期刊论文详细信息
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
The phylogenetic signal of species co-occurrence in high-diversity shrublands: different patterns for fire-killed and fire-resistant species
Marcel Cardillo1 
[1] Centre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia
关键词: Southwestern Australia;    Regeneration strategy;    Phylogenetic conservatism;    Phylogenetic community ecology;    Co-occurrence matrix;    Competition;    Coexistence;   
Others  :  1085849
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6785-12-21
 received in 2012-06-28, accepted in 2012-09-24,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Using phylogenies in community ecology is now commonplace, but typically, studies assume and test for a single common phylogenetic signal for all species in a community, at a given scale. A possibility that remains little-explored is that species differing in demographic or ecological attributes, or facing different selective pressures, show different community phylogenetic patterns, even within the same communities. Here I compare community phylogenetic patterns for fire-killed and fire-resistant Banksia species in the fire-prone shrublands of southwest Australia.

Results

Using new Bayesian phylogenies of Banksia, together with ecological trait data and abundance data from 24 field sites, I find that fire regeneration mode influences the phylogenetic and phenotypic signal of species co-occurrence patterns. Fire-killed species (reseeders) show patterns of phylogenetic and phenotypic repulsion consistent with competition-driven niche differentiation, but there are no such patterns for fire-resistant species (resprouters). For pairs of species that differ in fire response, co-occurrence is mediated by environmental filtering based on similarity in edaphic preferences.

