Structural reorganisation of cellulose fibrils in hydrothermally deconstructed lignocellulosic biomass and relationships with enzyme digestibility

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Roger Ibbett¹  Sanyasi Gaddipati¹  Sandra Hill¹  Greg Tucker¹ 

[1] BBSRC Sustainable Bioenergy Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK

关键词: Pre-treatment;    Hydrothermal;    Enzyme;    Reactivity;    Accessibility;    Morphology;    Fibril;    Biomass;   

Others  :  798133
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-6-33

 received in 2012-07-30, accepted in 2013-01-25,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The investigation of structural organisation in lignocellulose materials is important to understand changes in cellulase accessibility and reactivity resulting from hydrothermal deconstruction, to allow development of strategies to maximise bioethanol process efficiencies. To achieve progress, wheat straw lignocellulose and comparative model wood cellulose were characterised following increasing severity of hydrothermal treatment. Powder and fibre wide-angle X-ray diffraction techniques were employed (WAXD), complemented by enzyme kinetic measurements up to high conversion.

Results

Evidence from WAXD indicated that cellulose fibrils are not perfectly crystalline. A reduction in fibril crystallinity occurred due to hydrothermal treatment, although dimensional and orientational data showed that fibril coherency and alignment were largely retained. The hypothetical inter-fibril spacing created by hydrothermal deconstruction of straw was calculated to be insufficient for complete access by cellulases, although total digestion of cellulose in both treated straw and model pulp was observed. Both treated straw and model pulps were subjected to wet mechanical attrition, which caused separation of smaller fibril aggregates and fragments, significantly increasing enzyme hydrolysis rate. No evidence from WAXD measurements was found for preferential hydrolysis of non-crystalline cellulose at intermediate extent of digestion, for both wood pulp and hydrothermally treated straw.

