Combined inactivation of the Clostridium cellulolyticum lactate and malate dehydrogenase genes substantially increases ethanol yield from cellulose and switchgrass fermentations

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Yongchao Li³  Timothy J Tschaplinski³  Nancy L Engle³  Choo Y Hamilton³  Miguel Rodriguez³  James C Liao²  Christopher W Schadt¹  Adam M Guss³  Yunfeng Yang³  David E Graham¹ 

[1] Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0845, USA

[2] Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

[3] BioEnergy Science Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA

关键词: fermentation;    metabolic engineering;    Clostridium cellulolyticum;    biofuel;    ethanol;    Cellulose;   

Others  :  798356
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-5-2

 received in 2011-09-15, accepted in 2012-01-04,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

The model bacterium Clostridium cellulolyticum efficiently degrades crystalline cellulose and hemicellulose, using cellulosomes to degrade lignocellulosic biomass. Although it imports and ferments both pentose and hexose sugars to produce a mixture of ethanol, acetate, lactate, H₂ and CO₂, the proportion of ethanol is low, which impedes its use in consolidated bioprocessing for biofuels production. Therefore genetic engineering will likely be required to improve the ethanol yield. Plasmid transformation, random mutagenesis and heterologous expression systems have previously been developed for C. cellulolyticum, but targeted mutagenesis has not been reported for this organism, hindering genetic engineering.

Results

The first targeted gene inactivation system was developed for C. cellulolyticum, based on a mobile group II intron originating from the Lactococcus lactis L1.LtrB intron. This markerless mutagenesis system was used to disrupt both the paralogous L-lactate dehydrogenase (Ccel_2485; ldh) and L-malate dehydrogenase (Ccel_0137; mdh) genes, distinguishing the overlapping substrate specificities of these enzymes. Both mutations were then combined in a single strain, resulting in a substantial shift in fermentation toward ethanol production. This double mutant produced 8.5-times more ethanol than wild-type cells growing on crystalline cellulose. Ethanol constituted 93% of the major fermentation products, corresponding to a molar ratio of ethanol to organic acids of 15, versus 0.18 in wild-type cells. During growth on acid-pretreated switchgrass, the double mutant also produced four times as much ethanol as wild-type cells. Detailed metabolomic analyses identified increased flux through the oxidative branch of the mutant's tricarboxylic acid pathway.

