Comparison of spectral estimators for characterizing fractionated atrial electrograms

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

Hasan Garan¹  Angelo B Biviano¹  Edward J Ciaccio¹ 

[1]Department of Medicine – Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, USA

关键词: Spectral estimation;    Persistent;    Paroxysmal;    Dominant frequency;    Atrial fibrillation;   

Others  :  797438
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-925X-12-72

 received in 2013-05-13, accepted in 2013-07-10,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) acquired during atrial fibrillation (AF) are commonly assessed using the discrete Fourier transform (DFT), but this can lead to inaccuracy. In this study, spectral estimators derived by averaging the autocorrelation function at lags were compared to the DFT.

Method

Bipolar CFAE of at least 16 s duration were obtained from pulmonary vein ostia and left atrial free wall sites (9 paroxysmal and 10 persistent AF patients). Power spectra were computed using the DFT and three other methods: 1. a novel spectral estimator based on signal averaging (NSE), 2. the NSE with harmonic removal (NSH), and 3. the autocorrelation function average at lags (AFA). Three spectral parameters were calculated: 1. the largest fundamental spectral peak, known as the dominant frequency (DF), 2. the DF amplitude (DA), and 3. the mean spectral profile (MP), which quantifies noise floor level. For each spectral estimator and parameter, the significance of the difference between paroxysmal and persistent AF was determined.

Results

For all estimators, mean DA and mean DF values were higher in persistent AF, while the mean MP value was higher in paroxysmal AF. The differences in means between paroxysmals and persistents were highly significant for 3/3 NSE and NSH measurements and for 2/3 DFT and AFA measurements (p<0.001). For all estimators, the standard deviation in DA and MP values were higher in persistent AF, while the standard deviation in DF value was higher in paroxysmal AF. Differences in standard deviations between paroxysmals and persistents were highly significant in 2/3 NSE and NSH measurements, in 1/3 AFA measurements, and in 0/3 DFT measurements.

