshin M, Gilkes N, Kadla J, Maximenko V, Kubo S, et al.: Inhibition of cellulase, xylanase and β-glucosidase activities by softwood lignin preparations. J Biotechnol 2006, 125:198-209.
  • [9]Yang B, Wyman CE: Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flowthrough pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 86:88-98.
  • [10]Iiyama K, Lam TBT, Stone BA: Phenolic acid bridges between polysaccharides and lignin in wheat internodes. Phytochemistry 1990, 29:733-737.
  • [11]Harris PJ, Hartley RD: Phenolic constituents of the cell walls of monocotyledons. Biochem Syst Ecol 1980, 8:153-160.
  • [12]Belmokhtar N, Habrant A, Ferreira NL, Chabbert B: Changes in phenolics distribution after chemical pretreatment and enzymatic conversion of Miscanthus × giganteus internode. Bioenergy Res 2013, 6:506-518.
  • [13]Rezende CA, de Lima MA, Maziero P, deAzevedo ER, Garcia W, Polikarpov I: Chemical and morphological characterization of sugarcane bagasse submitted to a delignification process for enhanced enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011, 4:1-19. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [14]Holopainen-Mantila U, Marjamaa K, Merali Z, Käsper A, de Bot P, Jääskeläinen AS, et al.: Impact of hydrothermal pretreatment to chemical composition, enzymatic digestibility and spatial distribution of cell wall polymers. Bioresour Technol 2013, 138:156-162.
  • [15]Liu J, Wang ML, Tonnis B, Habteselassie M, Liao X, Huang Q: Fungal pretreatment of switchgrass for improved saccharification and simultaneous enzyme production. Bioresour Technol 2013, 135:39-45.
  • [16]Wyman CE, Balan V, Dale BE, Elander RT, Falls M, Hames B, et al.: Comparative data on effects of leading pretreatments and enzyme loadings and formulations on sugar yields from different switchgrass sources. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:11052-11062.
  • [17]Zhou X, Xu J, Wang Z, Cheng JJ, Li R, Qu R: Dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of transgenic switchgrass for sugar production. Bioresour Technol 2012, 104:823-827.
  • [18]Jiang LQ, Fang Z, Li X-K, Luo J, Fan S-P: Combination of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatments of sugarcane bagasse for glucose by enzymatic hydrolysis. Process Biochem 2013, 48:1942-1946.
  • [19]McIntosh S, Vancov T: Optimisation of dilute alkaline pretreatment for enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:3094-3103.
  • [20]Foston M, Ragauskas AJ: Changes in lignocellulosic supramolecular and ultrastructure during dilute acid pretreatment Populus and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:1885-1895.
  • [21]Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Keshwani D, Chen C: Potential of agricultural residues and hay for bioethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2007, 142:276-290.
  • [22]Varga E, Szengyel Z, Réczey K: Chemical pretreatments of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic digestibility. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2002, 98:73-87.
  • [23]Ibbett R, Gaddipati S, Davies S, Hill S, Tucker G: The mechanisms of hydrothermal deconstruction of lignocellulose: new insights from thermal-analytical and complementary studies. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:9272-9278.
  • [24]Merali Z, Ho JD, Collins SR, Gall GL, Elliston A, Käsper A, et al.: Characterization of cell wall components of wheat straw following hydrothermal pretreatment and fractionation. Bioresour Technol 2013, 131:226-234.
  • [25]Garrote G, Kabel MA, Schols HA, Falqué E, Domínguez H, Parajó JC: Effects of Eucalyptus globulus wood autohydrolysis conditions on the reaction products. J Agric Food Chem 2007, 55:9006-9013.
  • [26]Vegas R, Kabel M, Schols HA, Alonso J, Parajó J: Hydrothermal processing of rice husks: effects of severity on product distribution. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2008, 83:965-972.
  • [27]Scalbert A, Monties B, Lallemand J-Y, Guittet E, Rolando C: Ether linkage between phenolic acids and lignin fractions from wheat straw. Phytochemistry 1985, 24:1359-1362.
  • [28]Waldron KW, Parr AJ, Ng A, Ralph J: Cell wall esterified phenolic dimers: identification and quantification by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography and diode array detection. Phytochem Anal 1996, 7:305-312.
  • [29]Ralph J, Hatfield RD, Quideau S, Helm RF, Grabber JH, Jung HJG: Pathway of p-coumaric acid incorporation into maize lignin as revealed by NMR. J Am Chem Soc 1994, 116:9448-9456.
  • [30]Jeoh T, Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Himmel ME, Adney WS, Johnson DK: Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 98:112-122.
  • [31]Wi S, Singh A, Lee K, Kim Y: The pattern of distribution of pectin, peroxidase and lignin in the middle lamella of secondary xylem fibres in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Ann Bot 2005, 95:863-868.
  • [32]Monro J, Bailey R, Penny D: Polysaccharide composition in relation to extensibility and possible peptide linked arabino-galactan of lupin hypocotyl cell walls. Phytochemistry 1972, 11:1597-1602.
