| BMC Biotechnology | |
| Keratinocyte cytoskeletal roles in cell sheet engineering | |
| Qi Wei1  Daniel Reidler1  Min Ye Shen1  Hayden Huang1  | |
| [1] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace, 500 W 120th Street, MC 8904, New York, NY 10027, USA | |
| 关键词: Contraction; Adhesion; Cytoskeleton; Cell sheet; | |
| Others : 1123241 DOI : 10.1186/1472-6750-13-17 |
|
| received in 2012-08-23, accepted in 2013-02-22, 发布年份 2013 | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background
There is an increasing need to understand cell-cell interactions for cell and tissue engineering purposes, such as optimizing cell sheet constructs, as well as for examining adhesion defect diseases. For cell-sheet engineering, one major obstacle to sheet function is that cell sheets in suspension are fragile and, over time, will contract. While the role of the cytoskeleton in maintaining the structure and adhesion of cells cultured on a rigid substrate is well-characterized, a systematic examination of the role played by different components of the cytoskeleton in regulating cell sheet contraction and cohesion in the absence of a substrate has been lacking.
Results
In this study, keratinocytes were cultured until confluent and cell sheets were generated using dispase to remove the influence of the substrate. The effects of disrupting actin, microtubules or intermediate filaments on cell-cell interactions were assessed by measuring cell sheet cohesion and contraction. Keratin intermediate filament disruption caused comparable effects on cell sheet cohesion and contraction, when compared to actin or microtubule disruption. Interfering with actomyosin contraction demonstrated that interfering with cell contraction can also diminish cell cohesion.
Conclusions
All components of the cytoskeleton are involved in maintaining cell sheet cohesion and contraction, although not to the same extent. These findings demonstrate that substrate-free cell sheet biomechanical properties are dependent on the integrity of the cytoskeleton network.
【 授权许可】
2013 Wei et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150216021137945.pdf | 1809KB | ||
| Figure 4. | 79KB | Image | |
| Figure 3. | 103KB | Image | |
| Figure 2. | 182KB | Image | |
| Figure 1. | 174KB | Image |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Fujita H, Shimizu K, Nagamori E: Application of a cell sheet-polymer film complex with temperature sensitivity for increased mechanical strength and cell alignment capability. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 103:370-377.
- [2]Ito A, Ino K, Hayashida M, Kobayashi T, Matsunuma H: Novel methodology for fabrication of tissue-engineered tubular constructs using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force. Tissue Eng 2005, 11:1553-1561.
- [3]Tsuda Y, Kikuchi A, Yamato M, Sakurai Y, Umezu M: Control of cell adhesion and detachment using temperature and thermoresponsive copolymer grafted culture surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004, 69:70-78.
- [4]Kushida A, Yamato M, Isoi Y, Kikuchi A, Okano T: A noninvasive transfer system for polarized renal tubule epithelial cell sheets using temperature-responsive culture dishes. Eur Cell Mater 2005, 10:23-30. discussion 23–30
- [5]Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, Watanabe K, Yamamoto K: Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:1187-1196.
- [6]Shimizu T, Yamato M, Akutsu T, Shibata T, Isoi Y: Electrically communicating three-dimensional cardiac tissue mimic fabricated by layered cultured cardiomyocyte sheets. J Biomed Mater Res 2002, 60:110-117.
- [7]Shimizu T, Yamato M, Kikuchi A, Okano T: Two-dimensional manipulation of cardiac myocyte sheets utilizing temperature-responsive culture dishes augments the pulsatile amplitude. Tissue Eng 2001, 7:141-151.
- [8]Bazzoni G, Martinez-Estrada OM, Orsenigo F, Cordenonsi M, Citi S: Interaction of junctional adhesion molecule with the tight junction components ZO-1, cingulin, and occludin. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:20520-20526.
- [9]Gliem M, Heupel WM, Spindler V, Harms GS, Waschke J: Actin reorganization contributes to loss of cell adhesion in pemphigus vulgaris. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010, 299:C606-613.
- [10]Huang H, Cruz F, Bazzoni G: Junctional adhesion molecule-A regulates cell migration and resistance to shear stress. J Cell Physiol 2006, 209:122-130.
- [11]Ingber DE, Prusty D, Sun Z, Betensky H, Wang N: Cell shape, cytoskeletal mechanics, and cell cycle control in angiogenesis. J Biomech 1995, 28:1471-1484.
- [12]Mooney DJ, Langer R, Ingber DE: Cytoskeletal filament assembly and the control of cell spreading and function by extracellular matrix. J Cell Sci 1995, 108(Pt 6):2311-2320.
