A 28 nt long synthetic 5′UTR (synJ) as an enhancer of transgene expression in dicotyledonous plants

BMC Biotechnology

Shaveta Kanoria¹  Pradeep Kumar Burma¹ 

[1] Department of Genetics, University of Delhi South Campus, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi, 110021, India

关键词: AMV leader;    Ω leader;    35S promoter;    Transgene expression;    Synthetic 5^′UTR;   

Others  :  1134670
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6750-12-85

 received in 2012-06-15, accepted in 2012-11-04,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

A high level of transgene expression is required, in several applications of transgenic technology. While use of strong promoters has been the main focus in such instances, 5^′UTRs have also been shown to enhance transgene expression. Here, we present a 28 nt long synthetic 5^′UTR (synJ), which enhances gene expression in tobacco and cotton.

Results

The influence of synJ on transgene expression was studied in callus cultures of cotton and different tissues of transgenic tobacco plants. The study was based on comparing the expression of reporter gene gus and gfp, with and without synJ as its 5^′UTR. Mutations in synJ were also analyzed to identify the region important for enhancement. synJ, enhances gene expression by 10 to 50 fold in tobacco and cotton depending upon the tissue studied. This finding is based on the experiments comparing the expression of gus gene, encoding the synJ as 5^′UTR under the control of 35S promoter with expression cassettes based on vectors like pBI121 or pRT100. Further, the enhancement was in most cases equivalent to that observed with the viral leader sequences known to enhance translation like Ω and AMV. In case of transformed cotton callus as well as in the roots of tobacco transgenic plants, the up-regulation mediated by synJ was much higher than that observed in the presence of both Ω as well as AMV. The enhancement mediated by synJ was found to be at the post-transcriptional level. The study also demonstrates the importance of a 5^′UTR in realizing the full potential of the promoter strength. synJ has been utilized to design four cloning vectors: pGEN01, pBGEN02, pBGEN02-hpt and pBGEN02-ALS^dm each of which can be used for cloning the desired transgene and achieving high level of expression in the resulting transgenic plants.

