Stream invertebrate communities of Mongolia: current structure and expected changes due to climate change

Aquatic Biosystems

Jon Gelhaus¹  Alain Maasri¹ 

[1]The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, 1900 Ben Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195, USA

关键词: Aquatic insects;    Central Asia;    Conservation;    Hydrological connectivity;    Nestedness;    Macroinvertebrates;   

Others  :  794496
DOI  :  10.1186/2046-9063-8-18

 received in 2012-03-28, accepted in 2012-07-30,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Mongolia’s riverine landscape is divided into three watersheds, differing in extent of permafrost, amount of precipitation and in hydrological connectivity between sub-drainages. In order to assess the vulnerability of macroinvertebrate communities to ongoing climate change, we consider the taxonomic and functional structures of stream communities in two major watersheds: The Central Asian Internal Watershed (CAIW) and the Arctic Ocean Watershed (AOW), together covering 86.1% of Mongolia’s surface area. We assess the consequences of the hydrological connectivity between sub-drainages on the nestedness and distinctness of the stream communities. And accordingly, we discuss the expected biotic changes to occur in each watershed as a consequence of climate change.

Results

Gamma and beta diversities were higher in the CAIW than the AOW. High community nestedness was also found in the CAIW along with a higher heterogeneity of macroinvertebrate assemblage structure. Assemblages characteristic of cold headwater streams in the CAIW, were typical of the drainages of the Altai Mountain range. Macroinvertebrate guilds of the CAIW streams exhibited traits reflecting a high stability and low resilience capacity for eutrophication. In contrast, the community of the AOW had lower nestedness and a combination of traits reflecting higher stability and a better resilience capacity to disturbances.

