| Aquatic Biosystems | |
| Infaunal macrobenthic community dynamics in a manipulated hyperhaline ecosystem: a long-term study | |
| Bruno Bellisario1  Claudio Carere1  Fulvio Cerfolli1  Dario Angeletti1  Giuseppe Nascetti1  Roberta Cimmaruta1  | |
| [1] Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, Ichthyogenic Experimental Marine Centre (CISMAR), Tuscia University, Borgo Le Saline, 01016 Tarquinia, VT, Italy | |
| 关键词: Biodiversity homogenization; Species specialization index; Long-term study; Macroinvertebrates community; Biomonitoring; Central Tyrrhenian Sea; Wetlands; Hyperhaline habitat; | |
| Others : 793994 DOI : 10.1186/2046-9063-9-20 |
|
| received in 2013-05-16, accepted in 2013-11-02, 发布年份 2013 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
Understanding the responses of ecological communities to human-induced perturbations is crucial for establishing conservation goals. Ecological communities are dynamic entities undergoing fluctuations due to their intrinsic characteristics as well as anthropogenic pressures varying over time. In this respect, long-term studies, based on large spatial and temporal datasets, may provide useful information in understanding patterns and processes influencing the communities’ structure. Theoretical evidence suggests that a role of biodiversity is acting as a compensatory buffer against environmental variability by decreasing the temporal variance in ecosystem functioning and by raising the level of community response to perturbations through the selection of better performing species. Therefore, the spatial and temporal changes in the specialization of the community components may be used as an effective tool to monitor the effects of natural and anthropogenic alterations of the environment in dynamic systems. We examined the temporal dynamics of macroinvertebrate community structure in the hyperhaline habitat of Tarquinia Saltworks (central Italy). We aimed at: (i) investigating the relationships between the level of community specialization and the alterations of the environment across fourteen years; (ii) comparing the ability of aggregate community parameters such as the average abundance vs. species specialization in describing patterns of community composition.
Results
We arranged the data in three sub-sets according to three periods, each characterized by different environmental conditions. The mean abundance of sampled macroinvertebrates showed a significant change (p < 0.01) only in the community inhabiting the saltwork basin closely connected to the sea, characterized by the highest environmental variation (i.e. the coefficient of variation, CV, of the aggregate environmental variability over the study period, CVrange = 0.010 - 0.2). Here we found marine species like Modiolus adriaticus (Lamarck, 1819), Neanthes irrorata (Malmgren, 1867), and Amphiglena mediterranea (Leydig, 1851), which inhabited the saltworks during the halt period but disappeared during the subsequent eutrophication phase. Conversely, species specialization showed a significant decrease for each sampled community in the presence of habitat degradation and a recovery after ecological restoration. The widest fluctuations of specialization were recorded for the community inhabiting the saltwork basin with the highest long-term environmental variability.
Conclusions
Recent advances have shown how the increased temporal and spatial variability of species’ abundance within the communities may be a signal of habitat disturbance, even in the absence of an apparent decline. Such approach could also be used as a sensitive monitoring tool, able to detect whether or not communities are subjected to increasing biotic homogenization. Also, the increased functional similarity triggered by habitat degradation may impact on species at higher trophic levels, such as the waterbirds wintering in the area or using it as a stopover during migration.
【 授权许可】
2013 Bellisario et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140705061738948.pdf | 883KB | ||
| Figure 5. | 26KB | Image | |
| Figure 4. | 36KB | Image | |
| Figure 3. | 57KB | Image | |
| Figure 2. | 24KB | Image | |
| Figure 1. | 49KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Ives AR, Cardinale BJ: Food-web interactions govern the resistance of communities following non-random extinctions. Nature 2004, 429:174-177.
- [2]Thébault E, Loreau M: The relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs. Ecol Res 2006, 21:17-25.
- [3]Levins R: Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press; 1968.
- [4]Engelmann KE, Schlichting CD: Coarse- versus fine-grained water stress in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 2005, 92:101-106.