Conclusions

synJ, a synthetic 5^′UTR, can enhance transgene expression under a strong promoter like 35S as well as under a weak promoter like nos in dicotyledonous plants. synJ can be incorporated as the 5^′UTR of transgenes, especially in cases where high levels of expression is required. A set of vectors has also been designed to facilitate this process.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Kanoria and Burma; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Sanger M, Daubert S, Goodman RM: Characteristics of a strong promoter from figwort mosaic virus: comparison with the analogous 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus and the regulated mannopine synthase promoter. Plant Mol Biol 1990, 14(3):433-443.
• [2]Samac DA, Tesfaye M, Dornbusch M, Saruul P, Temple SJ: A comparison of constitutive promoters for expression of transgenes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Transgenic Res 2004, 13(4):349-361.
• [3]Govindarajulu M, Elmore JM, Fester T, Taylor CG: Evaluation of constitutive viral promoters in transgenic soybean roots and nodules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2008, 21(8):1027-1035.
• [4]Benfey PN, Chua NH: The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter: combinatorial regulation of transcription in plants. Science 1990, 250(4983):959-966.
• [5]Cazzonelli C, McCallum E, Lee R, Botella J: Characterization of a strong constitutive mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) promoter with a complex mode of regulation in planta. Transgenic Res 2005, 14:941-967.
• [6]Wu K, Hu M, Martin T, Wang C, Li XQ, Tian L, Brown D, Miki B: The cryptic enhancer elements of the tCUP promoter. Plant Mol Biol 2003, 51(3):351-362.
• [7]Bhullar S, Chakravarthy S, Advani S, Datta S, Pental D, Burma PK: Strategies for development of functionally equivalent promoters with minimum sequence homology for transgene expression in plants: cis-elements in a novel DNA context versus domain swapping. Plant Physiol 2003, 132(2):988-998.
• [8]Sawant S, Singh PK, Madanala R, Tuli R: Designing of an artificial expression cassette for the high-level expression of transgenes in plants. Theor Appl Genet 2001, 102(4):635-644.
• [9]Cazzonelli C, Velten J: In vivo characterization of plant promoter element interaction using synthetic promoters. Transgenic Res 2008, 17(3):437-457.
• [10]Venter M: Synthetic promoters: genetic control through cis engineering. Trends Plant Sci 2007, 12(3):118-124.
• [11]Gallie D: Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1993, 44:77-105.
• [12]Gallie D, Walbot V: Identification of the motifs within the tobacco mosaic virus 5′-leader responsible for enhancing translation. Nucleic Acids Res 1992, 20(17):4631-4638.
• [13]Fan Q, Treder K, Miller WA: Untranslated regions of diverse plant viral RNAs vary greatly in translation enhancement efficiency. BMC Biotechnol 2012, 12(1):22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [14]Gallie DR, Sleat DE, Watts JW, Turner PC, Wilson TM: A comparison of eukaryotic viral 5'-leader sequences as enhancers of mRNA expression in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 1987, 15(21):8693-8711.
• [15]Gallie DR, Sleat DE, Watts JW, Turner PC, Wilson TM: The 5'-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA enhances the expression of foreign gene transcripts in vitro and in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 1987, 15(8):3257-3273.
• [16]Datla RSS, Bekkaoui F, Hammerlindl JK, Pilate G, Dunstan DI, Crosby WL: Improved high-level constitutive foreign gene expression in plants using an AMV RNA4 untranslated leader sequence. Plant Sci 1993, 94(1–2):139-149.
• [17]Satoh J, Kato K, Shinmyo A: The 5'-untranslated region of the tobacco alcohol dehydrogenase gene functions as an effective translational enhancer in plant. J Biosci Bioeng 2004, 98(1):1-8.
• [18]Trujillo MM, Briones VL, Cha′vez-Ba′rcenas T, Herrera-Estrella L: Functional analysis of the 5' untranslated region of the sucrose phosphate synthase rice gene (sps1). Plant Sci 2003, 165(1):9-20.
• [19]Anthonisen IL, Salvador ML, Klein U: Specific sequence elements in the 5' untranslated regions of rbcL and atpB gene mRNAs stabilize transcripts in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. RNA 2001, 7(7):1024-1033.
• [20]De Amicis F, Patti T, Marchetti S: Improvement of the pBI121 plant expression vector by leader replacement with a sequence combining a poly(CAA) and a CT motif. Transgenic Res 2007, 16(6):731-738.
• [21]Topfer R, Matzeit V, Gronenborn B, Schell J, Steinbiss HH: A set of plant expression vectors for transcriptional and translational fusions. Nucleic Acids Res 1987, 15(14):5890.
• [22]Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J: Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 1987, 236(4806):1299-1302.
• [23]Joshi CP, Zhou H, Huang X, Chiang VL: Context sequences of translation initiation codon in plants. Plant Mol Biol 1997, 35(6):993-1001.
• [24]Curie C, McCormick S: A strong inhibitor of gene expression in the 5' untranslated region of the pollen-specific LAT59 gene to tomato. Plant Cell 1997, 9(11):2025-2036.
• [25]De Loose M, Danthinne X, Bockstaele EV, Montagu MV, Depicker A: Different 5' leader sequences modulate β-glucuronidase accumulation levels in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum plants. Euphytica 1995, 85(1):209-216.
• [26]Chen PY, Wang CK, Soong SC, To KY: Complete sequence of the binary vector pBI121 and its application in cloning T-DNA insertion from transgenic plants. Molecular Breeding 2003, 11(4):287-293.
• [27]Badejo AA, Tanaka N, Esaka M: Analysis of GDP-D-mannose pyrophosphorylase gene promoter from acerola (Malpighia glabra) and increase in ascorbate content of transgenic tobacco expressing the acerola gene. Plant Cell Physiol 2008, 49(1):126-132.
• [28]Kelemen Z, Mai A, Kapros T, Feher A, Gyorgyey J, Waterborg JH, Dudits D: Transformation vector based on promoter and intron sequences of a replacement histone H3 gene. A tool for high, constitutive gene expression in plants. Transgenic Res 2002, 11(1):69-72.
• [29]Maekawa T, Kusakabe M, Shimoda Y, Sato S, Tabata S, Murooka Y, Hayashi M: Polyubiquitin promoter-based binary vectors for overexpression and gene silencing in Lotus japonicus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2008, 21(4):375-382.
