Physicochemical and biological factors controlling water column metabolism in Sundarbans estuary, India

Aquatic Biosystems

Maitree Bhattacharyya¹  Somenath Bhattacharyya²  Pankaj Naskar²  Kakoli Sen Sarma²  Suman Manna²  Kaberi Chaudhuri² 

[1]Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata, 700019, India

[2]Institute of Environmental Studies and Wetland Management, DD-24, Sector-I, Salt lake, Kolkata, 700064, India

关键词: Sundarban estuary;    Nutrient load;    Nitrification;    Community respiration;    Gross primary productivity;    Net ecosystem metabolism;   

Others  :  794401
DOI  :  10.1186/2046-9063-8-26

 received in 2012-04-04, accepted in 2012-10-15,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Sundarbans is the single largest deltaic mangrove forest in the world, formed at estuarine phase of the Ganges - Brahmaputra river system. Primary productivity of marine and coastal phytoplankton contributes to 15% of global oceanic production. But unfortunately estuarine dynamics of tropical and subtropical estuaries have not yet received proper attention in spite of the fact that they experience considerable anthropogenic interventions and a baseline data is required for any future comparison. This study is an endeavor to this end to estimate the primary productivity (gross and net), community respiration and nitrification rates in different rivers and tidal creeks around Jharkhali island, a part of Sundarbans estuary surrounded by the mangrove forest during a period of three years starting from November’08 to October’11.

Results

Various physical and chemical parameters of water column like pH, temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, suspended particulate matter, secchi disc index, tidal fluctuation and tidal current velocity, standing crop and nutrients were measured along with water column productivity. Relationship of net water column productivity with algal biomass (standing crop), nutrient loading and turbidity were determined experimentally. Correlations of bacterial abundance with community respiration and nitrification rates were also explored. Annual integrated phytoplankton production rate of this tidal estuary was estimated to be 151.07 gC m^-2 y^-1. Gross primary productivity showed marked inter annual variation being lowest in monsoon and highest in postmonsoon period.

