Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Hao Cai¹  Jennifer B Dunn¹  Zhichao Wang¹  Jeongwoo Han¹  Michael Q Wang¹ 

[1] Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA

关键词: Greenhouse gas emissions;    Life-cycle analysis;    Ethanol;    Forage sorghum;    Sweet sorghum;    Grain sorghum;   

Others  :  797885
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-6-141

 received in 2013-05-11, accepted in 2013-09-25,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The availability of feedstock options is a key to meeting the volumetric requirement of 136.3 billion liters of renewable fuels per year beginning in 2022, as required in the US 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. Life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of sorghum-based ethanol need to be assessed for sorghum to play a role in meeting that requirement.

Results

Multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways show diverse well-to-wheels (WTW) energy use and GHG emissions due to differences in energy use and fertilizer use intensity associated with sorghum growth and differences in the ethanol conversion processes. All sorghum-based ethanol pathways can achieve significant fossil energy savings. Relative to GHG emissions from conventional gasoline, grain sorghum-based ethanol can reduce WTW GHG emissions by 35% or 23%, respectively, when wet or dried distillers grains with solubles (DGS) is the co-product and fossil natural gas (FNG) is consumed as the process fuel. The reduction increased to 56% or 55%, respectively, for wet or dried DGS co-production when renewable natural gas (RNG) from anaerobic digestion of animal waste is used as the process fuel. These results do not include land-use change (LUC) GHG emissions, which we take as negligible. If LUC GHG emissions for grain sorghum ethanol as estimated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are included (26 g CO₂e/MJ), these reductions when wet DGS is co-produced decrease to 7% or 29% when FNG or RNG is used as the process fuel. Sweet sorghum-based ethanol can reduce GHG emissions by 71% or 72% without or with use of co-produced vinasse as farm fertilizer, respectively, in ethanol plants using only sugar juice to produce ethanol. If both sugar and cellulosic bagasse were used in the future for ethanol production, an ethanol plant with a combined heat and power (CHP) system that supplies all process energy can achieve a GHG emission reduction of 70% or 72%, respectively, without or with vinasse fertigation. Forage sorghum-based ethanol can achieve a 49% WTW GHG emission reduction when ethanol plants meet process energy demands with CHP. In the case of forage sorghum and an integrated sweet sorghum pathway, the use of a portion of feedstock to fuel CHP systems significantly reduces fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions.

