Plant genetic variation mediates an indirect ecological effect between belowground earthworms and aboveground aphids

Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Akanksha Singh¹  Julia Braun¹  Emilia Decker¹  Sarah Hans¹  Agnes Wagner¹  Wolfgang W Weisser¹  Sharon E Zytynska¹ 

[1] Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department for Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Centre for Food and Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, Freising 85354, Germany

关键词: Vicia faba;    Plant genotype;    Genetic interactions;    Acyrthosiphon pisum;    Aphis fabae;    Aboveground-belowground interactions;   

Others  :  1084710
DOI  :  10.1186/s12898-014-0025-5

 received in 2014-06-04, accepted in 2014-09-25,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Interactions between aboveground and belowground terrestrial communities are often mediated by plants, with soil organisms interacting via the roots and aboveground organisms via the shoots and leaves. Many studies now show that plant genetics can drive changes in the structure of both above and belowground communities; however, the role of plant genetic variation in mediating aboveground-belowground interactions is still unclear. We used an earthworm-plant-aphid model system with two aphid species (Aphis fabae and Acyrthosiphon pisum) to test the effect of host-plant (Vicia faba) genetic variation on the indirect interaction between the belowground earthworms (Eisenia veneta) on the aboveground aphid populations.

Results

Our data shows that host-plant variety mediated an indirect ecological effect of earthworms on generalist black bean aphids (A. fabae), with earthworms increasing aphid growth rate in three plant varieties but decreasing it in another variety. We found no effect of earthworms on the second aphid species, the pea aphid (A. pisum), and no effect of competition between the aphid species. Plant biomass was increased when earthworms were present, and decreased when A. pisum was feeding on the plant (mediated by plant variety). Although A. fabae aphids were influenced by the plants and worms, they did not, in turn, alter plant biomass.

