期刊论文详细信息
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Optimization of key factors affecting hydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse by a thermophilic anaerobic pure culture
Zhicheng Lai1  Muzi Zhu1  Xiaofeng Yang1  Jufang Wang1  Shuang Li1 
[1] Guangdong Key Laboratory of Fermentation and Enzyme Engineering, School of Bioscience and Bioengineering, South China University of Technology, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China
关键词: Dark fermentation;    Acid hydrolysate;    Sugarcane bagasse;    Non-sterilization;    Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27/Δldh;    Biohydrogen;   
Others  :  1084698
DOI  :  10.1186/s13068-014-0119-5
 received in 2014-02-21, accepted in 2014-07-28,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Hydrogen is regarded as an attractive future energy carrier for its high energy content and zero CO2 emission. Currently, the majority of hydrogen is generated from fossil fuels. However, from an environmental perspective, sustainable hydrogen production from low-cost lignocellulosic biomass should be considered. Thermophilic hydrogen production is attractive, since it can potentially convert a variety of biomass-based substrates into hydrogen at high yields.

Results

Sugarcane bagasse (SCB) was used as the substrate for hydrogen production by Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense SCUT27/Δldh. The key parameters of acid hydrolysis were studied through the response surface methodology. The hydrogen production was maximized under the conditions of 2.3% of H2SO4 for 114.2 min at 115°C. Using these conditions, a best hydrogen yield of 1.86 mol H2/mol total sugar and a hydrogen production rate (HPR) of 0.52 L/L · h were obtained from 2 L SCB hydrolysates in a 5-L fermentor, showing a superior performance to the results reported in the literature. Additionally, no obvious carbon catabolite repression (CCR) was observed during the fermentation using the multi-sugars as substrates.

Conclusions

Considering these advantages and theimpressive HPR, the potential of hydrogen production using T. aotearoense SCUT27/Δldh is intriguing. Thermophilic, anaerobic fermentation using SCB hydrolysates as the medium by this strain would be a practical and eco-friendly process.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Lai et al.; licensee Springer

