期刊论文详细信息
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Oleaginous yeast platform for producing biofuels via co-solvent hydrothermal liquefaction
Umakanta Jena1  Alex T. McCurdy2  Andrew Warren1  Hailey Summers2  Rhesa N. Ledbetter2  S. Kent Hoekman1  Lance C. Seefeldt2  Jason C. Quinn2 
[1] Desert Research Institute, Reno 89512, NV, USA
[2] Utah State University, Logan 84322, UT, USA
关键词: Techno-economic analysis;    Co-solvent;    Biocrude;    Yeast;    Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL);    Biofuel;   
Others  :  1229685
DOI  :  10.1186/s13068-015-0345-5
 received in 2015-05-14, accepted in 2015-09-21,  发布年份 2015
【 摘 要 】

Background

Oleaginous microorganisms are attractive feedstock for production of liquid biofuels. Direct hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is an efficient route that converts whole, wet biomass into an energy-dense liquid fuel precursor, called ‘biocrude’. HTL represents a promising alternative to conventional lipid extraction methods as it does not require a dry feedstock or additional steps for lipid extraction. However, high operating pressure in HTL can pose challenges in reactor sizing and overall operating costs. Through the use of co-solvents the HTL operating pressure can be reduced. The present study investigates low-temperature co-solvent HTL of oleaginous yeast, Cryptococcus curvatus, using laboratory batch reactors.

Results

In this study, we report the co-solvent HTL of microbial yeast biomass in an isopropanol–water binary system in the presence or absence of Na 2 CO 3catalyst. This novel approach proved to be effective and resulted in significantly higher yield of biocrude (56.4 ± 0.1 %) than that of HTL performed without a co-solvent (49.1 ± 0.4 %)(p = 0.001). Addition of Na 2 CO 3as a catalyst marginally improved the biocrude yield. The energy content of the resulting biocrude (~37 MJ kg −1 ) was only slightly lower than that of petroleum crude (42 MJ kg −1 ). The HTL process was successful in removing carboxyl groups from fatty acids and creating their associated straight-chain alkanes (C 17 –C 21 ). Experimental results were leveraged to inform techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the baseline HTL conversion pathway to evaluate the commercial feasibility of this process. TEA results showed a renewable diesel fuel price of $5.09 per gallon, with the HTL-processing step accounting for approximately 23 % of the total cost for the baseline pathway.

Conclusions

This study shows the feasibility of co-solvent HTL of oleaginous yeast biomass in producing an energy-dense biocrude, and hence provides a platform for adding value to the current dairy industry. Co-solvents can be used to lower the HTL temperature and hence the operating pressure. This process results in a higher biocrude yield at a lower HTL temperature. A conceptual yeast HTL biofuel platform suggests the use of a dairy waste stream for increasing the productivity and sustainability of rural areas while providing a new feedstock (yeast) for generating biofuels.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Jena et al.

附件列表
Files Size Format View
Fig.9. 50KB Image download
Fig.8. 49KB Image download
Fig.7. 57KB Image download
Fig.6. 35KB Image download
Fig.5. 18KB Image download
Fig.4. 72KB Image download
Fig.3. 32KB Image download
Fig.2. 16KB Image download
Fig.1. 23KB Image download
Fig.9. 50KB Image download
Fig.8. 49KB Image download
Fig.7. 57KB Image download
Fig.6. 35KB Image download
Figure 2. 75KB Image download
Fig.4. 72KB Image download
Fig.3. 32KB Image download
Fig.2. 16KB Image download
Fig.1. 23KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig.1.

Fig.2.

Fig.3.

Fig.4.

Figure 2.

Fig.6.

Fig.7.

Fig.8.

Fig.9.

Fig.1.

Fig.2.

Fig.3.

Fig.4.

Fig.5.

Fig.6.

Fig.7.

Fig.8.