Conclusion

Higher distinctness of stream communities is due to lower connectivity between the drainages. This was the case of the stream macroinvertebrate communities of the two major Mongolian watersheds, where connectivity of streams between sub-drainages is an important element structuring their communities. Considering differences in the communities’ guild structure, hydrological connectivity and different magnitudes of upcoming impacts of climate change between the two watersheds, respective stream communities will be affected differently. The hitherto different communities will witness an increasing differentiation and divergent adaptations for the upcoming changes. Accordingly, in an increasing awareness to protect Mongolia’s nature, our results encourage adapting conservation planning and management strategies specifically by watershed.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Maasri and Gelhaus; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Heino J, Virkkala R, Toivonen H: Climate change and freshwater biodiversity: detected patterns, future trends and adaptations in northen regions. Biol Rev 2009, 84:39-54.
• [2]Walter G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F: Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416:389-395.
• [3]Scarlett L: Climate change effects: the intersection of science, policy, and management in the USA. J N Am Benthol Soc 2010, 29:892-903.
• [4]Strayer DL, Dudgeon D: Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J N Am Benthol Soc 2010, 29:344-358.
• [5]Poff NL, Pyne MI, Bledsoe BP, Cuhaciyan CC, Carlisle DM: Developping linkage between species traits and multiscaled environmental variation to explore vulnerability of stream benthic communities to climate change. J N Am Benthol Soc 2010, 29:1441-1458.
• [6]Johns TC, Gregory JM, Ingram WJ, Johnson CE, Jones A, Lowe JA, Mitchell JFB, Roberts DL, Sexton DMH, Stevenson DS, et al.: Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios. Clim Dynam 2003, 20:583-612.
• [7]Lawrence DM, Slater AG: A projection of severe near-surface permafrost degradation during the 21st century. Geophys Res Lett 2005, 32:L24401.
• [8]Frey KE, McCelland W: Impacts of permafrost degradation on arctic river biogeochemistry. Hydrol Process 2009, 23:169-182.
• [9]Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Drizo R, Huber-sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, et al.: Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287:1770-1774.
• [10]Burgmer T, Hillebrand H, Pfenninger M: Effects of climate-driven temperature changes on the diversity of freshwater macroinvertebrates. Oecologia 2007, 151:93-103.
• [11]Domisch S, Jähnig SC, Haase P: Climate-change winners and losers: stream macroinvertebrates of a submontane region in Central Europe. Freshwater Biol 2011, 56:2009-2020.
• [12]Poff NL: Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 1997, 16:391-409.
• [13]Townsend CR, Dolédec S, Norris R, Peacock K, Arbuckle C: The influence of scale and geography on relathionships between stream community and landscape variables: description and prediction. Freshwater Biol 2003, 48:768-785.
• [14]Feio MJ, Alves T, Boavida M, Medeiros A, Graça MAS: Functional indicators of stream health: a river-basin approach. Freshwater Biol 2010, 55:1050-1065.
• [15]Usseglio Polatera P, Bournaud M, Richoux P, Tachet H: Biological and ecological traits of benthic freshwater macroinvertebrates: relationships and definition of groups with similar traits. Freshwater Biol 2000, 43:175-205.
• [16]Bonada N, Dolédec S, Statzner B: Taxonomic and biological trait differences of stream macroinvertebrate communities between mediterranean and temperate regions: implications for future climatic scenarios. Glob Chang Biol 2007, 13:1658-1671.
• [17]Pringle CM: Hydrological connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecol Appl 2001, 11:981-998.
• [18]Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, et al.: The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 2004, 7:601-613.
• [19]Unknown: Water quality monitoring in rivers - Mongolia. Ulaanbataar, The Asia Foundation; 2008.
• [20]Grunert J, Lehmkuhl F, Walther M: Paleoclimatic evolution of the Uvs Nuur basin and adjacent areas (Western Mongolia). Quatern Int 2000, 65/66:171-192.
• [21]Barbour MT, Gerristen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB: Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C; 1999.
• [22]Zaika VV: An atlas guide to the aquatic invertebrates of Tuva and West Mongolia, Part 2: Stonefly Insecta, Ectognatha, Plecoptera. Tuvinian Institute for the Exploration of Natural Resources SB RAS, Kyzyl; 2000.
• [23]Kelderman P, Batima P: Water quality assessment of rivers in Mongolia. Water Sci Technol 2006, 53:111-119.
• [24]Zaika VV: An atlas guide to the aquatic invertebrates of Tuva and West Mongolia, Part 1: Mayflies—Insecta, Ectognatha, Ephemeroptera. Tuvinian Institute for the Exploration of Natural Resources SB RAS, Kyzyl; 2000.
• [25]Tsalolkhin SJ: Key to freshwater invertebrates of Russia and adjacent lands. Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of sciences, Saint Petersburg; 1997.
• [26]Lehr PA: Keys to the Insects of the Far East of the USSR - in six volumes. Nauka Publishing House, Leningrad, URSS; 1988.
• [27]Morse JC, Lianfang Y, Lixin T: Aquatic insects of China useful for monitoring water quality. Hohai University Press, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China; 1994.
• [28]Batima P, Natsagdorj L, Gombluudev P, Erdenetsetseg B: Observed climate change in Mongolia. Assessment of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change, vol. Working paper No.12. Ulaanbaatar 2005, 1-26.
• [29]Li J, Cook ER, D'arrigo R, Chen F, Gou X: Moisture variability across China and Mongolia: 1951-2005. Clim Dynam 2009, 32:1173-1186.
• [30]Morinaga Y, Tian S-F, Shinoda M: Winter snow anomaly and atmospheric circulation in Mongolia. Int J Climatol 2003, 23:1627-1636.
• [31]Kadota T, Gombo D: Recent glacier variations in Mongolia. Ann Glaciol 2007, 46:185-188.
• [32]Wu T, Wang Q, Watanabe M, Chen J, Battogtokh D: Mapping vertical profile of dicontinuous permafrost with ground penetrating radar at Nalaikh depression, Mongolia. Environ Geol 2009, 56:1577-1583.
• [33]Ward JV, Stanford JA: Thermal responses in the evolutionary ecology of aquatic insects. Annu Rev Entomol 1982, 27:97-117.
• [34]Mérigoux S, Lamouroux N, Olivier JM, Dolédec S: Invertebrate hydraulic preferences and predicted impacts of changes in discharge in a large river. Freshwater Biol 2009, 54:1343-1356.
• [35]Mérigoux S, Dolédec S: Hydraulic requirements of stream communities: a case study on invertebrates. Freshwater Biol 2004, 49:600-613.
• [36]Cao Y, Larsen DP, White D: Estimating regional species richness using a limited number of survey units. Ecoscience 2004, 11:23-35.
• [37]Chao A: Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 1987, 43:783-791.
• [38]Patterson BD, Brown JH: Regional nested patterns of species composition in grainivorous rodent assemblages. Biogeography 1991, 18:395-402.
• [39]Ulrich W: Nestedness - a FORTRAN program for calculation ecological matrix temperatures. 2006. http://www.uni.torun.pl/~ulrichw
• [40]Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournaud M, Usseglio-Polatera P: Invertébrés d'eau douce: Systématique, biologie, écologie. CNRS éditions, Paris; 2000.
• [41]Chevenet F, Dolédec S, Chessel D: A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long-term ecological data. Freshwater Biol 1994, 31:295-309.
• [42]Charvet S, Statzner B, Usseglio-Polatera P, Dumont B: Traits of benthic macroinvertebrates in semi-natural French stream: an initial application to biomonitoring in Europe. Freshwater Biol 2000, 43:277-296.
• [43]Chessel D, Durfour AB, Thioulouse J: The ade4 package - I: one-table methods. R news 2004, 4:5-10.
• [44]Poff NL, Olden JD, Merritt DM, Pepin DM: Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2007, 104:5732-5737.
• [45]Hannan MT, Freeman J: The population ecology of organizations. Am J Sociol 1977, 82:929-964.
• [46]Courtney GW: Revision of Palaearctic mountain midges (Diptera: Deuterophlebiidae), with phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses of the world species. Syst Entomol 1994, 19:1-24.
• [47]Muneepeerakul R, Bertuzzo E, Lynch HJ, Fagan WF, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I: Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi-Missouri basin. Nature 2008, 453:220-222.
• [48]Heino J, Mykrä H: Control of stream insect assemblages: roles of spatial configuration and local environmental factors. Ecol Entomol 2008, 33:614-622.
• [49]Thompson R, Townsend C: A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. J Anim Ecol 2006, 75:476-484.
• [50]Petersen I, Masters Z, Hildrew AG, Ormerod ST: Dispersal of adult aquatic insects in catchements of differing land use. J Appl Ecol 2004, 41:934-950.
• [51]Pianka ER: On r- and K-selection. Am Nat 1970, 104:592-597.
• [52]Ward JV: Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biol Conserv 1998, 83:269-278.
• [53]Maasri A, Gelhaus J: The new era of the livestock production in Mongolia: consequences on streams of the Great Lakes Depression. Sci Total Environ 2011, 409:4841-4846.