Conclusion

Average primary production was a function of nutrient loading and light penetration in the water column. High aquatic turbidity, conductivity and suspended particulate matter were the limiting factors to attenuate light penetration with negative influence on primary production. Community respiration and nitrification rates of the estuary were influenced by the bacterial abundance. The estuary was phosphorus limited in postmonsoon whereas nitrogen-limited in premonsoon and monsoon period. High algal biomass and primary productivity indicated the estuary to be in eutrophic state in most of the time throughout the year. Our study also indicated a seasonal shifting between autotrophic and heterotrophic conditions in Sundarban estuarine ecosystem and it is a tropical, well mixed (high tidal influx) and marine dominated (no fresh water connection) system.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Chaudhuri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Nixon SW: Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition. social causes and future concerns. Ophelia 1995, 31:199-219.
• [2]Cloern JL: The relative importance of light and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth: a simple index of coastal ecosystem sensitivity to nutrient enrichment. Aquatic Ecology 1999, 33:3-16.
• [3]Murrell MC, Hagy JD III, Lores EM, Greene RM: Phytoplankton production and nutrient distributions in a subtropical estuary: importance of freshwater flow. Estuaries and Coasts 2007, 30(3):390-402.
• [4]Howarth RW, Paerl HW: Coastal marine eutrophication: control of both nitrogen and phosphorus is necessary. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:E103-E103.
• [5]Cloern JE, Cole BE, Oremland RS: Autotrophic processes in meromictic big soda lake. Nevada. Limnol Oceanogr 1983, 28(6):1049-1061.
• [6]Stolte W, Mccllin T, Noordeloos A, Reigman R: Effect of nitrogen-source on the size distribution within marine-phytoplankton populations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1994, 184:83-97.
• [7]Richardson K: Harmful or exceptional phytoplankton blooms in the marine ecosystem. Adv Mar Biol 1997, 31:301-385.
• [8]Pereira LCC, Jiménez JA, Medeiros C: Environmental Degradation of the Littoral of Casa Caiada and Rio Doce, Olinda-PE (Brazil). J Coastal Res 2003, 35:502-508. SI
• [9]Pereira LCC, Jiménez JA, Koening ML, Neto FP, Medeiros C, Da Costa RM: Effect of coastline properties and wastewater on plankton composition and distribution in a stressed environment on the North Coast of Olinda-PE (Brazil). Braz Arch Biol Technol 2005, 48:1013-1026.
• [10]Valdes-Weaver LM, Piehler MF, Pinckney JL JL, Howe KE, Rossignol K, Paerl HW: Long-term temporal and spatial trends in phytoplankton biomass and class-level taxonomic composition in the hydrologically variable Neuse-Pamlico estuarine continuum, North Carolina U. S. A. Limnol Oceanogr 2006, 51(3):1410-1420.
• [11]Seitzinger SP, Harrison JA, Dumont E, Bensen AHW, Bouwman AF: Sources and delivery of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous to the coastal zone: an overview of global nutrient export from watersheds (NEWS) models and their application. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2005, 19:GB4S01.
• [12]Biswas H, Dey M, Ganguly D, De TK, Ghosh S, Jana TK: Comparative analysis of phytoplankton composition and abundance over a two- decade period at the land-ocean boundary of a tropical mangrove ecosystem. Estuaries and Coasts 2010, 33:384-394.
• [13]Smith VH: Eutrophication of fresh water and coastal marine ecosystem: a global problem. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2003, 10:1-14.
• [14]Boynton WR, Kemp WM, Keefe CW: A cornparative analysis of nutrients and other factors influencing estuarine phytoplankton production. In Estuarine comparisons. Edited by Kennedy V. Academic Press, New York; 1982:69-90.
• [15]Kemp WM, Boynton WR, Adolf JE, Boesch DF, Boicourt WC, Brush G, Cornwell JC, Fisher TR, Glibert PA, Hugy JD, Harding LW, Houde ED Jr, Kimmel DG, Millar WD, Newell RIE, Roman MR, Smith EM, Stevenson JC: Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions. Mar eco Pro Ser 2005, 303:1-29.
• [16]Cloern JE: Phytoplankton bloom dynamics in coastal ecosystems: a review with some general lessons from sustained investigation of San Francisco Bay. California. Rev Geophysics 1996, 33:127-168.
• [17]Conley DJ, Kaas F, Mohlenberg F, Rasmussen B, Windolf J: Characteristics of Danish estuaries. Estuaries 2000, 23:820-837.
• [18]Eyre BD: Water quality changes in an episodically flushed sub-tropical Australian estuary: a 50 year perspective. Mar chem 1997, 59:177-187.
• [19]Turner RE, Rabalais NN: Linking landscape and water quality in the Mississippi River basin for 200 years. Bioscience 2003, 53:563-572.
• [20]Heip CHR, Goosen NK, Herman PMJ, Kromkamp J, Middelburg JJ, Soetaert K, Ansell AD, Gibson RN, Barnes M: Production and consumption of biological particles in temperate tidal estuaries. Oceanography and Marine Biology. An Annual Review 1995, 33:1-149.
• [21]Smith SV, Hollibaugh JT: Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance. Rev Geophys 1993, 31:75-89.
• [22]Gattuso JP, Frankignoulle M, Wollast R: Carbon and carbonate metabolism in coastal aquatic ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1998, 29:405-434.
• [23]Borges AV: Do we have enough pieces of the jigsaw to intergrate CO2 fluxes in the coastal ocean? Estuaries 2005, 28:1-25.
• [24]Cai WJ: Estuarine and coastal ocean carbon paradox; CO2 sinks or sites of terrestrial carbon incineration. Ann Rev Mar Sci 2011, 3:123-145.
• [25]Laruelle GG, Dürr HH, Slomp CP, Borges AV: Evaluation of sinks and sources of CO2 in the global ocean using spatially-explicit typology of estuaries and shelves. Geophys Res Lett 2010, 37:L15607.
• [26]Kemp WM, Smith EM, Marvin-Dipasquale M, Boynton WR: Organic carbon balance and net ecosystem metabolism in Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1997, 150:229-248.
• [27]Eyre BD, Mckee LJ: Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus budgets for a shallow subtropical coastal embayment (Moreton Bay, Australia). Limnol Oceanogra 2002, 47:1043-1055.