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150113163713904.pdf 1277KB PDF download
Figure 5. 46KB Image download
Figure 4. 92KB Image download
Figure 3. 49KB Image download
Figure 2. 46KB Image download
Figure 1. 48KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Bockris JO: On hydrogen futures: toward a sustainable energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2003, 28:131-133.
  • [2]Guo XM, Trably E, Latrille E, Carrere H, Steyer JP: Hydrogen production from agricultural waste by dark fermentation: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010, 35:10660-10673.
  • [3][http://www.iea.org/techno/essentials5.pdf] webcite IEA energy technology essentials - hydrogen production and distribution. []
  • [4]Saraphirom P, Reungsang A: Optimization of biohydrogen production from sweet sorghum syrup using statistical methods. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010, 35:13435-13444.
  • [5]Zhang ZY, O’Hara IM, Rackemann DW, Doherty WOS: Low temperature pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse at atmospheric pressure using mixtures of ethylene carbonate and ethylene glycol. Green Chem 2013, 15:255-264.
  • [6]Pawar SS, Van Niel EW: Thermophilic biohydrogen production: how far are we? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:7999-8009.
  • [7]Kengen SWM, Goorissen HP, Verhaart M, Stams AJM, Van Niel EWJ, Claassen PAM: Biological hydrogen production by anaerobic microorganisms. InBiofuels.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2009, 197–221.
  • [8]Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT: Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 2000, 74:69-80.
  • [9]Basso TP, Basso TO: Gallo CR. Towards the production of second generation ethanol from sugarcane bagasse in Brazil. In Biomass Now - Cultivation and Utilization. Edited by MatovicMD. InTech, Basso LC; 2013.
  • [10]Gamez S, Gonzalez-Cabriales JJ, Ramirez JA, Garrote G, Vazquez M: Study of the hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse using phosphoric acid. J Food Eng 2006, 74:78-88.
  • [11]Pattra S, Sangyoka S, Boonmee M, Reungsang A: Bio-hydrogen production from the fermentation of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate by Clostridium butyricum. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2008, 33:5256-5265.
  • [12]Canilha L, Santos VTO, Rocha GJM, Silva JBAE, Giulietti M, Silva SS, Felipe MGA, Ferraz A, Milagres AMF, Carvalho W: A study on the pretreatment of a sugarcane bagasse sample with dilute sulfuric acid. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2011, 38:1467-1475.
  • [13]Cheng J, Zhu M: A novel anaerobic co-culture system for bio-hydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 2013, 144:623-631.
  • [14]Kaar WE, Gutierrez CV, Kinoshita CM: Steam explosion of sugarcane bagasse as a pretreatment for conversion to ethanol. Biomass Bioenergy 1998, 14:277-287.
  • [15]Laser M, Schulman D, Allen SG, Lichwa J, Antal MJ, Lynd LR: A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagasse for bioconversion to ethanol. Bioresour Technol 2002, 81:33-44.
  • [16]Rocha GJM, Goncalves AR, Oliveira BR, Olivares EG, Rossell CEV: Steam explosion pretreatment reproduction and alkaline delignification reactions performed on a pilot scale with sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Ind Crop Prod 2012, 35:274-279.
  • [17]Cardona CA, Quintero JA, Paz IC: Production of bioethanol from sugarcane bagasse: status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:4754-4766.
  • [18]Li S, Lai C, Cai Y, Yang X, Yang S, Zhu M, Wang J, Wang X: High efficiency hydrogen production from glucose/xylose by the ldh-deleted Thermoanaerobacterium strain. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:8718-8724.
  • [19]Yang X, Lai Z, Lai C, Zhu M, Li S, Wang J, Wang X: Efficient production of L-lactic acid by an engineered Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoensewith broad substrate specificity. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:124. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Ren N, Cao G, Wang A, Lee D-J, Guo W, Zhu Y: Dark fermentation of xylose and glucose mix using isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum W16. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2008, 33:6124-6132.
  • [21]Lo YC, Lu WC, Chen CY, Chang JS: Dark fermentative hydrogen production from enzymatic hydrolysate of xylan and pretreated rice straw by Clostridium butyricum CGS5. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:5885-5891.
  • [22]Ask M, Bettiga M, Mapelli V, Olsson L: The influence of HMF and furfural on redox-balance and energy-state of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:22. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [23]Laopaiboon P, Thani A, Leelavatcharamas V, Laopaiboon L: Acid hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for lactic acid production. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:1036-1043.
  • [24]Thomsen AB, Schmidt AS: Further development of chemical and biological processes for production of bioethanol: optimisation of pre-treatment processes and characterisation of products. Roskilde (Denmark), Risoe National Lab; 1999.
  • [25]Aguilar R, Ramırez JA, Garrote G, Vaazquez M: Kinetic study of the acid hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse. J Food Eng 2002, 55:309-318.
  • [26]Kim HK, Kim JG, Cho JD, Hong JW: Optimization and characterization of UV-curable adhesives for optical communications by response surface methodology. Polym Test 2003, 22:899-906.
  • [27]Van Niel EWJ, Budde MAW, De Haas GG, van der Wal FJ, Claassen PAM, Stams AJM: Distinctive properties of high hydrogen producing extreme thermophiles, Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga elfii. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2002, 27:1391-1398.
  • [28]Mars AE, Veuskens T, Budde MAW, Van Doeveren PFNM, Lips SJ, Bakker RR, De Vrije T, Claassen PAM: Biohydrogen production from untreated and hydrolyzed potato steam peels by the extreme thermophiles Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga neapolitana. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010, 35:7730-7737.
  • [29]Evvyernie D, Morimoto K, Karita S, Kimura T, Sakka K, Ohmiya K: Conversion of chitinous wastes to hydrogen gas by Clostridium paraputrificum M-21. J Biosci Bioeng 2001, 91:339-343.
  • [30]Wang CC, Chang CW, Chu CP, Lee DJ, Chang BV, Liao CS: Producing hydrogen from wastewater sludge by Clostridium bifermentans. J Biotechnol 2003, 102:83-92.
  • [31]Schröder C, Selig M, Schönheit P: Glucose fermentation to acetate, CO2 and H2 in the anaerobic hyperthermophilic eubacterium Thermotoga maritima: involvement of the Embden-Meyerhof pathway. Arch Microbiol 1994, 161:460-470.
  • [32]Wu X, Li Q, Dieudonne M, Cong Y, Zhou J, Long M: Enhanced H2 gas production from bagasse using adhE inactivated Klebsiella oxytoca HP1 by sequential dark-photo fermentations. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:9605-9611.
  • [33]Plangklang P, Reungsang A, Pattra S: Enhanced bio-hydrogen production from sugarcane juice by immobilized Clostridium butyricumon sugarcane bagasse. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012, 37:15525-15532.
  • [34]Kuen-Sheng W, Jung-Hsing C, Yu-Hsiang H, Shir-Ly H: Integrated Taguchi method and response surface methodology to confirm hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation of cow manure. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2013, 38:45-53.
  • [35]Reungsang A, Sreela-or C: Bio-hydrogen production from pineapple waste extract by anaerobic mixed cultures. Energies 2013, 6:2175-2190.
  • [36]Ren NQ, Cao GL, Guo WQ, Wang AJ, Zhu YH, Liu BF, Xu JF: Biological hydrogen production from corn stover by moderately thermophilic Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum W16. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010, 35:2708-2712.
  • [37]Vinuselvi P, Kim MK, Lee SK, Ghim CM: Rewiring carbon catabolite repression for microbial cell factory. BMB Rep 2012, 45:59-70.
  • [38]Vinuselvi P, Park JM, Lee JM, Oh K, Ghim C-M, Lee SK: Engineering microorganisms for biofuel production. Biofuels 2011, 2:153-166.
  • [39]Agrawal M, Mao Z, Chen RR: Adaptation yields a highly efficient xylose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis strain. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011, 108:777-785.
  • [40]Karhumaa K, Wiedemann B, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Boles E, Gorwa-Grauslund MF: Co-utilization of L-arabinose and D-xylose by laboratory and industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Microb Cell Fact 2006, 5:18. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [41]Vinuselvi P, Lee SK: Engineering Escherichia coli for efficient cellobiose utilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 92:125-132.
  • [42]Montgomery DC: Design and Analysis of Experiments. John-Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ; 2012.
  • [43]Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley, New York; 2008.
  • [44]Ghosh D, Sobro IF, Hallenbeck PC: Optimization of the hydrogen yield from single-stage photofermentation of glucose by Rhodobacter capsulatus JP91 using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 2012, 123:199-206.
  • [45]Ghosh D, Sobro IF, Hallenbeck PC: Stoichiometric conversion of biodiesel derived crude glycerol to hydrogen: response surface methodology study of the effects of light intensity and crude glycerol and glutamate concentration. Bioresour Technol 2012, 106:154-160.
  • [46]Ehrman CI, Himmel ME: Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated biomass: improving mass balance closure. Biotechnol Tech 1994, 8:99-104.
  • [47]Kujala TS, Loponen JM, Klika KD, Pihlaja K: Phenolics and betacyanins in red beetroot (Beta vulgaris) root: distribution and effect of cold storage on the content of total phenolics and three individual compounds. J Agr Food Chem 2000, 48:5338-5342.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:72次 浏览次数:10次