Routine dipstick urinalysis in daily practice of Belgian occupational physicians

Archives of Public Health

Lutgart Braeckman²  Eva Haak¹  Lieve Peremans³ 

[1] Provikmo, Occupational Health Service, Dirk Martensstraat 26/1, 8200, Bruges, Belgium

[2] Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

[3] Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium

关键词: Health surveillance;    Guidelines;    Occupational health;    Evidence-based practice;   

Others  :  791122
DOI  :  10.1186/0778-7367-70-15

 received in 2011-11-18, accepted in 2012-06-04,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Little work has been done to assess the quality of health care and the use of evidence-based methods by occupational physicians in Belgium. Therefore, the main objective is to describe one aspect of occupational health assessments, namely the common use of dipstick urinalysis, and to compare the current practice with international guidelines.

Methods

A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to 211 members of the Scientific Association of Occupational Medicine in the Dutch speaking part of Belgium.

Results

A total of 120 occupational physicians responded, giving a response rate of 57%. Dipstick urinalysis was a routine investigation for the vast majority of physicians (69%). All test strips screened for protein and in 90% also for blood. Occupational health services offered clinical tests to satisfy customer wants as international guidelines do not recommend screening for haematuria and proteinuria in asymptomatic adults. A lack of knowledge concerning positive testing and referral criteria was demonstrated in almost half of the study participants.

Conclusions

Belgian occupational physicians still routinely perform dipstick testing although there is no evidence to support this screening in healthy workers. To practice evidence-based medicine, occupational physicians need more instruction and training. Development and implementation of more guidelines is not only of use for the individual practitioner, it may also enhance professionalization and efficiency of occupational health care.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Braeckman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Carter T: The application of the methods of evidence-based practice to occupational health. Occup Med (Lond) 2000, 50:231-236.
• [2]Strauss SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB: Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; 2005.
• [3]Adeodu A, Agius R, Madan I: Attitudes and barriers to evidence-based guidelines among UK occupational physicians. Occup Med (Lond) 2009, 59:586-592.
• [4]Schaafsma F, Hulshof C, van Dijk F, Verbeek J: Information demands of occupational health physicians and their attitude towards evidence-based medicine. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004, 30:327-330.
• [5]Hugenholtz NI, Schaafsma FG, Schreinemakers JF, van Dijk FJ, Nieuwenhuijsen K: Occupational physicians' perceived value of evidence-based medicine intervention in enhancing their professional performance. Scand J Work Environ Health 2008, 34:189-197.
• [6]Hugenholtz NI, Schaafsma FG, Nieuwenhuijsen K, van Dijk FJ: Effect of an EBM course in combination with case method learning sessions: an RCT on professional performance, job satisfaction, and self-efficacy of occupational physicians. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008, 82:107-115.
• [7]Heselmans A, Donceel P, Aertgeerts B, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D: The attitude of Flemish occupational health physicians toward evidence-based occupational health and clinical practice guidelines. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010, 83:201-208.
• [8]Grol R: Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2001, 39(S2):II-46-II-54.
• [9]Verbeek JH, van Dijk FJ, Malmivaara A, et al.: Evidence-based medicine for occupational health. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002, 28:197-204.
• [10]Federale Overheidsdienst Werkgelegenheid, Arbeid en Sociaal Overleg (FODWASO): Wet betreffende het welzijn van de werknemers tijdens de uitoefening van hun werk (Law of Well-being at Work). , ; 1996.
• [11]Nicholson PJ: Occupational health services in the UK - challenges and opportunities. Occup Med (Lond) 2004, 54:147-152.
• [12]National Health Service (NHS Plus Occupational Health) [http://www.nhsplus.nhs.uk webcite]
• [13]Nederlandse Vereniging voor Arbeids- en Bedrijfsgeneeskunde (NVAB) [http://www.nvab.artsennet.nl webcite]
• [14]Federale Overheidsdienst Werkgelegenheid, Arbeid en Sociaal Overleg (FOD WASO) Leidraad voor het uitvoeren van het gezondheidstoezicht van leden van Brandweer en Civiele Bescherming [http://www.beswic.be/nl/topics/health/gezondheidstoezicht webcite]
• [15]Woolhandler S, Pels RJ, Bor DH, Himmelstein DU, Lawrence RS: Dipstick urinalysis screening of asymptomatic adults for urinary tract disorders. I. Hematuria and Proteinuria. JAMA 1989, 262:1214-1219.
• [16]Hiatt RA, Ordonez JD: Dipstick urinalysis screening, asymptomatic microhematuria, and subsequent urological cancers in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994, 3:439-443.
• [17]Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf JS, et al.: Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria in Adults: the American Urological Association Best Practice Policy Recommendations - Part I: definition, detection, prevalence and etiology. Urology 2001, 57:599-603.
• [18]Anderson J, Fawcett D, Feehally J, Goldberg L, Kelly J, Mac Tier R: BAUS/RA Guidelines. The initial assessment of haematuria. Renal Association and British Association of Urological Surgeons, ; 2008. [Haematuria -RA-BAUS consensus guideline 2008 via http://www.renal.org/Clinical/OtherGuidelines.aspx webcite]
• [19]Rodgers M, Nixon J, Hempel S, et al.: Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment NHS R&D HTA Programme 2006, 10:no.18.
• [20]Heffernan C: Screening for chronic kidney disease: an evidence based review for the National Screening Committee. United Kingdom NCS, ; 2008. [ChronicKidneyDisease_ EvidenceBasedReview_DrHeffernanJune08.pdf via http://www.renal.org webcite]
• [21]National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions: Chronic kidney disease. Early identification and management of chronic kidney disease in adults in primary and secondary care. Royal College of Physicians, London; 2008.
• [22]Johnson DW: Global Proteinuria Guidelines: Are We Nearly There Yet? Clin Biochem Rev 2011, 32:89-95.
• [23]Verstappen WHJM, van der Weijden T, Sijbrandij J, et al.: Effect of a Practice-Based Strategy on Test Ordering Performance of Primary Physicians. JAMA 2003, 289:2407-2412.