Conclusions

The increased efficiency of enzyme digestion of cellulose in the lignocellulosic cell wall following hydrothermal treatment is a consequence of the improved fibril accessibility due to the loss of hemicellulose and disruption of lignin. However, incomplete accessibility of cellulase at the internal surfaces of fibrillar aggregates implies that etching type mechanisms will be important in achieving complete hydrolysis. The reduction in crystalline perfection following hydrothermal treatment may lead to an increase in fibril reactivity, which could amplify the overall improvement in rate of digestion due to accessibility gains. The lack of preferential digestion of non-crystalline cellulose is consistent with the existence of localised conformational disorder, at surfaces and defects, according to proposed semicrystalline fibril models. Cellulases may not interact in a fully selective manner with such disordered environments, so fibril reactivity may be considered as a function of average conformational states.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Ibbett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Fan LT, Lee H-Y, Beardmore DH: Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: effect of major structural features on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1980, 22:177-199.
• [2]Zhang Y-HP, Lynd LR: Towards an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of Cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 88(7):797-823.
• [3]Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro NJ: Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process basedon enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:4851-4861.
• [4]Chundawat SPS, Donohoe BS, Costa Sousa L, Elder T, Agarwal UP, Lu F, Ralph J, Himmel ME, Balan V, Dale BE: Multi-scale visualization and characterisation of lignocellulosic plant cell wall deconstruction following thermochemical pretreatment. Energy Envrion Sci 2011, 4:973-984.
• [5]Chum HL, Johnson DK, Black SK: Organosolv pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of poplars. 2. Catalyst effect and the combined severity parameter. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 1990, 29:156-162.
• [6]Cheng G, Varansi P, Li C, Liu H, Melnichenko YB, Simmons BA, Kent MS, Singh S: Transition of cellulose crystalline structure and surface morphology of biomass as a function of ionic liquid pretreatment and its relation to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12:933-941.
• [7]Donohoe BS, Decker SR, Tucker MB, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB: Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 101(5):913-925.
• [8]Ramos LP: The Chemistry involved in the steam pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials. Quim. Nova 2003, 26(6):863-871.
• [9]Deguchi S, Tsujiib K, Horikoshi K: Crystalline-to-amorphous transformation of cellulose in hot and compressed water and its implications for hydrothermal conversion. Green Chemistry 2008, 10:191-196.
• [10]Hu Z, Foston M, Ragauskas AJ: Comparative studies on hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of leave and internodes of Alamo switchgrass. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:7224-7228.
• [11]Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS: Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27:833-848.
• [12]Jakob HF, Tschegg SE, Fratzl P: Hydration dependence of the wood-cell wall structure in picea abies: A small-angle X-ray scattering study. Macromolecules 1996, 29:8435-8440.
• [13]Jung K, Paris O, Fraatzl P, Burgert I: The implication of chemical extraction treatments on the cell wall nanostructure of softwood. Cellulose 2008, 15:407-418.
• [14]Pingali S-V, Urban VS, Heller WT, McGauchey J, ONeill H, Foston M, Myles DA, Ragauskas A, Evans BR: Breakdwon of Cell Wall Nanostructure in Dilute Acid Pretreated Biomass. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:2329-2335.
• [15]Maier G, Zipper P, Stubičar M, Schurz J: Amorphization of different cellulose samples by ballmilling. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 2005, 39:167-177.
• [16]Thygesen A, Oddershede J, Lilholt H, Thomsen AB, Stahl K: On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 2005, 12:563-576.
• [17]Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK: Cellulose crystallinity index measurement: techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2010, 3:10-20. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Driemeier C, Calligaris GA: Theoretical and experimental developments for accurate determination of crystallinity of cellulose I materials. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2011, 44:184-192.
• [19]Driemeier C, Pimenta MTB, Rocha GJM, Oliveira MM, Mello DB, Maziero P, Adilson R, Gonçalves R: Evolution of cellulose crystals during prehydrolysis and soda delignification of sugarcane lignocelluloses. Cellulose 2011, 18:1509-1519.
• [20]Ding S-Y, Himmel ME: The maize primary cell wall microfibril: A new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem 2006, 54:597-606.
• [21]Gümüşkaya E, Usta M: Crystalline Structure Properties of Bleached and Unbleached Wheat Straw (Triticum Aestivum L.) Soda-Oxygen Pulp. Turkish Journal for Agriculture and Forestry 2002, 26:247-252.
• [22]Fink H-P, Weigel P, Ganster J, Rihm R, Puls J, Sixta H, Parajo JC: Evaluation of new organosolv dissolving pulps Part II: Structure and NMMO processability of the pulps. Cellulose 2004, 11(1):85-98.
• [23]Ioelovitch M, Gordeev M: Crystallinity of cellulose and its accessibility during deuteration. Acta Polymer 1994, 45:121-123.
• [24]Ibbett R, Gaddipati S, Davies S, Hill S, Tucker G: The mechanisms of hydrothermal deconstruction of lignocellulose: New insights from thermal–analytical and complementary studies. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102(19):9272-9278.
• [25]Newman RH: Estimation of the lateral dimensions of cellulose crystallites using 13C NMR signal strengths. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 1999, 15:21-29.
• [26]Kennedy CJ, Cameron GJ, Turcova AS, Apperley DC, Altaner C, Wess TJ, Jarvis MC: Microfibril diameter in celery collenchyma cellulose: X-ray scattering and NMR evidence. Cellulose 2007, 14:235-246.
• [27]Fernandes NA, Thomas LH, Altaner CM, Callow P, Forsyth VT, Apperley DC, Kennedy CJ, Jarvis MC: Nanostructure of cellulose microfibrils in spruce wood. Proc Nat Ac Sci USA 2011, 108(47):E1195-203.
• [28]Yu H, Liu R, Zhonghua DS, Huan WY: Arrangement of cellulose microfibrils in the wheat straw cell wall. Carbohydr Polym 2008, 72:122-127.
• [29]Gindl W, Reifferscheid M, Martinschitz KJ, Boesecke P, Keckes J: Reorientation of crystalline and noncrystalline regions in regenerated cellulose fibers and films tested in uniaxial tension. Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physic 2008, 46:297-304.
• [30]Lichtenegger H, Reiterer A, Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Fratzl P: Variation of cellulose microfibril angles in softwoods and hardwoods - A possible strategy of mechanical optimization. J Struct Biol 1999, 128:257-269.
• [31]Simonovic J, Stevanic J, Djikanovic D, Salmén L, Radoti K: Anisotropy of cell wall polymers in branches of hardwood and softwood: a polarized FTIR study. Cellulose 2011, 18:1433-1440.
• [32]Pick M, Lovell R, Windle A: X-ray measurement of chain orientation in non-crystalline polymers. Polymer 1980, 21:1017-1024.
• [33]Chen Y, Wang Y, Wan J, Ma Y: Crystal and pore structure of wheat straw cellulose fiber during recycling. Cellulose 2010, 17:329-338.
• [34]Sattler W, Esterbauer H, Glatter G, Steiner W: The effect of enzyme concentration on the rate of hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1989, 3:1221-1234.
• [35]Hong J, Xinhao YX, Zhang Y-H P: Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir 2007, 23:12535-12540.
• [36]Grethlein HE, Converse AO: Common aspects of acid prehydrolysis and steam explosion for pretreating wood. Bioresour Technol 1991, 36:77-82.
• [37]Wong KKY, Deverall KF, Mackie KL, Clark TA: The relationship between fibre porosity and cellulose digestibility in steam-exploded Pinus radiate. Biotechnol Bioeng 1988, 31:447-456.
• [38]Chen Y, Stipanovic AJ, Winter WT, Wilson DB, Kim Y-J: Effect of digestion by pure cellulases on crystallinity and average chain length for bacterial and microcrystalline celluloses. Cellulose. 2007, 14:283-293.
• [39]Hall M, Bansal P, Lee J, Realff M, Bommarius A: Cellulose crystallinity – a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J 2010, 277:1571-1582.
• [40]Luo XL, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Zhan HY: Effects of wet-pressing-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Cellulose. 2011, 18:1055-1062.
• [41]Gardiner KH, Blackwell J: The Structure of Native cellulose. Biopolymers 1974, 13:1975-2001.