Conclusions

The efficient intron-based gene inactivation system produced the first non-random, targeted mutations in C. cellulolyticum. As a key component of the genetic toolbox for this bacterium, markerless targeted mutagenesis enables functional genomic research in C. cellulolyticum and rapid genetic engineering to significantly alter the mixture of fermentation products. The initial application of this system successfully engineered a strain with high ethanol productivity from cellobiose, cellulose and switchgrass.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR: Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 2006, 24:452-481.
• [2]Li Y, Irwin DC, Wilson DB: Increased crystalline cellulose activity via combinations of amino acid changes in the family 9 catalytic domain and family 3c cellulose binding module of Thermobifida fusca Cel9A. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:2582-2588.
• [3]Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS: Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002, 66:506-577.
• [4]Lynd LR, Zyl WHv, McBride JE, Laser M: Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005, 16:577-583.
• [5]Shaw AJ, Podkaminer KK, Desai SG, Bardsley JS, Rogers SR, Thorne PG, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR: Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:13769-13774.
• [6]Petitdemange E, Caillet F, Giallo J, Gaudin C: Clostridium cellulolyticum sp. nov., a cellulolytic, mesophilic species from decayed grass. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984, 34:155-159.
• [7]Mohand-Oussaid O, Payot S, Guedon E, Gelhaye E, Youyou A, Petitdemange H: The extracellular xylan degradative system in Clostridium cellulolyticum cultivated on xylan: evidence for cell-free cellulosome production. J Bacteriol 1999, 181:4035-4040.
• [8]Jennert KCB, Tardif C, Young DI, Young M: Gene transfer to Clostridium cellulolyticum ATCC 35319. Microbiology 2000, 146:3071-3080.
• [9]Blouzard J-C, Valette O, Tardif C, de Philip P: Random mutagenesis of Clostridium cellulolyticum by using a Tn1545 derivative. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:4546-4549.
• [10]Nevoigt E: Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2008, 72:379-412.
• [11]Ingram LO, Conway T, Sewell GW: Genetic engineering of ethanol production in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987, 53:2420-2425.
• [12]Guedon E, Desvaux M, Petitdemange H: Improvement of cellulolytic properties of Clostridium cellulolyticum by metabolic engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:53-58.
• [13]Higashide W, Li Y, Yang Y, Liao JC: Metabolic engineering of Clostridium cellulolyticum for production of isobutanol from cellulose. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:2727-2733.
• [14]Tripathi SA, Olson DG, Argyros DA, Miller BB, Barrett TF, Murphy DM, McCool JD, Warner AK, Rajgarhia VB, Lynd LR, Hogsett DA, Caiazza NC: Development of pyrF-based genetic system for targeted gene deletion in Clostridium thermocellum and creation of a pta mutant. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:6591-6599.
• [15]Chen Y, McClane BA, Fisher DJ, Rood JI, Gupta P: Construction of an alpha toxin gene knockout mutant of Clostridium perfringens type A by use of a mobile group II intron. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:7542-7547.
• [16]Heap JT, Kuehne SA, Ehsaan M, Cartman ST, Cooksley CM, Scott JC, Minton NP: The ClosTron: mutagenesis in Clostridium refined and streamlined. J Microbiol Methods 2010, 80:49-55.
• [17]Tolonen AC, Chilaka AC, Church GM: Targeted gene inactivation in Clostridium phytofermentans shows that cellulose degradation requires the family 9 hydrolase Cphy3367. Mol Microbiol 2009, 74:1300-1313.
• [18]Lambowitz AM, Zimmerly S: Mobile group II introns. Annu Rev Genet 2004, 38:1-35.
• [19]Frazier CL, San Filippo J, Lambowitz AM, Mills DA: Genetic manipulation of Lactococcus lactis by using targeted group II introns: generation of stable insertions without selection. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:1121-1128.
• [20]Perutka J, Wang W, Goerlitz D, Lambowitz AM: Use of computer-designed group II introns to disrupt Escherichia coli DExH/D-box protein and DNA helicase genes. J Mol Biol 2004, 336:421-439.
• [21]Shao L, Hu S, Yang Y, Gu Y, Chen J, Yang Y, Jiang W, Yang S: Targeted gene disruption by use of a group II intron (targetron) vector in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Cell Res 2007, 17:963-965.
• [22]Heap JT, Pennington OJ, Cartman ST, Carter GP, Minton NP: The ClosTron: a universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium. J Microbiol Methods 2007, 70:452-464.
• [23]Huang I-H, Waters M, Grau RR, Sarker MR: Disruption of the gene (spo0A) encoding sporulation transcription factor blocks endospore formation and enterotoxin production in enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens type A. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004, 233:233-240.
