Does size matter? Separations on guard columns for fast sample analysis applied to bioenergy research

BMC Biotechnology

Stefan Bauer¹  Ana B. Ibáñez¹ 

[1] Energy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley 94720, CA, USA

关键词: Fermentation;    Furans;    Butanol;    Ethanol;    Glucose;    Enzymatic digestibility assay;    Micro Guard Cation H;    Rezex RFQ;    Aminex HPX-87H;    Ion exclusion chromatography;   

Others  :  1210248
DOI  :  10.1186/s12896-015-0159-3

 received in 2014-12-18, accepted in 2015-05-01,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Increasing sample throughput is needed when large numbers of samples have to be processed. In chromatography, one strategy is to reduce column length for decreased analysis time. Therefore, the feasibility of analyzing samples simply on a guard column was explored using refractive index and ultraviolet detection. Results from the guard columns were compared to the analyses using the standard 300 mm Aminex HPX-87H column which is widely applied to the analysis of samples from many biotechnology- and bioenergy-related experiments such as biomass conversions or fermentations.

Results

The 50 mm Rezex RFQ Fast Acid H⁺ guard column was able to separate the most common fermentation products (ethanol, acetone, iso- and n-butanol) and promising precursors (furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural) of biofuels and value-added chemicals. Compound profiles in fermentation samples were analyzed with similar accuracy compared to results using the 300 mm column. However, separation of glucose and xylose was not achieved. Nevertheless, it was possible to monitor the consumption of one of the two sugars during fermentation if the other one was absent or remained constant over the course of the experiment. If correct peak integration and interference subtraction was applied, concentration profiles from enzymatic digestibility experiments and even more complex samples (e.g. acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation) were reliably obtained. With the 50 mm guard column, samples were analyzed up to ten-times faster compared to the 300 mm column. A further decrease in analysis time was achieved by using the 30 mm Micro Guard Cation H guard column. This column is especially suitable for the rapid analysis of compounds with long elution times on the standard 300 mm column, such as biofuel-related alcohols (e.g., n-butanol, n-hexanol) and furan- and tetrahydrofuran-type molecules.

