期刊论文详细信息
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Amoxicillin rash in patients with infectious mononucleosis: evidence of true drug sensitization
Katinka Ónodi-Nagy2  Ágnes Kinyó2  Angéla Meszes2  Edina Garaczi2  Lajos Kemény1  Zsuzsanna Bata-Csörgő1 
[1] Dermatological Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
[2] Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Center, Korányi fasor 6, Szeged 6720, Hungary
关键词: Drug tests;    Infectious mononucleosis;    Sensitization to antibiotics;    Amoxicillin;   
Others  :  1089004
DOI  :  10.1186/1710-1492-11-1
 received in 2014-04-01, accepted in 2014-10-08,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

It hasn’t been clearly understood yet whether sensitization to antibiotics, the virus itself or transient loss of drug tolerance due to the virus, is responsible for the development of maculopapular exanthems following amoxicillin intake in patients with infectious mononucleosis. We aimed to examine whether sensitization to penicillin developed among patients with skin rash following amoxicillin treatment within infectious mononucleosis.

Methods

Ten patients were investigated for drug sensitization by lymphocyte transformation test and six patients were further tested by prick-, intradermal and patch tests employing the penicillin’s main antigens.

Results

Lymphocyte transformation test showed negative results with amoxicillin, while one patient had positive reaction to cefixime. Six patients with suspected sensitization to amoxicillin were then investigated by in vivo tests. Prick tests were negative in all six patients, but the intradermal tests showed positive reactions in four patients.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that in vitro testing is not sensitive enough in determining drug sensitization to penicillin. In vivo tests should be performed to detect sensitization and indeed with skin tests our results confirmed that sensitization to aminopenicillin may develop within infectious mononucleosis.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Ónodi-Nagy et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150123010502955.pdf 690KB PDF download
Figure 2. 81KB Image download
Figure 1. 148KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Chovel-Sella A, Ben Tov A, Lahav E, Mor O, Rudich H, Paret G, Reif S: Incidence of rash after amoxicillin treatment in children with infectious mononucleosis. Pediatrics 2013, 131:e1424-e1427.
  • [2]Leung AK, Rafaat M: Eruption associated with amoxicillin in a patient with infectious mononucleosis. Int J Dermatol 2003, 42:553-555.
  • [3]Gonzalez-Delgado P, Blanes M, Soriano V, Montoro D, Loeda C, Niveiro E: Erythema multiforme to amoxicillin with concurrent infection by Epstein-Barr virus. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr ) 2006, 34:76-78.
  • [4]Renn CN, Straff W, Dorfmuller A, Al Masaoudi T, Merk HF, Sachs B: Amoxicillin-induced exanthema in young adults with infectious mononucleosis: demonstration of drug-specific lymphocyte reactivity. Br J Dermatol 2002, 147:1166-1170.
  • [5]Jappe U: Amoxicillin-induced exanthema in patients with infectious mononucleosis: allergy or transient immunostimulation? Allergy 2007, 62:1474-1475.
  • [6]Drug, Hypersensitivity. Basel, Freyburg: Karger; 2007.
  • [7]Mardivirin L, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Branlant-Redon E, Beneton N, Jidar K, Barbaud A, Crickx B, Ranger-Rogez S, Descamps V: Amoxicillin-induced flare in patients with DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms): report of seven cases and demonstration of a direct effect of amoxicillin on Human Herpesvirus 6 replication in vitro. Eur J Dermatol 2010, 20:68-73.
  • [8]Pichler WJ, Tilch J: The lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 2004, 59:809-820.
  • [9]Luque I, Leyva L, Jose TM, Rosal M, Mayorga C, Segura JM, Blanca M, Juarez C: In vitro T-cell responses to beta-lactam drugs in immediate and nonimmediate allergic reactions. Allergy 2001, 56:611-618.
  • [10]McCloskey GL, Massa MC: Cephalexin rash in infectious mononucleosis. Cutis 1997, 59:251-254.
  • [11]Yoshimura T, Kurita C, Hayata M, Nagai H: Diagnosis of drug allergy by the lymphocyte stimulation test with the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] assay. Biol Pharm Bull 1993, 16:686-689.
  • [12]Romano A, Viola M, Bousquet PJ, Gaeta F, Valluzzi R, Caruso C, Demoly P: A comparison of the performance of two penicillin reagent kits in the diagnosis of beta-lactam hypersensitivity. Allergy 2007, 62:53-58.
  • [13]Romano A, Demoly P: Recent advances in the diagnosis of drug allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2007, 7:299-303.
  • [14]Brockow K, Romano A, Blanca M, Ring J, Pichler W, Demoly P: General considerations for skin test procedures in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. Allergy 2002, 57:45-51.
  • [15]Lammintausta K, Kortekangas-Savolainen O: The usefulness of skin tests to prove drug hypersensitivity. Br J Dermatol 2005, 152:968-974.
  • [16]Romano A, Viola M, Gaeta F, Rumi G, Maggioletti M: Patch testing in non-immediate drug eruptions. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2008, 4:66-74. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [17]Schissel DJ, Singer D, David-Bajar K: Azithromycin eruption in infectious mononucleosis: a proposed mechanism of interaction. Cutis 2000, 65:163-166.
  • [18]Paily R: Quinolone drug rash in a patient with infectious mononucleosis. J Dermatol 2000, 27:405-406.
  • [19]van der Linden PD, van der LJ, Vlug AE, Stricker BH: Skin reactions to antibacterial agents in general practice. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:703-708.
  • [20]Dakdouki GK, Obeid KH, Kanj SS: Azithromycin-induced rash in infectious mononucleosis. Scand J Infect Dis 2002, 34:939-941.
  • [21]Timar L, Balo-Banga JM, Budai J: Infectious mononucleosis and drug exanthema. Orv Hetil 1987, 128:1871-1874.
  • [22]Copeman PW, Scrivener R: Amoxycillin rash. Br Med J 1977, 1:1354.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:16次 浏览次数:7次