期刊论文详细信息
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Production and effect of aldonic acids during enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose at high dry matter content
Henning Jørgensen1  Claus Felby1  Chia-wen C Hsieh1  David Cannella1 
[1]Forest and landscape, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, Frederksberg C, DK-1958, Denmark
关键词: Cellulose oxidation;    Gluconic acid;    High solids hydrolysis;    GH61;   
Others  :  798310
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-5-26
 received in 2012-02-09, accepted in 2012-04-05,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

The recent discovery of accessory proteins that boost cellulose hydrolysis has increased the economical and technical efficiency of processing cellulose to bioethanol. Oxidative enzymes (e.g. GH61) present in new commercial enzyme preparations have shown to increase cellulose conversion yields. When using pure cellulose substrates it has been determined that both oxidized and unoxidized cellodextrin products are formed. We report the effect of oxidative activity in a commercial enzyme mix (Cellic CTec2) upon overall hydrolysis, formation of oxidized products and impact on β-glucosidase activity. The experiments were done at high solids loadings using a lignocellulosic substrate simulating commercially relevant conditions.

Results

The Cellic CTec2 contained oxidative enzymes which produce gluconic acid from lignocellulose. Both gluconic and cellobionic acid were produced during hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw at 30% WIS. Up to 4% of released glucose was oxidized into gluconic acid using Cellic CTec2, whereas no oxidized products were detected when using an earlier cellulase preparation Celluclast/Novozym188. However, the cellulose conversion yield was 25% lower using Celluclast/Novozym188 compared to Cellic CTec2. Despite the advantage of the oxidative enzymes, it was shown that aldonic acids could be problematic to the hydrolytic enzymes. Hydrolysis experiments revealed that cellobionic acid was hydrolyzed by β-glucosidase at a rate almost 10-fold lower than for cellobiose, and the formed gluconic acid was an inhibitor of the β-glucosidase.

Interestingly, the level of gluconic acid varied significantly with temperature. At 50°C (SHF conditions) 35% less gluconic acid was produced compared to at 33°C (SSF conditions). We also found that in the presence of lignin, no reducing agent was needed for the function of the oxidative enzymes.

Conclusions

The presence of oxidative enzymes in Cellic CTec2 led to the formation of cellobionic and gluconic acid during hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw and filter paper. Gluconic acid was a stronger inhibitor of β-glucosidase than glucose. The formation of oxidized products decreased as the hydrolysis temperature was increased from 33° to 50°C. Despite end-product inhibition, the oxidative cleavage of the cellulose chains has a synergistic effect upon the overall hydrolysis of cellulose as the sugar yield increased compared to using an enzyme preparation without oxidative activity.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Cannella et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140706115616788.pdf 1057KB PDF download
Figure 6 . 28KB Image download
Figure 5 . 27KB Image download
Figure 4 . 26KB Image download
Figure 3 . 20KB Image download
Figure 2 . 37KB Image download
Figure 1 . 35KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1 .

Figure 2 .

Figure 3 .

Figure 4 .

Figure 5 .

Figure 6 .

