Very high gravity ethanol fermentation by flocculating yeast under redox potential-controlled conditions

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Chen-Guang Liu²  Na Wang²  Yen-Han Lin¹  Feng-Wu Bai² 

[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N5A9, Canada

[2] School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116023, China

关键词: Redox potential;    Ethanol fermentation;    Very high gravity;    Flocculating yeast;   

Others  :  798237
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-5-61

 received in 2012-05-28, accepted in 2012-08-17,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Very high gravity (VHG) fermentation using medium in excess of 250 g/L sugars for more than 15% (v) ethanol can save energy consumption, not only for ethanol distillation, but also for distillage treatment; however, stuck fermentation with prolonged fermentation time and more sugars unfermented is the biggest challenge. Controlling redox potential (ORP) during VHG fermentation benefits biomass accumulation and improvement of yeast cell viability that is affected by osmotic pressure and ethanol inhibition, enhancing ethanol productivity and yield, the most important techno-economic aspect of fuel ethanol production.

Results

Batch fermentation was performed under different ORP conditions using the flocculating yeast and media containing glucose of 201 ± 3.1, 252 ± 2.9 and 298 ± 3.8 g/L. Compared with ethanol fermentation by non-flocculating yeast, different ORP profiles were observed with the flocculating yeast due to the morphological change associated with the flocculation of yeast cells. When ORP was controlled at −100 mV, ethanol fermentation with the high gravity (HG) media containing glucose of 201 ± 3.1 and 252 ± 2.9 g/L was completed at 32 and 56 h, respectively, producing 93.0 ± 1.3 and 120.0 ± 1.8 g/L ethanol, correspondingly. In contrast, there were 24.0 ± 0.4 and 17.0 ± 0.3 g/L glucose remained unfermented without ORP control. As high as 131.0 ± 1.8 g/L ethanol was produced at 72 h when ORP was controlled at −150 mV for the VHG fermentation with medium containing 298 ± 3.8 g/L glucose, since yeast cell viability was improved more significantly.

Conclusions

No lag phase was observed during ethanol fermentation with the flocculating yeast, and the implementation of ORP control improved ethanol productivity and yield. When ORP was controlled at −150 mV, more reducing power was available for yeast cells to survive, which in turn improved their viability and VHG ethanol fermentation performance. On the other hand, controlling ORP at −100 mV stimulated yeast growth and enhanced ethanol production under the HG conditions. Moreover, the ORP profile detected during ethanol fermentation with the flocculating yeast was less fluctuated, indicating that yeast flocculation could attenuate the ORP fluctuation observed during ethanol fermentation with non-flocculating yeast.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Solange IM, Dragone G, Guimaraes PMR, Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, Vicente A, Lucilia : Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol Adv 2010, 28:817-830.
• [2]Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M: Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 2008, 26:89-105.
• [3]Zhao XQ, Zi LH, Bai FW, Lin HL, Hao XM, Yue GJ, Ho NWY: Bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2012, 128:25-52.
• [4]Zhao XQ, Bai FW: Yeast flocculation: New story in fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27:849-856.
• [5]Lei J, Zhao X, Ge X, Bai F: Ethanol tolerance and the variation of plasma membrane composition of yeast floc populations with different size distribution. J Biotechnol 2007, 131:270-275.
• [6]Xue C, Zhao XQ, Bai FW: Effect of the size of yeast flocs and zinc supplementation on continuous ethanol fermentation performance and metabolic flux distribution under very high concentration conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 105:935-944.
• [7]Kjaergaard L: The redox potential: Its use and control in biotechnology. Adv Biochem Eng 1977, 7:131-150.
• [8]Berovic M, Cimerman A: Redox potential in submerged citric acid fermentation. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1982, 16:185-188.
• [9]Du C, Yan H, Zhang Y, Li Y, Cao Z: Use of oxidoreduction potential as an indicator to regulate 1,3-propanediol fermentation by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 69:554-563.
• [10]Sheu DC, Duan KJ, Jou SR, Chen YC, Chen CW: Production of xylitol from Candida tropicalis by using an oxidation-reduction potential-stat controlled fermentation. Biotechnol Lett 2003, 25:2065-2069.
• [11]Lin YH, Chien WS, Duan KJ: Correlations between reduction-oxidation potential profiles and growth patterns of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during very-high-gravity fermentation. Process Biochem 2010, 45:765-770.
• [12]Liu CG, Lin YH, Bai FW: Development of redox potential-controlled schemes for very-high-gravity ethanol fermentation. J Biotechnol 2011, 153:42-47.
• [13]Yu Y, Wang YH, Chu J, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL: The influence of controlling redox potential on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chin J Biotechnol 2007, 23:878-884.
• [14]Draculic T, Dawes IW, Grant CM: A single glutaredoxin or thioredoxin gene is essential for viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 2000, 36:1167-1174.
• [15]Wheeler GL, Grant CM: Regulation of redox homeostasis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Physiol Plant 2004, 120:12-20.
• [16]Liu CG, Lin YH, Bai FW: Ageing vessel configuration for continuous redox potential-controlled very-high-gravity fermentation. J Biosci Bioeng 2011, 111:61-66.
• [17]Liu CG, Lin YH, Bai FW: Ageing vessel design and optimization for continuous very-high-gravity ethanol fermentation processes. Process Biochem 2012, 47:57-61.
• [18]Hu C, Bai FW, An L: Effect of flocculence of a flocculating yeast on its tolerance to ethanol and the mechanism. Chin J Biotechnol 2005, 21:123-128.
• [19]Zhao XQ, Li Q, He LY, Li F, Que WW, Bai FW: Exploration of a natural reservoir of flocculating genes from various Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and improved ethanol fermentation using stable genetically engineered flocculating yeast strains. Process Biochem 2011.
• [20]Smart KA, Chambers KM, Lambert I, Jenkins C, Smart CA: Use of methylene violet staining procedures to determine yeast viability and vitality. J Am Soc Brew Chem 1999, 57:18-23.
• [21]Ge XM, Zhao XQ, Bai FW: Online monitoring and characterization of flocculating yeast cell flocs during continuous ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005, 90:523-531.