The roles of abiotic factors, dispersal, and species interactions in structuring stream assemblages of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae)

Aquatic Biosystems

John W McCreadie¹  Peter H Adler² 

[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA

[2] School of Agricultural, Forest & Environmental Sciences (Entomology), Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

关键词: Streams;    Simuliidae;    Null models;    Mantel tests;    Dispersal;    Co-occurrence;    Competition;    Community structure;    Black flies;   

Others  :  794570
DOI  :  10.1186/2046-9063-8-14

 received in 2012-03-22, accepted in 2012-05-30,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

The patterns and drivers of species assemblages represent the core of community ecology. We focus on the assemblages of a single family of ubiquitous lotic insects, the Simuliidae (black flies), of which the larvae play a critical role in resource turnover in steams. We use Mantel tests and null models to tease out the potential influence of abiotic stream conditions, species interactions, and dispersal on the assemblage patterns of larval black flies over two spatial scales (within and across ecoregions) and two seasons (spring and summer).

Results

When stream sites were considered across ecoregions in the spring, stream conditions and dispersal were correlated significantly with species similarity; however, within ecoregions in the spring, dispersal was important only in the Piedmont and Sandhills and abiotic factors only in the Mountains. In contrast, results of the summer analyses within and across ecoregions were congruent; assemblage similarity was significantly correlated with stream conditions both across and within ecoregions. Null models suggested that patterns of species segregation in the spring were consistent with a community structured by competition, whereas patterns in the summer were consistent with species assemblages influenced by abiotic factors.