Conclusion

Applied to a suitable set of samples, separations on a guard column can give rapid and sufficiently accurate information on compound changes over the course of an experiment. Therefore, it is an inexpensive and ideal tool for processing a large amount of samples, such as in screening or discovery experiments, where detecting relative changes is often sufficient to identify promising candidates for further analysis.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Bauer and Ibáñez; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 9.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Erdei B, Barta Z, Sipos B, Réczey K, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010; 3:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [2]Saha BC, Iten LB, Cotta MA, Wu YW. Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochem. 2005; 40:3693-3700.
• [3]Román-Leshkov Y, Barrett CJ, Liu ZY, Dumesic JA. Production of dimethylfuran for liquid fuels from biomass-derived carbohydrates. Nature. 2007; 447:982-986.
• [4]Brandt A, Ray MJ, To TQ, Leak DJ, Murphy RJ, Welton T. Ionic liquid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquid-water mixtures. Green Chem. 2012; 13:2489-2499.
• [5]Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D: Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. In Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO. Revised Version 2012. http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html. Accessed November 2014.
• [6]Scarlata CJ, Hyman DA. Development and validation of a fast high pressure liquid chromatography method for the analysis of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis and fermentation products. J Chromatogr A. 2010; 1217:2082-2087.
• [7]Buday Z, Linden JC, Karim MN. Improved acetone-butanol fermentation analysis using subambient HPLC column temperature. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1990; 12:24-27.
• [8]Kumar M, Saini S, Gayen K. Acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation analysis using only high performance liquid chromatography. Anal Methods. 2014; 6:774-781.
• [9]Binder JB, Blank JJ, Cefali AV, Raines RT. Synthesis of furfural from xylose and xylan. Chem Sus Chem. 2010; 3:1268-1272.
• [10]Cai CM, Nagane N, Kumar R, Wyman CE. Coupling metal halides with a co-solvent to produce furfural and 5-HMF at high yields directly from lignocellulosic biomass as an integrated biofuels strategy. Green Chem. 2014; 16:3819-3829.
• [11]Li H, Chai X-S, Deng Y, Zhan H, Fu Z. Rapid determination of ethanol in fermentation liquor by full evaporation headspace gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2009; 1216:169-172.
• [12]Mendes LS, Oliveira FCC, Suarez PAZ, Rubim JC. Determination of ethanol in fuel ethanol and beverages by Fourier transform (FT)-near infrared and FT-Raman spectrometries. Anal Chim Acta. 2003; 493:219-231.
• [13]Vermeir S, Nicolaï BM, Jans K, Maes G, Lammertyn J. High-throughput microplate enzymatic assay for fast sugar and acid quantification in apple and tomato. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55:3240-3248.
• [14]Birnberg PR, Brenner ML. A one-step assay for sucrose with sucrose phosphorylase. Anal Biochem. 1984; 142:556-561.
• [15]Kristoffersen L, Skuterud B, Larssen BR, Skurtveit S, Smith-Kielland A. Fast quantification of ethanol in whole blood specimens by the enzymatic alcohol dehydrogenase method. Optimization by experimental design. J Anal Toxicol. 2005; 29:66-70.
• [16]Velterop JS, Vos F. A rapid an inexpensive microplate assay for the enzymatic determination of glucose, fructose, sucrose, L-malate and citrate in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) extracts and in orange juice. Phytochem Anal. 2011; 12:299-304.
• [17]Raba J, Mottola HA. Glucose oxidase as an analytical reagent. Critic Rev Anal Chem. 1995; 25:1-42.
• [18]YSI 2950 biochemistry analyzer [http://www.ysilifesciences.com/index.php?page=ysi-2950-biochemistry-analyzer]
• [19]Wyman CE. Aqueous Pretreatment of Plant Biomass for Biological and Chemical Conversion to Fuels and Chemicals. Wiley, New York; 2013.
• [20]Ebert J: Furfural: Future feedstock for fuels and chemicals. Biomass Magazine [http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/1950/furfural-future-feedstock-for-fuels-and-chemicals]
• [21]Greer DR, Basso TP, Ibanez AB, Bauer S, Skerker JM, Ozcam AE et al.. Fermentation of hydrolysate detoxified by pervaporation through block copolymer membranes. Green Chem. 2014; 16:4206-4213.
• [22]Mitchell VD, Taylor CM, Bauer S. Comprehensive analysis of monomeric phenolics in dilute acid plant hydrolysates. Bioenerg Res. 2014; 7:654-669.
• [23]Ibanez A, Bauer S. Analytical method for the determination of organic acids in dilute acid pretreated biomass hydrolysate by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014; 7:145. BioMed Central Full Text
• [24]Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A, Schoen P, Lukas J, Olthof B, Worley M, Sexton D, Dudgeon D: Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover. Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-47764. United States National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of Energy. May 2011.
• [25]Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Rev. 2009; 48:3713-3729.
• [26]Selig M, Weiss N, Ji Y: Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO. 2008. http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html. Accessed November 2014.
• [27]Yuan J-P, Chen F. Simultaneous separation and determination of sugars, ascorbic acid and furanic compounds by HPLC-dual detection. Food Chem. 1999; 64:423-427.
• [28]Fisher MA, Boyarskiy S, Yamada MR, Kong N, Bauer S, Tullman E. Enhancing tolerance to short-chain alcohols by engineering the Escherichia coli AcrB efflux pump to secrete the non-native substrate n-butanol. ACS Synth Biol. 2014; 3:30-40.
• [29]Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature. 2008; 451:86-90.
• [30]Rodriguez GM, Atsumi S. Isobutyraldehyde production from Escherichia coli by removing aldehyde reductase activity. Microb Cell Fact. 2012; 11:90. BioMed Central Full Text
• [31]Kim SR, Park Y-C, Jin Y-S, Seo J-H. Strain engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisae for enhanced xylose metabolism. Biotechnol Adv. 2013; 31:851-861.
• [32]Kim SR, Skerker JM, Kang W, Lesmana A, Wei N, Arkin AP et al.. Rational and evolutionary engineering approaches uncover a small set of genetic changes efficient for rapid xylose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2013; 8: Article ID e57048
• [33]Anbarasan P, Baer ZC, Sreekumar S, Gross E, Binder JB, Blanch HW et al.. Integration of chemical catalysis with extractive fermentation to produce fuels. Nature. 2012; 491:235-239.
• [34]Alsaker KV, Paredes C, Papoutsakis ET. Metabolite stress and tolerance in the production of biofuels and chemicals: gene-expression-based systemsanalysis of butanol, butyrate, and acetate stresses in the anaerobe Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010; 105:1131-1147.