Conclusions

This study provides new insight into life-cycle energy use and GHG emissions of multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways in the US. Our results show that adding sorghum feedstocks to the existing options for ethanol production could help in meeting the requirements for volumes of renewable, advanced and cellulosic bioethanol production in the US required by the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard program.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Cai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA): Summary of Provisions. http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/otheranalysis/aeo_2008analysispapers/eisa.html webcite
• [2]Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): Overview and Issues. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40155.pdf webcite
• [3]Feed Grains Database. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/feed-grains-database/feed-grains-custom-query.aspx#.UWrwEcpy0bk webcite
• [4]Doggett H: Sorghum. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific & Technical; 1988.
• [5]Mcbee GG, Creelman RA, Miller FR: Ethanol yield and energy potential of stems from a spectrum of sorghum biomass types. Biomass 1988, 17(3):203-211.
• [6]Census of Agriculture: Volume 1, United States Summary and State Data. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report webcite
• [7]Zegada-Lizarazu W, Monti A: Are we ready to cultivate sweet sorghum as a bioenergy feedstock? A review on field management practices. Biomass Bioenerg 2012, 40:1-12.
• [8]Kim M, Day DF: Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2011, 38(7):803-807.
• [9]NASS Quick Stats 2.0. http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov webcite
• [10]Sarath G, Mitchell RB, Sattler SE, Funnell D, Pedersen JF, Graybosch RA, Vogel KP: Opportunities and roadblocks in utilizing forages and small grains for liquid fuels. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2008, 35(5):343-354.
• [11]Vermerris W, Saballos A, Ejeta G, Mosier NS, Ladisch MR, Carpita NC: Molecular breeding to enhance ethanol production from corn and sorghum stover. Crop Sci 2007, 47:S142-S153.
• [12]Crop Production 2010 Summary. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1047 webcite CropProdSu-01-12-2011_new_format.pdf
• [13]Kubecka B: Sorghum plays role in ethanol’s impact. http://www.ethanolproducer.com/articles/7408/sorghum-plays-role-in-ethanolundefineds-impact webcite
• [14]Biorefinery Locations. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/bio-refinery-locations webcite
• [15]Peterka A: Nation’s second-largest ethanol co. to produce fuel from sorghum. http://www.governorsbiofuelscoalition.org/?p=5438 webcite
• [16]Schill SR: Groundwork begins on Florida sweet sorghum-to-ethanol plant. http://www.ethanolproducer.com/articles/9751/groundwork-begins-on-florida-sweet-sorghum-to-ethanol-plant webcite
• [17]Wang D, Bean S, McLaren J, Seib P, Madl R, Tuinstra M, Shi Y, Lenz M, Wu X, Zhao R: Grain sorghum is a viable feedstock for ethanol production. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2008, 35(5):313-320.
• [18]Federal Register: Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Grain Sorghum. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-12-17/pdf/2012-30100.pdf webcite
• [19]GREET Model. http://greet.es.anl.gov webcite
• [20]Wang M, Han J, Dunn JB, Cai H, Elgowainy A: Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environ Res Lett 2012, 7(4):045905.
• [21]Kwon HY, Mueller S, Dunn JB, Wander MM: Modeling state-level soil carbon emissions factors under various scenarios for direct land use change associated with United States biofuel feedstock production. Biomass Bioenerg 2013, 55:299-310.
• [22]Govaerts B, Verhulst N, Castellanos-Navarrete A, Sayre KD, Dixon J, Dendooven L: Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: between myth and farmer reality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2009, 28(3):97-122.
• [23]Varvel GE: Soil organic carbon changes in diversified rotations of the western Corn Belt. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2006, 70(2):426-433.
• [24]Meki MN, Kemanian AR, Potter SR, Blumenthal JM, Williams JR, Gerik TJ: Cropping system effects on sorghum grain yield, soil organic carbon, and global warming potential in central and south Texas. Agr Syst 2013, 117:19-29.
• [25]Dunn JB, Mueller S, Kwon H, Wang MQ: Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:51-62. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Plevin RJ, O’Hare M, Jones AD, Torn MS, Gibbs HK: Greenhouse Gas emissions from biofuels’ indirect land Use change Are uncertain but May Be much greater than previously estimated. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44(21):8015-8021.
• [27]Nelson RG, Hellwinckel CM, Brandt CC, West TO, Ugarte DGD, Marland G: Energy Use and carbon dioxide emissions from cropland production in the United States, 1990–2004. J Environ Qual 2009, 38(2):418-425.
• [28]Mahama GY: Variation among grain sorghum genotypes in response to nitrogen fertilizer. PhD Thesis. : Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy; 2012.
• [29]Tew TL, Cobill RM, Richard EP: Evaluation of sweet sorghum and sorghum x sudangrass hybrids as feedstocks for ethanol production. Bioenerg Res 2008, 1(2):147-152.
• [30]Wu XR, Staggenborg S, Propheter JL, Rooney WL, Yu JM, Wang DH: Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation. Ind Crop Prod 2010, 31(1):164-170.
• [31]Propheter JL, Staggenborg S: Performance of annual and perennial biofuel crops: nutrient removal during the first two years. Agron J 2010, 102(2):798-805.