• [24]Özkan M, Yılmaz Eİ, Lynd LR, Özcengiz G: Cloning and expression of the Clostridium thermocellum l-lactate dehydrogenase gene in Escherichia coli and enzyme characterization. Can J Microbiol 2004, 50:845-851.
• [25]Hsieh J-Y, Hung H-C: Engineering of the cofactor specificities and isoform-specific inhibition of malic enzyme. J Biol Chem 2009, 284:4536-4544.
• [26]Lamed R, Zeikus JG: Thermostable, ammonium-activated malic enzyme of Clostridium thermocellum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981, 660:251-255.
• [27]Lamed R, Zeikus JG: Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: relationship between fermentation product yields of and catabolic enzyme activities in Clostridium thermocellum and Thermoanaerobium brockii. J Bacteriol 1980, 144:569-578.
• [28]Wang S, Huang H, Moll J, Thauer RK: NADP+ reduction with reduced ferredoxin and NADP+ reduction with NADH are coupled via an electron-bifurcating enzyme complex in Clostridium kluyveri. J Bacteriol 2010, 192:5115-5123.
• [29]Biegel E, Schmidt S, González JM, Müller V: Biochemistry, evolution and physiological function of the Rnf complex, a novel ion-motive electron transport complex in prokaryotes. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011, 68:613-634.
• [30]Wilks HM, Hart KW, Feeney R, Dunn CR, Muirhead H, Chia WN, Barstow DA, Atkinson T, Clarke AR, Holbrook JJ: A specific, highly active malate dehydrogenase by redesign of a lactate dehydrogenase framework. Science 1988, 242:1541-1544.
• [31]Yin Y, Kirsch JF: Identification of functional paralog shift mutations: Conversion of Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase to a lactate dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:17353-17357.
• [32]Chistoserdova LV, Lidstrom ME: Purification and characterization of hydroxypyruvate reductase from the facultative methylotroph Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. J Bacteriol 1991, 173:7228-7232.
• [33]Buckel W, Barker HA: Two pathways of glutamate fermentation by anaerobic bacteria. J Bacteriol 1974, 117:1248-1260.
• [34]Amador-Noguez D, Feng X-J, Fan J, Roquet N, Rabitz H, Rabinowitz JD: Systems-level metabolic flux profiling elucidates a complete, bifurcated tricarboxylic acid cycle in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 2010, 192:4452-4461.
• [35]Crown SB, Indurthi DC, Ahn WS, Choi J, Papoutsakis ET, Antoniewicz MR: Resolving the TCA cycle and pentose-phosphate pathway of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824: Isotopomer analysis, in vitro activities and expression analysis. Biotechnol J 2011, 6:300-305.
• [36]Lindberg B, Rosell K-G, Svensson S: Positions of the O-acetyl groups in birch xylan. Sven Papperstidn 1973, 76:30-32.
• [37]Dien BS, Jung H-JG, Vogel KP, Casler MD, Lamb JFS, Iten L, Mitchell RB, Sarath G: Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg 2006, 30:880-891.
• [38]Schell DJ, Farmer J, Newman M, McMillan JD: Dilute-sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover in pilot-scale reactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2003, 105-108:69-85.
• [39]Yao J, Zhong J, Fang Y, Geisinger E, Novick RP, Lambowitz AM: Use of targetrons to disrupt essential and nonessential genes in Staphylococcus aureus reveals temperature sensitivity of Ll.LtrB group II intron splicing. RNA 2006, 12:1271-1281.
• [40]Raman B, Pan C, Hurst GB, Rodriguez M, McKeown CK, Lankford PK, Samatova NF, Mielenz JR: Impact of pretreated switchgrass and biomass carbohydrates on Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 cellulosome composition: a quantitative proteomic analysis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5271.
• [41]Graves MC, Rabinowitz JC: In vivo and in vitro transcription of the Clostridium pasteurianum ferredoxin gene. Evidence for "extended" promoter elements in gram-positive organisms. J Biol Chem 1986, 261:11409-11415.
• [42]Yang S, Tschaplinski T, Engle N, Carroll S, Martin S, Davison B, Palumbo A, Rodriguez M, Brown S: Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of Zymomonas mobilis during aerobic and anaerobic fermentations. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:34. BioMed Central Full Text
• [43]Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D: Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) NREL/TP-510-42618. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2008.
• [44]Welthagen W, Shellie R, Spranger J, Ristow M, Zimmermann R, Fiehn O: Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOF) for high resolution metabolomics: biomarker discovery on spleen tissue extracts of obese NZO compared to lean C57BL/6 mice. Metabolomics 2005, 1:65-73.
• [45]Drevland RM, Waheed A, Graham DE: Enzymology and evolution of the pyruvate pathway to 2-oxobutyrate in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. J Bacteriol 2007, 189:4391-4400.