Fig.9.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Huang C, Chen X-F, Xiong L, Chen X-D, Ma L-L, Chen Y: Single cell oil production from low-cost substrates: the possibility and potential of its industrialization. Biotechnol Adv 2013, 31:129-139.
  • [2]Koutinas AA, Chatzifragkou A, Kopsahelis N, Papanikolaou S, Kookos IK: Design and techno-economic evaluation of microbial oil production as a renewable resource for biodiesel and oleochemical production. Fuel 2014, 116:566-577.
  • [3]Moody JW, McGinty CM, Quinn JC. Global evaluation of biofuel potential from microalgae. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014.
  • [4]Pirozzi D, Ausiello A, Zuccaro G, Sannino F, Yousuf A: Culture of oleaginous yeasts in dairy industry wastewaters to obtain lipids suitable for the production of II-generation Biodiesel. Proteins. 2014, 7:4-26.
  • [5]Grierson S, Strezov V, Bengtsson J: Life cycle assessment of a microalgae biomass cultivation, bio-oil extraction and pyrolysis processing regime. Algal Res. 2013, 2:299-311.
  • [6]Vasudevan V, Stratton RW, Pearlson MN, Jersey GR, Beyene AG, Weissman JC, et al.: Environmental performance of algal biofuel technology options. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46:2451-2459.
  • [7]Jena U, Das K, Kastner J: Effect of operating conditions of thermochemical liquefaction on biocrude production from Spirulina platensis. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:6221-6229.
  • [8]Peterson AA, Vogel F, Lachance RP, Fröling M, Antal MJ Jr, Tester JW: Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sub-and supercritical water technologies. Energy Environ Sci 2008, 1:32-65.
  • [9]Jones S, Davis R, Zhu Y, Kinchin C, Anderson D, Hallen R, et al. Process design and economics for the conversion of algal biomass to hydrocarbons: whole algae hydrothermal liquefaction and upgrading. U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office; 2014.
  • [10]Biddy M, Davis R, Jones S, Zhu Y: Whole algae hydrothermal liquefaction technology pathway. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden; 2013.
  • [11]Jena U, Das K: Comparative evaluation of thermochemical liquefaction and pyrolysis for bio-oil production from microalgae. Energy Fuels 2011, 25:5472-5482.
  • [12]Shuping Z, Yulong W, Mingde Y, Kaleem I, Chun L, Tong J: Production and characterization of bio-oil from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae Dunaliella tertiolecta cake. Energy. 2010, 35:5406-5411.
  • [13]Valdez PJ, Dickinson JG, Savage PE: Characterization of product fractions from hydrothermal liquefaction of Nannochloropsis sp. and the influence of solvents. Energy Fuels 2011, 25:3235-3243.
  • [14]Vardon DR, Sharma BK, Scott J, Yu G, Wang Z, Schideman L, et al.: Chemical properties of biocrude oil from the hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina algae, swine manure, and digested anaerobic sludge. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:8295-8303.
  • [15]Miao C, Chakraborty M, Dong T, Yu X, Chi Z, Chen S: Sequential hydrothermal fractionation of yeast Cryptococcus curvatus biomass. Bioresour Technol 2014, 164:106-112.
  • [16]Valdez PJ, Nelson MC, Faeth JL, Wang HY, Lin XN, Savage PE: Hydrothermal liquefaction of bacteria and yeast monocultures. Energy Fuels 2013, 28:67-75.
  • [17]Hammerschmidt A, Boukis N, Galla U, Dinjus E, Hitzmann B: Conversion of yeast by hydrothermal treatment under reducing conditions. Fuel 2011, 90:3424-3432.
  • [18]Akhtar J, Amin NAS: A review on process conditions for optimum bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:1615-1624.
  • [19]Toor SS, Rosendahl L, Rudolf A: Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a review of subcritical water technologies. Energy. 2011, 36:2328-2342.
  • [20]LópezBarreiro D, Prins W, Ronsse F, Brilman W: Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) of microalgae for biofuel production: state of the art review and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013, 53:113-127.