Conclusions

Species composition of black flies at streams sites is correlated with dispersal factors and stream conditions, but results vary over spatial and temporal scales. Communities of black flies can be viewed within a metacommunity context; local assemblages are consistent with species sorting and mass effects. Given that black flies have a terrestrial stage, with females deciding where to place the eggs, a full understanding of the processes that determine local aquatic assemblages will require integration of the dynamics of the aquatic immature stages and the terrestrial adults.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 McCreadie and Adler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Morin PJ: Community Ecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science; 2011.
• [2]White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke RA: Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Div Distrib 2006, 12:443-455.
• [3]Gotelli NJ, Graves GR, Rahbek C: Macroecological signals of species interactions in the Danish avifauna. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:5030-5035.
• [4]Agrawal AA, Ackerly DA, Adler F, Arnold B, Cáceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson P, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz JJ, Strauss SY, Turner MG, Werner E: Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front Ecol Environ 2007, 5:145-152.
• [5]Whittaker RJ, Wills KJ, Field R: Scale and species richness: towards a general hierarchal theory of species diversity. J Biogeogr 2001, 28:453-470.
• [6]Heino J: Biodiversity of aquatic insects: spatial gradients and environmental correlates of assemblage-level measures at large scales. Freshwat Rev 2009, 2:1-29.
• [7]Ricklefs RE, Schluter D: Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. In Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1993.
• [8]Hubbell SP: The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001.
• [9]Thompson R, Townsend C: A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitations together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. J Animal Ecol 2006, 75:476-484.
• [10]Malmqvist B, Adler PH, Kuusela K, Merritt RW, Wotton RS: Black flies in the boreal biome, key organisms in both terrestrial and aquatic environments: a review. Ecoscience 2004, 11:187-200.
• [11]Adler PH, Currie DC, Wood DM: The Black Flies (Simuliidae) of North America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2004.
• [12]Adler PH, McCreadie JW: The hidden ecology of black flies: sibling species and ecological scale. Am Entomol 1997, 43:153-161.
• [13]Crosskey RW: The Natural History of Blackflies. London: John Wiley & Sons; 1990.
• [14]McCreadie JW, Adler PH, Burger JF: Species assemblages of larval black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae): random or predictable? J N Am Bentholl Soc 1997, 16:760-770.
• [15]Sanders NJ, Gotelli NJ, Wittman SE, Ratchford JS, Ellison AM, Jules ES: Assembly rules of ground-foraging ant assemblages are contingent on disturbance, habitat and spatial scale. J Biogeogr 2007, 34:1632-1641.
• [16]McCreadie JW, Adler PH: Scale, time, space, and predictability: species distributions of preimaginal black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Oecologia 1998, 114:79-92.
• [17]Myers RK, Zahner R, Jones SM, Clemson SC: Forest Habitat Regions of South Carolina from Landsat Imagery. Forest Research Series 1986, 42:1-31.
• [18]Corkum LD, Currie DC: Distributional patterns of immature Simuliidae (Diptera) in northwestern North America. Freshwat Biol 1987, 17:201-221.
• [19]McCreadie JW, Hamada N, Grillet EM: Spatial-temporal distribution of preimaginal blackflies in Neotropical streams. Hydrobiologia 2004, 513:183-196.
• [20]McCreadie JW, Colbo MH: Spatial distribution patterns of larval cytotypes of the Simulium venustum/verecundum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) on the Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland: factors associated with occurrence. Can J Zool 1991, 69:2651-2659.
• [21]McCreadie JW, Colbo MH: Spatial distribution patterns of larval cytotypes of the Simulium venustum/verecundum complex (Diptera: Simuliidae) on the Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland: factors associated with cytotype abundance and composition. Can J Zool 1992, 70:1389-1396.
• [22]McCreadie JW, Colbo MH: Larval and pupal microhabitat selection by Simulium truncatum Lundström, S. rostratum Lundström, and S. verecundum AA (Diptera: Simuliidae). Can J Zool 1993, 71:358-367.
• [23]Quinn JM, Hickey CW: Characterization and classification of benthic invertebrate communities in 88 New Zealand rivers in relation to environmental factors. N Z J Marine Freshwat Res 1990, 24:387-409.
• [24]Vinson MR, Hawkins CP: Biodiversity of stream insects: variation at the local, basin and regional scales. Annu Rev Entomol 1998, 43:271-293.
• [25]Rothfels K, Feraday R, Kaneps A: A cytological description of sibling species of Simulium venustum and S. verecundum with standard maps for the subgenus Simulium Davies (Diptera). Can J Zool 1978, 55:482-507.
• [26]Corkum LD: Patterns of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in rivers of northwest North America. Freshwat Biol 1989, 21:191-205.
• [27]Feminella JW: Correspondence between stream macroinvertebrate assemblages and 4 ecoregions of the southeastern USA. J N Am Bentholl Soc 2000, 19:442-461.
• [28]McCreadie JW, Bedwell CR: Patterns of co-occurrence of stream insects and an examination of a causal mechanism: ecological checkerboard or habitat checkerboard? Insect Conserv Div, in press
• [29]McCune B, Grace JB: Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MJM Software Design; 2002.
• [30]Clarke KR, Warwick RM: Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. 2nd edition. Plymouth, UK: Primer-E Ltd; 2001.
