期刊论文详细信息
Chemistry Central Journal
Optimizing Bi2O3 and TiO2 to achieve the maximum non-linear electrical property of ZnO low voltage varistor
Seyedehmaryam Moosavi1  Masoumeh Dorraj2  Nurhidayati Mohd Sidek1  Nuraine Mariana Mohd Shahrani1  Khamirul Amin Matori2  Siti Norazilah Ahmad Tamili1  Raba’ah Syahidah Aziz1  Azmi Zakaria2  Yadollah Abdollahi2 
[1]Department of Physics, Faculty Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
[2]Material Synthesis and Characterization Laboratory, Institute of Advanced Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词: TiO2;    Bi2O3;    RSM;    Modeling;    ZnO-varistor;    Optimization;   
Others  :  787856
DOI  :  10.1186/1752-153X-7-137
 received in 2013-05-19, accepted in 2013-08-06,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

In fabrication of ZnO-based low voltage varistor, Bi2O3 and TiO2 have been used as former and grain growth enhancer factors respectively. Therefore, the molar ratio of the factors is quit important in the fabrication. In this paper, modeling and optimization of Bi2O3 and TiO2 was carried out by response surface methodology to achieve maximized electrical properties. The fabrication was planned by central composite design using two variables and one response. To obtain actual responses, the design was performed in laboratory by the conventional methods of ceramics fabrication. The actual responses were fitted into a valid second order algebraic polynomial equation. Then the quadratic model was suggested by response surface methodology. The model was validated by analysis of variance which provided several evidences such as high F-value (153.6), very low P-value (<0.0001), adjusted R-squared (0.985) and predicted R-squared (0.947). Moreover, the lack of fit was not significant which means the model was significant.

Results

The model tracked the optimum of the additives in the design by using three dimension surface plots. In the optimum condition, the molars ratio of Bi2O3 and TiO2 were obtained in a surface area around 1.25 point that maximized the nonlinear coefficient around 20 point. Moreover, the model predicted the optimum amount of the additives in desirable condition. In this case, the condition included minimum standard error (0.35) and maximum nonlinearity (20.03), while molar ratio of Bi2O3 (1.24 mol%) and TiO2 (1.27 mol%) was in range. The condition as a solution was tested by further experiments for confirmation. As the experimental results showed, the obtained value of the non-linearity, 21.6, was quite close to the predicted model.