- [13]Thoumine O, Cardoso O, Meister JJ: Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study. Eur Biophys J 1999, 28:222-234.
- [14]Wang N, Ingber DE: Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. Biophys J 1994, 66:2181-2189.
- [15]Ingber DE: Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol 1997, 59:575-599.
- [16]Numaguchi K, Eguchi S, Yamakawa T, Motley ED, Inagami T: Mechanotransduction of rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells requires RhoA and intact actin filaments. Circ Res 1999, 85:5-11.
- [17]Park S, Koch D, Cardenas R, Kas J, Shih CK: Cell motility and local viscoelasticity of fibroblasts. Biophys J 2005, 89:4330-4342.
- [18]Tseng Y, Kole TP, Lee JS, Fedorov E, Almo SC: How actin crosslinking and bundling proteins cooperate to generate an enhanced cell mechanical response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005, 334:183-192.
- [19]Turner CH, Pavalko FM: Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J Orthop Sci 1998, 3:346-355.
- [20]Van Citters KM, Hoffman BD, Massiera G, Crocker JC: The role of F-actin and myosin in epithelial cell rheology. Biophys J 2006, 91:3946-3956.
- [21]Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE: Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 1993, 260:1124-1127.
- [22]Elson EL, Felder SF, Jay PY, Kolodney MS, Pasternak C: Forces in cell locomotion. Biochem Soc Symp 1999, 65:299-314.
- [23]Gardel ML, Sabass B, Ji L, Danuser G, Schwarz US: Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed. J Cell Biol 2008, 183:999-1005.
- [24]Hale CM, Sun SX, Wirtz D: Resolving the role of actoymyosin contractility in cell microrheology. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7054.
- [25]Kraning-Rush CM, Carey SP, Califano JP, Smith BN, Reinhart-King CA: The role of the cytoskeleton in cellular force generation in 2D and 3D environments. Phys Biol 2011, 8:015009.
- [26]Wang N, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Chen J, Mijailovich SM, Butler JP: Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002, 282:C606-616.
- [27]Kaverina I, Krylyshkina O, Small JV: Microtubule targeting of substrate contacts promotes their relaxation and dissociation. J Cell Biol 1999, 146:1033-1044.
- [28]Schoenwaelder SM, Burridge K: Bidirectional signaling between the cytoskeleton and integrins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1999, 11:274-286.
- [29]Jones JC, Green KJ: Intermediate filament-plasma membrane interactions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1991, 3:127-132.
- [30]Sivaramakrishnan S, DeGiulio JV, Lorand L, Goldman RD, Ridge KM: Micromechanical properties of keratin intermediate filament networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:889-894.
- [31]Wang N: Mechanical interactions among cytoskeletal filaments. Hypertension 1998, 32:162-165.
- [32]Wang N, Stamenovic D: Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2000, 279:C188-194.
- [33]Yin T, Getsios S, Caldelari R, Godsel LM, Kowalczyk AP: Mechanisms of plakoglobin-dependent adhesion: desmosome-specific functions in assembly and regulation by epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:40355-40363.
- [34]Yin T, Getsios S, Caldelari R, Kowalczyk AP, Muller EJ: Plakoglobin suppresses keratinocyte motility through both cell-cell adhesion-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:5420-5425.
- [35]Huang H, Asimaki A, Lo D, McKenna W, Saffitz J: Disparate effects of different mutations in plakoglobin on cell mechanical behavior. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2008, 65:964-978.
- [36]Wei Q, Hariharan V, Huang H: Cell-Cell Contact Preserves Cell Viability via Plakoglobin. PLoS One 2011, 6:e27064.
- [37]Eckert BS: Alteration of intermediate filament distribution in PtK1 cells by acrylamide. Eur J Cell Biol 1985, 37:169-174.
- [38]Shabana AH, Oboeuf M, Forest N: Cytoplasmic desmosomes and intermediate filament disturbance following acrylamide treatment in cultured rat keratinocytes. Tissue Cell 1994, 26:43-55.
- [39]Russell D, Andrews PD, James J, Lane EB: Mechanical stress induces profound remodelling of keratin filaments and cell junctions in epidermolysis bullosa simplex keratinocytes. J Cell Sci 2004, 117:5233-5243.
- [40]Dickson MA, Hahn WC, Ino Y, Ronfard V, Wu JY: Human keratinocytes that express hTERT and also bypass a p16(INK4a)-enforced mechanism that limits life span become immortal yet retain normal growth and differentiation characteristics. Mol Cell Biol 2000, 20:1436-1447.
PDF