- [5]Marusso V, Trabucco B, Nonnis O, Maggi C, Cecchetti S, Nascetti G, Angeletti D, Cimmaruta R: Effects of sediment management on the amphipod community off the Latium coast (Tyrrhenian Sea) and preliminary DNA barcoding data on Ampelisca (Amphipoda). Crustaceana 2013, 86:871-889.
- [6]Erikson BK, Bergström L: Local distribution patterns of macroalgae in relation to environmental variables in the northern Baltic Proper. Estuar Coast Shelf S 2005, 62:109-117.
- [7]Tilman D: An evolutionary approach to ecosystem functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:10979-10980.
- [8]Mason NWH, MacGillivray K, Steel JB, Bastow WJ: An index of functional diversity. J Veg Sci 2003, 14:571-578.
- [9]Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E: The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 1997, 277:1300-1302.
- [10]Scherer-Lorenzen M: Functional diversity affects decomposition processes in experimental grasslands. Funct Ecol 2008, 22:547-555.
- [11]de Bello F, Lavorel S, Diaz S, Harrington R, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD, Berg MP, Cipriotti P, Feld CK, Hering D, da Silva PM, Potts SG, Sandin L, Sousa JP, Storkey J, Wardle DA, Harrison PA: Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers Conserv 2010, 19:2873-2893.
- [12]Mouillot D, Villéger S, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Mason NWH: Functional Structure of Biological Communities Predicts Ecosystem Multifunctionality. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17476.
- [13]Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, Lambers JHR, Clark C, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Reich PB, Loreau M: From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of a biodiversity-productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 2007, 274:871-876.
- [14]Reiss J, Bridle J, Montoya JM, Woodward G: Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends Ecol Evol 2009, 24:505-514.
- [15]Poisot T, Bever JD, Nemri A, Thrall PH, Hochberg ME: A conceptual framework for the evolution of ecological specialization. Ecol Lett 2011, 14:841-51.
- [16]Root RB: The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr 1967, 37:317-350.
- [17]Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F, Couvet D: Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 2008, 117:507-514.
- [18]Julliard R, Clavel J, Devictor V, Jiguet F, Couvet D: Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol Lett 2006, 9:1237-1244.
- [19]Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V: Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ 2011, 9:222-228.
- [20]Lavergne S, Albert CH, Boulangeat I, Mazel F, Thuiller W: Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: a case study in the French Alps. Ecography 2013, 36:393-402.
- [21]Fisher DO, Owens IPF: The comparative method in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 2004, 19:391-398.
- [22]Villeger S, Miranda JR, Hernandez DF, Mouillot D: Contrasting changes in taxonomic vs. functional diversity of tropical fish communities after habitat degradation. Ecol Appl 2010, 20:1512-1522.
- [23]Tavares PC, Alves D, Shapouri M: Structural changes in macroinvertebrate communities associated with reduction in the management of coastal saltpans. J Mar Biol 2009, e:1-13.
- [24]Underwood AJ: Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 1991, 42:569-587.
- [25]Callaghan A, Holloway GJ: The relationship between environmental stress and variance. Ecol Appl 1999, 9:456-462.
- [26]Piazzi L, Balata D, Cinelli F, Benedetti-Cecchi L: Patterns of spatial variability in epiphytes of Posidonia oceanica: differences between a disturbed and two reference locations. Aquat Bot 2004, 79:345-356.
- [27]Reizopoulou S, Nicolaidou A: Benthic diversity of coastal brackish-water lagoons in western Greece. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 2004, 14:S93-S102.
- [28]Cañedo-Argüelles M, Rieradevall M: Disturbance caused by freshwater releases of different magnitude on the aquatic macroinvertebrate communities of two coastal lagoons. Estuar Coast Shelf S 2010, 88:190-198.
- [29]Kassen R: The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J Evolution Bio 2002, 15:173-190.
- [30]Pandit SN, Kolasa J, Cotienne K: Population synchrony decreases with richness and increases with environmental fluctuations in an experimental metacommunity. Oecologia 2013, 171:237-47.
- [31]Austin MP, Nicholls AO, Margules CR: Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species. Ecol Monogr 1990, 60:161-177.
