Benthic infaunal community structuring in an acidified tropical estuarine system

Aquatic Biosystems

M Belal Hossain¹  David J Marshall² 

[1] Department of Fisheries and Marine Science, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Sonapur 3814, Bangladesh

[2] Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, BE1410 Jalan Tunkgu Link, Brunei Darussalam

关键词: Acidification;    Salinity;    Tropical estuary;    Soft-bottom;    Infauna;    Community structure;   

Others  :  1089028
DOI  :  10.1186/2046-9063-10-11

 received in 2014-08-04, accepted in 2014-10-22,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Recent studies suggest that increasing ocean acidification (OA) should have strong direct and indirect influences on marine invertebrates. While most theory and application for OA is based on relatively physically-stable oceanic ecological systems, less is known about the effects of acidification on nearshore and estuarine systems. Here, we investigated the structuring of a benthic infaunal community in a tropical estuarine system, along a steep salinity and pH gradient, arising largely from acid-sulphate groundwater inflows (Sungai Brunei Estuary, Borneo, July 2011- June 2012).

Results

Preliminary data indicate that sediment pore-water salinity (range: 8.07 - 29.6 psu) declined towards the mainland in correspondence with the above-sediment estuarine water salinity (range: 3.58 – 31.2 psu), whereas the pore-water pH (range: 6.47- 7.72) was generally lower and less variable than the estuarine water pH (range: 5.78- 8.3), along the estuary. Of the thirty six species (taxa) recorded, the polychaetes Neanthes sp., Onuphis conchylega, Nereididae sp. and the amphipod Corophiidae sp., were numerically dominant. Calcified microcrustaceans (e.g., Cyclopoida sp. and Corophiidae sp.) were abundant at all stations and there was no clear distinction in distribution pattern along the estuarine between calcified and non-calcified groups. Species richness increased seawards, though abundance (density) showed no distinct directional trend. Diversity indices were generally positively correlated (Spearman’s rank correlation) with salinity and pH (p <0.05) and negatively with clay and organic matter, except for evenness values (p >0.05). Three faunistic assemblages were distinguished: (1) nereid-cyclopoid-sabellid, (2) corophiid-capitellid and (3) onuphid- nereid-capitellid. These respectively associated with lower salinity/pH and a muddy bottom, low salinity/pH and a sandy bottom, and high salinity/pH and a sandy bottom. However, CCA suggested that species distribution and community structuring is more strongly influenced by sediment particle characteristics than by the chemical properties of the water (pH and salinity).

