Stomach temperature of narwhals (Monodon monoceros) during feeding events

Animal Biotelemetry

Mads Peter Heide-Jørgensen¹  Nynne H Nielsen¹  Rikke G Hansen¹  Susanna B Blackwell² 

[1] Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Box 570, DK-3900 Nuuk, Greenland

[2] Greeneridge Sciences, Inc., 6160-C Wallace Becknell Road, 93117 Santa Barbara CA, USA

关键词: Stomach temperature;    Stomach contents;    Prey consumption;    Narwhal;    Feeding;    East Greenland;    Arctic;   

Others  :  790444
DOI  :  10.1186/2050-3385-2-9

 received in 2014-01-31, accepted in 2014-05-12,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Information on the feeding rate by free-ranging odontocetes is necessary for assessing potential conflicts with fishing activities. One way of obtaining a proxy for feeding events in homeothermic predators is to measure stomach temperature, which drops during prey ingestion. In this study, stomach temperature pills (STPs) were deployed in eight narwhals (Monodon monoceros) in East Greenland (2012-2013). A coded message with information on the temperature was transmitted from the STP and received and relayed by a satellite-linked radio transmitter attached to the back of the whale. Meal size and prey composition were estimated from samples collected from the Inuit hunt of narwhals.

Results

Two STPs provided data for 7.9 and 17.3 days and six STPs were rejected within 48 h. All whales had their first ingestion event between 20 min and 14 h after handling and release. The mean duration of the STP deployments was 93 h (SD = 164) and duration was positively correlated with the time between the deployment and the first ingestion event, but did not seem to be affected by the ingestion rate. The average stomach temperature during non-feeding periods was 35.5°C. During ingestion events, the temperature dropped, on average, to 31.6°C. Ingestion events took place at depths of 13 to 850 m with a mean depth of 286 m (n = 126, SD = 195). The mean number of detected ingestion events was 9.9 (SD = 4.2) per 24 h. The average duration of the ingestion events was 9.6 min (SD = 4.1) and it was not correlated with the size of the drop in temperature or the depth of the feeding dive (r² = 0.03 and 0.004) and there was no diel pattern in the ingestion events. The average mass of the stomach contents was ~2 kg. No effect was detected on narwhal behavior as a result of the instrumentation.