- [32]Gregory RD, van Strien A, Vorisek P, Meyling AWG, Noble DG, Foppen RPB, Gibbons DW: Developing indicators for European birds. Philos T Roy Soc B 2005, 360:269-288.
- [33]Angeletti D, Cimmaruta R, Nascetti G: Genetic diversity of the killifish Aphanius fasciatus paralleling the environmental changes of Tarquinia Salterns habitat. Genetica 2010, 138:1011-1021.
- [34]Bellisario B, Cerfolli F, Nascetti G: Pattern of species occurrence in detritus-based system with variable connectivity. Web Ecology. 2011, 11:1-9.
- [35]Piscart C, Moreteau J-C, Beisel J-N: Biodiversity and structure of macroinvertebrate communities along a small permanent salinity gradient (Meurthe River, France). Hydrobiologia 2005, 551:227-236.
- [36]Brucet S, Boix D, Nathansen LW, Quintana XD, Jensen E, et al.: Effects of temperature, salinity and fish in structuring the macroinvertebrate community in shallow lakes: implications for effects of climate change. PloS one 2012, 7:e30877.
- [37]Micheli F, Cottingham KL, Bascompte J, Bjørnstad ON, Eckert GL, Fischer JM, Keitt TH, Kendall BE, Klug JL, Rusak JA: The dual nature of community variability. Oikos 1999, 85:161-169.
- [38]Collins SL, Micheli F, Hartt L: A method to determine rates and patterns of variability in ecological communities. Oikos 2000, 91:285-293.
- [39]Hsieh CH, Reiss CS, Hunter JR, Beddington JR, May RM, Sugihara G: Fishing elevates variability in the abundance of exploited species. Nature 2006, 443:859-862.
- [40]Flinn KM, Marks PL: Agricultural legacies in forest environments: tree communities, soil properties, and light availability. Ecol Appl 2007, 17:452-463.
- [41]Fraterrigo JM, Turner MG, Pearson SM, Dixon P: Effects of past land use on spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in southern Appalachian forests. Ecol Monogr 2005, 75:215-230.
- [42]Cimmaruta R, Blasi S, Angeletti D, Nascetti G: The recent history of the Tarquinia Salterns offers the opportunity to investigate parallel changes at the habitat and biodiversity levels. Transitional Waters Bulletin 2010, 2:53-59.
- [43]Abaunza P, Murta AG, Campbell N, Cimmaruta R, Comesana AS, Dahle G, Gallo E, Garcia Santamaria MT, Gordo LS, Iversen SA, Mackenzie K, Magoulas A, Mattiucci S, Molloy J, Nascetti G, Pinto AL, Quinta R, Ramos P, Ruggi A, Sanjuan A, Santos AT, Stransky C, Zimmermman C: Considerations on sampling strategies for an holistic approach to stock identification: The example of the HOMSIR project. Fish Res 2008, 89:104-113.
- [44]Sánchez MA, Jaubet MA, Garaffo GV, Elías R: Spatial and long-term analyses of reference and sewage-impacted sites in the SW Atlantic (38°S, 57°W) for the assessment of sensitive and tolerant polychaetes. Mar Pollut Bull 2013, 74:325-333.
- [45]Shadrin NV: Coupling of shoreline erosion and biodiversity loss: examples from the Black Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 2013, 3:352-360.
- [46]Koutsoubas D, Arvanitidis C, Dounas C, Drummond L: Community structure and dynamics of the molluscan fauna in a Mediterranean lagoon (Gialova lagoon, SW Greece). Belg J Zool 2013, 130:131-138.
- [47]Ramsar Convention Bureau: Wetlands and Biological Diversity: Cooperation between The Convention of Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar, Iran,1971) and The Convention on Biological Diversity. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Document UNEP/CBD/COP/3/Inf.21; 1996.
- [48]Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, et al.: Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J Appl Ecol 2010, 47:15-25.
- [49]Hutchinson GE: Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Har. Symp 1957, 22:415-427.
- [50]Anderson MJ: A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 2001, 26:32-46.
- [51]R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org webcite
- [52]Clarke KR, Warwick RM: A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2001, 216:265-278.
PDF