Conclusions

Infaunal estuarine communities, which are typically adapted to survive relatively acidic conditions, may be less exposed, less sensitive, and less vulnerable than epibenthic or pelagic communities to further acidification of above-sediment waters. These data question the extent to which all marine infaunal communities, including oceanic communities, are likely to be affected by future global CO₂-driven acidification.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Hossain and Marshall; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Dove CM, Sammut J: Impacts of estuarine acidification on survival and growth of sydney rock oysters Saccostrea glomerata (Gould 1850). J Shellfish Res 2007, 26:519-527.
• [2]Salisbury J, Green M, Hunt C, Campbell J: Coastal acidification by rivers: a threat to shellfish? Eos 2008, 89:513-528.
• [3]Amaral V, Cabral HN, Bishop MJ: Resistance among wild invertebrate populations to recurrent estuarine acidification. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2011, 93:460-467.
• [4]Amaral V, Cabral HN, Bishop MJ: Effects of estuarine acidification on predator–prey interactions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2012, 445:117-127.
• [5]Amaral V, Cabral HN, Bishop MJ: Prior exposure influences the behavioural avoidance by an intertidal gastropod, Bembicium auratum, of acidified waters. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2014, 136:82-90.
• [6]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): pH and Alkalinity. In Voluntary Estuary Monitoring Manual. Washington DC: USEPA Office of Water; 2006:1-13. Available at http://water.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/upload/2009_03_13_estuaries_monitor_chap11.pdf webcite
• [7]Sammut J, Melville MD, Callinan RB, Fraser GC: Estuarine acidification: impacts on aquatic biota of draining acid sulfate soils. Aust Geogr Stud 1995, 33:89-100.
• [8]Knutzen J: Effects of decreased pH on marine organisms. Mar Pollut Bull 1981, 12:25-29.
• [9]Amaral V, Cabral HN, Bishop MJ: Moderate acidification affects growth but not survival of 6-month-old oysters. Aquat Ecol 2012, 46:119-127.
• [10]Guinotte JM, Fabry VJ: Ocean acidification and its potential effects on marine ecosystems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1134:320-342.
• [11]Marshall DJ, Santos JH, Leung KMY, Chak WH: Correlations between gastropod shell dissolution and water chemical properties in a tropical estuary. Mar Environ Res 2008, 66:422-429.
• [12]Caldeira K, Wickett ME: Oceanography: anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 2003, 425:365.
• [13]Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, Bopp L, Doney SC, Feely RA, Gnanadesikan A, Gruber N, Ishida A, Joos F, Key RM, Lindsay K, Maier-Reimer E, Matear R, Monfray P, Mouchet A, Najjar RG, Plattner GK, Rodgers KB, Sabine CL, Sarmiento JL, Schlitzer R, Slater RD, Totterdell IJ, Weirig MF, Yamanaka Y, Yool A: Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 2005, 437(7059):681-686.
• [14]Feely RA, Simone RA, Newton J, Sabine CL, Warner M, Devol C, Krembs MC: The combined effects of ocean acidification, mixing, and respiration on pH and carbonate saturation in an urbanized estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2010, 88:442-449.
• [15]Kroeker KJ, Micheli F, Gambi MC, Martz TR: Divergent ecosystem responses within a benthic marine community to Ocean acidification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:14515-14520.
• [16]Roach AC: The effect of acid water inflow on the estuarine benthic and fish communities in the Richmond River, NSW Australia. Australas J Ecotoxicol 1997, 3:25-56.
• [17]Corfield J: The effects of acid sulphate run-off on a subtidal estuarine macrobenthic community in the Richmond River, NSW, Australia. ICES J Mar Sci 2000, 57:1517-1523.
• [18]Lohbeck KT, Riebesell U, Reusch TB: Adaptive evolution of a key phytoplankton species to ocean acidification. Nat Geosci 2012, 5(5):346-351.
• [19]Wittmann AC, Pörtner HO: Sensitivities of extant animal taxa to ocean acidification. Nat Clim Chang 2013, 3:995-1001.
• [20]Teske PR, Wooldridge TH: What limits the distribution of subtidal macrobenthos in permanently open and temporarily open/closed South African estuaries? Salinity vs. sediment particle size. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2003, 57:225-238.
• [21]Warwick RM: Comparative study of the structure of some tropical and temperate marine soft-bottom macrobenthic communities. Mar Biol 1987, 95(4):641-649.
• [22]Ysebaert T, Herman PMJ, Meire P, Craeymeersch J, Verbeek H, Heip CHR: Large-scale spatial patterns in estuaries: estuarine macrobenthic communities in the Schelde estuary, NW Europe. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2003, 57:335-355.
• [23]McLusky DS, Elliot M: The Estuarine Ecosystem: Ecology, Threats, and Management. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
• [24]Barnes RSK: Distribution patterns of macrobenthic biodiversity in the intertidal seagrass beds of an estuarine system, and their conservation significance. Biodivers Conserv 2013, 22:357-372.
• [25]McLusky DS, Hull SC, Elliott M: Variations in the intertidal and subtidal macrofauna and sediments along a salinity gradient in the Upper Forth estuary. Neth J Aquat Ecol 1993, 27:101-109.
• [26]Hossain MB, Marshall DJ, Senapathi V: Sediment granulometry and organic matter content in the intertidal zone of the Sungai Brunei estuarine system, northwest coast of Borneo. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci 2014, 9(2):231-239.
