The analysis of densitometric and geometric parameters of bilateral proximal phalanges in horses with the use of peripheral quantitative computed tompgraphy

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Małgorzata Dzierzęcka²  Anna Charuta¹ 

[1] Vertebrates Morphology Department, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, 08-110, Poland

[2] Department of Morphological Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 166, Warsaw, 02-776, Poland

关键词: Computed tomography;    Bone parameters;    Proximal phalanx;    Horse;   

Others  :  789459
DOI  :  10.1186/1751-0147-54-41

 received in 2012-01-13, accepted in 2012-07-13,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Proximal phalanges in horses are among bones that are most prone to injuries. So far, the detailed analysis of densitometric and geometric parameters of both front legs proximal phalanges in horses has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the densitometric and geometric parameters between proximal phalanges in equine both front legs with the use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).

Methods

The study material comprised isolated both front legs proximal phalanges derived from 22 horses. The structure analysis of the proximal phalanges was conducted with the pQCT. The following bone parameters were determined: bone mineral content, volumetric bone mineral density, total bone area, trabecular area, cortical area, cortical thickness, periosteal circumference, endocortical circumference, Strength Strain Index. Tomographic analysis of proximal phalanges was conducted at three levels: at 15%, 50% and 85% of the bone length.

Results

The statistical analysis showed that both the densitometric and geometric parameters of the bone at 50% and 85% of its length, did not present any statistically significant differences for the left or right proximal phalanges of the forelimb. At the same time, all examined parameters measured at 15% of the bone length, in the vicinity of the proximal metaphysis revealed significant statistical differences between both front legs proximal phalanges.

