Evaluation of hydrophobic micro-zeolite-mixed matrix membrane and integrated with acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation for enhanced butanol production

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Chuang Xue²  Decai Yang²  Guangqing Du²  Lijie Chen²  Jiangang Ren²  Fengwu Bai¹ 

[1] School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

[2] School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Linggong Road 2, Dalian 116024, China

关键词: Zeolite-mixed membrane;    Butanol recovery;    Pervaporation;    ABE fermentation;   

Others  :  1225782
DOI  :  10.1186/s13068-015-0288-x

 received in 2015-05-21, accepted in 2015-07-13,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

Butanol is regarded as an advanced biofuel that can be derived from renewable biomass. However, the main challenge for microbial butanol production is low butanol titer, yield and productivity, leading to intensive energy consumption in product recovery. Various alternative separation technologies such as extraction, adsorption and gas stripping, etc., could be integrated with acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation with improving butanol productivity, but their butanol selectivities are not satisfactory. The membrane-based pervaporation technology is recently attracting increasing attention since it has potentially desirable butanol selectivity.

Results

The performance of the zeolite-mixed polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes were evaluated to recover butanol from butanol/water binary solution as well as fermentation broth in the integrated ABE fermentation system. The separation factor and butanol titer in permeate of the zeolite-mixed PDMS membrane were up to 33.0 and 334.6 g/L at 80°C, respectively, which increased with increasing zeolite loading weight in the membrane as well as feed temperature. The enhanced butanol separation factor was attributed to the hydrophobic zeolites with large pore size providing selective routes preferable for butanol permeation. In fed-batch fermentation incorporated with pervaporation, 54.9 g/L ABE (34.5 g/L butanol, 17.0 g/L acetone and 3.4 g/L ethanol) were produced from 172.3 g/L glucose. The overall butanol productivity and yield increased by 16.0 and 11.1%, respectively, which was attributed to the alleviated butanol inhibition by pervaporation and reassimilation of acids for ABE production. The zeolite-mixed membrane produced a highly concentrated condensate containing 169.6 g/L butanol or 253.3 g/L ABE, which after phase separation easily gave the final product containing >600 g/L butanol.

Conclusions

Zeolite loading in the PDMS matrix was attributed to improving the pervaporative performance of the membrane, showing great potential to recover butanol with high purity. Therefore, this zeolite-mixed PDMS membrane had the potential to improve biobutanol production when integrating with ABE fermentation.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Xue et al.

【 图 表 】

Figure1.

Figure2.

Figure3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Dürre P: Biobutanol: an attractive biofuel. Biotechnol J 2007, 2:1525-1534.
• [2]Xue C, Zhao J, Liu FF, Lu CC, Yang ST, Bai FW: Two-stage in situ gas stripping for enhanced butanol fermentation and energy-saving product recovery. Bioresour Technol 2013, 135:396-402.
• [3]Ezeji TC, Milne C, Price ND, Blaschek HP: Achievements and perspectives to overcome the poor solvent resistance in acetone and butanol-producing microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:1697-1712.
• [4]Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET: A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: From biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. Metab Eng 2010, 12:307-331.
• [5]Nielsen DR, Prather KJ: In situ product recovery of n-butanol using polymeric resins. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 102:811-821.
• [6]Xue C, Zhao JB, Chen LJ, Bai FW, Yang ST, Sun JX: Integrated butanol recovery for an advanced biofuel: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:3463-3474.
• [7]Garcia V, Pongrácz E, Muurinen E, Keiski RL: Recovery of n-butanol from salt containing solutions by pervaporation. Desalination 2009, 241:201-211.
• [8]Fadeev AG, Meagher MM, Kelley SS, Volkov VV: Fouling of poly[-1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] membranes in pervaporative recovery of butanol from aqueous solutions and ABE fermentation broth. J Membr Sci 2000, 173:133-144.
• [9]Hecke WV, Vandezande P, Claes S, Vangeel S, Beckers H, Diels L, et al.: Intergrated bioprocess for long-term continuous cultivation of Clostridium acetobutylicum coupled to pervaporation with PDMS composite membranes. Bioresour Technol 2012, 111:368-377.
• [10]Li SY, Srivastava R, Parnas RS: Separation of 1-butanol by pervaporation using a novel tri-layer PDMS composite membrane. J Membr Sci 2010, 363:287-294.
• [11]Wu YD, Xue C, Chen LJ, Bai FW: Effect of zinc supplementation on acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Biotechnol 2013, 165:18-21.
• [12]Chen CY, Xiao ZY, Tang XY, Cui HD, Zhang JQ, Li WJ, et al.: Acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation in a continuous and closed-circulating fermentation system with PDMS membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 2013, 128:246-251.
• [13]He ZJ, Pinnau I, Morisato A: Nanostructured poly(4-methyl-2-pentyne)/silica hybrid membranes for gas separation. Desalination 2003, 146:11-15.
• [14]Bowen TC, Meier RG, Vane LM: Stability of MFI zeolite-filled PDMS membranes during pervaporative ethanol recovery from aqueous mixtures containing acetic acid. J Membr Sci 2007, 298:117-125.
• [15]Shao PH, Kumar A: Separation of 1-butanol/2,3-butanediol using ZSM-5 zeolite-filled polydimethylsiloxane membrane. J Membr Sci 2009, 339:143-150.
• [16]Vane LM, Namboodiri VV, Bowen TC: Hydrophobic zeolite–silicone rubber mixed matrix membranes for ethanol–water separation: effect of zeolite and silicone component selection on pervaporation performance. J Membr Sci 2008, 308:230-241.
• [17]Gapes JR, Nimcevic D, Friedl A: Long-term continuous cultivation of Clostridium beijerinckii in a two-stage chemostat with on-line solvent removal. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996, 6:3210-3219.
• [18]Srinivasan K, Palanivelu K, Gopalakrishnan AN: Recovery of 1-butanol from a model pharmaceutical aqueous waste by pervaporation. Chem Eng Sci 2007, 62:2905-2914.
• [19]Huang JC, Meagher MM: Pervaporative recovery of n-butanol from aqueous solutions and ABE fermentation broth using thin-film silicalite-filled silicone composite membranes. J Membr Sci 2001, 192:231-242.
• [20]Zhou HL, Su Y, Chen XR, Wan YH: Separation of acetone, butanol and ethanol (ABE) from dilute aqueous solutions by silicalite-1/PDMS hybrid pervaporation membranes. Sep Purif Technol 2011, 79:375-384.
• [21]Korelskiy D, Leppäjärvi T, Zhou H, Grahn M, Tanskanen J, Hedlund J: High flux MFI membranes for pervaporation. J Membr Sci 2013, 427:381-389.
• [22]Wu H, Chen XP, Liu GP, Jiang M, Guo T, Jin WQ, et al.: Acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation using Clostridium acetobutylicum XY16 and in situ recovery by PDMS/ceramic composite membrane. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2012, 35:1057-1065.
• [23]Xue C, Du GQ, Chen LJ, Ren JG, Bai FW: Evaluation of asymmetric polydimethylsiloxane-polyvinylidene fluorid composite membrane and incorporated with acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation for butanol recovery. J Biotechnol 2014, 188:158-165.
• [24]Xue C, Zhao JB, Lu CC, Yang ST, Bai FW, Tang IC: High-titer n-butanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum JB200 in fed-batch fermentation with intermittent gas stripping. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012, 109:2746-2756.