• [27]Ram A, Zingde MD: Interstitial water chemistry and nutrients fluxes from tropical intertidal sediment. Indian J Mar Sci 2000, 29(4):310-318.
• [28]Day JW, Hall CAS, Kemp WM, Yanez-Arancibia A: Estuarine Ecology. New York: J. Wiley and Sons; 1989:558.
• [29]Sasekumar A: Distribution of macrofauna on a Malayan mangrove shore. J Anim Ecol 1974, 43(1):51-69.
• [30]Zhai W, Dai M, Guo X: Carbonate system and CO2 degassing fluxes in the inner estuary of Changjiang (Yangtze) River. Chin Mar Chem 2007, 107(3):342-356.
• [31]Zhai W, Dai M, Cai WJ, Wang Y, Wang Z: High partial pressure of CO2 and its maintaining mechanism in a subtropical estuary: the Pearl River estuary. Chin Mar Chem 2005, 93(1):21-32.
• [32]Gray JS, Elliott M: Ecology of Marine Sediments: science to management. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:225.
• [33]Selleslagh J, Lobry J, N'Zigou AR, Bachelet G, Blanchet H, Chaalali , Sautour AB, Boet P: Seasonal succession of estuarine fish, shrimps, macrozoobenthos and plankton: physico-chemical and trophic influence. The Gironde Estuary as a Case Study. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2012, 112:243-254.
• [34]Telesh I, Schubert H, Skarlato S: Life in the salinity gradient: Discovering mechanisms behind a new biodiversity pattern. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2013. in Press
• [35]Gray JS: Animal-sediment relationships. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 1974, 12(223):61.
• [36]Anderson MJ, Ford RB, Honeywill C, Feary D: Quantitative measures of sedimentation in an estuarine system and its relationship with intertidal soft-sediment infauna. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2004, 272:33-48.
• [37]Giménez L, Dimitriadis C, Carranza A, Borthagaray AI, Rodríguez M: Unravelling the complex structure of a benthic community: a multiscale-multianalytical approach to an estuarine sandflat. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2006, 68:462-472.
• [38]Norkko A, Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Cummings VJ, Norkko J, Ellis JI, MacDonald I: Smothering of estuarine sandflats by terrigenous clay: the role of wind-wave disturbance and bioturbation in site-dependent macrofaunal recovery. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2002, 234:23-42.
• [39]Ysebaert T, Herman PM: Spatial and temporal variation in benthic macrofauna and relationships with environmental variables in an estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2002, 244:105-124.
• [40]Giménez L, Venturini N, Kandratavicius N, Hutton M, Lanfranconi A, Rodríguez M, Muniz P: Macrofaunal patterns and animal–sediment relationships in Uruguayan estuaries and coastal lagoons (Atlantic coast of South America). J Sea Res 2014, 87:46-55.
• [41]Hendriks IE, Duarte CM, Alvarez M: Vulnerability of marine biodiversity to ocean acidification: a meta-analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2010, 86:157-164.
• [42]Hofmann GE, Barry JP, Edmunds PJ, Gates RD, Hutchins DA, Klinger T, Sewell MA: The effect of ocean acidification on calcifying organisms in marine ecosystems: an organism-to-ecosystem perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2010, 41:127-147.
• [43]Hall-Spencer JM, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Martin S, Ransome E, Fine M, Turner SM, Buia MC: Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification. Nature 2008, 454(7200):96-99.
• [44]Pörtner HO: Ecosystem effects of ocean acidification in times of ocean warming: a physiologist’s view. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2008, 373:203-217.
• [45]Hampel H, Elliott M, Cattrijsse A: Macrofaunal communities in the habitats of intertidal marshes along the salinity gradient of the Schelde estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 2009, 84:45-53.
• [46]Hossain MB: Macrobenthic Community Structure from a Tropical Estuary. Germany: LAP publishing company; 2011:84.
• [47]Traister EM, McDowell WD, Krám P, Fottová D, Kolaříková K: Persistent effects of acidification on stream ecosystem structure and function. Freshw Sci 2013, 32:586-596.
• [48]Chua T-E, Chou LM, Sadorra MSM: The coastal environmental profile of Brunei Darussalam: resource assessment and management issues. Brunei Darussalam: ICLARM Technical Report 18, Fisheries Department, Ministry of Development; 1987:193.
• [49]Fauvel P: The Fauna of India, including Pakistan, Ceylon, Burma and Malaya. Annelida Polychaeta. Allahabad: The Indian Press; 1953:507.
• [50]Day JH: A monograph of the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. Lond Br Nat Hist Mus 1967, 1:458.
• [51]Fauchald K: The polychaete worms, definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles Cty: Los Angeles CA (USA) Sci Ser 1977, 28:1-188.
• [52]Day JH: A monograph of the polychaeta of Southern Africa. Lond Br Nat Hist Mus 1967, 2:420.
• [53]Hutchings P, Reid A: The Nereididae (Polychaeta) from Australia - Leonnates, Platynereis and Solomononereis. Rec Aust Mus 1991, 43:47-62.
• [54]Barnes RD, Ruppert EE: Invertebrate Zoology. USA: Brooks; 1994:928.
• [55]Oliver I, Beattie AJ: A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 1993, 7:562-568.
• [56]Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD: PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 2004., 4art. 4
• [57]Clarke KR, Warwick RM: Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory; 2001:172.
• [58]Clarke KR, Gorley RN: PRIMER v.6: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E; 2006.