Conclusions

Previous work has shown inconsistent effects of earthworms on aphids, but we suggest these differences could be explained by plant genetic variation and variation among aphid species. This study demonstrates that the outcome of belowground-aboveground interactions can be mediated by genetic variation in the host-plant, but depends on the identity of the species involved.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Singh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setälä H, van der Putten WH, Wall DH: Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 2004, 304:1629-1633.
• [2]Hooper DU, Bignell DE, Brown VK, Brussard L, Mark Dangerfield J, Wall DH, Wardle DA, Coleman DC, Giller KE, Lavelle P: Interactions between aboveground and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: patterns, mechanisms, and feedbacks. Bioscience 2000, 50:1049-1061.
• [3]Heil M: Plant‐mediated interactions between above-and below-ground communities at multiple trophic levels. J Ecol 2011, 99:3-6.
• [4]Astles PA, Moore AJ, Preziosi RF: Genetic variation in response to an indirect ecological effect. Proc R Soc B 2005, 272:2577-2581.
• [5]Wootton JT: The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1994, 25:443-466.
• [6]Ohgushi T, Craig TP, Price PW: Ecological Communities: Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2007.
• [7]Van Der Putten WH, Vet LEM, Harvey JA, Wäckers FL: Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16:547-554.
• [8]Bardgett RD, Wardle DA: Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology 2003, 84:2258-2268.
• [9]Bezemer TM, van Dam NM: Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defenses. Trends Ecol Evol 2005, 20:617-624.
• [10]Belovsky G, Slade J: Insect herbivory accelerates nutrient cycling and increases plant production. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000, 97:14412-14417.
• [11]Bardgett RD, Jones AC, Jones DL, Kemmitt SJ, Cook R, Hobbs PJ: Soil microbial community patterns related to the history and intensity of grazing in sub-montane ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 2001, 33:1653-1664.
• [12]Andersen DC: Below-ground herbivory in natural communities: a review emphasizing fossorial animals. Q Rev Biol 1987, 62:261-286.
• [13]Masters G, Brown V, Gange A: Plant mediated interactions between above-and below-ground insect herbivores. Oikos 1993, 66:148-151.
• [14]Findlay S, Carreiro M, Krischik V, Jones CG: Effects of damage to living plants on leaf litter quality. Ecol Appl 1996, 6:269-275.
• [15]Masters GJ: The effect of herbivore density on host plant mediated interactions between two insects. Ecol Res 1995, 10:125-133.
• [16]Masters G, Brown V: Plant-mediated interactions between two spatially separated insects. Funct Ecol 1992, 6:175-179.
• [17]Eisenhauer N, Hörsch V, Moeser J, Scheu S: Synergistic effects of microbial and animal decomposers on plant and herbivore performance. Basic Appl Ecol 2010, 11:23-34.
• [18]Orwin KH, Buckland SM, Johnson D, Turner BL, Smart S, Oakley S, Bardgett RD: Linkages of plant traits to soil properties and the functioning of temperate grassland. J Ecol 2010, 98:1074-1083.
• [19]Wurst S, Langel R, Rodger S, Scheu S: Effects of belowground biota on primary and secondary metabolites in Brassica oleracea. Chemoecology 2006, 16:69-73.
• [20]Masters GJ, Jones TH, Rogers M: Host-plant mediated effects of root herbivory on insect seed predators and their parasitoids. Oecologia 2001, 127:246-250.
• [21]Johnson SN, Clark KE, Hartley SE, Jones TH, McKenzie SW, Koricheva J: Aboveground-belowground herbivore interactions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 2012, 93:2208-2215.
• [22]Tetard-Jones C, Kertesz MA, Gallois P, Preziosi RF: Genotype-by-genotype interactions modified by a third species in a plant-insect system. Am Nat 2007, 170:492-499.
• [23]Zytynska SE, Fleming S, Tétard-Jones C, Kertesz MA, Preziosi RF: Community genetic interactions mediate indirect ecological effects between a parasitoid wasp and rhizobacteria. Ecology 2010, 91:1563-1568.
• [24]Rowntree JK, Shuker DM, Preziosi RF: Forward from the crossroads of ecology and evolution. Phil Trans R Soc B 2011, 366:1322-1328.
• [25]Whitham TG, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Bangert RK, LeRoy CJ, Lonsdorf EV, Allan GJ, DiFazio SP, Potts BM: A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nat Rev Genet 2006, 7:510-523.
• [26]Mooney KA, Agrawal AA: Plant genotype shapes ant‐aphid interactions: implications for community structure and indirect plant defense. Am Nat 2008, 171:E195-E205.
• [27]Stireman JO, Nason JD, Heard SB, Seehawer JM: Cascading host-associated genetic differentiation in parasitoids of phytophagous insects. Proc R Soc B 2006, 273:523-530.
• [28]Pineda A, Zheng S-J, van Loon JJA, Pieterse CMJ, Dicke M: Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. Trends Plant Sci 2010, 15:507-514.
• [29]Schweitzer JA, Madritch MD, Felker-Quinn E, Bailey JK: From genes to ecosystems: plant genetics as a link between above-and belowground processes. In Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services; 2013:82-97.
• [30]Powell G, Tosh CR, Hardie J: Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral, evolutionary, and applied perspectives. Annu Rev Entomol 2006, 51:309-330.
• [31]Blau PA, Feeny P, Contardo L, Robson DS: Allylglucosinolate and herbivorous caterpillars: a contrast in toxicity and tolerance. Science 1978, 200(4347):1296-1298.
• [32]Agrawal AA: Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 2000, 89:493-500.
• [33]Debarro PJ, Sherratt TN, David O, Maclean N: An Investigation of the differential performance of clones of the aphid sitobion-avenae on 2 host species. Oecologia 1995, 104:379-385.
• [34]Via S: Specialized host plant performance of pea aphid clones is not altered by experience. Ecology 1991, 72:1420-1427.
• [35]Zytynska SE, Preziosi RF: Genetic interactions influence host preference and performance in a plant-insect system. Evol Ecol 2011, 25:1321-1333.
• [36]Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M: Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 1994, 69:373-386.
• [37]Atlavinyté O, Bagdonavičiené Z, Budavičiené I: The effect of Lumbricidae on the barley crops in various soils. Pedobiologia 1968, 8:415-423.
• [38]Haimi J, Huhta V, Boucelham M: Growth increase of birch seedlings under the influence of earthworms—a laboratory study. Soil Biol Biochem 1992, 24:1525-1528.
• [39]Alphei J, Bonkowski M, Scheu S: Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europeaus (Poaceae): faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth. Oecologia 1996, 106:111-126.
• [40]Bonkowski M, Geoghegan IE, Birch ANE, Griffiths BS: Effects of soil decomposer invertebrates (protozoa and earthworms) on an above-ground phytophagous insect (cereal aphid) mediated through changes in the host plant. Oikos 2001, 95:441-450.
• [41]White TCR: The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals. Springer, Berlin; 1993.
• [42]Johnson SN, Staley JT, McLeod FA, Hartley SE: Plant-mediated effects of soil invertebrates and summer drought on above-ground multitrophic interactions. J Ecol 2011, 99:57-65.
• [43]Scheu S, Theenhaus A, Jones TH: Links between the detritivore and the herbivore system: effects of earthworms and Collembola on plant growth and aphid development. Oecologia 1999, 119:541-551.
• [44]Wurst S, Jones TH: Indirect effects of earthworms (Aporrectodea caliginosa) on an above-ground tritrophic interaction. Pedobiologia 2003, 47:91-97.
• [45]Wurst S, Langel R, Reineking A, Bonkowski M, Scheu S: Effects of earthworms and organic litter distribution on plant performance and aphid reproduction. Oecologia 2003, 137:90-96.
• [46]Wurst S, Dugassa‐Gobena D, Langel R, Bonkowski M, Scheu S: Combined effects of earthworms and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizas on plant and aphid performance. New Phytol 2004, 163:169-176.
• [47]Scheu S: Effects of earthworms on plant growth: patterns and perspectives: the 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology · Cardiff · Wales · 2002. Pedobiologia 2003, 47:846-856.
• [48]Banks CJ, Macaulay EDM: Effects of Aphis fabae Scop. and of its attendant ants and insect predators on yields of field beans (Vicia faba L.). Ann Appl Biol 1967, 60:445-453.
• [49]Banks CJ, Macaulay EDM: Effects of varying the hostplant and environmental conditions on the feeding and reproduction of Aphis fabae. Entomol Exp Appl 1970, 13:85-96.
• [50]Denno RF, McClure MS, Ott JR: Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: competition reexamined and resurrected. Annu Rev Entomol 1995, 40:297-331.
• [51]Heath KD, Tiffin P: Context dependence in the coevolution of plant and rhizobial mutualists. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 2007, 274:1905-1912.
• [52]Heath KD: Intergenomic epistasis and coevolutionary constraint in plants and rhizobia. Evolution 2010, 64:1446-1458.
• [53]Heath KD, Lau JA: Herbivores alter the fitness benefits of a plant–rhizobium mutualism. Acta Oecol 2011, 37:87-92.