Protein interface classification by evolutionary analysis

BMC Bioinformatics

Jose M Duarte²  Adam Srebniak³  Martin A Schärer¹  Guido Capitani² 

[1] Present address: Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, CH-8093, Switzerland

[2] Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, CH-5232, Switzerland

[3] SyBIT, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

关键词: Web server;    Core residues;    Evolutionary;    Classification;    Crystal interfaces;    Protein-protein interfaces;    Protein structure;   

Others  :  1088036
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2105-13-334

 received in 2012-08-02, accepted in 2012-12-15,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Distinguishing biologically relevant interfaces from lattice contacts in protein crystals is a fundamental problem in structural biology. Despite efforts towards the computational prediction of interface character, many issues are still unresolved.

Results

We present here a protein-protein interface classifier that relies on evolutionary data to detect the biological character of interfaces. The classifier uses a simple geometric measure, number of core residues, and two evolutionary indicators based on the sequence entropy of homolog sequences. Both aim at detecting differential selection pressure between interface core and rim or rest of surface. The core residues, defined as fully buried residues (>95% burial), appear to be fundamental determinants of biological interfaces: their number is in itself a powerful discriminator of interface character and together with the evolutionary measures it is able to clearly distinguish evolved biological contacts from crystal ones. We demonstrate that this definition of core residues leads to distinctively better results than earlier definitions from the literature. The stringent selection and quality filtering of structural and sequence data was key to the success of the method. Most importantly we demonstrate that a more conservative selection of homolog sequences - with relatively high sequence identities to the query - is able to produce a clearer signal than previous attempts.

