期刊论文详细信息
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
The effect of muscle weakness on the capability gap during gross motor function: a simulation study supporting design criteria for exoskeletons of the lower limb
Maarten Afschrift2  Friedl De Groote1  Joris De Schutter1  Ilse Jonkers2 
[1] Production Engineering, Machine Design and Automation, Department of mechanical engineering, KU, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, KU, Leuven, Belgium
关键词: Simulation;    Musculoskeletal model;    Exoskeleton;    Design criteria;    Muscle weakness;    Assistance as needed;   
Others  :  1084573
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-925X-13-111
 received in 2014-02-28, accepted in 2014-07-21,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Enabling persons with functional weaknesses to perform activities of daily living (ADL) is one of the main challenges for the aging society. Powered orthoses, or exoskeletons, have the potential to support ADL while promoting active participation of the user. For this purpose, assistive devices should be designed and controlled to deliver assistance as needed (AAN). This means that the level of assistance should bridge the capability gap, i.e. the gap between the capabilities of the subjects and the task requirements. However, currently the actuators of exoskeletons are mainly designed using inverse dynamics (ID) based calculations of joint moments. The goal of the present study is to calculate the capability gap for the lower limb during ADL when muscle weakness is present, which is needed for appropriate selection of actuators to be integrated in exoskeletons.

Methods

A musculoskeletal model (MM) is used to calculate the joint kinematics, joint kinetics and muscle forces of eight healthy subjects during ADL (gait, sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, stair ascent, stair descent). Muscle weakness was imposed to the MM by a stepwise decrease in maximal isometric force imposed to all muscles. Muscle forces were calculated using static optimization. In order to compensate for muscle weakness, ideal moment actuators that represent the motors of an exoskeleton in the simulation were added to deliver AAN required to perform the task.

Results

The ID approach overestimates the required assistance since it relies solely on the demands of the task, whereas the AAN approach incorporates the capabilities of the subject. Furthermore, the ID approach delivers continuous support whereas the AAN approach targets the period where a capability gap occurs. The level of muscle weakness for which the external demands imposed by ADL can no longer be met by active muscle force production, is respectively 40%, 70%, 80% and 30%.

Conclusions

The present workflow allows estimating the AAN during ADL for different levels of muscle weakness, which can be used in the mechatronic design and control of powered exoskeletons. The AAN approach is a more physiological approach than the ID approach, since the MM accounts for the subject-specific capabilities of the user.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Afschrift et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150113162803734.pdf 789KB PDF download
Figure 8. 33KB Image download
Figure 7. 47KB Image download
Figure 6. 30KB Image download
Figure 5. 21KB Image download
Figure 4. 47KB Image download
Figure 3. 51KB Image download
Figure 2. 68KB Image download
Figure 1. 43KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Kaelin-lang A, Sawaki L, Cohen LG: Role of Voluntary Drive in Encoding an Elementary Motor Memory. J Neurophysiol 2005, 93(2):1099-1103.
  • [2]Carmichael MG, Liu D: Estimating Physical Assistance Need Using a Musculoskeletal Model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013, 60:1912-1919.
  • [3]Skelton J, Wu S: Design of a Powered Lower-Extremity Orthosis for Sit-to-Stand and Ambulation Assistance. J Med Devices 2013, 7:1-2.
  • [4]Tsukahara A, Kawanishi R, Hasegawa Y, Sankai Y: Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit Transfer Support for Complete Paraplegic Patients with Robot Suit HAL. Adv Robot 2010, 24:1615-1638.
  • [5]Bleex EE, Zoss AB, Kazerooni H, Chu A: Biomechanical Design of the Berkeley Lower. Trans Mechatron 2006, 11:128-138.
  • [6]Carmichael MG, Liu D: A task description model for robotic rehabilitation. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Conf 2012, 2012:3086-3089.
  • [7]Carmichael MG, Liu D: Towards using Musculoskeletal Models for Intelligent Control of Physically Assistive Robots. Eng Med Biol Soc 2011, 1:8162-8165.
  • [8]Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G: Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000, 10:361-374.
  • [9]Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG: OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007, 54:1940-1950.
  • [10]Hamner SR, Seth A, Delp SL: Muscle contributions to propulsion and support during running. J Biomech 2010, 43:2709-2716.
  • [11]Doherty TJ: Invited review: Aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985 2003, 95:1717-1727.
  • [12]Crowninshield RD: Use of Optimization Techniques to Predict Muscle Forces. J Biomech Eng 1978, 100:88-92.
  • [13]Cenciarini M, Dollar AM: Biomechanical considerations in the design of lower limb exoskeletons. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot Proc 2011, 2011:5975366.
  • [14]Van der Krogt MM, Delp SL, Schwartz MH: How robust is human gait to muscle weakness? Gait Posture 2012, 36:113-119.
  • [15]Hughes MA, Myers BS, Schenkman ML: The role of strength in rising from a chair in the functionally impaired elderly. J Biomech 1996, 29:1509-1513.
  • [16]Hughes MA, Schenkman ML: Chair rise strategy in the functionally impaired elderly. J Rehabil Res Dev 1996, 33:409-412.
  • [17]Duysens J, De Groote F, Jonkers I: The flexion synergy, mother of all synergies and father of new models of gait. Front Comput Neurosci 2013, 7:14.
  • [18]Kao P-C, Lewis CL, Ferris DP: Invariant ankle moment patterns when walking with and without a robotic ankle exoskeleton. J Biomech 2010, 43:203-209.
  • [19]Lewis CL, Ferris DP: Invariant hip moment pattern while walking with a robotic hip exoskeleton. J Biomech 2011, 44:789-793.
  • [20]Galle S, Malcolm P, Derave W, De CD: Gait & Posture Adaptation to walking with an exoskeleton that assists ankle extension. Gait Posture 2013, 38:495-499.
  • [21]Sawicki G: Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons. J Exp Biol 2008, 211:1402-1413.
  • [22]Thelen DG: Adjustment of Muscle Mechanics Model Parameters to Simulate Dynamic Contractions in Older Adults. J Biomech Eng 2003, 125:70.
  • [23]Stevens-Lapsley J, Kluger BM, Schenkman M: Quadriceps muscle weakness, activation deficits, and fatigue with Parkinson disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012, 26:533-541.
  • [24]Yoshioka S, Nagano A, Himeno R, Fukashiro S: Computation of the kinematics and the minimum peak joint moments of sit-to-stand movements. Biomed Eng Online 2007, 6:26.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:132次 浏览次数:41次