  • [33]Selvendran RR, March JF, Ring SG: Determination of aldoses and uronic acid content of vegetable fiber. Anal Biochem 1979, 96:282-292.
  • [34]DeMartini JD, Pattathil S, Avci U, Szekalski K, Mazumder K, Hahn MG, et al.: Application of monoclonal antibodies to investigate plant cell wall deconstruction for biofuels production. Energ Environ Sci. 2011, 4:4332-4339.
  • [35]Lehringer C, Daniel G, Schmitt U: TEM/FE-SEM studies on tension wood fibres of Acer spp., Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L. Wood Sci Technol 2009, 43:691-702.
  • [36]Donohoe BS, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB: Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 5:913-925.
  • [37]Hartley RD, Ford CW: Phenolic constituents of plant cell walls and wall biodegradability. In Plant cell wall polymers. Edited by Lewis NG, Paice MG. American Chemical Society, Washington; 1989:137-145.
  • [38]Selig MJ, Viamajala S, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB: Deposition of lignin droplets produced during dilute acid pretreatment of maize stems retards enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Progr 2007, 23:1333-1339.
  • [39]Chandel AK, Antunes FF, Anjos V, Bell MJ, Rodrigues LN, Singh OV, et al.: Ultra-structural mapping of sugarcane bagasse after oxalic acid fiber expansion (OAFEX) and ethanol production by Candida shehatae and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:1-15. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [40]Alonso-Simón A, Kristensen JB, Øbro J, Felby C, Willats WG, Jørgensen H: High-throughput microarray profiling of cell wall polymers during hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 105:509-514.
  • [41]Brunecky R, Vinzant TB, Porter SE, Donohoe BS, Johnson DK, Himmel ME: Redistribution of xylan in maize cell walls during dilute acid pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 102:1537-1543.
  • [42]Kumar L, Chandra R, Saddler J: Influence of steam pretreatment severity on post-treatments used to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated softwoods at low enzyme loadings. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:2300-2311.
  • [43]Chen X, Lawoko M, van Heiningen A: Kinetics and mechanism of autohydrolysis of hardwoods. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:7812-7819.
  • [44]Atalla R, Agarwal U: Recording Raman spectra from plant cell walls. J Raman Spectrosc 1986, 17:229-231.
  • [45]Atalla RH, Agarwal UP: Raman microprobe evidence for lignin orientation in the cell walls of native woody tissue. Science 1985, 227:636-638.
  • [46]Agarwal UP: Raman imaging to investigate ultrastructure and composition of plant cell walls: distribution of lignin and cellulose in black spruce wood (Picea mariana). Planta 2006, 224:1141-1153.
  • [47]Agarwal UP, McSweeny JD, Ralph SA: FT–Raman investigation of milled-wood lignins: softwood, hardwood, and chemically modified black spruce lignins. J Wood Chem Technol 2011, 31:324-344.
  • [48]Piot O, Autran JC, Manfait M: Spatial distribution of protein and phenolic constituents in wheat grain as probed by confocal Raman microspectroscopy. J Cereal Sci 2000, 32:57-71.
  • [49]Chundawat SP, Donohoe BS, da Costa Sousa L, Elder T, Agarwal UP, Lu F, et al.: Multi-scale visualization and characterization of lignocellulosic plant cell wall deconstruction during thermochemical pretreatment. Energ Environ Sci. 2011, 4:973-984.
  • [50]El Hage R, Chrusciel L, Desharnais L, Brosse N: Effect of autohydrolysis of Miscanthus × giganteus on lignin structure and organosolv delignification. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:9321-9329.
  • [51]Silverstein RA, Chen Y, Sharma-Shivappa RR, Boyette MD, Osborne J: A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks. Bioresour Technol 2007, 98:3000-3011.
  • [52]Liu C, Wyman CE: Partial flow of compressed-hot water through corn stover to enhance hemicellulose sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 2005, 96:1978-1985.
  • [53]Vidal BC Jr, Dien BS, Ting K, Singh V: Influence of feedstock particle size on lignocellulose conversion—a review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2011, 164:1405-1421.
  • [54]Du L, Yu P, Rossnagel BG, Christensen DA, McKinnon JJ: Physicochemical characteristics, hydroxycinnamic acids (ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid) and their ratio, and in situ biodegradability: comparison of genotypic differences among six barley varieties. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57:4777-4783.
  • [55]Fu C, Xiao X, Xi Y, Ge Y, Chen F, Bouton J, et al.: Downregulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) leads to improved saccharification efficiency in switchgrass. Bioenergy Res. 2011, 4:153-164.
  • [56]Pu Y, Hu F, Huang F, Davison BH, Ragauskas AJ: Assessing the molecular structure basis for biomass recalcitrance during dilute acid and hydrothermal pretreatments. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:1-13. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [57]Ji Z, Ma J, Xu F: Multi-scale visualization of dynamic changes in poplar cell walls during alkali pretreatment. Microsc Microanal 2014, 20:566-576.
  • [58]Zhang J, Tang M, Viikari L: Xylans inhibit enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials by cellulases. Bioresour Technol 2012, 121:8-12.
  • [59]Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D et al (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:42次 浏览次数:12次