Conclusions

Measurements made from all four spectral estimators were in agreement as to whether the means and standard deviations in three spectral parameters were greater in CFAEs acquired from paroxysmal or in persistent AF patients. Since the measurements were consistent, use of two or more of these estimators for power spectral analysis can be assistive to evaluate CFAE more objectively and accurately, which may lead to improved clinical outcome. Since the most significant differences overall were achieved using the NSE and NSH estimators, parameters measured from their spectra will likely be the most useful for detecting and discerning electrophysiologic differences in the AF substrate based upon frequency analysis of CFAE.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Ciaccio et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Jalife J, Berenfeld O, Skanes A, Mandapati R: Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: mother rotors or multiple daughter wavelets, or both? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1998, 9(8 Suppl):S2-S12.
• [2]Skanes AC, Mandapati R, Berenfeld O, Davidenko JM, Jalife J: Spatiotemporal periodicity during atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation 1998, 98:1236-1248.
• [3]Sanders P, Berenfeld O, Hocini M, Jais P, Vaidyanathan R, Hsu LF, Garrigue S, Takahashi Y, Rotter M, Sacher F, Scavee C, Ploutz-Snyder R, Jalife J, Haissaguerre M: Spectral analysis identifies sites of high-frequency activity maintaining atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation 2005, 112:789-797.
• [4]Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, Schwab M, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Vasavakul T, Khunnawat C, Ngarmukos T: A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:2044-2053.
• [5]Takahashi Y, O’Neill MD, Hocini M, Dubois R, Matsuo S, Knecht S, Mahapatra S, Lim KT, Jais P, Jonsson A, Sacher F, Sanders P, Rostock T, Bordachar P, Clementy J, Klein GJ, Haissaguerre M: Characterization of electrograms associated with termination of chronic atrial fibrillation by catheter ablation. J Amer Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:1003-1010.
• [6]Porter M, Spear W, Akar JG, Helms R, Brysiewicz N, Santucci P, Wilber DJ: Prospective study of atrial fibrillation termination during ablation guided by automated detection of fractionated electrograms. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008, 19:613-620.
• [7]Ciaccio EJ, Biviano AB, Whang W, Wit AL, Garan H, Coromilas J: New methods for estimating local electrical activation rate during atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2009, 6:21-32.
• [8]Grzeda KR, Noujaim SF, Berenfeld O, Jalife J: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms: properties of time-domain versus frequency-domain methods. Heart Rhythm 2009, 6:1475-1482.
• [9]Ciaccio EJ, Biviano AB, Whang W, Wit AL, Coromilas J, Garan H: Optimized measurement of activation rate at left atrial sites with complex fractionated electrograms during atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophys 2010, 21:133-143.
• [10]Ng J, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ: Effect of electrogram characteristics on the relationship of dominant frequency to atrial activation rate in atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2006, 3:1295-1305.
• [11]Ng J, Passman RS, Arora R, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ: Paradoxical change in atrial fibrillation dominant frequencies with baroreflex-mediated parasympathetic stimulation with phenylephrine infusion. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012, 23:1045-1050.
• [12]Botteron GW, Smith JM: A technique for measurement of the extent of spatial organization of atrial activation during atrial fibrillation in the intact human heart. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995, 42:579-586.
• [13]Botteron GW, Smith JM: Quantitative assessment of the spatial organization of atrial fibrillation in the intact human heart. Circulation 1996, 93:513-518.
• [14]Everett TH IV, Moorman JR, Kok LC, Akar JG, Haines DE: Assessment of global atrial fibrillation organization to optimize timing of atrial defibrillation. Circulation 2001, 103:2857-2861.
• [15]Ng J, Goldberger JJ: Understanding and interpreting dominant frequency analysis of AF electrograms. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007, 18:680-685.
• [16]Fischer G, Stühlinger MC, Nowak CN, Wieser L, Tilg B, Hintringer F: On computing dominant frequency from bipolar intracardiac electrograms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007, 54:165-169.
• [17]Ng J, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ: Technical considerations for dominant frequency analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007, 18:757-764.
• [18]Alcaraz R, Sandberg F, Sörnmo L, Rieta JJ: Application of frequency and sample entropy to discriminate long-term recordings of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010, 2010:4558-4561.
• [19]Ciaccio EJ, Biviano AB, Whang W, Coromilas J, Garan H: A new transform for the analysis of complex fractionated atrial electrograms. BioMed Eng OnLine 2011, 10:35-45. BioMed Central Full Text
• [20]Ciaccio EJ, Biviano AB, Whang W, Gambhir A, Garan H: Improved frequency resolution for characterization of complex fractionated atrial electrograms. BioMed Eng OnLine 2012, 11:17. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Ciaccio EJ, Biviano AB, Whang W, Gambhir A, Garan H: Spectral profiles of complex fractionated atrial electrograms are different in longstanding and acute onset atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012, 23:971-979.
• [22]Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Kahn AM, Karasik PL, Franz MR: Evaluating fluctuations in human atrial fibrillatory cycle length using monophasic action potentials. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006, 29:1209-1218.
• [23]Brown JP, Krummen DE, Feld GK, Narayan SM: Using electrocardiographic activation time and diastolic intervals to separate focal from macro–re-entrant atrial tachycardias. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:1965-1973.
• [24]Narayan SM, Franz MR: Quantifying fractionation and rate in human atrial fibrillation using monophasic action potentials: implications for substrate mapping. Europace 2007, 9:vi89-vi95.
• [25]Hasan T, Fattah SA, Khan MR: Identification of noisy AR systems using damped sinusoidal model of autocorrelation function. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2003, 10:157-160.
• [26]Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT: Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: the Art of scientific computing. 2nd edition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
• [27]Romero I, Fleck E, Kriatselis C: Frequency analysis of atrial fibrillation surface and intracardiac electrograms during pulmonary vein isolation. Europace 2011, 13:1340-1345.
• [28]Everett TH 4th, Verheule S, Wilson EE, Foreman S, Olgin JE: Left atrial dilatation resulting from chronic mitral regurgitation decreases spatiotemporal organization of atrial fibrillation in left atrium. American Journal of Physiology - Heart & Circulatory Physiology 2004, 286:H2452-H2460.
• [29]Ciaccio EJ, Coromilas J, Wit AL, Garan H: Onset dynamics of ventricular tachyarrhythmias as measured by dominant frequency. Heart Rhythm 2011, 8:615-623.
• [30]Ciaccio EJ, Tennyson CA, Bhagat G, Lewis SK, Green PH: Transformation of videocapsule images to detect small bowel mucosal differences in celiac versus control patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2012, 108:28-37.
• [31]Mateo J, Rieta JJ: Radial basis function neural networks applied to efficient QRST cancellation in atrial fibrillation. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2013, 43:154-163.
• [32]Naseri H, Homaeinezhad MR: Detection and boundary identification of phonocardiogram sounds using an expert frequency-energy based metric. Ann Biomed Eng 2013, 41:279-292.
• [33]Kanjilal PP, Palit S: On multiple pattern extraction using singular value decomposition. IEEE Transactions Signal Process 1995, 43:1536-1540.