Conclusions

These results suggest that it may be simplistic to characterize an entire community by a single structuring process, such as competition or environmental filtering. For this reason, community analyses based on pairwise species co-occurrence patterns may be more informative than those based on whole-community structure metrics.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Cardillo; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150113181021296.pdf 1858KB PDF download
Figure 4. 65KB Image download
Figure 3. 51KB Image download
Figure 2. 75KB Image download
Figure 1. 27KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Emerson BC, Gillespie RG: Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2008, 23:619-630.
  • [2]Vamosi SM, Heard SB, Vamosi JC, Webb CO: Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol Ecol 2009, 18:572-592.
  • [3]Webb CO: Integrating phylogenies into community ecology. Ecology 2006, 87:S1-S2.
  • [4]Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ: Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2002, 33:475-505.
  • [5]Kembel SW, Hubbell SP: The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. Ecology 2006, 87:S86-S99.
  • [6]Kraft NJB, Ackerly DD: Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest. Ecol Monogr 2010, 80:401-422.
  • [7]Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK: The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. Ecology 2007, 88:1770-1780.
  • [8]Helmus MR, Savage K, Diebel MW, Maxted JT, Ives AR: Separating the determinants of phylogenetic community structure. Ecol Lett 2007, 10:917-925.
  • [9]Cardillo M, Meijaard E: Phylogeny and co-occurrence of mammal species on southeast Asian islands. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 2010, 19:465-474.
  • [10]Cavender-Bares J, Ackerly DD, Baum DA, Bazzaz FA: Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. Am Nat 2004, 163:823-843.
  • [11]Slingsby JA, Verboom GA: Phylogenetic relatedness limits co-occurrence at fine spatial scales: Evidence from the schoenoid sedges (Cyperaceae: Schoeneae) of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Am Nat 2006, 168:14-27.
  • [12]Merwin L, He T, Lamont BB: Phylogenetic and phenotypic structure among Banksia communities in south-western Australia. J Biogeogr 2012, 39:397-407.
  • [13]Verdu M, Pausas JG: Fire drives phylogenetic clustering in Mediterranean Basin woody plant communities. J Ecol 2007, 95:1316-1323.
  • [14]Cowling RM, Rundel PW, Lamont BB, Arroyo MK, Arianoutsou M: Plant diversity in Mediterranean-climate regions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1996, 11:362-366.
  • [15]Cowling RM: Fire and Its Role in Coexistence and Speciation in Gondwanan Shrublands. South African Journal of Science 1987, 83:106-112.
  • [16]Grubb PJ: The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 1977, 52:107-145.
  • [17]Lamont BB, Witkowski ETF: A test for lottery recruitment among four Banksia species based on their demography and biological attributes. Oecologia 1995, 101:299-308.
  • [18]Miller AD, Chesson P: Coexistence in Disturbance-Prone Communities: How a Resistance-Resilience Trade-Off Generates Coexistence via the Storage Effect. Am Nat 2009, 173:E30-E43.
  • [19]Tilman D: Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1982.
  • [20]Cody ML: Structural niches in plant communities. In Community Ecology. Edited by Diamond JM, Case TJ. New York: Harper & Row; 1986:381-405.
  • [21]Bond WJ, Midgley JJ: Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2001, 16:45-51.
  • [22]Bond WJ, Midgley JJ: The evolutionary ecology of sprouting in woody plants. Int J Plant Sci 2003, 164:S103-S114.
  • [23]Groeneveld J, Enright NJ, Lamont BB, Wissel C: A spatial model of coexistence among three Banksia species along a topographic gradient in fire-prone shrublands. J Ecol 2002, 90:762-774.
  • [24]Falster DS, Westoby M: Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in ecology & evolution (Personal edition) 2003, 18:337-343.
  • [25]Midgley JJ: Is bigger better in plants? The hydraulic costs of increasing size in trees. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2003, 18:5-6.
  • [26]Gibson N, Keighery GJ, Lyons MN, Webb A: Terrestrial flora and vegetation of the Western Australian wheatbelt. Records of the Western Australian Museum supplement 2004, 67:139-189.
  • [27]Mast AR, Thiele K: The transfer of Dryandra R.Br. to Banksia L.f. (Proteaceae). Aust Syst Bot 2007, 20:63-71.
  • [28]Geneious version 5.6.3 created by Biomatters. Available from http://www.geneious.com/ webcite
  • [29]Drummond AJ, Rambaut A: BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7:214. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [30]Crisp M, Cook L, Steane D: Radiation of the Australian flora: what can comparisons of molecular phylogenies across multiple taxa tell us about the evolution of diversity in present-day communities? Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2004, 359:1551-1571.
  • [31]Sauquet H, Weston PH, Anderson CL, Barker NP, Cantrill DJ, Mast AR, Savolainen V: Contrasted patterns of hyperdiversification in Mediterranean hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:221-225.
  • [32]Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A: Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence. PLoS Biol 2006, 4:e88.
  • [33]Schliep KP: phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:592-593.
  • [34]George AS: Banksia. Flora of Australia 1999, 17B:175-250.
  • [35]George AS: Dryandra. Flora of Australia 1999, 17B:251-363.
  • [36]Cavanagh T, Pieroni M: The Dryandras. Australian Plants Society Inc., Hawthorn, Victoria; 2006.
  • [37]Moles AT, Ackerly DD, Webb CO, Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, Pitman AJ, Westoby M: Factors that shape seed mass evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:10540-10544.
  • [38]Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ: Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2002, 33:125-159.
  • [39]Westoby M, Leishman M, Lord J: Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 1996, 351:1309-1317.
  • [40]Craine JM, Wolkovich EM, Towne EG, Kembel SW: Flowering phenology as a functional trait in a tallgrass prairie. New Phytol 2011, 193:673-682.
  • [41]Rathcke B, Lacey EP: Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1985, 16:179-214.
  • [42]Hopper SD, Gioia P: The Southwest Australian Floristic Region: Evolution and conservation of a global hot spot of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2004, 35:623-650.
  • [43]Cowling RM, Witkowski ETF, Milewski AV, Newbey KR: Taxonomic, Edaphic and Biological Aspects of Narrow Plant Endemism on Matched Sites in Mediterranean South-Africa and Australia. J Biogeogr 1994, 21:651-664.
  • [44]FloraBasehttp://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au/ webcite
  • [45]ESRI: ArcGIS Version 9. In Book ArcGIS Version 9. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc, City; 2009.
  • [46]Schoener TW: Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 1970, 51:408.
  • [47]Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO: Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1463-1464.
  • [48]Pagel MD: Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 1999, 401:877-884.
  • [49]Fritz SA, Purvis A: Selectivity in Mammalian Extinction Risk and Threat Types: a New Measure of Phylogenetic Signal Strength in Binary Traits. Conserv Biol 2010, 24:1042-1051.
  • [50]Felsenstein J: Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 1985, 125:1-15.
  • [51]Garland T, Harvey PH, Ives AR: Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 1992, 41:18-32.
  • [52]Bond WJ, Cowling RM, Richards MB: Competition and coexistence. In The Ecology of Fynbos: Nutrients, Fire and Diversity. Edited by Cowling RM. Oxford University press, Oxford; 1992:206-225.
  • [53]Midgley JJ: Why the world’s vegetation is not totally dominated by resprouting plants; Because resprouters are shorter than reseeders. Ecography 1996, 19:92-95.
  • [54]Pronk TE, Schieving F, Anten NPR, Werger MJA: Plants that differ in height investment can coexist if they are distributing non-uniformly within an area. Ecol Complex 2007, 4:182-191.
  • [55]Lamont BB, Markey A: Biogeography of fire-killed and resprouting Banksia species in south-western Australia. Aust J Bot 1995, 43:283-303.
  • [56]Lambers H, Brundrett MC, Raven JA, Hopper SD: Plant mineral nutrition in ancient landscapes: high plant species diversity on infertile soils is linked to functional diversity for nutritional strategies. Plant Soil 2010, 348:7-27.
  • [57]Lambers H, Raven JA, Shaver GR, Smith SE: Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2008, 23:95-103.
  • [58]Rajakaruna N: The edaphic factor in the origin of plant species. Int Geol Rev 2004, 46:471-478.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:46次 浏览次数:10次