期刊论文详细信息
Biological Procedures Online
Quantification of bone changes in a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model by reconstructed three dimensional micro-CT
J Michael Mathis2  Stephen J Lokitz6  Dmitry V Ostanin4  Shubnum I Chaudhery3  Elysse A Orchard1  Anne M Hollister5  Shu Yang2 
[1]Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
[2]Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
[3]Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
[4]Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
[5]Department of Orthopedics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
[6]PET Imaging Center, Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA
关键词: Disease index;    Bone volume;    Bone density;    Collagen induced arthritis;    Imaging;    Computed tomography;    Micro-CT;    Rheumatoid arthritis;   
Others  :  793061
DOI  :  10.1186/1480-9222-15-8
 received in 2013-05-27, accepted in 2013-06-29,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Inflammatory arthritis is a chronic disease, resulting in synovitis and subchondral and bone area destruction, which can severely affect a patient’s quality of life. The most common form of inflammatory arthritis is rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in which many of the disease mechanisms are not well understood. The collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model is similar to RA as it exhibits joint space narrowing and bone erosion as well as involves inflammatory factors and cellular players that have been implicated in RA pathogenesis. Quantitative data for disease progression in RA models is difficult to obtain as serum blood markers may not always reflect disease state and physical disease indexes are subjective. Thus, it is important to develop tools to objectively assess disease progression in CIA.

Results

Micro-CT (Computed Tomography) is a relatively mature technology that has been used to track a variety of anatomical changes in small animals. In this study, micro-CT scans of several joints of control and CIA mice were acquired at 0, 4, 7, and 9 weeks after the immunization with collagen type II. Each micro-CT scan was analyzed by applying a segmentation algorithm to individual slices in each image set to provide 3-dimensional representations of specific bones including the humerus, femur, and tibia. From these representations, the volume and mean density of these bones were measured and compared. This analysis showed that both the volume and the density of each measured bone of the CIA mice were significantly smaller than those of the controls at week 7.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that micro-CT can be used to quantify bone changes in the CIA mouse model as an alternative to disease index assessments. In conclusion, micro-CT could be useful as a non-invasive method to monitor the efficacy of new treatments for RA tested in small animals.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140705043010374.pdf 3022KB PDF download
Figure 7. 129KB Image download
Figure 6. 133KB Image download
Figure 5. 102KB Image download
Figure 4. 48KB Image download
Figure 3. 120KB Image download
Figure 2. 73KB Image download
Figure 1. 93KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Moller Dohn U, Boonen A, Hetland ML, Hansen MS, Knudsen LS, Hansen A, Madsen OR, Hasselquist M, Moller JM, Ostergaard M: Erosive progression is minimal, but erosion healing rare, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. A 1 year investigator-initiated follow-up study using high-resolution computed tomography as the primary outcome measure. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:1585-1590.
  • [2]Alamanos Y, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA: Incidence and prevalence of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2008, 35:1354-1358.
  • [3]Forney MC, Winalski CS, Schils JP: Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory arthropathies of peripheral joints. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2011, 22:45-59.
  • [4]Goldring SR, Purdue PE, Crotti TN, Shen Z, Flannery MR, Binder NB, Ross FP, McHugh KP: Bone remodelling in inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013, 72:ii52-ii55.
  • [5]Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW: Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2010, 376:1094-1108.
  • [6]Myasoedova E, Crowson CS, Kremers HM, Therneau TM, Gabriel SE: Is the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis rising?: results from Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1955–2007. Arthritis Rheum 2010, 62:1576-1582.
  • [7]van der Heijde D: Erosions versus joint space narrowing in rheumatoid arthritis: what do we know? Ann Rheum Dis 2011, 70(Suppl 1):i116-i118.
  • [8]Schett G, Coates LC, Ash ZR, Finzel S, Conaghan PG: Structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: traditional views, novel insights gained from TNF blockade, and concepts for the future. Arthritis Res Ther 2011, 13(Suppl 1):S4.
  • [9]Ostergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Dohn UM: Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis–status and recent advances for magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, computed tomography and conventional radiography. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008, 22:1019-1044.
  • [10]Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Hasselquist M, Narvestad E, Moller J, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M: Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography. Arthritis Res Ther 2008, 10:R25.
  • [11]Perry D, Stewart N, Benton N, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Crabbe J, McQueen F: Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning. J Rheumatol 2005, 32:256-267.
  • [12]Ford-Hutchinson AF, Cooper DM, Hallgrimsson B, Jirik FR: Imaging skeletal pathology in mutant mice by microcomputed tomography. J Rheumatol 2003, 30:2659-2665.
  • [13]Finzel S, Ohrndorf S, Englbrecht M, Stach C, Messerschmidt J, Schett G, Backhaus M: A detailed comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound and micro-computed tomography for detection of arthritic bone erosions. Arthritis Rheum 2011, 63:1231-1236.
  • [14]Genant HK, Jiang Y: Advanced imaging assessment of bone quality. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1068:410-428.
  • [15]Koo V, Hamilton PW, Williamson K: Non-invasive in vivo imaging in small animal research. Cell Oncol 2006, 28:127-139.
  • [16]Brand DD: Rodent models of rheumatoid arthritis. Comp Med 2005, 55:114-122.
  • [17]Brand DD, Latham KA, Rosloniec EF: Collagen-induced arthritis. Nat Protoc 2007, 2:1269-1275.
  • [18]Wooley PH, Luthra HS, Griffiths MM, Stuart JM, Huse A, David CS: Type II collagen-induced arthritis in mice. IV. Variations in immunogenetic regulation provide evidence for multiple arthritogenic epitopes on the collagen molecule. J Immunol 1985, 135:2443-2451.
  • [19]Bevaart L, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Tak PP: Collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 602:181-192.
  • [20]Joe B, Wilder RL: Animal models of rheumatoid arthritis. Mol Med Today 1999, 5:367-369.
  • [21]Trentham DE: Collagen arthritis as a relevant model for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1982, 25:911-916.
  • [22]Camps M, Ruckle T, Ji H, Ardissone V, Rintelen F, Shaw J, Ferrandi C, Chabert C, Gillieron C, Francon B, Martin T, Gretener D, Perrin D, Leroy D, Vitte PA, Hirsch E, Wymann MP, Cirillo R, Schwarz MK, Rommel C: Blockade of PI3Kgamma suppresses joint inflammation and damage in mouse models of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Med 2005, 11:936-943.
  • [23]Stuart JM, Townes AS, Kang AH: Collagen autoimmune arthritis. Annu Rev Immunol 1984, 2:199-218.
  • [24]Marinova-Mutafchieva L, Williams RO, Mason LJ, Mauri C, Feldmann M, Maini RN: Dynamics of proinflammatory cytokine expression in the joints of mice with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Clin Exp Immunol 1997, 107:507-512.
  • [25]Larsson E, Erlandsson Harris H, Larsson A, Mansson B, Saxne T, Klareskog L: Corticosteroid treatment of experimental arthritis retards cartilage destruction as determined by histology and serum COMP. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004, 43:428-434.
  • [26]Oestergaard S, Chouinard L, Doyle N, Karsdal MA, Smith SY, Qvist P, Tanko LB: The utility of measuring C-terminal telopeptides of collagen type II (CTX-II) in serum and synovial fluid samples for estimation of articular cartilage status in experimental models of destructive joint diseases. Osteoarthr Cartil 2006, 14:670-679.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:35次 浏览次数:10次