• [30]Mahmoud EA, El-Din SM, Aboul-Soud MA, Aboul-Enein AM, Sobhy GA, El-Shemy HA: Cloning of a novel antifungal promoter from Phaseolus vulgaris and the determination of its activity in stably transformed Nicotiana tabacum plants. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2009, 11(Suppl 1):i55-63.
• [31]Ohl S, Hedrick SA, Chory J, Lamb CJ: Functional properties of a phenylalanine ammonia-lyase promoter from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1990, 2(9):837-848.
• [32]Sanders PR, Winter JA, Barnason AR, Rogers SG, Fraley RT: Comparison of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and nopaline synthase promoters in transgenic plants. Nucleic Acids Res 1987, 15(4):1543-1558.
• [33]Jobling SA, Gehrke L: Enhanced translation of chimaeric messenger RNAs containing a plant viral untranslated leader sequence. Nature 1987, 325(6105):622-625.
• [34]Ko K, Norelli JL, Reynoird JP, Boresjza-Wysocka E, Brown SK, Aldwinckle HS: Effect of untranslated leader sequence of AMV RNA 4 and signal peptide of pathogenesis-related protein 1b on attacin gene expression, and resistance to fire blight in transgenic apple. Biotechnology Letter 2000, 22(5):373-381.
• [35]Krasnyanski SF, Sandhu J, Domier LL, Buetow DE, Korban SS: Effect of an enhanced CaMV 35S promoter as a fruit-specific promoter on vidA gene expression in transgenic tomato plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2001, 37(4):427-433.
• [36]Warkentin TD, Jordan MC, Hobbs SLA: Effect of promoter-leader sequences on transient reporter gene expression in particle bombarded pea (Pisum sativum L.) tissues. Plant Sci 1992, 87(2):171-177.
• [37]Joshi CP: An inspection of the domain between putative TATA box and translation start site in 79 plant genes. Nucleic Acids Res 1987, 15(16):6643-6653.
• [38]Luehrsen K, Walbot V: The impact of AUG start codon context on maize gene expression in vivo. Plant Cell Rep 1994, 13:454-458.
• [39]Lutcke HA, Chow KC, Mickel FS, Moss KA, Kern HF, Scheele GA: Selection of AUG initiation codons differs in plants and animals. EMBO J 1987, 6(1):43-48.
• [40]Guerineau F, Lucy A, Mullineaux P: Effect of two consensus sequences preceding the translation initiator codon on gene expression in plant protoplasts. Plant Mol Biol 1992, 18(4):815-818.
• [41]Lukaszewicz M, Feuermann M, Jerouville B, Stas A, Boutry M: In vivo evaluation of the context sequence of the translation initiation codon in plants. Plant Sci 2000, 154(1):89-98.
• [42]Jackson RJ, Hellen CU, Pestova TV: The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11(2):113-127.
• [43]Agarwal S, Jha S, Sanyal I, Amla DV: Effect of point mutations in translation initiation context on the expression of recombinant human alpha(1)-proteinase inhibitor in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Cell Rep 2009, 28(12):1791-1798.
• [44]Inaba Y, Zhong WQ, Zhang XH, Widholm JM: Specificity of expression of the GUS reporter gene (uidA) driven by the tobacco ASA2 promoter in soybean plants and tissue cultures. J Plant Physiol 2007, 164(7):824-834.
• [45]Joersbo M, Mikkelsen JD, Brunstedt J: Relationship between promoter strength and transformation frequencies using mannose selection for the production of transgenic sugar beet. Molecular Breeding 2000, 6(2):207-213.
• [46]Kuluev BR, Knyazev AV, Chemeris AV: Activity of promoters of carnation etched ring virus and dahlia mosaic virus in tobacco protoplasts and transgenic plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 2008, 55(5):687-693.
• [47]Liang YS, Jeon YA, Lim SH, Kim JK, Lee JY, Kim YM, Lee YH, Ha SH: Vascular-specific activity of the Arabidopsis carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 7 gene promoter. Plant Cell Rep 2011, 30(6):973-980.
• [48]Li Z, Upadhyaya NM, Meena S, Gibbs AJ, Waterhouse PM: Comparison of promoters and selectable marker genes for use in Indica rice transformation. Mol Breed 1997, 3(1):1-14.
• [49]Outchkourov NS, Peters J, de Jong J, Rademakers W, Jongsma MA: The promoter-terminator of chrysanthemum rbcS1 directs very high expression levels in plants. Planta 2003, 216(6):1003-1012.
• [50]Verdaguer B, de Kochko A, Beachy RN, Fauquet C: Isolation and expression in transgenic tobacco and rice plants, of the cassava vein mosaic virus (CVMV) promoter. Plant Mol Biol 1996, 31(6):1129-1139.
• [51]Wilkinson JE, Twell D, Lindsey K: Activities of CaMV 35S and nos promoters in pollen: implications for field release of transgenic plants. J Exp Bot 1997, 48(2):265-275.
• [52]Xie Y, Liu Y, Meng M, Chen L, Zhu Z: Isolation and identification of a super strong plant promoter from cotton leaf curl Multan virus. Plant Mol Biol 2003, 53(1–2):1-14.
• [53]Bhullar S, Datta S, Burma PK: Delayed trans-inactivation of synthetic domain A 35S promoters by “Tobacco 271 Locus” due to reduced sequence homology. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2011, 29(1):1-11.
• [54]Benfey PN, Ling R, Chua NH: The CaMV 35S enhancer contains at least two domains which can confer different developmental and tissue-specific expression patterns. EMBO J 1989, 8(8):2195-2202.
• [55]Xu MY, Zhang X, Zhang L, Luo YZ, Fan YL, Wang L: Functional analysis of BnMAR element in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol Biol Rep 2010, 38(5):3285-3291.
• [56]Hemphill JK, Maier CGA, Chapman KD: Rapid in-vitro plant regeneration of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Rep 1988, 17(4):273-2778.
• [57]Chaudhary B, Kumar S, Prasad KVSK, Oinam GS, Burma PK, Pental D: Slow desiccation leads to high-frequency shoot recovery from transformed somatic embryos of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Coker 310 FR). Plant Cell Rep 2003, 21(10):955-960.
• [58]Svab Z, Hajdukiewicz P, Maliga P: Generation of transgenic tobacco plants by cocultivation of leaf disks with Agrobacterium pPZP binary vectors. New York: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press; 1995.
• [59]Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW: GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 1987, 6(13):3901-3907.
• [60]Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72(1–2):248-254.