• [32]Wortmann CS, Liska AJ, Ferguson RB, Lyon DJ, Klein RN, Dweikat I: Dryland Performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska. Agron J 2010, 102(1):319-326.
• [33]Alvarez MM, Perez-Carrillo E, Serna-Saldivar SO: Effect of decortication and protease treatment on the kinetics of liquefaction, saccharification, and ethanol production from sorghum. J Chem Technol Biot 2010, 85(8):1122-1129.
• [34]Yan SP, Wu XR, Bean SR, Pedersen JF, Tesso T, Chen YHR, Wang DH: Evaluation of waxy grain sorghum for ethanol production. Cereal Chem 2011, 88(6):589-595.
• [35]Assessment of energy and greenhouse gas inventories of SS for first and second generation bioethanol. http://foris.fao.org/static/data/nrc/SweetSorghumGHGIFEU2009.pdf webcite
• [36]Ensinas AV, Modesto M, Nebra SA, Serra L: Reduction of irreversibility generation in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy 2009, 34(5):680-688.
• [37]Almodares A, Hadi MR: Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: a review. Afr J Agr Res 2009, 4(9):772-780.
• [38]The Economic Feasibility of Ethanol Production from Sugar in the United States. http://www.usda.gov/oce/reports/energy/EthanolSugarFeasibilityReport3.pdf webcite
• [39]Yu JL, Zhang X, Tan TT: Ethanol production by solid state fermentation of sweet sorghum using thermotolerant yeast strain. Fuel Process Technol 2008, 89(11):1056-1059.
• [40]Mei XY, Liu RH, Shen F, Wu HJ: Optimization of fermentation conditions for the production of ethanol from stalk juice of sweet sorghum by immobilized yeast using response surface methodology. Energ Fuel 2009, 23(1):487-491.
• [41]Liu RH, Shen F: Impacts of main factors on bioethanol fermentation from stalk juice of sweet sorghum by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CICC 1308). Bioresource Technol 2008, 99(4):847-854.
• [42]Laopaiboon L, Laopaiboon P: Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in repeated-batch fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on corncob. World J Microb Biot 2012, 28(2):559-566.
• [43]Ariyajaroenwong P, Laopaiboon P, Jaisil P, Laopaiboon L: Repeated-batch ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on sweet sorghum stalks. Energies 2012, 5(4):1215-1228.
• [44]Laopaiboon L, Nuanpeng S, Srinophakun P, Klanrit P, Laopaiboon P: Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. Bioresource Technol 2009, 100(18):4176-4182.
• [45]Khongsay N, Laopaiboon L, Jaisil P, Laopaiboon P: Optimization of agitation and aeration for very high gravity ethanol fermentation from sweet sorghum juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using an orthogonal array design. Energies 2012, 5(3):561-576.
• [46]Dunn JB, Mueller S, Wang M, Han J: Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from enzyme and yeast manufacture for corn and cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Lett 2012, 34(12):2259-2263.
• [47]Easyfit™. http://www.mathwave.com webcite
• [48]Woods J: Integrating Sweet Sorghum and Sugarcane for Bioenergy: Modelling the Potential for Electricity and ethanol Production in Zimbabwe. PhD Thesis. : Division of Life Sciences, King’s College London, University of London; 2000.
• [49]Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A, Schoen P, Lukas J, Olthof B, Worley M, Sexton D, Dudgeon D: Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol. : Golden, CO; 2011. Report TP-5100-47764
• [50]A Sustainability Analysis of the Brazilian Ethanol. http://www.globalbioenergy.org/uploads/media/0811_Unicamp_-_A_sustainability_analysis_of_the_Brazilian_ethanol.pdf webcite
• [51]Eiland BR, Clayton JE, Bryan WL: Losses of fermentable sugars in sweet sorghum during storage. Sugar J 1982, 45(4):17-21.
• [52]Coble CG, Egg RP, Shmulevich I: Processing techniques for ethanol-production from sweet sorghum. Biomass 1984, 6(1–2):111-117.
• [53]Yosef E, Carmi A, Nikbachat M, Zenou A, Umiel N, Miron J: Characteristics of tall versus short-type varieties of forage sorghum grown under two irrigation levels, for summer and subsequent fall harvests, and digestibility by sheep of their silages. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2009, 152(1–2):1-11.
• [54]Erickson JE, Woodard KR, Sollenberger LE: Optimizing Sweet sorghum production for biofuel in the south-eastern USA through nitrogen fertilization and top removal. Bioenerg Res 2012, 5(1):86-94.
• [55]Wang Z, Dunn JB, Wang MQ: GREET model miscanthus parameter development. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory; 2012.
• [56]Dunn JB, Eason J, Wang MQ: Updated sugarcane and switchgrass parameters in the GREET model. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory; 2012.
• [57]Sorghum production costs, income, and farm characteristics http://webarchives.cdlib.org/sw1s17tt5t/http://ers.usda.gov/publications/fbei/fbei-sor.pdf webcite
• [58]Seabra JEA, Macedo IC, Chum HL, Faroni CE, Sarto CA: Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 2011, 5(5):519-532.
• [59]Williams SD, Shinners KJ: Farm-scale anaerobic storage and aerobic stability of high dry matter sorghum as a biomass feedstock. Biomass Bioenerg 2012, 46:309-316.
• [60]Bennett AS, Anex RP: Production, transportation and milling costs of sweet sorghum as a feedstock for centralized bioethanol production in the upper Midwest. Bioresource Technol 2009, 100(4):1595-1607.
• [61]Whitfield MB, Chinn MS, Veal MW: Processing of materials derived from sweet sorghum for biobased products. Ind Crop Prod 2012, 37(1):362-375.
• [62]Wang M, Huo H, Arora S: Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the US context. Energ Policy 2011, 39(10):5726-5736.
• [63]Arora S, Wu M, Wang M: Update of Distillers Grains Displacement Ratios for Corn Ethanol Life-Cycle Analysis. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory; 2008.