Conclusions

Stomach temperature telemetry offers the possibility of directly estimating narwhal feeding rates over periods of weeks. The information obtained, however, would need to be validated to account for mariposa and to gauge whether feeding events could be missed by the STPs.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Heide-Jørgensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Rechsteiner EU, Rosen DAS, Trites AW: Energy requirements of Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) as predicted by a bioenergetic model. J Mammal 2013, 94:820-832.
• [2]Kastelein RA, Ford J, Berghout E, Wiepkema PR, Van Boxsel M: Food consumption, growth and reproduction of belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) in human care. Aquat Mammals 1994, 20:81-97.
• [3]Kastelein RA, Odell D, Nieuwstraten SH, Wiepkema PR: Food consumption of a captive female killer whale (Orcinus orca). Aquat Mammals 2000, 26:127-131.
• [4]Kastelein RA, Staal C, Wiepkema PR: Food consumption, food passage time, and body measurements of captive Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Aquat Mammals 2003, 29:53-66.
• [5]Wilson RP, Cooper J, Plötz J: Can we determine when marine endotherms feed? A case study with seabirds. J Exp Biol 1992, 167:267-275.
• [6]Gales R, Renouf D: Detecting and measuring food and water intake in captive seals using temperature telemetry. J Wildlife Manage 1993, 57:514-519.
• [7]Bjørge A, Thompson D, Hammond P, Fedak M, Bryant E, Aarefjord H, Roen R, Olsen M: Habitat use and diving behavior of harbour seals in a coastal archipelago in Norway. In Whales, Seals, Fish and Man. Edited by Blix AS, Walløe L, Ulltang Ø. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1995:211-224.
• [8]Bekkby T, Bjørge A: Variation in stomach temperature as indicator of meal size in harbor seals, Phoca vitulina. Mar Mam Sci 1998, 14:627-637.
• [9]Austin D, Bowen WD, McMillan JI, Boness DJ: Stomach temperature telemetry reveals temporal patterns of foraging success in a free-ranging marine mammal. J Anim Ecology 2006, 75:408-420.
• [10]Kuhn CE, Costa DP: Identifying and quantifying prey consumption using stomach temperature change in pinnipeds. J Exp Biol 2006, 209:4524-4532.
• [11]Garde E, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Ditlevsen S, Tvermosegaard KT, Harding K, Hansén J, Hansen SH: Population dynamics of narwhals Monodon monoceros from East and West Greenland. Polar Res 2014. In press
• [12]Heide-Jørgensen MP, Dietz R, Leatherwood S: A note on the diet of narwhals (Monodon monoceros) in Inglefield Bredning (NW Greenland). Meddr Grønland, Biosci 1994, 39:213-216.
• [13]Laidre KL, Heide-Jørgensen MP: Winter feeding intensity of narwhals (Monodon monoceros). Mar Mam Sci 2005, 21:45-57.
• [14]Wilson RP, Pütz K, Grémillet D, Culik BM, Kierspel M, Regel J, Boat CA, Lage J, Cooper J: Reliability of stomach temperature changes in determining feeding characteristics of seabirds. J Exp Biol 1995, 198:115-1135.
• [15]Kristensen TK: Biology of the squid Gonatus fabricii (Lichtenstein, 1818) from West Greenland waters. Meddr Grønland, Biosci 1984, 13:3-17.
• [16]Santos MB, Pierce GJ, Smeenk C, Addink MJ, Kinze CC, Tougaard S, Herman J: Stomach contents of northern bottlenose whales Hyperoodon ampullatus stranded in the North Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 2001, 81:143-150.
• [17]Clarke MR: A Handbook for the Identification of Cephalopod Beaks. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 1986.
• [18]Laidre KL, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Jørgensen OA, Treble MA: Deep-ocean predation by a high Arctic cetacean. ICES J Mar Sci 2004, 61:430-440.
• [19]Welch HE, Crawford RE, Hop H: Occurrence of Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) schools and their vulnerability to predation in the Canadian high Arctic. Arctic 1993, 46:331-339.
• [20]Hooker SK, Whitehead H, Gowans S: Ecosystem consideration in conservation planning: energy demand of foraging bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus) in a marine protected area. Biol Conserv 2002, 104:51-58.
• [21]Noren DP: Estimated field metabolic rates and prey requirements of resident killer whales. Mar Mam Sci 2010, 27:60-77.
• [22]DeRuiter SL, Alexander B, Blanchet M-A, Hansen SF, Kristensen JH, Madsen PT, Tyack PL, Wahlberg M: Acoustic behaviour of echolocating porpoises during prey capture. J Exp Biol 2009, 212:3100-3107.
• [23]Heide-Jørgensen MP, Richard P, Dietz R, Laidre K: A metapopulation model for Canadian and West Greenland narwhals. Anim Conserv 2013, 16:331-343.
• [24]Woodhead GS, Gray RW: On the stomach of the narwhal (Monodon monoceros). Proc R Soc Edin 1889, 16:792-807.
• [25]Dietz R, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Richard P, Orr J, Laidre K, Schmidt HC: Movements of narwhals (Monodon monoceros) from Admiralty Inlet monitored by satellite telemetry. Polar Biol 2008, 31:1295-1306.
• [26]Argos S: Guide to ARGOS System. Service Argos Inc. Toulouse: CLS ARGOS; 1989.
• [27]Harris RB, Fancy SG, Douglas DC, Garner GW, Amstrup SC, McCabe TR, Pank LF: Tracking wildlife by satellite: current systems and performance. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Fish Wildlife Tech Rep 1990, 30:52.