Conclusion

Response surface methodology has been successful for modeling and optimizing the additives such as Bi2O3 and TiO2 of ZnO-based low voltage varistor to achieve maximized non-linearity properties.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Abdollahi et al.; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140702204843212.pdf 1088KB PDF download
Figure 8. 62KB Image download
Figure 7. 60KB Image download
Figure 6. 42KB Image download
Figure 5. 79KB Image download
Figure 4. 123KB Image download
Figure 3. 47KB Image download
Figure 2. 60KB Image download
Figure 1. 52KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Ramírez M, Bueno P, Ribeiro W, Varela J, Bonett D, Villa J, Márquez M, Rojo C: The failure analyses on ZnO varistors used in high tension devices. J Mater Sci 2005, 40:5591-5596.
  • [2]Ramirez M, Bassi W, Bueno P, Longo E, Varela J: Comparative degradation of ZnO-and SnO2-based polycrystalline non-ohmic devices by current pulse stress. J Phys D Appl Phys 2008, 41:122002-122002.
  • [3]Ramírez MA, Bassi W, Parra R, Bueno PR, Longo E, Varela JA: Comparative electrical behavior at low and high current of SnO2 and ZnO based varistors. J Am Ceram Soc 2008, 91:2402-2404.
  • [4]Levinson L, Philipp H: Zinc oxide varistors–a review. Am Ceram Soc Bull 1986, 65:639.
  • [5]Eda K: Zinc oxide varistors. IEEE Electr Insul Mag 2002, 5:28-30.
  • [6]Bernik S, Zupancic P, Kolar D: Influence of Bi2O3/TiO2/Sb2O3 and Cr2O3 doping on low-voltage varistor ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 1999, 19:709-713.
  • [7]Suzuki H, Bradt R: Grain growth of ZnO in ZnO-Bi2O3 ceramics with TiO2 addition. J Am Ceram Soc 1995, 78:1354-1360.
  • [8]Clarke DR: Varistor ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1999, 82:485-502.
  • [9]Pillai SC, Kelly JM, McCormack DE, O'Brien P, Ramesh R: The effect of processing conditions on varistors prepared from nanocrystalline ZnO. J Mater Chem 2003, 13:2586-2590.
  • [10]Elfwing M, Österlund R, Olsson E: Differences in wetting characteristics of Bi2O3 polymorphs in ZnO varistor materials. J Am Ceram Soc 2000, 83:2311-2314.
  • [11]Lao Y-W, Kuo S-T, Tuan W-H: Effect of Bi2O3 and Sb2O3 on the grain size distribution of ZnO. J Electroceram 2007, 19:187-194.
  • [12]Peiteado M, Fernández Lozano JF, Caballero AC: Varistors based in the ZnO-Bi2O3 system: microstructure control and properties. J Eur Ceram Soc 2007, 27:3867-3872.
  • [13]Peiteado M, De la Rubia M, Velasco M, Valle F, Caballero A: Bi2O3 vaporization from ZnO-based varistors. J Eur Ceram Soc 2005, 25:1675-1680.
  • [14]Metz R, Delalu H, Vignalou J, Achard N, Elkhatib M: Electrical properties of varistors in relation to their true bismuth composition after sintering. Mater Chem Phys 2000, 63:157-162.
  • [15]Wong J: Sintering and varistor characteristics of ZnO Bi2O3 ceramics. J Appl Phys 1980, 51:4453-4459.
  • [16]Yilmaz S, Ercenk E, Toplan HO, Gunay V: Grain growth kinetic in x TiO 2–6 wt.% Bi 2 O 3–(94- x) ZnO (x = 0, 2, 4) ceramic system. J Mater Sci 2007, 42:5188-5195.
  • [17]Toplan HÖ, Karakaş Y: Processing and phase evolution in low voltage varistor prepared by chemical processing. Ceram Int 2001, 27:761-765.
  • [18]Yan MF, Heuer AH: Additives and interfaces in electronic ceramics. Columbus, OH: Amer Ceramic Society; 1983.
  • [19]Peigney A, Andrianjatovo H, Legros R, Rousset A: Influence of chemical composition on sintering of bismuth-titanium-doped zinc oxide. J Mater Sci 1992, 27:2397-2405.
  • [20]Bernik S, Daneu N, Rečnik A: Inversion boundary induced grain growth in TiO2 or Sb2O3 doped ZnO-based varistor ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2004, 24:3703-3708.
  • [21]Montgomery DC: Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2008.
  • [22]Khuri AI, Cornell JA: Response surfaces: designs and analyses. New York: CRC; 1996.
  • [23]Bernik S: Microstructural and electrical characteristics of ZnO based varistor ceramics with varying TiO2/Bi2O3 ratio. Advances in science and technology 1999, 151-158.
  • [24]Williges RC, Clark C: Response surface methodology design variants useful in human performance research. 1971. [Illinois Univ Savoy Aviation Research Lab]
  • [25]Myers RH, Anderson-Cook CM: Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2009.
  • [26]Clark C, Williges RC: Response surface methodology design variants useful in human performance research. 1971. [DTIC Document, New York]
  • [27]Deming S: Quality by design-part 5. Chemtech 1990, 20:118-120.
  • [28]Hader R, Park SH: Slope-rotatable central composite designs. Technometrics 1978, 20:413-417.
  • [29]Palasota JA, Deming SN: Central composite experimental designs: applied to chemical systems. J Chem Educ 1992, 69:560.
  • [30]Rubin IB, Mitchell TJ, Goldstein G: Program of statistical designs for optimizing specific transfer ribonucleic acid assay conditions. Anal Chem 1971, 43:717-721.
  • [31]Baş D, Boyacı İH: Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng 2007, 78:836-845.
  • [32]Khuri AI, Mukhopadhyay S: Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 2010, 2:128-149.
  • [33]Anderson MJ, Whitcomb PJ: RSM simplified: optimizing processes using response surface methods for design of experiments. Virginia: Productivity Pr; 2005.
  • [34]Oehlert GW: A first course in design and analysis of experiments. New York: WH Freeman; 2000.
  • [35]Deming S: Quality by design-part 3. Chemtech 1989, 19:249-255.
  • [36]Whitcomb PJ, Anderson MJ: RSM simplified: optimizing processes using response surface methods for design of experiments. New York: Productivity Press; 2004.
  • [37]Allen DM: The relationship between variable selection and data agumentation and a method for prediction. Technometrics 1974, 16:125-127.
  • [38]Stuart A, Ord JK: Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics: vol 1. Distribution theory. London: Arnold; 1994.
  • [39]Abdollahi Y, Zakaria A, Abdullah AH, Masoumi HRF, Jahangirian H, Shameli K, Rezayi M, Banerjee S, Abdollahi T: Semi-empirical study of ortho-cresol photo degradation in manganese-doped zinc oxide nanoparticles suspensions. Chem Cent J 2012, 6:1-8. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [40]Box GEP, Wilson K: On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Roy Stat Soc B 1951, 13:1-45.
  • [41]Stuart A, Ord JK, Arnold S: Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics: vol 2A. Classical inference and the linear model. London: Arnold; 1999.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:212次 浏览次数:69次