• [28]JGOFS Protocol: Protocol for the Joint Global Flux Study (JGOFS): Core Management. 1994.
• [29]Harrison PJ, Khan N, Yin K, Saleem M, Bano N, Nisa M, Ahmed SI, Rizvi N, Azam F: Nutrient and phytoplankton dynamics in two mangrove tidal creeks of the Indus River delta, Pakistan. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1997, 157:13-19.
• [30]Ventrick EL, Hayward TL: Determining chlorophyll on the 1984 CalCOFI surveys. CalCOFI Rep 1984, 25:74-79.
• [31]UNESCO: Monograph and Oceanographic methodology. In Phytoplankton Manual. 28th edition. Edited by Sournia A. UNESCO, PARIS; 1978:337. [UNESCO Technicalpaper]
• [32]Hobbie JE, Daleyr RJ, Jasper S: Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 1976, 33:1225-1228.
• [33]Bianchi A, Giuliano L: Enumeration of viable bacteria in the marine pelagic environment. Appl Enviro Microbiol 1995, 62:174-177.
• [34]APHA: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC; 1998.
• [35]Redfield AC, Ketchum BH, Richards FA: The influence of organisms on the composition of seawater. In The sea. Interscience 2nd edition. Edited by Hill MN. 1963, 26-63.
• [36]Hopkinson CSK, Smith EM: Estuarine respiration: an overview of benthic, pelagic and whole system respiration. In Respiration in aquatic ecosystem. Edited by Williams PJLB, Giorgio PA. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2005:123-147.
• [37]Berounsky VM, Nixon SW: Rates of nitrification along an estuarine gradient in Narraganset Bay. Estuaries 1993, 16:718-730.
• [38]Manna S, Chaudhuri K, Bhattacharyya S, Bhattacharyya M: Dynamics of Sundarban estuarine ecosystem: eutrophication induced threat to mangroves. Saline Systems 2010, 6:8. BioMed Central Full Text
• [39]Webster IT, Ford PW, Robson B, Margvelashvili N, Parslow JS: Conceptual models of the hydrodynamics, fine-sediment dynamics, biogeochemistry,and primary production in the fitzroy estuary. Coastal CRC Project CM-2. Technical Report 2003, 8:1-41.
• [40]Prabhahar C, Saleshrani K, Enbarasan R: Studies on the ecology and distribution of phytoplankton biomass in Kadalur coastal zone Tamil nadu. India. Curr. Bot. 2011, 2(3):26-30.
• [41]Cloern JE: Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity in estuaries. Continental shelf Research 1987, 7:1367-1381. 11/12
• [42]Sharma SK: Adsorptive iron removal from groundwater. PhD dissertation. Wageningen University / IHE Delft, The Netherlands; 2001a:187-198. Sharma SK: Comparison of physicochemical iron removal mechanisms in filters. In Journal of water supply: Research and Technology –aqua. 2001b
• [43]Cole BE, Cloern JE: An empirical model for estimating phytoplankton productivity in estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1987, 36:295-305.
• [44]Smith VH: Responses of estuarine and coastal marine phytoplankton to nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 2006, 51(1, part 2):377-384.
• [45]Downing JA: Marine nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry and the global N: P cycle. Biogeochemistry 1997, 37:237-252.
• [46]Sarma VVSS, Prasad VR, Kumar BSK, Rajeev K, Devi BMM, Reddy NPC, Sarma VV, Kumar MD: Intra-annual variability in nutrients in the Godavari Estuary, India. Cont Shelf Res 2010, 30(19):2005-2014.
• [47]Pennock JR, Sharp JH: Phytoplankton production in Delaware estuary: temporal and spatial variability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1986, 34:143-155.
• [48]Cloern JE: Phytoplankton ecology of the San Francisco Bay system: the statues of our current understanding. In San Francisco Bay: the urbanized estuary. Edited by Conomos JT. Allen Press, San Francisco; 1979:247-264.
• [49]Colijn F, Ludden E: Primary production of phytoplankton in the Ems-Dollard estuary. In Primary production in the Ems-Dollard estuary. Edited by Colijn F. Drukkerij Van Denderen, Groningen; 1983:38-99.
• [50]Peterson DH: Sources and sinks of biologically reactive oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, and silica in Northern San Francisco Bay. In San Francisco Bay, The urbanized estuary. Edited by Conomos TJ. Allen Press, San Francisco; 1979:175-193.
• [51]Parson TR, Le Brasseur RJ, Barracloug WE: Levels of production in the pelagic environment of the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia: A review. J Fish Res Board of Can 1970, 27:1251-1264.
• [52]Anderson GC: Aspects of marine phytoplankton studies near the Columbia River, with special reference to a subsurface chlorophyll maximum. In The Columbia River estuary and adjacent oceanwaters. Edited by Prljter AT, Alverson DL. University of Washington, Seattle; 1972.
• [53]Turner RE, Woo SW, Jitts HR: Phytoplankton production in a turbid, temperate salt-marsh estuary. Est Coast Mar Sci 1979, 9:603-613.
• [54]Iriarte A, de Madariaga I, Diez-Garagarza F, Revilla M, Orive E: Primary plankton production, respiration and nitrification in a shallow temperate estuary during summer. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1996, 208:127-151.
• [55]Gocke K, Cortes J, Murillo MM: The annual cycle of primary productivity in a tropical estuary. the inner regions of the Golfo de Nicoya, Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 2001, 49:289-306.
• [56]Gazeau F, Gattuso J, Middelburg JJ, Brion N, Schiettecatte L, Frankignoulle M, Borges AV: Planktonic and whole system metabolism in a nutrient-rich estuary (the Scheldt Estuary). Estuaries 2005, 28(6):868-883.
• [57]Savoye N, David V, Morisseau F, Etcheber H, Billy I, Charlier K, Abril G, Oggian G, Derriennic H, Sautour B: Origin and composition of particulate organic matter in a macrotidal turbid estuary: The Gironde Estuary, France. Est, Coast Shelf Sci 2012, 30:1-3.
• [58]Ram ASP, Nair S, Chandramohan D: Seasonal shift in net ecosystem production in a tropical estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 2003, 48(4):1601-1607.
• [59]Gupta GVM, Shoji D, Thottathil K, Balachandran K, Madhu NV, Madeswaran P, Nair S: CO2 supersaturation and net heterotrophy in a tropical estuary (Cochin, India): Influence of Anthropogenic effect. Ecosystems 2009, 12(12):1145-1157.
• [60]Jones RA, Fred Lee G: Recent advances in assessing impact of phosphorus load on eutrophication-related water quality. Water Res 1982, 16:503-515.