Conclusions

An evolutionary approach like the one presented here is key to the advancement of the field, which so far was missing an effective method exploiting the evolutionary character of protein interfaces. Its coverage and performance will only improve over time thanks to the incessant growth of sequence databases. Currently our method reaches an accuracy of 89% in classifying interfaces of the Ponstingl 2003 datasets and it lends itself to a variety of useful applications in structural biology and bioinformatics. We made the corresponding software implementation available to the community as an easy-to-use graphical web interface at http://www.eppic-web.org webcite.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Duarte et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Leibundgut M, Jenni S, Frick C, Ban N: Structural basis for substrate delivery by acyl carrier protein in the yeast fatty acid synthase. Science 2007, 316:288-90.
• [2]Huber EM, Basler M, Schwab R, Heinemeyer W, Kirk CJ, Groettrup M, Groll M: Immuno- and constitutive proteasome crystal structures reveal differences in substrate and inhibitor specificity. Cell 2012, 148:727-38.
• [3]Bilokapic S, Schwartz TU: 3D ultrastructure of the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24:86-91.
• [4]Hoelz A, Debler EW, Blobel G: The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biochem 2011, 80:613-43.
• [5]Janin J: Specific versus non-specific contacts in protein crystals. Nat Struct Biol 1997, 4:973-4.
• [6]Valdar WS, Thornton JM: Conservation helps to identify biologically relevant crystal contacts. J Mol Biol 2001, 313:399-416.
• [7]Elcock AH, McCammon JA: Identification of protein oligomerization states by analysis of interface conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:2990-4.
• [8]Guharoy M, Chakrabarti P: Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:15447-52.
• [9]Bernauer J, Bahadur RP, Rodier F, Janin J, Poupon A: DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2008, 24:652-8.
• [10]Zhu H, Domingues F, Sommer I, Lengauer T: NOXclass: prediction of protein-protein interaction types. BMC Bioinforma 2006, 7:27. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Mitra P, Pal D: Combining bayes classification and point group symmetry under boolean framework for enhanced protein quaternary structure inference. Structure London England 1993 2011, 19:304-12.
• [12]Krissinel E, Henrick K: Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 2007, 372:774-97.
• [13]Xu Q, Canutescu AA, Wang G, Shapovalov M, Obradovic Z, Dunbrack RL: Statistical analysis of interface similarity in crystals of homologous proteins. J Mol Biol 2008, 381:487-507.
• [14]Xu Q, Dunbrack RL: The protein common interface database (ProtCID)–a comprehensive database of interactions of homologous proteins in multiple crystal forms. Nuc Acids Res 2011, 39:D761-70.
• [15]Schärer MA, Grütter MG, Capitani G: CRK: an evolutionary approach for distinguishing biologically relevant interfaces from crystal contacts. Proteins 2010, 78:2707-2713.
• [16]Hurst LD: The Ka/Ks ratio: diagnosing the form of sequence evolution. Trends Genet 2002, 18:486.
• [17]Valdar WS, Thornton JM: Protein-protein interfaces: analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers. Proteins 2001, 42:108-124.
• [18]Ponstingl H, Kabir T, Thornton JM: Automatic inference of protein quaternary structure from crystals. J Appl Crystallogr 2003, 36:1116-1122.
• [19]Brünger AT: Free R value: cross-validation in crystallography. Methods Enzymol 1997, 277:366-96.
• [20]Jones S, Thornton JM: Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:13.
• [21]Ponstingl H, Henrick K, Thornton JM: Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins 2000, 41:47-57.
• [22]Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J: A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2004, 336:943-55.
• [23]Levy ED: PiQSi: protein quaternary structure investigation. Structure 2007, 15:1364-7.
• [24]Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J: The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999, 285:2177-98.
• [25]Chakrabarti P, Janin J: Dissecting protein–protein recognition sites. Proteins 2002, 47:334-343.
• [26]Levy ED: A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution. J Mol Biol 2010, 403:660-670.
• [27]Bordner AJ, Gorin A: Comprehensive inventory of protein complexes in the protein data bank from consistent classification of interfaces. BMC Bioinforma 2008, 9:234. BioMed Central Full Text
• [28]Bogan AA, Thorn KS: Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 1998, 280:1-9.
• [29]Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J: CASP9 results compared to those of previous casp experiments. Proteins 2011, 79(Suppl 1):196-207.
• [30]Baker D, Sali A: Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001, 294:93-96.
• [31]Poupon A, Janin J: Analysis and prediction of protein quaternary structure. In Molecular Biology. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press 2010, 609:349-364.
• [32]Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE: An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996, 257:342-58.
• [33]Glaser F, Rosenberg Y, Kessel A, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N: The ConSurf-HSSP database: the mapping of evolutionary conservation among homologs onto PDB structures. Proteins 2005, 58:610-617.
• [34]Sander C, Schneider R: Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 1991, 9:56-68.
• [35]Caffrey DR, Somaroo S, Hughes JD, Mintseris J, Huang ES: Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? Protein Sci 2004, 13:190-202.
• [36]Krissinel E: Detection of protein assemblies in crystals. Computational, Life Sciences; 2005.
• [37]Kato HE, Zhang F, Yizhar O, Ramakrishnan C, Nishizawa T, Hirata K, Ito J, Aita Y, Tsukazaki T, Hayashi S, Hegemann P, Maturana AD, Ishitani R, Deisseroth K, Nureki O: Crystal structure of the channelrhodopsin light-gated cation channel. Nature 2012, 482:369-74.
• [38]Liu S, Li Q, Lai L: A combinatorial score to distinguish biological and nonbiological protein–protein interfaces. Proteins 2006, 64:68-78.
• [39]Sboner A, Mu X, Greenbaum D, Auerbach RK, Gerstein MB: The real cost of sequencing: higher than you think! Genome Biol 2011, 12:125. BioMed Central Full Text
• [40]Jmol: an open-source java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/ webcite
• [41]DeLano WL: The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5 Schrödinger, LLC. 2002. (see http://www.pymol.org webcite)
• [42]Zhang X, Gureasko J, Shen K, Cole PA, Kuriyan J: An allosteric mechanism for activation of the kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor. Cell 2006, 125:1137-49.
• [43]Stamos J, Sliwkowski MX, Eigenbrot C: Structure of the epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain alone and in complex with a 4-anilinoquinazoline inhibitor. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:46265-72.
• [44]Landau M, Fleishman SJ, Ben-Tal N: A putative mechanism for downregulation of the catalytic activity of the EGF receptor via direct contact between its kinase and C-terminal domains. Structure 2004, 12:2265-75.
• [45]Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux J-P: On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J Mol Biol 1965, 12:88-118.
• [46]Eliot AC, Kirsch JF: Pyridoxal phosphate enzymes: mechanistic, structural, and evolutionary considerations. Annu Rev Biochem 2004, 73:383-415.
• [47]Shrake A, Rupley JA: Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J Mol Biol 1973, 79:351-71.
• [48]Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nuc Acids Res 1997, 25:3389-3402.
• [49]Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG: Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:539.
• [50]Murphy LR, Wallqvist A, Levy RM: Simplified amino acid alphabets for protein fold recognition and implications for folding. Protein Eng 2000, 13:149-52.
• [51]Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P, Rodier F, Janin J: Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins. Proteins 2003, 53:708-19.
• [52]Team RDC: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria; 2010.