Torque measurements reveal large process differences between materials during high solid enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulose

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Gunnar Lidén¹  Benny Palmqvist¹ 

[1]Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Box 124, Lund, SE-221 00, Sweden

关键词: Power input;    Torque;    Mixing;    Lignocellulose hydrolysis;   

Others  :  798246
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-5-57

 received in 2012-06-01, accepted in 2012-07-30,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

A common trend in the research on 2^nd generation bioethanol is the focus on intensifying the process and increasing the concentration of water insoluble solids (WIS) throughout the process. However, increasing the WIS content is not without problems. For example, the viscosity of pretreated lignocellulosic materials is known to increase drastically with increasing WIS content. Further, at elevated viscosities, problems arise related to poor mixing of the material, such as poor distribution of the enzymes and/or difficulties with temperature and pH control, which results in possible yield reduction. Achieving good mixing is unfortunately not without cost, since the power requirements needed to operate the impeller at high viscosities can be substantial. This highly important scale-up problem can easily be overlooked.

Results

In this work, we monitor the impeller torque (and hence power input) in a stirred tank reactor throughout high solid enzymatic hydrolysis (< 20% WIS) of steam-pretreated Arundo donax and spruce. Two different process modes were evaluated, where either the impeller speed or the impeller power input was kept constant. Results from hydrolysis experiments at a fixed impeller speed of 10 rpm show that a very rapid decrease in impeller torque is experienced during hydrolysis of pretreated arundo (i.e. it loses its fiber network strength), whereas the fiber strength is retained for a longer time within the spruce material. This translates into a relatively low, rather WIS independent, energy input for arundo whereas the stirring power demand for spruce is substantially larger and quite WIS dependent. By operating the impeller at a constant power input (instead of a constant impeller speed) it is shown that power input greatly affects the glucose yield of pretreated spruce whereas the hydrolysis of arundo seems unaffected.

Conclusions

The results clearly highlight the large differences between the arundo and spruce materials, both in terms of needed energy input, and glucose yields. The impact of power input on glucose yield is furthermore shown to vary significantly between the materials, with spruce being very affected while arundo is not. These findings emphasize the need for substrate specific process solutions, where a short pre-hydrolysis (or viscosity reduction) might be favorable for arundo whereas fed-batch might be a better solution for spruce.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Palmqvist and Lidén; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Hahn-Hagerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Liden G, Zacchi G: Bio-ethanol - the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 2006, 24:549-556.
• [2]Gnansounou E: Production and use of lignocellulosic bioethanol in Europe: Current situation and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:4842-4850.
• [3]Galbe M, Zacchi G: A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002, 59:618-628.
• [4]Kristensen JB, Felby C, Jorgensen H: Yield-determining factors in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels 2009, 2:11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [5]Wiman M, Palmqvist B, Tornberg E, Lidén G: Rheological characterization of dilute acid pretreated softwood. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:1031-1041.
• [6]Roche CM, Dibble CJ, Knutsen JS, Stickel JJ, Liberatore MW: Particle Concentration and Yield Stress of Biomass Slurries During Enzymatic Hydrolysis at High-Solids Loadings. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 104:290-300.
• [7]Pimenova NV, Hanley AR: Effect of corn stover concentration on rheological characteristics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2004, 113:347-360.
• [8]Zhang J, Chu DQ, Huang J, Yu ZC, Dai GC, Bao J: Simultaneous Saccharification and Ethanol Fermentation at High Corn Stover Solids Loading in a Helical Stirring Bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 105:718-728.
• [9]Dasari RK, Dunaway K, Berson RE: A Scraped Surface Bioreactor for Enzymatic Saccharification of Pretreated Corn Stover Slurries. Energy Fuel 2008, 23:492-497.
• [10]Pimenova NV, Hanley TR: Measurement of rheological properties of corn stover suspensions. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2003, 105:383-392.
• [11]Dasari RK, Berson RE: The effect of particle size on hydrolysis reaction rates and rheological properties in cellulosic slurries. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2007, 137:289-299.
• [12]Palmqvist B, Wiman M, Liden G: Effect of mixing on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce: a quantitative analysis of conversion and power consumption. Biotechnol Biofuels 2011, 4:10. BioMed Central Full Text
• [13]Sakata M, Ooshima H, Harano Y: Effects of agitation on enzymatic saccharification of cellulose. Biotechnol Lett 1985, 7:689-694.
• [14]Tengborg C, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Influence of enzyme loading and physical parameters on the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Biotechnol Prog 2001, 17:110-117.
• [15]Roche CM, Dibble CJ, Stickel JJ: Laboratory-scale method for enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass at high-solids loadings. Biotechnol Biofuels 2009, 2:28. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Jorgensen H, Vibe-Pedersen J, Larsen J, Felby C: Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 96:862-870.
• [17]Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Larsson M, Stenberg K, Szengyel Z, Tengborg C, Zacchi G: Design and operation of a bench-scale process development unit for the production of ethanol from lignocellulosics. Bioresour Technol 1996, 58:171-179.
• [18]Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D: Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass (LAP). Golden, CO: NREL; 2008.
• [19]Kristensen J, Felby C, Jørgensen H: Determining Yields in High Solids Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009, 156:127-132.
• [20]Zhu Y, Malten M, Torry-Smith M, McMillan JD, Stickel JJ: Calculating sugar yields in high solids hydrolysis of biomass. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:2897-2903.
• [21]Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D: Determination of sugars, byproducts and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples (LAP). Golden, CO: NREL; 2008.
• [22]Metzner AB, Otto RE: Agitation of non-newtonian fluids. AICHE J 1957, 3:3-10.
• [23]Samaniuk JR, Tim Scott C, Root TW, Klingenberg DJ: The effect of high intensity mixing on the enzymatic hydrolysis of concentrated cellulose fiber suspensions. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:4489-4494.
• [24]Lenting HBM, Warmoeskerken M: Mechanism of interaction between cellulase action and applied shear force, an hypothesis. J Biotechnol 2001, 89:217-226.
• [25]Eriksson J, Malmsten M, Tiberg F, Callisen TH, Damhus T, Johansen KS: Enzymatic degradation of model cellulose films. J Colloid Interface Sci 2005, 284:99-106.
• [26]Jager G, Wu ZJ, Garschhammer K, Engel P, Klement T, Rinaldi R, Spiess AC, Buchs J: Practical screening of purified cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases with alpha-cellulose and specification of hydrodynamics. Biotechnol Biofuels 2010, 3:18. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Kaya F, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW: Cellulase binding to cellulose fibers in high-shear fields. J Biotechnol 1994, 36:1-10.