• [31]Cao Y, Epifanio J: Quantifying the responses of macroinvertebrate assemblages to simulated stress: are more accurate similarity indices less useful? Methods Ecol Evol 2010, 1:380-388.
• [32]Brown BL, Swan CM: Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. J Anim Ecol 2010, 79:571-580.
• [33]Mantel N: The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967, 27:209-220.
• [34]Hammer Ø: Paleontological Statistics, Version 2.14, Reference Manua. Oslo: University of Oslo; 2009.
• [35]Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P: Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 1992, 73:1045-1055.
• [36]Diamond J: Assembly of species communities. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Edited by Cody ML, Diamond JD. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1975:342-349.
• [37]Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL: EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7. Acquired Intelligence Inc. Kesey-Bear; 2011. [ http://garyentsminger.com/ecosim.htm webcite]
• [38]Holt RD: Predation and community organization. In The Princeton Guide to Ecology. Edited by Levin SA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009:274-281.
• [39]Pulliam HR: On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecological Letters 2000, 3:349-361.
• [40]Gotteli NJ, McCabe DJ: Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J.M. Diamond’s assembly rules. Ecology 2002, 83:2091-2096.
• [41]Connell JH, Slatyer RO: Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 1977, 111:1119-1144.
• [42]Reice SR: Nonequilibrium determinants of biological community structure. Am Scient 1994, 82:424-435.
• [43]Gotelli NJ: Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 2000, 81:2606-2621.
• [44]Stone L, Roberts A: The checkerboard score and species distributions. Oecologia 1990, 91:419-424.
• [45]Quinn FP, Keough MJ: Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologsits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
• [46]Morin A, Harper PP, Peters RH: Microhabitat-preference curves of blackfly larvae (Diptera: Simuliidae): a comparison of three estimation methods. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1986, 43:1235-1241.
• [47]Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M, Bogutskaya N, Coad B, Mandrak N, Balderas SC, Bussing W, Stiassny MLJ, Skelton P, Allen GR, Unmack P, Naseka A, Ng R, Sindorf N, Robertson J, Armijo E, Higgins JV, Heibel TJ, Wikramanayake E, Olson D, López HL, Reis RE, Lundberg JG, Sabaj Pérez MH, Petry P: Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience 2008, 58:403-414.
• [48]McCreadie JW, Adler PH: Spatial distribution of rare species in lotic habitats. Insect Conserv Div 2008, 1:127-134.
• [49]Heino J: Concordance of species richness patterns among multiple freshwater taxa: a regional perspective. Biodiv Conserv 2002, 11:137-147.
• [50]Tello JS, Steven RD, Dick CW: Patterns of species co-occurrence and density compensation: a test for interspecific competition in bat ectoparasite infracommunities. Oikos 2008, 117:693-702.
• [51]Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM: Patterns and Process in Macroecology. London: Blackwell Science; 2000.
• [52]Maurer BA: Untangling Ecological Complexity: the Macroscopic Perspective. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press; 1999.
• [53]Simberloff D, Connor EF: Missing species combinations. Am Nat 1981, 118:215-239.
• [54]Gotteli NJ, Ellison AM: Assemblage rules for New England ant assemblages. Oikos 2002, 99:591-599.
• [55]Hart DD: Processes and patterns of competition in larval black flies. In Black Flies: Ecology, Population Management, and Annotated World List. Edited by Kim KC, Merritt RW. PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, State College; 1988:109-128.
• [56]Hemphill N: Competition between two stream dwelling filter-feeders, Hydropsyche oslari and Simulium virgatum. Oecologia 1998, 77:73-80.
• [57]Harding J, Colbo MH: Competition for attachment sites between larvae of Simuliidae (Diptera). Can Entomol 1981, 1981(113):761-763.
• [58]Malmqvist B: Preimaginal blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) and their predators in a central Scandinavian lake outlet stream. Ann Zool Fennici 1994, 31:245-255.
• [59]Muotka T: Microhabitat use by predaceous stream insects in relation to seasonal changes in prey availability. Ann Zool Fennici 1993, 30:287-297.
• [60]Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A: The metacommunity concept: a framework for multiscale community ecology. Ecol Lett 2004, 7:601-613.
• [61]Chase JM: Towards a really unified theory for metacommunities. Functional Ecol 2005, 19:182-186.
• [62]Chase JM, Leibold MA: Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
• [63]Amarasekare P, Hoopes M, Mouquet N, Holyoak M: Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive meta-communities. Am Nat 2004, 164:310-326.
• [64]Chase JM, Bengtsson J: Increasing spatio-temporal scales: metacommunity ecology. In Community Ecology: Processes, Models, Applications. Edited by Verhoef HA, Morin PJ. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:57-68.
• [65]Knight TM, McCoy MW, Chase JM, McCoy KA, Holt RD: Trophic cascades across landscapes. Nature 2005, 437:880-883.
• [66]Rothfels KH: Cytological approaches to the study of blackfly systematics and evolution. In Application of Genetics and Cytology in Insect Systematics and Evolution. Edited by Stock MW. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho; 1981:67-83.
• [67]Hunter FF, Jain H: Do gravid black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) oviposit at their natal site? J Insect Behav 2000, 13:585-595.
• [68]Malmqvist B, Hoffsten PO: Macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness, community structure and nestedness in Swedish streams. Archiv Hydrobiol 2000, 150:29-54.