Techno-economic analysis of the deacetylation and disk refining process: characterizing the effect of refining energy and enzyme usage on minimum sugar selling price and minimum ethanol selling price

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Xiaowen Chen¹  Joseph Shekiro¹  Thomas Pschorn²  Marc Sabourin²  Melvin P. Tucker¹  Ling Tao¹ 

[1] National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Lab, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden 80127, CO, USA

[2] Andritz Inc., 3200 Upper Valley Pike, Springfield, OH, USA

关键词: Clean sugar production;    No acid pretreatment;    Disk refining;    Mechanical refining;    Deacetylation;    Enzymatic hydrolysis;    Pretreatment;    Biofuel;   

Others  :  1229675
DOI  :  10.1186/s13068-015-0358-0

 received in 2015-02-06, accepted in 2015-10-14,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

A novel, highly efficient deacetylation and disk refining (DDR) process to liberate fermentable sugars from biomass was recently developed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The DDR process consists of a mild, dilute alkaline deacetylation step followed by low-energy-consumption disk refining. The DDR corn stover substrates achieved high process sugar conversion yields, at low to modest enzyme loadings, and also produced high sugar concentration syrups at high initial insoluble solid loadings. The sugar syrups derived from corn stover are highly fermentable due to low concentrations of fermentation inhibitors. The objective of this work is to evaluate the economic feasibility of the DDR process through a techno-economic analysis (TEA).

Results

A large array of experiments designed using a response surface methodology was carried out to investigate the two major cost-driven operational parameters of the novel DDR process: refining energy and enzyme loadings. The boundary conditions for refining energy (128–468 kWh/ODMT), cellulase (Novozyme’s CTec3) loading (11.6–28.4 mg total protein/g of cellulose), and hemicellulase (Novozyme’s HTec3) loading (0–5 mg total protein/g of cellulose) were chosen to cover the most commercially practical operating conditions. The sugar and ethanol yields were modeled with good adequacy, showing a positive linear correlation between those yields and refining energy and enzyme loadings. The ethanol yields ranged from 77 to 89 gallons/ODMT of corn stover. The minimum sugar selling price (MSSP) ranged from $0.191 to $0.212 per lb of 50 % concentrated monomeric sugars, while the minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) ranged from $2.24 to $2.54 per gallon of ethanol.

Conclusions

The DDR process concept is evaluated for economic feasibility through TEA. The MSSP and MESP of the DDR process falls within a range similar to that found with the deacetylation/dilute acid pretreatment process modeled in NREL’s 2011 design report. The DDR process is a much simpler process that requires less capital and maintenance costs when compared to conventional chemical pretreatments with pressure vessels. As a result, we feel the DDR process should be considered as an option for future biorefineries with great potential to be more cost-effective.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Chen et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig.1.

Fig.2.

Fig.3.

Fig.4.

Fig.5.

Fig.1.

Fig.2.

Fig.3.

Fig.4.

Fig.5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A, Schoen P, Lukas J, Olthof B, Worley M, et al. Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report, NREL/TP-5100-47764, Golden, CO; 2011.
• [2]Franden MA, Pilath H, Mohagheghi A, Pienkos P, Zhang M: Inhibition of growth of Zymomonas mobilis by model compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:99. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Chen X, Shekiro J, Pschorn T, Sabourin M, Tao L, Elander R, Park S, Jennings E, Nelson R, Trass O, et al.: A highly efficient dilute alkali deacetylation and mechanical (disk) refining process for the conversion of renewable biomass to lower cost sugars. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014, 7:98. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Humbird D, Mohagheghi A, Dowe N, Schell D: Economic impact of total solids loading on enzymatic hydrolysis of dilute acid pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Prog 2010, 26:1245-1251.
• [5]Zhu Y, Malten M, Torry-Smith M, McMillan J, Stickel J: Calculating sugar yields in high solids hydrolysis of biomass. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:2897-2903.
• [6]Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D. Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report, NREL/TP-5100-42623, Golden, CO; 2008.
• [7]Templeton D, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Wolfrum E: Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 2. Method uncertainties. J Agric Food Chem. 2010, 58:9054-9062.
• [8]US EIA. Electricity Wholesale Market Data. In: Book Electricity Wholesale Market Data. 2013.
• [9]Electricity Retail Price to Consumers. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data.cfm#sales. Accessed June 2013
• [10]Tao L, Schell D, Tan EC, Elander R, A. B. Achievement of Ethanol Cost Targets: Biochemical Ethanol Fermentation via Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report, NREL/TP-5100-61563, Golden, CO; 2014.
• [11]World raw sugar price. ICE Contract 11 nearby futures price, monthly quarterly, and by calendar and fiscal year. (http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/sugar-and-sweeteners-yearbook-tables.aspx#25442). Accessed 15 June 2013
• [12]Sluiter A, Hyman D, Payne C, Wolfe J. Determination of Insoluble Solids in Pretreated Biomass Material: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP). In: Book Determination of Insoluble Solids in Pretreated Biomass Material: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report, NREL/TP-510-42627, Golden, CO; 2008.
• [13]Raymond H. Myers, Douglas C. Montgomery, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 3rd ed. Wiley; 2009.
• [14]AspenPlus™: Release 7.2, Aspen Technology Inc., Cambridge MA; 2007.
• [15]Liu X, Sheng J, Curtiss R III: Fatty acid production in genetically modified cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011, 108:6899-6904.
• [16]Consulting S. US Producer Price Indexes—Chemicals and Allied Products/Industrial Inorganic Chemicals Index. In: Chemical Economics Handbook. 2008.
• [17]National Employment, Hours, and Earnings Catalog, Industry: Chemicals and Allied Products, 1980–2009.
• [18]Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace B, Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report, NREL/TP-5100-42623, Golden, CO; 2008.
• [19]Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618 2008.