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS: Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol R 2002, 66:506-577.
  • [2]Merino ST, Cherry J: Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. In Biofuels. Volume 108. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg;; 2007::95-120.
  • [3]Arantes V, Saddler JN: Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels 2010, 3:4. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [4]Henrissat B, Davies G: Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr Opin Struc Biol 1997, 7:637-644.
  • [5]Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Horn SJ, Liu Z, Zhai H, Sørlie M, Eijsink VGH: An Oxidative Enzyme Boosting the Enzymatic Conversion of Recalcitrant Polysaccharides. Science 2010, 330:219-222.
  • [6]Westereng B, Ishida T, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Wu M, Eijsink VGH, Igarashi K, Samejima M, Ståhlberg J, Horn SJ, Sandgren M: The Putative Endoglucanase PcGH61D from Phanerochaete chrysosporium Is a Metal-Dependent Oxidative Enzyme that Cleaves Cellulose. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e27807.
  • [7]Quinlan RJ, Sweeney MD, Lo Leggio L, Otten H, Poulsen J-CN, Johansen KS, Krogh KBRM, Jørgensen CI, Tovborg M, Anthonsen A, Tryfona T, Walter CP, Dupree P, Xu F, Davies GJ, Walton PH: Insights into the Oxidative Degradation of Cellulose by a Copper Metalloenzyme That Exploits Biomass Components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:15079-15084.
  • [8]Langston JA, Shaghasi T, Abbate E, Xu F, Vlasenko E, Sweeney MD: Oxidoreductive Cellulose Depolymerization by the Enzymes Cellobiose Dehydrogenase and Glycoside Hydrolase 61. Appl Environ Microb 2011, 77:7007-7015.
  • [9]Phillips CM, Beeson WT, Cate JH, Marletta MA: Cellobiose Dehydrogenase and a Copper-Dependent Polysaccharide Monooxygenase Potentiate Cellulose Degradation by Neurospora crassa. ACS Chem Biol 2011, 6:1399-1406.
  • [10]Forsberg Z, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Bunaes AC, Stenstrøm Y, MacKenzie A, Sørlie M, Horn SJ, Eijsink VGH: Cleavage of cellulose by a CBM33 protein. Protein Sci 2011, 20:1479-1483.
  • [11]Ramachandran S, Fontanille P, Pandey A, Larroche C: Gluconic acid: Properties, applications and microbial production. Food Technol Biotechnol 2006, 44:185-195.
  • [12]Zhang Z, Gibson P, Clark SB, Tian G, Zanonato PL, Rao L: Lactonization and Protonation of Gluconic Acid: A Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study by Potentiometry, NMR and ESI-MS. J Solution Chem 2007, 36:1187-1200.
  • [13]Dale MP, Ensley HE, Kern K, Sastry KAR, Byers LD: Reversible inhibitors of beta-glucosidase. Biochemistry 1985, 24:3530-3539.
  • [14]Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D: Yeasts: characteristics and identification. 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2000.
  • [15]Harris PV, Welner D, McFarland KC, Re E, Poulsen J-CN, Brown K, Salbo R, Ding H, Vlasenko E, Merino S, Xu F, Cherry J, Larsen S, Lo-Leggio L: Stimulation of Lignocellulosic Biomass Hydrolysis by Proteins of Glycoside Hydrolase Family 61: Structure and Function of a Large, Enigmatic Family. Biochemistry 2010, 49:3305-3316.
  • [16]Cracking cellulose [http://www.biorefiningmagazine.com/articles/5800/cracking-cellulose webcite]
  • [17]Foreman PK, Brown D, Dankmeyer L, Dean R, Diener S, Dunn-Coleman NS, Goedegebuur F, Houfek TD, England GJ, Kelley AS, Meerman HJ, Mitchell T, Mitchinson C, Olivares HA, Teunissen PJM, Yao J, Ward M: Transcriptional Regulation of Biomass-degrading Enzymes in the Filamentous Fungus Trichoderma reesei. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:31988-31997.
  • [18]Karlsson J, Saloheimo M, Siikaaho M, Tenkanen M, Penttilä M, Tjerneld F: Homologous expression and characterization of Cel61A (EG IV) of Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem 2001, 268:6498-6507.
  • [19]Bey M, Berrin J-G, Poidevin L, Sigoillot J-C: Heterologous expression of Pycnoporus cinnabarinus cellobiose dehydrogenase in Pichia pastoris and involvement in saccharification processes. Microb Cell Fact 2011, 10:113. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [20]Felby C, Nielsen BR, Olesen PO, Skibsted LH: Identification and quantification of radical reaction intermediates by electron spin resonance spectrometry of laccase-catalyzed oxidation of wood fibers from beech (Fagus sylvatica). Appl Microbiol Biot 1997, 48:459-464.
  • [21]Beeson WT, Phillips CM, Cate JHD, Marletta MA: Oxidative Cleavage of Cellulose by Fungal Copper-Dependent Polysaccharide Monooxygenases. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:890-892.
  • [22]Larsen J, Østergaard Petersen M, Thirup L, Wen Li H, Krogh Iversen F: The IBUS Process – Lignocellulosic Bioethanol Close to a Commercial Reality. Chem Eng Technol 2008, 31:765-772.
  • [23]TAPPI, Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry In TAPPI Standard Methods, T-222 om-98. Atlanta, GA: TAPPI Press;; 1998.
  • [24]Ghose TK: Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 1987, 59:257-268.
  • [25]Saha BC, Bothast RJ: Production, purification, and characterization of a highly glucose-tolerant novel beta-glucosidase from Candida peltata. Appl Environ Microb 1996, 62:3165-3170.
  • [26]Starcher B: A Ninhydrin-Based Assay to Quantitate the Total Protein Content of Tissue Samples. Anal Biochem 2001, 292:125-129.
  • [27]Mohagheghi A, Tucker M, Grohmann K, Wyman C: High solids simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated wheat straw to ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1992, 33:67-81.
  • [28]Kristensen JB, Felby C, Jørgensen H: Determining Yields in High Solids Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008, 156:127-132.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:48次 浏览次数:21次