  • [21]Ross A, Biller P, Kubacki M, Li H, Lea-Langton A, Jones J: Hydrothermal processing of microalgae using alkali and organic acids. Fuel 2010, 89:2234-2243.
  • [22]Yuan X, Li H, Zeng G, Tong J, Xie W: Sub-and supercritical liquefaction of rice straw in the presence of ethanol–water and 2-propanol–water mixture. Energy. 2007, 32:2081-2088.
  • [23]Yuan X, Wang J, Zeng G, Huang H, Pei X, Li H, et al.: Comparative studies of thermochemical liquefaction characteristics of microalgae using different organic solvents. Energy. 2011, 36:6406-6412.
  • [24]Zhang J, Zhang Y: Hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae in an ethanol-water co-solvent to produce biocrude oil. Energy Fuels 2014, 28:5178-5183.
  • [25]Cheng S, D’cruz I, Wang M, Leitch M, Xu C: Highly efficient liquefaction of woody biomass in hot-compressed alcohol–water co-solvents. Energy Fuels 2010, 24:4659-4667.
  • [26]Chumpoo J, Prasassarakich P: Bio-Oil from hydro-liquefaction of bagasse in supercritical ethanol. Energy Fuels 2010, 24:2071-2077.
  • [27]Li H, Yuan X, Zeng G, Huang D, Huang H, Tong J, et al.: The formation of bio-oil from sludge by deoxy-liquefaction in supercritical ethanol. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:2860-2866.
  • [28]Zhou D, Zhang S, Fu H, Chen J: Liquefaction of macroalgae Enteromorpha prolifera in sub-/supercritical alcohols: direct production of ester compounds. Energy Fuels 2012, 26:2342-2351.
  • [29]Jena U, Das K, Kastner J: Comparison of the effects of Na 2 CO 3 , Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 , and NiO catalysts on the thermochemical liquefaction of microalga Spirulina platensis. Appl Energy 2012, 98:368-375.
  • [30]Summers HM, Ledbetter RN, McCurdy AT, Morgan MR, Seefeldt LC, Jena U, et al.: Techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment of dairy effluent to renewable diesel via hydrothermal liquefaction. Bioresour Technol 2015, 196:431-440.
  • [31]Ogi T, Yokoyama S-y, Koguchi K: Direct liquefaction of wood by alkali and alkaline earth salt in an aqueous phase. Chem Lett 1985, 9:1199-1202.
  • [32]Minowa T, Kondo T, Sudirjo ST: Thermochemical liquefaction of Indonesian biomass residues. Biomass Bioenergy 1998, 14:517-524.
  • [33]Brown TM, Duan P, Savage PE: Hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification of Nannochloropsis sp. Energy Fuels 2010, 24:3639-3646.
  • [34]Behrendt F, Neubauer Y, Oevermann M, Wilmes B, Zobel N: Direct Liquefaction of Biomass. Chem Eng Technol 2008, 31:667-677.
  • [35]Kruse A, Krupka A, Schwarzkopf V, Gamard C, Henningsen T: Influence of Proteins on the Hydrothermal Gasification and Liquefaction of Biomass. 1. Comparison of Different Feedstocks. Ind Eng Chem Res 2005, 44:3013-3020.
  • [36]Brand S, Hardi F, Kim J, Suh DJ: Effect of heating rate on biomass liquefaction: differences between subcritical water and supercritical ethanol. Energy. 2014, 68:420-427.
  • [37]Duan P, Savage PE: Upgrading of crude algal bio-oil in supercritical water. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:1899-1906.
  • [38]Roussis SG, Cranford R, Sytkovetskiy N: Thermal treatment of crude algae oils prepared under hydrothermal extraction conditions. Energy Fuels 2012, 26:5294-5299.
  • [39]Ackelsberg O: Fat splitting. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1958, 35:635-640.
  • [40]Logan TJ, Rheinecker TC, Underwood DC. Hydrolysis of triglycerides. US: US Patent; 1980.
  • [41]Pretsch E, Bühlmann P, Affolter C, Pretsch E, Bhuhlmann P, Affolter C: Structure determination of organic compounds. 4th edition. Springer, Berline; 2009.
  • [42]Jena U, Vaidyanathan N, Chinnasamy S, Das K: Evaluation of microalgae cultivation using recovered aqueous co-product from thermochemical liquefaction of algal biomass. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:3380-3387.