Conclusions

The proximal phalanx parameters in the forelimbs are significantly different for the left and right proximal phalanx at 15% of the length and they indicate higher Strength Strain Index of the left bone in this location. The densitometric and geometric parameters of the bone at 50% and 85% of its length, did not present any statistically significant differences for the left or right proximal phalanges of the left and right forelimbs. The most serious changes caused by asymmetrical load of the thoracic limbs in horses occur near the proximal metaphysis, where the spongious substance is most abundant. This may happen because the metabolism of the spongious bone tissue is eight times faster compared to the compact bone tissue. Thus, any changes, including those caused by asymmetrical strain exerted on the right and left thoracic limbs, are the earliest to be observed.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Dzierzecka and Charuta; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Dzierzęcka M, Wąsowski AJ, Kobryń H: Leg bones injuries during race training in two- year-old thoroughbred horses. Med Wet 2007, 63:574-577.
• [2]Yovich JV, McIlwraith CW: Arthroscopic surgery for osteochondral fractures of the proximal phalanx of the metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) joints in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986, 188:273-279.
• [3]Ellis DR, Simpson DJ, Greenwood RE, Crowhurst JS: Observations and management of fractures of the proximal phalanx in young Thoroughbreds. Equine Vet J 1987, 19:43-49.
• [4]Parkin TD, Clegg PD, French NP, Proudman CJ, Riggs CM, Singer ER, Webbon PM, Morgan KL: Risk of fatal distal limb fractures among Thoroughbreds involved in the five types of racing in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec 2004, 154:493-497.
• [5]Tóth P, Horváth C, Ferencz V, Nagy K, Gligor N, Szenci O, Bodó G: Assessment of the mineral density and mineral content of the equine third metacarpal and first phalanx bone by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Acta Vet Hung 2010, 58:317-329.
• [6]Firth EC, Rogers CW, van Weeren PR, Barneveld A, McIlwraith CW, Kawcak CE, Goodship AE, Smith RK: Mild exercise early in life produces changes in bone size and strength but not density in proximal phalangeal, third metacarpal and third carpal bones of foals. Vet J 2011, 190:383-389.
• [7]Alho A: Mineral and mechanics of bone fragility fractures. Acta Orthop Scan 1993, 64:227-232.
• [8]Czerwiński E: Radiological and densitometric diagnostics of osteoporosis. Przegl Lek 1997, 4:220-225.
• [9]Claes LE, Wilke HJ, Kiefer H: Osteonal structure better predicts tensile strength of healin bone than volume fraction. J Biomech 1995, 28:1377-1390.
• [10]Chappard D, Legrand E, Basle MF, Audran M: Measuring trabecular bone architecture by image analysis of histological sections. Eur Microsc Anal 1997, 11:13-15.
• [11]Walters J, Koo WW, Bush A, Hammami M: Effect of hand dominance on bone mass measurement in sedentary individuals. J Clin Densitom 1998, 1:359-367.
• [12]Akar S, Sivrikaya H, Canikli A, Varoğlu E: Lateralized mineral content and density in distal forearm bones in right-handed men and women: relation of structure to function. Int J Neurosci 2002, 112:131-301.
• [13]Sanchis-Moysi J, Dorado C, Olmedillas H, Serrano-Sanchez JA, Calbet JA: Bone mass in prepubertal tennis players. Int J Sports Med 2010, 31:416-420.
• [14]Gümüştekin K, Akar S, Dane S, Yildirim M, Seven B, Varoglu E: Handedness and bilateral femoral bone densities in men and women. Int J Neurosci 2004, 114:1533-1547.
• [15]Llorente M, Riba D, Palou L, Carrasco L, Mosquera M, Colell M, Feliu O: Population-level right-handedness for a coordinated bimanual task in naturalistic housed chimpanzees: replication and extension in 114 animals from Zambia and Spain. Am J Primatol 2011, 73:281-290.
• [16]Smith HM, Thompson CL: Observations of hand preference in wild groups of white-faced sakis (Pithecia pithecia) in Suriname. Am J Primatol 2011, 73:655-664.
• [17]Blendinger W: Psychologie und Verhaltenweisen des Pferdes. Recht, Peter Thein, München-Wien- Zürich; 1984.
• [18]Pearce GP, May-Davis S, Greaves D: Femoral asymmetry in the Thoroughbred racehorse. Aust Vet J 2005, 83:367-370.
• [19]Davies HM, Watson KM: Third metacarpal bone laterality asymmetry and midshaft dimensions in Thoroughbred racehorses. Aust Vet J 2005, 83:224-226.
• [20]Ramzan PHL, Palmer L: Musculoskeletal injuries in Thoroughbred horses: a study of three large training yards in Newmarket UK (2005–2007). Vet J 2011, 187:325-329.
• [21]Laib A, Häuselmann HJ, Rüegsegger P: In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm. Technol Health Care 1998, 6:329-337.
• [22]Laib A, Rüegsegger P: Calibration of trabecular bone structure measurements of in vivo three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography with 28-microm-resolution microcomputed tomography. Bone 1999, 24:35-39.
• [23]Link TM, Bauer JS: Imaging of trabecular bone structure. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002, 6:253-261.
• [24]Fürst A, Meier D, Michel S, Schmidlin A, Held L, Laib A: Effect of age on bone mineral density and micro architecture in the radius and tibia of horses: an Xtreme computed tomographic study. BMC Vet Res 2008, 25:1-12.
• [25]Nicholson CL, Firth EC: Assessment of bone response to conditioning exercise in the radius and tibia of young thoroughbred horses using pQCT. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2010, 10:199-206.
• [26]Whitton RC, Trope GD, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Anderson GA, Parkin TD, Mackie EJ, Seeman E: Third metacarpal condylar fatigue fractures in equine athletes occur within previously modelled subchondral bone. Bone 2010, 47:826-831.
• [27]Claerhoudt S, Bergman EH, van der Veen H, Vanderperren K, Raes EV, Saunders JH: Computed tomographic morphology of the synovial invaginations of the distal sesamoid bone of the horse. Anat Histol Embryol 2011, 40:55-60.
• [28]Komosa M, Moliński K, Godynicki S: The variability of cranial morphology in modern horses. Zoolog Sci 2006, 23:289-298.
• [29]Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH: Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17:1545-1554.
• [30]Dziedzic-Gocławska A: Tkanka kostna. Histologia, Wyd. PZWL, Warszawa; 1995. in polish
• [31]Piastowska AW: Influence of biologically active substances from soybean on mineral content and mechanical properties of bones in rats. In Doctoral Thesis. Warsaw University of Life Sciences, ; 2005.
• [32]Advani S, Wimalawansa SJ: Bones and nutrition: common sense supplementation for osteoporosis. Corr Womens Health Rep 2003, 3:187-192.
• [33]Matrin RB, Ishida J: The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation. Porositt, density and mineralization on bone strength. J Biochem 1989, 22:419-426.
• [34]Turner CH, Robling AG: Designing exercise regiments to increase bone strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2003, 31:45-50.