  • [43]Levine RB, Sierra COS, Hockstad R, Obeid W, Hatcher PG, Savage PE: The use of hydrothermal carbonization to recycle nutrients in algal biofuel production. Environ Progress Sustain Energy 2013, 32:962-975.
  • [44]Yu G, Zhang Y, Schideman L, Funk T, Wang Z: Distributions of carbon and nitrogen in the products from hydrothermal liquefaction of low-lipid microalgae. Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4:4587-4595.
  • [45]Espinosa-Gonzalez I, Parashar A, Chae M, Bressler DC: Cultivation of oleaginous yeast using aqueous fractions derived from hydrothermal pretreatments of biomass. Bioresour Technol 2014, 170:413-420.
  • [46]Elliott DC, Hart TR, Neuenschwander GG, Rotness LJ, Roesijadi G, Zacher AH, et al.: Hydrothermal processing of macroalgal feedstocks in continuous-flow reactors. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2013, 2:207-215.
  • [47]Xu J, Du W, Zhao X, Zhang G, Liu D: Microbial oil production from various carbon sources and its use for biodiesel preparation. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2013, 7:65-77.
  • [48]Burrington K, Schoenfuss T, Patel S. Coproducts of milk and whey processing. Technical Report. U.S. Dairy Export Council. 2014. http://www.usdairy.com/~/media/usd/public/coproducts_milk_report.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2015
  • [49]Biller P, Sharma BK, Kunwar B, Ross AB: Hydroprocessing of bio-crude from continuous hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae. Fuel 2015, 159:197-205.
  • [50]Padmaja K, Atheya N, Bhatnagar A, Singh K: Conversion of Calotropis procera biocrude to liquid fuels using thermal and catalytic cracking. Fuel 2009, 88:780-785.
  • [51]Frank ED, Elgowainy A, Han J, Wang Z: Life cycle comparison of hydrothermal liquefaction and lipid extraction pathways to renewable diesel from algae. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 2013, 18:137-158.
  • [52]Schmitt ME, Brown TA, Trumpower BL: A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 1990, 18:3091.
  • [53]Angerbauer C, Siebenhofer M, Mittelbach M, Guebitz G: Conversion of sewage sludge into lipids by Lipomyces starkeyi for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:3051-3056.
  • [54]Yan W, Hoekman SK, Broch A, Coronella CJ: Effect of hydrothermal carbonization reaction parameters on the properties of hydrochar and pellets. Environ Progress Sustain Energy. 2014, 33(3):676-680.
  • [55]Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C: Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuels 2011, 25:1802-1810.
  • [56]Piorreck M, Baasch K-H, Pohl P: Biomass production, total protein, chlorophylls, lipids and fatty acids of freshwater green and blue-green algae under different nitrogen regimes. Phytochemistry 1984, 23:207-216.
  • [57]Pistorius A, DeGrip WJ, Egorova-Zachernyuk TA: Monitoring of biomass composition from microbiological sources by means of FT-IR spectroscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 103:123-129.
  • [58]Wahlen BD, Willis RM, Seefeldt LC: Biodiesel production by simultaneous extraction and conversion of total lipids from microalgae, cyanobacteria, and wild mixed-cultures. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:2724-2730.
  • [59]Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers P, Smith F: Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 1956, 28:350-356.
  • [60]Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C, Zielinska B, Felix L: Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of selected woody and herbaceous biomass feedstocks. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2013, 3:113-126.
  • [61]USEPA. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati; 1983.
  • [62]Tremblay VJ, Tremblay CH: The US brewing industry: data and economic analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge; 2005.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:366次 浏览次数:23次